Home Cart 0 Sign in  

[ CAS No. 627463-17-6 ] {[proInfo.proName]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]}
Chemical Structure| 627463-17-6
Chemical Structure| 627463-17-6
Structure of 627463-17-6 * Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
Cart0 Add to My Favorites Add to My Favorites Bulk Inquiry Inquiry Add To Cart

Quality Control of [ 627463-17-6 ]

Related Doc. of [ 627463-17-6 ]

Alternatived Products of [ 627463-17-6 ]

Product Details of [ 627463-17-6 ]

CAS No. :627463-17-6 MDL No. :MFCD09907860
Formula : C8H6BrF Boiling Point : -
Linear Structure Formula :- InChI Key :-
M.W : 201.04 Pubchem ID :-
Synonyms :

Safety of [ 627463-17-6 ]

Signal Word: Class:
Precautionary Statements: UN#:
Hazard Statements: Packing Group:

Application In Synthesis of [ 627463-17-6 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 627463-17-6 ]

[ 627463-17-6 ] Synthesis Path-Downstream   1~3

  • 1
  • [ 627463-17-6 ]
  • [ 627463-18-7 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
With hydrogen;palladium 10% on activated carbon; In ethyl acetate; under 760.051 Torr; 4-Bromo-2-fluoro-1-vinyl-benzene (1.80 g, 8.96 mmol) was dissolved in ethyl acetate (50 mL) and palladium-on-carbon (10%, 70 mg) was added and the mixture was hydrogenated under 1 atmosphere overnight. The mixture was filtered and the filtrate was concentrated to give the crude, 1.80 g, which was used directly for the next step.
  • 2
  • [ 623-73-4 ]
  • [ 627463-17-6 ]
  • [ 934995-82-1 ]
  • C12H12BrFO2 [ No CAS ]
  • [ 623-91-6 ]
  • [ 141-05-9 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
1: 99 % ee 2: 96% With aluminum oxide; potassium carbonate In chloroform at 0 - 20℃; for 24 - 25h; 2.1. Cyclopropanation and Purification of Compound 3; An improved Evans cyclopropanation protocol was used for this synthesis using the Cu catalyst prepared from copper (I) triflate and chiral ligand 10. Other ligands and Rh catalysts were tried but all afforded lower diastereoselectivity. The major by-products from the reaction were the cis-isomer, 11 and 12 from the dimerization of ethyl diazoacetate. Solvent plays a significant role in enantioselectivity, diastereoselectivity, and formation of the dimer impurities. As shown in Table 1, a variety of solvents, including coordinating and non-coordinating ones, gave good to excellent conversions (74-98%), except for THF (45%). The diastereoselectivity varied from 80:20 (trans:cis, 1,2-dichloroethane) to 93:7 (trans:cis, MTBE), and ee varied from 85% (1,2-dichloroethane) to 99% (many solvents including MTBE). MTBE gave the best results and was used as the solvent for our first GMP campaign. A significant amount of precipitate was formed when the catalyst was prepared in MTBE. In early studies, this precipitate was removed by filtration prior to the cyclopropanation. However, conversions and ethyl diazoacetate accumulation varied from batch to batch. The situation was greatly improved by generation of the catalyst in situ without filtration. The solid catalyst was completely dissolved after the addition of styrene, giving a clear solution before addition of ethyl diazoacetate. Similar diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity were obtained. In the prep lab, the cyclopropanation reaction was run in two batches. The first batch used the procedure with the solid catalyst removed and 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment, see below) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 92:8 and 98.8% ee for the trans. The conversion for the reaction was only 95% with 2.0 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate used. The second batch used the procedure with in situ generated catalyst without solid removal. Complete conversion was observed with the use of 1.5 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate. Again, 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 88:12 and 98.9% ee for the trans.
1: 99 % ee 2: 97 % ee In ethyl acetate at 0 - 20℃; for 24 - 25h; 2.1. Cyclopropanation and Purification of Compound 3; An improved Evans cyclopropanation protocol was used for this synthesis using the Cu catalyst prepared from copper (I) triflate and chiral ligand 10. Other ligands and Rh catalysts were tried but all afforded lower diastereoselectivity. The major by-products from the reaction were the cis-isomer, 11 and 12 from the dimerization of ethyl diazoacetate. Solvent plays a significant role in enantioselectivity, diastereoselectivity, and formation of the dimer impurities. As shown in Table 1, a variety of solvents, including coordinating and non-coordinating ones, gave good to excellent conversions (74-98%), except for THF (45%). The diastereoselectivity varied from 80:20 (trans:cis, 1,2-dichloroethane) to 93:7 (trans:cis, MTBE), and ee varied from 85% (1,2-dichloroethane) to 99% (many solvents including MTBE). MTBE gave the best results and was used as the solvent for our first GMP campaign. A significant amount of precipitate was formed when the catalyst was prepared in MTBE. In early studies, this precipitate was removed by filtration prior to the cyclopropanation. However, conversions and ethyl diazoacetate accumulation varied from batch to batch. The situation was greatly improved by generation of the catalyst in situ without filtration. The solid catalyst was completely dissolved after the addition of styrene, giving a clear solution before addition of ethyl diazoacetate. Similar diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity were obtained. In the prep lab, the cyclopropanation reaction was run in two batches. The first batch used the procedure with the solid catalyst removed and 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment, see below) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 92:8 and 98.8% ee for the trans. The conversion for the reaction was only 95% with 2.0 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate used. The second batch used the procedure with in situ generated catalyst without solid removal. Complete conversion was observed with the use of 1.5 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate. Again, 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 88:12 and 98.9% ee for the trans.
1: 99 % ee 2: 97 % ee In toluene at 0 - 20℃; for 24 - 25h; Molecular sieve; 2.1. Cyclopropanation and Purification of Compound 3; An improved Evans cyclopropanation protocol was used for this synthesis using the Cu catalyst prepared from copper (I) triflate and chiral ligand 10. Other ligands and Rh catalysts were tried but all afforded lower diastereoselectivity. The major by-products from the reaction were the cis-isomer, 11 and 12 from the dimerization of ethyl diazoacetate. Solvent plays a significant role in enantioselectivity, diastereoselectivity, and formation of the dimer impurities. As shown in Table 1, a variety of solvents, including coordinating and non-coordinating ones, gave good to excellent conversions (74-98%), except for THF (45%). The diastereoselectivity varied from 80:20 (trans:cis, 1,2-dichloroethane) to 93:7 (trans:cis, MTBE), and ee varied from 85% (1,2-dichloroethane) to 99% (many solvents including MTBE). MTBE gave the best results and was used as the solvent for our first GMP campaign. A significant amount of precipitate was formed when the catalyst was prepared in MTBE. In early studies, this precipitate was removed by filtration prior to the cyclopropanation. However, conversions and ethyl diazoacetate accumulation varied from batch to batch. The situation was greatly improved by generation of the catalyst in situ without filtration. The solid catalyst was completely dissolved after the addition of styrene, giving a clear solution before addition of ethyl diazoacetate. Similar diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity were obtained. In the prep lab, the cyclopropanation reaction was run in two batches. The first batch used the procedure with the solid catalyst removed and 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment, see below) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 92:8 and 98.8% ee for the trans. The conversion for the reaction was only 95% with 2.0 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate used. The second batch used the procedure with in situ generated catalyst without solid removal. Complete conversion was observed with the use of 1.5 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate. Again, 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 88:12 and 98.9% ee for the trans.
1: 85 % ee 2: 94 % ee In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 0 - 20℃; for 24 - 25h; Molecular sieve; 2.1. Cyclopropanation and Purification of Compound 3; An improved Evans cyclopropanation protocol was used for this synthesis using the Cu catalyst prepared from copper (I) triflate and chiral ligand 10. Other ligands and Rh catalysts were tried but all afforded lower diastereoselectivity. The major by-products from the reaction were the cis-isomer, 11 and 12 from the dimerization of ethyl diazoacetate. Solvent plays a significant role in enantioselectivity, diastereoselectivity, and formation of the dimer impurities. As shown in Table 1, a variety of solvents, including coordinating and non-coordinating ones, gave good to excellent conversions (74-98%), except for THF (45%). The diastereoselectivity varied from 80:20 (trans:cis, 1,2-dichloroethane) to 93:7 (trans:cis, MTBE), and ee varied from 85% (1,2-dichloroethane) to 99% (many solvents including MTBE). MTBE gave the best results and was used as the solvent for our first GMP campaign. A significant amount of precipitate was formed when the catalyst was prepared in MTBE. In early studies, this precipitate was removed by filtration prior to the cyclopropanation. However, conversions and ethyl diazoacetate accumulation varied from batch to batch. The situation was greatly improved by generation of the catalyst in situ without filtration. The solid catalyst was completely dissolved after the addition of styrene, giving a clear solution before addition of ethyl diazoacetate. Similar diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity were obtained. In the prep lab, the cyclopropanation reaction was run in two batches. The first batch used the procedure with the solid catalyst removed and 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment, see below) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 92:8 and 98.8% ee for the trans. The conversion for the reaction was only 95% with 2.0 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate used. The second batch used the procedure with in situ generated catalyst without solid removal. Complete conversion was observed with the use of 1.5 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate. Again, 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 88:12 and 98.9% ee for the trans.
1: 99 % ee 2: 97 % ee In tert-butyl methyl ether at 0 - 20℃; for 24 - 25h; Molecular sieve; 2.1. Cyclopropanation and Purification of Compound 3; An improved Evans cyclopropanation protocol was used for this synthesis using the Cu catalyst prepared from copper (I) triflate and chiral ligand 10. Other ligands and Rh catalysts were tried but all afforded lower diastereoselectivity. The major by-products from the reaction were the cis-isomer, 11 and 12 from the dimerization of ethyl diazoacetate. Solvent plays a significant role in enantioselectivity, diastereoselectivity, and formation of the dimer impurities. As shown in Table 1, a variety of solvents, including coordinating and non-coordinating ones, gave good to excellent conversions (74-98%), except for THF (45%). The diastereoselectivity varied from 80:20 (trans:cis, 1,2-dichloroethane) to 93:7 (trans:cis, MTBE), and ee varied from 85% (1,2-dichloroethane) to 99% (many solvents including MTBE). MTBE gave the best results and was used as the solvent for our first GMP campaign. A significant amount of precipitate was formed when the catalyst was prepared in MTBE. In early studies, this precipitate was removed by filtration prior to the cyclopropanation. However, conversions and ethyl diazoacetate accumulation varied from batch to batch. The situation was greatly improved by generation of the catalyst in situ without filtration. The solid catalyst was completely dissolved after the addition of styrene, giving a clear solution before addition of ethyl diazoacetate. Similar diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity were obtained. In the prep lab, the cyclopropanation reaction was run in two batches. The first batch used the procedure with the solid catalyst removed and 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment, see below) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 92:8 and 98.8% ee for the trans. The conversion for the reaction was only 95% with 2.0 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate used. The second batch used the procedure with in situ generated catalyst without solid removal. Complete conversion was observed with the use of 1.5 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate. Again, 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 88:12 and 98.9% ee for the trans.
In Isopropyl acetate at 0 - 20℃; for 24 - 25h; Molecular sieve; 2.1. Cyclopropanation and Purification of Compound 3; An improved Evans cyclopropanation protocol was used for this synthesis using the Cu catalyst prepared from copper (I) triflate and chiral ligand 10. Other ligands and Rh catalysts were tried but all afforded lower diastereoselectivity. The major by-products from the reaction were the cis-isomer, 11 and 12 from the dimerization of ethyl diazoacetate. Solvent plays a significant role in enantioselectivity, diastereoselectivity, and formation of the dimer impurities. As shown in Table 1, a variety of solvents, including coordinating and non-coordinating ones, gave good to excellent conversions (74-98%), except for THF (45%). The diastereoselectivity varied from 80:20 (trans:cis, 1,2-dichloroethane) to 93:7 (trans:cis, MTBE), and ee varied from 85% (1,2-dichloroethane) to 99% (many solvents including MTBE). MTBE gave the best results and was used as the solvent for our first GMP campaign. A significant amount of precipitate was formed when the catalyst was prepared in MTBE. In early studies, this precipitate was removed by filtration prior to the cyclopropanation. However, conversions and ethyl diazoacetate accumulation varied from batch to batch. The situation was greatly improved by generation of the catalyst in situ without filtration. The solid catalyst was completely dissolved after the addition of styrene, giving a clear solution before addition of ethyl diazoacetate. Similar diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity were obtained. In the prep lab, the cyclopropanation reaction was run in two batches. The first batch used the procedure with the solid catalyst removed and 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment, see below) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 92:8 and 98.8% ee for the trans. The conversion for the reaction was only 95% with 2.0 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate used. The second batch used the procedure with in situ generated catalyst without solid removal. Complete conversion was observed with the use of 1.5 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate. Again, 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 88:12 and 98.9% ee for the trans.
In α,α,α-trifluorotoluene at 0 - 20℃; for 24 - 25h; 2.1. Cyclopropanation and Purification of Compound 3; An improved Evans cyclopropanation protocol was used for this synthesis using the Cu catalyst prepared from copper (I) triflate and chiral ligand 10. Other ligands and Rh catalysts were tried but all afforded lower diastereoselectivity. The major by-products from the reaction were the cis-isomer, 11 and 12 from the dimerization of ethyl diazoacetate. Solvent plays a significant role in enantioselectivity, diastereoselectivity, and formation of the dimer impurities. As shown in Table 1, a variety of solvents, including coordinating and non-coordinating ones, gave good to excellent conversions (74-98%), except for THF (45%). The diastereoselectivity varied from 80:20 (trans:cis, 1,2-dichloroethane) to 93:7 (trans:cis, MTBE), and ee varied from 85% (1,2-dichloroethane) to 99% (many solvents including MTBE). MTBE gave the best results and was used as the solvent for our first GMP campaign. A significant amount of precipitate was formed when the catalyst was prepared in MTBE. In early studies, this precipitate was removed by filtration prior to the cyclopropanation. However, conversions and ethyl diazoacetate accumulation varied from batch to batch. The situation was greatly improved by generation of the catalyst in situ without filtration. The solid catalyst was completely dissolved after the addition of styrene, giving a clear solution before addition of ethyl diazoacetate. Similar diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity were obtained. In the prep lab, the cyclopropanation reaction was run in two batches. The first batch used the procedure with the solid catalyst removed and 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment, see below) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 92:8 and 98.8% ee for the trans. The conversion for the reaction was only 95% with 2.0 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate used. The second batch used the procedure with in situ generated catalyst without solid removal. Complete conversion was observed with the use of 1.5 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate. Again, 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 88:12 and 98.9% ee for the trans.

  • 3
  • [ 3536-96-7 ]
  • [ 105931-73-5 ]
  • [ 627463-17-6 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
80% With zinc(II) chloride In tetrahydrofuran at -5 - 20℃; for 4.16 - 6.16h; 1.3.1; 1 To a 72 L round bottomed flask was added zinc chloride THF solution (0.5 M, 33.2 L, 16.62 mol). The solution was cooled to -5° C. and vinyl magnesium chloride THF solution (1.6 M, 20.80 L, 33.24 mol) was added slowly, maintaining temperature at less than 20° C. Triphenylphosphine (149.5 g, 0.570 mol) was added, followed by Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (200 g, 0.285 mol). The mixture was stirred for 10 min, and 1-Bromo-3-fluoro-4-iodobenzene was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for 4-6 h until the reaction was complete by HPLC. Mixing zinc chloride and vinyl magnesium chloride THF solutions was exothermic. The temperature was controlled by adjusting the addition rate and the cooling bath temperature. The coupling reaction after the addition of aryl iodide (1) was slightly exorthermic. The temperature rose from 11° C. to 37° C. without a cooling bath in about 1 h and it cooled down thereafter. The reaction mixture was quenched into a pre-cooled (0° C.) mixture of pentane (20 L), water (12 L), and concentrated HCl (1.0 L) in a 200 L extractor. The two layers were separated. The organic layer was diluted with pentane (20 L), washed with water (16 L), and concentrated under reduced pressure. Compound 2 was quite volatile, and 20% was lost during rotavap concentration. Assay of the product before concentration normally gave product yield of 80-85%. The product was further purified in this way: The residue was taken up with pentane (10 L). The resulting suspension was filtered. The solid was washed with pentane (1.0 L). The combined filtrate and wash were concentrated. The crude oil was purified by vacuum distillation at 0.1-0.2 mm Hg. Purified product was light yellow with a boiling point of 45-50° C. at 0.1-0.2 mm Hg. Distillation recovery was 95%. Product was 93-95 wt %. The residue in the distillation pot was liquid at the end of distillation, but solidified upon cooling
80% Stage #1: vinylmagnesium chloride With zinc(II) chloride In tetrahydrofuran at -5 - 20℃; for 0.166667h; Stage #2: 1-bromo-3-fluoro-4-iodobenzene In tetrahydrofuran at 11 - 37℃; for 4 - 6h; 3.1 3.1. Preparation of Styrene Compound 2; Materials MW Amount Moles 1-Bromo-3-fluoro-4-iodobenzene 300.89 5.0 kg 16.62 Vinyl magnesium chloride3 1.6 M in THF 20.80 L 33.24 Zinc chloride 0.5 M in THF 33.2 L 16.62Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 701.89 200 g 0.285PPh3 262.29 149.5 g 0.570 Pentane 40 L To a 72 L round bottomed flask was added zinc chloride THF solution (0.5 M, 33.2 L, 16.62 mol). The solution was cooled to -5° C. and vinyl magnesium chloride THF solution (1.6 M, 20.80 L, 33.24 mol) was added slowly, maintaining temperature at less than 20° C. Triphenylphosphine (149.5 g, 0.570 mol) was added, followed by Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (200 g, 0.285 mol). The mixture was stirred for 10 min, and 1-Bromo-3-fluoro-4-iodobezene was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for 4-6 h until the reaction was complete by HPLC. Mixing zinc chloride and vinyl magnesium chloride THF solutions was exothermic. The temperature was controlled by adjusting the addition rate and the cooling bath temperature. The coupling reaction after the addition of aryl iodide (1) was slightly exorthermic. The temperature rose from 11° C. to 37° C. without a cooling bath in about 1 h and it cooled down thereafter. The reaction mixture was quenched into a pre-cooled (0° C.) mixture of pentane (20 L), water (12 L), and concentrated HCl (1.0 L) in a 200 L extractor. The two layers were separated. The organic layer was diluted with pentane (20 L), washed with water (16 L), and concentrated under reduced pressure. Compound 2 was quite volatile, and 20% was lost during rotavap concentration. Assay of the product before concentration normally gave product yield of 80-85%. The product was further purified in this way: The residure was taken up with pentane (10 L). The resulting suspension was filtered. The solid was washed with pentane (1.0 L). The combined filtrate and wash were concentrated. The crude oil was purified by vacuum distillation at 0.1-0.2 mm Hg. Purified product was light yellow with a boiling point of 45-50° C. at 0.1-0.2 mm Hg. Distillation recovery was 95%. Product was 93-95 wt %. The residue in the distillation pot was liquid at the end of distillation, but solidified upon cooling
Same Skeleton Products
Historical Records