* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.
Reference:
[1] Synthetic Communications, 2006, vol. 36, # 12, p. 1787 - 1793
[2] Synthetic Communications, 2009, vol. 39, # 16, p. 2928 - 2934
[3] Journal of Chemical Research - Part S, 1999, # 12, p. 710 - 711
[4] Journal of the Chemical Society, vol. 53, p. 551
[5] Journal of the Chemical Society, 1888, vol. 53, p. 556
[6] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1930, vol. 52, p. 1132
[7] Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matematiche e Naturali, Rendiconti, 1903, vol. <5> 12 I, p. 437
[8] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1930, vol. 52, p. 1132
[9] Fresenius' Zeitschrift fuer Analytische Chemie, 1929, vol. 77, p. 346
[10] Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, 1930, vol. 7, p. 794[11] Chem. Zentralbl., 1931, vol. 102, # I, p. 1438
2
[ 553-17-3 ]
[ 100-63-0 ]
[ 140-22-7 ]
Reference:
[1] Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie, 1926, vol. 446, p. 263
[2] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1930, vol. 52, p. 1132
[3] Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences, 1899, vol. 129, p. 1256[4] Bulletin de la Societe Chimique de France, 1900, vol. <3> 23, p. 52
[5] Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences, 1899, vol. 129, p. 1256[6] Bulletin de la Societe Chimique de France, 1900, vol. <3> 23, p. 52
3
[ 32315-10-9 ]
[ 100-63-0 ]
[ 140-22-7 ]
Reference:
[1] Chemical Communications, 2015, vol. 51, # 18, p. 3739 - 3742
4
[ 102-09-0 ]
[ 100-63-0 ]
[ 140-22-7 ]
Reference:
[1] Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences, vol. 129, p. 1256
[2] Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences, 1899, vol. 129, p. 1256[3] Bulletin de la Societe Chimique de France, 1900, vol. <3> 23, p. 52
[4] Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie, 1926, vol. 446, p. 263
[5] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1930, vol. 52, p. 1132
[6] Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences, 1899, vol. 129, p. 1256[7] Bulletin de la Societe Chimique de France, 1900, vol. <3> 23, p. 52
[8] Journal of Organic Chemistry USSR (English Translation), 1967, vol. 3, p. 831 - 835[9] Zhurnal Organicheskoi Khimii, 1967, vol. 3, # 5, p. 865 - 870
5
[ 4453-80-9 ]
[ 140-22-7 ]
Reference:
[1] Chemische Berichte, 1911, vol. 44, p. 3744,3748
[2] Chemische Berichte, 1911, vol. 44, p. 3744,3748
6
[ 6888-71-7 ]
[ 140-22-7 ]
Reference:
[1] Chemische Berichte, 1911, vol. 44, p. 3744,3748
7
[ 75-44-5 ]
[ 100-63-0 ]
[ 140-22-7 ]
Reference:
[1] Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie, 1891, vol. 263, p. 278
8
[ 100-63-0 ]
[ 102-07-8 ]
[ 140-22-7 ]
Reference:
[1] Gazzetta Chimica Italiana, 1938, vol. 68, p. 516,520
9
[ 15081-39-7 ]
[ 100-63-0 ]
[ 140-22-7 ]
Reference:
[1] Journal of Organic Chemistry USSR (English Translation), 1968, vol. 4, p. 814 - 820[2] Zhurnal Organicheskoi Khimii, 1968, vol. 4, p. 837 - 844
10
[ 100-63-0 ]
[ 51-79-6 ]
[ 103-03-7 ]
[ 140-22-7 ]
Reference:
[1] Journal of the Chemical Society, 1888, vol. 53, p. 556
[2] Chemische Berichte, 1890, vol. 23, p. 2837
In two conical flasks, the final concentrations of DPCI were both 5.00 103 mol/L, and the final concentrations of MB were 0.00 mol/L and 1.00 105 mol/L, respectively. They were all placed in the ultrasonic irradiation apparatus and the ultrasonic irradiation time was changed from 1.0 h to 6.0 h at 1.0 h intervals. At every time interval, the solutions (10 mL) were taken out and extracted repeatedly with Benzene-CCl4 (1:1) mixed solution.The extraction solutions were diluted to 10 mL with the extractant and detected at 563 nm by absorption spectrophotometer.
With graphene-SnS; In water; for 2h;Irradiation;
Firstly, six 10.00 mL DPCI stock solutions (1.00£102mol/L) were added into three 80 mL volumetricflasks,respectively. And then 50 mg of three different photocatalysts were added to above DPCI solutions, respectively. Allof the three solutions were diluted to 50 mL with doubledistilled water. For all three solutions, thefinal DPCI concentration and the amount of graphene-MxSy (Sb2S3,MnS2, SnS) photocatalysts was 2.00 £103mol/L and1.00 g/L, respectively. Among them, the reactors were putinto a visible light apparatus away from light directlyunder visible light irradiation. After 120 min irradiation,from each sample 10.00 mL solution was taken exactlyand extracted with benzene. And then, all extracted solutions were diluted to 10.00 mL with benzene solution andtheir UV-vis spectra were determined.
ethyl 1-[4-(ethoxycarbonyl)-5,6-dioxo-2,3-diphenyl-1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-1-pyridazine]carbonyl}-5,6-dioxo-2,3-diphenyl-1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-4-pyridazinecarboxylate[ No CAS ]
DPCAg complex compound sample is prepared by the chemical reaction between amorphous DPC and silver nitrate (dissolved in acetone). C13H14N4O + AgNO3 ? C13H13N4OAg + HNO3 A precipitated powder is obtained in a solution of nitric acid. After filtrating the precipitated powder and drying it, the physical properties of this new organic complex C13H13N4OAg can be studied. We report for the first time here the properties and the crystal structure of the new silver complex.
With potassium carbonate; In dimethyl sulfoxide; at 130℃; for 24h;Catalytic behavior;
General procedure: Amine (1.0mmol) was added to a suspension of aryl halide(1.0mmol), K2CO3(2.0mmol), and Cu catalyst (0.047g,7mol%) in DMSO (3.0mL) in a 10mL reaction flask. Thereaction mixture was stirred at 130C and monitored by TLC to determine completion of the reaction. Subsequently,the catalyst was separated magnetically and the reactionmixture was diluted with ethyl acetate (20mL). The solventwas evaporated under reduced pressure to get the crudeproduct and the product was purified by column chromatographyon silica using n-hexane and ethyl acetate.
General procedure: 10 mmol of all metal chlorides including iron (III) chloride hexahydrate,iron(II) chloride tetrahydrate, copper(II) chloride, zinc(II) chloride,tin(II) chloride were dissolved in 50 mL acetone separately.10 mmol of each ligand i.e. 1,3-Diphenylguanidine (DPG) (2.11 g), and<strong>[140-22-7]1,5-Diphenylcarbazid</strong>e (DPC) (2.42 g) were also dissolved in 50 mL acetoneseparately. Then, each ligand solution was added to each metalchloride solutions drop by drop and stirred for 15 min in order toform Cu(II)-(DPG), Fe(III)-(DPG), Fe(II)-(DPG), Zn(II)-(DPG), Sn(II)-(DPG), Cu(II)-(DPC), Fe(III)-(DPC), Fe(II)-(DPC), Zn(II)-(DPC), Sn(II)-(DPC). The obtained metal complexes (MC) were insoluble in acetoneand precipitated in the medium. The precipitated complexes were filteredand washed with acetone for several times and then, were dried in vacuum desiccator. One mole of choline chloride as hydrogen bondacceptor and 1 mol of MC as hydrogen bond donors were mixed andstirred for 4 h at 80 C in oil bath, and a homogeneous and transparentliquid was obtained for each metal.
General procedure: 10 mmol of all metal chlorides including iron (III) chloride hexahydrate,iron(II) chloride tetrahydrate, copper(II) chloride, zinc(II) chloride,tin(II) chloride were dissolved in 50 mL acetone separately.10 mmol of each ligand i.e. 1,3-Diphenylguanidine (DPG) (2.11 g), and<strong>[140-22-7]1,5-Diphenylcarbazid</strong>e (DPC) (2.42 g) were also dissolved in 50 mL acetoneseparately. Then, each ligand solution was added to each metalchloride solutions drop by drop and stirred for 15 min in order toform Cu(II)-(DPG), Fe(III)-(DPG), Fe(II)-(DPG), Zn(II)-(DPG), Sn(II)-(DPG), Cu(II)-(DPC), Fe(III)-(DPC), Fe(II)-(DPC), Zn(II)-(DPC), Sn(II)-(DPC). The obtained metal complexes (MC) were insoluble in acetoneand precipitated in the medium. The precipitated complexes were filteredand washed with acetone for several times and then, were dried in vacuum desiccator. One mole of choline chloride as hydrogen bondacceptor and 1 mol of MC as hydrogen bond donors were mixed andstirred for 4 h at 80 C in oil bath, and a homogeneous and transparentliquid was obtained for each metal.
General procedure: 10 mmol of all metal chlorides including iron (III) chloride hexahydrate,iron(II) chloride tetrahydrate, copper(II) chloride, zinc(II) chloride,tin(II) chloride were dissolved in 50 mL acetone separately.10 mmol of each ligand i.e. 1,3-Diphenylguanidine (DPG) (2.11 g), and<strong>[140-22-7]1,5-Diphenylcarbazid</strong>e (DPC) (2.42 g) were also dissolved in 50 mL acetoneseparately. Then, each ligand solution was added to each metalchloride solutions drop by drop and stirred for 15 min in order toform Cu(II)-(DPG), Fe(III)-(DPG), Fe(II)-(DPG), Zn(II)-(DPG), Sn(II)-(DPG), Cu(II)-(DPC), Fe(III)-(DPC), Fe(II)-(DPC), Zn(II)-(DPC), Sn(II)-(DPC). The obtained metal complexes (MC) were insoluble in acetoneand precipitated in the medium. The precipitated complexes were filteredand washed with acetone for several times and then, were dried in vacuum desiccator. One mole of choline chloride as hydrogen bondacceptor and 1 mol of MC as hydrogen bond donors were mixed andstirred for 4 h at 80 C in oil bath, and a homogeneous and transparentliquid was obtained for each metal.
General procedure: 10 mmol of all metal chlorides including iron (III) chloride hexahydrate,iron(II) chloride tetrahydrate, copper(II) chloride, zinc(II) chloride,tin(II) chloride were dissolved in 50 mL acetone separately.10 mmol of each ligand i.e. 1,3-Diphenylguanidine (DPG) (2.11 g), and<strong>[140-22-7]1,5-Diphenylcarbazid</strong>e (DPC) (2.42 g) were also dissolved in 50 mL acetoneseparately. Then, each ligand solution was added to each metalchloride solutions drop by drop and stirred for 15 min in order toform Cu(II)-(DPG), Fe(III)-(DPG), Fe(II)-(DPG), Zn(II)-(DPG), Sn(II)-(DPG), Cu(II)-(DPC), Fe(III)-(DPC), Fe(II)-(DPC), Zn(II)-(DPC), Sn(II)-(DPC). The obtained metal complexes (MC) were insoluble in acetoneand precipitated in the medium. The precipitated complexes were filteredand washed with acetone for several times and then, were dried in vacuum desiccator. One mole of choline chloride as hydrogen bondacceptor and 1 mol of MC as hydrogen bond donors were mixed andstirred for 4 h at 80 C in oil bath, and a homogeneous and transparentliquid was obtained for each metal.
General procedure: 10 mmol of all metal chlorides including iron (III) chloride hexahydrate,iron(II) chloride tetrahydrate, copper(II) chloride, zinc(II) chloride,tin(II) chloride were dissolved in 50 mL acetone separately.10 mmol of each ligand i.e. 1,3-Diphenylguanidine (DPG) (2.11 g), and<strong>[140-22-7]1,5-Diphenylcarbazid</strong>e (DPC) (2.42 g) were also dissolved in 50 mL acetoneseparately. Then, each ligand solution was added to each metalchloride solutions drop by drop and stirred for 15 min in order toform Cu(II)-(DPG), Fe(III)-(DPG), Fe(II)-(DPG), Zn(II)-(DPG), Sn(II)-(DPG), Cu(II)-(DPC), Fe(III)-(DPC), Fe(II)-(DPC), Zn(II)-(DPC), Sn(II)-(DPC). The obtained metal complexes (MC) were insoluble in acetoneand precipitated in the medium. The precipitated complexes were filteredand washed with acetone for several times and then, were dried in vacuum desiccator. One mole of choline chloride as hydrogen bondacceptor and 1 mol of MC as hydrogen bond donors were mixed andstirred for 4 h at 80 C in oil bath, and a homogeneous and transparentliquid was obtained for each metal.