Home Cart 0 Sign in  
X

[ CAS No. 18402-83-0 ] {[proInfo.proName]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]}
3d Animation Molecule Structure of 18402-83-0
Chemical Structure| 18402-83-0
Chemical Structure| 18402-83-0
Structure of 18402-83-0 * Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
Cart0 Add to My Favorites Add to My Favorites Bulk Inquiry Inquiry Add To Cart

Quality Control of [ 18402-83-0 ]

Related Doc. of [ 18402-83-0 ]

Alternatived Products of [ 18402-83-0 ]

Product Details of [ 18402-83-0 ]

CAS No. :18402-83-0 MDL No. :MFCD00010241
Formula : C9H16O Boiling Point : -
Linear Structure Formula :- InChI Key :-
M.W : 140.22 Pubchem ID :-
Synonyms :

Safety of [ 18402-83-0 ]

Signal Word:Warning Class:N/A
Precautionary Statements:P261-P305+P351+P338 UN#:N/A
Hazard Statements:H302-H315-H319-H335 Packing Group:N/A
GHS Pictogram:

Application In Synthesis of [ 18402-83-0 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 18402-83-0 ]

[ 18402-83-0 ] Synthesis Path-Downstream   1~64

  • 1
  • [ 66-25-1 ]
  • [ 67-64-1 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
67% at 20℃; for 46h;
67% at 20℃; for 46h; 5 General Procedure for Synthesis of a, p-Unsaturated Acetones: A mixture of aldehyde(0.15 mmol) and catalyst I (0.03 mmol) in 0.5 mL of anhydrous acetone was vigorouslystirred for 10 or 46 hr. The endpoint of the reaction was monitored by TLC. The resultingmixture was then purified by silica gel chromatography and fractions were collected andconcentrated in vacuo to provide a solid or clear oil.; (ZT)-Non-3-en-2-one: This compound was prepared according to the general procedure in67% yield. .H NMR (500 MHz, CDC13): 8 6.84-6.77 (m, 1H), 6.07 (d, 1H, /= 15.5 Hz),2.25-2.20 (m, 5H), 1.51-1.44 (m, 2H), 1.35-1.29 (m, 4H), 0.90 (t, 3H, /= 7.0 Hz). 13C NMR(125 MHz, CDC13): 5 198.7,148.6, 131.3, 32.4, 31.3, 27.8, 26.8, 22.4, 139.
52% With cycl-isopropylidene malonate; N,N-dimethylethylenediamine In ethyl acetate at 55℃; for 24h; diastereoselective reaction; General Procedure for the synthesis of unsaturated carbonyl compounds (3): General procedure: To a stirred solution of benzaldehyde 2 (4 mmol, 1 equiv.), acetone 1 (20 mmol, 5 equiv.) and N, N-dimethylethylenediamine (DMEDA) 5 (0.4 mmol, 10 mol%) in EtOAc (5 mL) was added Meldrum’s Acid 4 (1.2 mmol, 30 mol% in two portions, 15 mol% initially at rt and the remaining 15 mol% after 12 h). Then the reaction mixture was warmed to 55 oC and stirred for 24 h. After completion of reaction (as monitored by TLC), volatiles were evaporated and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using EtOAc/petroleum ether (5-15:95-85) as an eluent to afford the α,β-unsaturated ketones (3).
With piperidine; acetic acid

  • 2
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 75-24-1 ]
  • [ 67639-92-3 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
96% In tetrahydrofuran for 1.5h; Ambient temperature;
62% With tetrakis(acetonitrile)copper(I)tetrafluoroborate; O-mono(N,N-dimethyl thiourea)substituted BINOL In tetrahydrofuran at -20℃; for 0.333333h;
With copper(I) bromide 1.) THF, 0.5 h, 2.) THF, 1.5 h; Yield given. Multistep reaction;
  • 3
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 75-24-1 ]
  • [ 67639-92-3 ]
  • 3-(1-Methyl-hexyl)-4-pentyl-heptane-2,6-dione [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
1: 45% 2: 47% With copper(I) bromide In hexane; ethyl acetate for 1h;
  • 4
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 143-66-8 ]
  • [ 155816-67-4 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
47% With sodium acetate In acetic acid at 25℃; for 24h;
47% With sodium acetate; antimony(III) chloride In acetic acid at 25℃; for 24h;
  • 5
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 132118-89-9 ]
  • 3-methylene-4-(methylthio)-2-pentyl-4-(trimethylsilyl)cyclobutyl methyl ketone [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
80% With ethylaluminum dichloride In hexane; dichloromethane at 0℃; for 16h;
  • 6
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 145145-92-2 ]
  • (1R*,4S*)-3-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-2-(methylthio)-4-pentyl-1-cyclobut-2-enyl methyl ketone [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
71% With titanium tetrachloride In dichloromethane at 0℃; for 0.25h;
  • 7
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 821-55-6 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
97% With hydrogen In tetrahydrofuran for 10h; Ambient temperature; other α,β-unsaturated ketones and aldehydes; other time;
97% With hydrogen In tetrahydrofuran for 10h; Ambient temperature;
94% With triethylsilane; palladium dichloride; tricyclohexylphosphine In tetrahydrofuran; water at 20℃; for 1h;
91% With (PPh<SUB>3</SUB>)<SUB>3</SUB>CuF; Dimethylphenylsilane In N,N-dimethyl acetamide for 6h; Ambient temperature;
91% With (PPh<SUB>3</SUB>)<SUB>3</SUB>CuF; Dimethylphenylsilane In N,N-dimethyl acetamide 1.) 0 deg C, 30 min, 2.) room temperature, 2.5 h;
74% With phenylsilane; isopropyl alcohol at 23℃;
68% With diphenyl sulfide; hydrogen In methanol at 20℃; for 1.5h;
Multi-step reaction with 2 steps 1: Bu3SnH, di-tert-butyl peroxide / toluene / 12 h / Heating 2: aq. NaOH / toluene; acetone / 0.5 h

  • 9
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 557-20-0 ]
  • [ 87148-00-3 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
99% With N-benzylbenzenesulfonamide In toluene at 0℃; for 20h;
96% In diethyl ether; hexane at -20℃; for 4h;
85% Stage #1: (E)-non-3-en-2-one With palladium(II) trifluoroacetate In tetrahydrofuran at -78℃; for 0.166667h; Inert atmosphere; Stage #2: diethylzinc In tetrahydrofuran at 0℃; for 7h; Inert atmosphere;
66% With tetrakis(acetonitrile)copper(I)tetrafluoroborate; O-mono(N,N-dimethyl thiourea)substituted BINOL In tetrahydrofuran at -20℃; for 0.333333h;
With copper(I) thiophene-2-carboxylate In diethyl ether; hexane Inert atmosphere;

  • 10
  • [ 207925-79-9 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • (5S,6R)-3-(tert-Butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-6-pentyl-5-trimethylsilanyl-cyclohept-3-enone [ No CAS ]
  • (Z)-3-(tert-Butyl-dimethyl-silanyl)-1-trimethylsilanyl-propenone [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
1: 75% 2: 47% 3: 3% With lithium diisopropyl amide In tetrahydrofuran; hexane at -80℃; for 0.5h;
  • 11
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 75-16-1 ]
  • [ 67639-92-3 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
81% With tetrakis(acetonitrile)copper(I)tetrafluoroborate; O-mono(N,N-dimethyl thiourea)substituted BINOL In tetrahydrofuran at -20℃; for 0.333333h;
81% With (Ra)-2-[OC(S)NMe2]-2'-OH-1,1'-binaphthyl
  • 12
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • (R)-(E)-3-nonen-2-ol [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
98% With (S,S)-RuCl2(2,2'-bis(di-3,5-xylylphosphino)-1,1'-binaphthyl)(1,1-dianisyl-2-isopropyl-1,2-ethylenediamine); hydrogen; potassium carbonate In isopropyl alcohol at 28 - 30℃; for 15h;
95% With hydrogen In isopropyl alcohol at 23 - 25℃; for 16h;
93% With hydrogen In isopropyl alcohol at 25℃; for 16h; 12; 14 Chiral hydrogenation of (E)-3-nonene-2-one was carried out(see formula (14) below). That is, a reaction was carried out in accordance with the procedures of Example 4 using the (S,SS)-ruthenium hydride complex (1.5 mg; 0.00125 mmol) synthesized in Example 2 and using (E)-3-nonene-2-one (701 mg; 5.0 mmol) (made by Tokyo Kasei Kogyo Co., Ltd.)as the substrate and 2-propanol (2.5 mL) as the solvent. However, the hydrogen pressure was set to 8 atmosphere, the reaction temperature was set to 25° C., and the reaction time was set to 16 hours. As a result, (E)-3-nonene-2-ol was obtained at a GC yield of 95%, isolation yield of 93% (668 mg; 4.65 mmol), and enantiomeric excess of 99%. GC (column: Chirasil-DEX CB; column temperature: 65° C.; injection and detection temperature: 200° C.; helium pressure: 41 kPa; tR of (R)-(E)-3-nonene-2-ol: 70.5 minutes(99.6%); tR of (S)-(E)-3-nonene-2-ol:80.7 minutes (0.4%)); [α]26D+21.16° (c:1.042; CHCl3); absolute structure: R; literature value: [α]25D+10.68° (c:1.03; CHCl3), 97% ee (R).
  • 13
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • 1-(3-pentyloxiran-2-yl)ethanone [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
70% With dihydrogen peroxide In methanol; n-heptane; water at 40℃; for 6h;
60% With L-arginine; dihydrogen peroxide In tert-Amyl alcohol; ethanol; water at 25℃; for 24h; A general method for the epoxidation is as follows General procedure: Method A: in a 4 mL vial, cyclohex-2-enone (0.5 mmol, 48 μL), internal standard (t-amyl alcohol, 0.05 mmol, 5.5 μL), amino acid (0.05 mmol), H2O2 (1.5 mmol, 155 μL of 30%) were added in water (791.5 μL). The reaction mixture was stirred at 25 °C. After 2 h, the reaction mixture (100 μL) was retrieved and extracted with hexane (1 mL). The hexane layer was analyzed by gas chromatography. Method B: in a 4 mL vial, cyclohex-2-enone (0.5 mmol, 48 μL), internal standard (t-amyl alcohol, 0.05 mmol, 5.5 μL), amino acid (0.05 mmol), H2O2 (1.5 mmol, 155 μL of 30%) were added in water (791.5 μL). After addition of hexane (1 mL), the reaction mixture was vigorously stirred at 25 °C. After 2 h, 100 μL of the hexane layer was retrieved for analysis by gas chromatography.
89 % Chromat. With dihydrogen peroxide; dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide In n-heptane; water at 40℃; for 16h;
  • 14
  • [ 66-25-1 ]
  • [ 1439-36-7 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
82% With 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium Tetrafluoroborate at 60℃; for 12h;
82% In tetrahydrofuran for 48h; Inert atmosphere; Reflux; 3.2.11. General procedure for the synthesis of unsaturated ketones (13) General procedure: A mixture of methylcarbonylmethylenephosphorane (12) (1 equiv) and aldehyde (0.75 equiv) in THF (150 mL) was refluxed for 48 h in argon. The resulting solution was allowed to cool to room temperature, concentrated in vacuo and chromatographed on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl aetate 9:1) to afford the corresponding unsaturated ketone (13).
  • 15
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 762-72-1 ]
  • [ 235085-01-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
82% With indium(III) chloride; chloro-trimethyl-silane In dichloromethane at 20℃;
67% With indium; chloro-trimethyl-silane In dichloromethane at 20℃; for 0.5h;
53% With titanium tetrachloride In dichloromethane
  • 16
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 934-56-5 ]
  • [ 155816-67-4 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
85% With water In tetrahydrofuran at 60℃; for 2h;
  • 17
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 544-97-8 ]
  • (+)-(R)-4-methyl-nonan-2-one [ No CAS ]
  • (S)-(-)-4-methyl-nonan-2-one [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
With copper(I) trifluoromethanesulfonate benzene; 2-(diphenylphosphino)-phenyl-L-Tle-L-Tyr(OBut)-Bu In toluene at 22℃; for 2h;
With C40H38NO7P; copper(II) bis(trifluoromethanesulfonate) In diethyl ether; toluene at 22℃; for 12h; Inert atmosphere; optical yield given as %ee; stereoselective reaction;
16 % ee With C48H60NO9P; copper(II) bis(trifluoromethanesulfonate) In toluene at 20℃; for 18h; Inert atmosphere; Overall yield = 25 %Chromat.; enantioselective reaction; 4.5. Typical procedure for the asymmetric conjugate 1,4-addition General procedure: Method A: A solution of the copper-catalyst precursor Cu(OTf)2(1 mol %, 0.003 mmol) and the corresponding ligand (2.5 equiv,0.0075 mmol) in 2 mL of dry toluene was stirred for 30 min atroom temperature. The alkylating organometallic reagent ZnR2(2 equiv 1.2 M toluene or 1.0 M hexane solutions, 0.24 mmol)was added dropwise and then the substrate (0.12 mmol). Afterthe desired time, the reaction was quenched with 2 M HCl(2 mL). Undecane (10 lL) was then added as an internal standardand the organic layer filtered twice through a plug of silica.
47 % ee With C50H57N2O8P; copper(II) bis(trifluoromethanesulfonate) In toluene at 20℃; for 18h; Inert atmosphere; Overall yield = 30 %Chromat.; enantioselective reaction; 4.5. Typical procedure for the asymmetric conjugate 1,4-addition General procedure: Method A: A solution of the copper-catalyst precursor Cu(OTf)2(1 mol %, 0.003 mmol) and the corresponding ligand (2.5 equiv,0.0075 mmol) in 2 mL of dry toluene was stirred for 30 min atroom temperature. The alkylating organometallic reagent ZnR2(2 equiv 1.2 M toluene or 1.0 M hexane solutions, 0.24 mmol)was added dropwise and then the substrate (0.12 mmol). Afterthe desired time, the reaction was quenched with 2 M HCl(2 mL). Undecane (10 lL) was then added as an internal standardand the organic layer filtered twice through a plug of silica.

  • 18
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 98-80-6 ]
  • [ 435269-67-3 ]
  • [ 501919-45-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
With sodium carbonate; (R)-Digm-BINAP In ethylene glycol at 100℃; Title compound not separated from byproducts;
With [Rh(R-binap)(norbornadiene)]BF4; triethylamine In 1,4-dioxane; water at 25℃; for 6h; Title compound not separated from byproducts;
With (S)-(1,1'-binaphthalene)-2,2'-diylbis(diphenylphosphine) In 1,4-dioxane; water at 100℃; for 5h; Title compound not separated from byproducts;
With potassium hydroxide; [RhCl((1R,5R)-2,6-diphenylbicyclo[3.3.1]nona-2,6-diene)]2 In 1,4-dioxane at 50℃; for 6h; Title compound not separated from byproducts;
With di(norbornadiene)rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate; chiral modified linked BINOL derivative; triethylamine In 1,4-dioxane; water at 25℃; for 2h; Title compound not separated from byproducts;
With bis(ethylene)rhodium acetylacetonate; (R,Sp)-2-(CH3(Ph2P)CH-)diphenylphosphinocyrhetrene In 1,4-dioxane; water at 100℃; for 6h;
With PS-PEG resin-supported (S)-binaphthyl derivative In tetrahydrofuran; water at 100℃; for 3h;
With potassium hydroxide In 1,4-dioxane at 50℃; for 3h; Title compound not separated from byproducts;
With potassium hydroxide In 1,4-dioxane; water at 23℃; for 15h; Title compound not separated from byproducts.;
With potassium hydroxide In 1,4-dioxane; water at 23℃; for 15h; Title compound not separated from byproducts.;
With potassium hydroxide In 1,4-dioxane; water at 50℃; for 6h; Title compound not separated from byproducts.;
75 % ee Stage #1: phenylboronic acid With chlorobis(ethylene)rhodium(I) dimer; (S)-2-diphenylphosphino-2'-phenylsulfinyl-1,1'-binaphthyl In cyclohexane at 40℃; for 0.333333h; Inert atmosphere; Stage #2: (E)-non-3-en-2-one With potassium carbonate In cyclohexane; water for 7h; Overall yield = 50 %; Overall yield = 64.3 mg; General Procedure for the 1,4-addition of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds with arylboronic acid. General procedure: A flame-dried two-necked flask (10 mL) was charged with ligand(R,Ss)-sulfoxide-MOP L2 (4.2 mg, 7.5 μmol, 1.5 mol%), [Rh(C2H4)2Cl]2 (1.5 mg, 3.8 μmol, 1.5mol% Rh), arylboronic acid 2 (1.0 mmol, 2 equiv), capped with a rubber septum, evacuated andbackfilled with argon (3 cycles), and then added cyclohexane (1.0 mL). After stirring at 40 °C for 20min, α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compound 1 (0.5 mmol) and an degassed aqueous solution of K2CO3(0.1 mL, 2.5 M) was added to the mixture and stirred for the appropriate time (followed by TLCuntil completion). The reaction mixture was directly charged onto a column (silica gel) and flashchromatographed with a mixture of hexane/EtOAc or hexane/Et2O to afford the product 3.

Reference: [1]Amengual, Rémi; Michelet, Véronique; Genêt, Jean-Pierre [Synlett, 2002, # 11, p. 1791 - 1794]
[2]Itooka, Ryoh; Iguchi, Yuki; Miyaura, Norio [Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2003, vol. 68, # 15, p. 6000 - 6004]
[3]Madec, Jonathan; Michaud, Guillaume; Genet, Jean-Pierre; Marinetti, Angela [Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2004, vol. 15, # 14, p. 2253 - 2261]
[4]Otomaru, Yusuke; Kina, Asato; Shintani, Ryo; Hayashi, Tamio [Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2005, vol. 16, # 9, p. 1673 - 1679]
[5]Yamamoto, Yasunori; Kurihara, Kazunori; Sugishita, Noriyuki; Oshita, Kengo; Piao, Dongguo; Miyaura, Norio [Chemistry Letters, 2005, vol. 34, # 9, p. 1224 - 1225]
[6]Stemmler, Rene T.; Bolm, Carsten [Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2005, vol. 70, # 24, p. 9925 - 9931]
[7]Otomaru, Yusuke; Senda, Taichi; Hayashi, Tamio [Organic Letters, 2004, vol. 6, # 19, p. 3357 - 3359]
[8]Duan, Wei-Liang; Iwamura, Hiroshi; Shintani, Ryo; Hayashi, Tamio [Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2007, vol. 129, # 7, p. 2130 - 2138]
[9]Monti, Chiara; Gennari, Cesare; Piarulli, Umberto [Chemistry - A European Journal, 2007, vol. 13, # 5, p. 1547 - 1558]
[10]Monti, Chiara; Gennari, Cesare; Piarulli, Umberto [Chemistry - A European Journal, 2007, vol. 13, # 5, p. 1547 - 1558]
[11]Kurihara, Kazunori; Sugishita, Noriyuki; Oshita, Kengo; Piao, Dongguo; Yamamoto, Yasunori; Miyaura, Norio [Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, 2007, vol. 692, # 1-3, p. 428 - 435]
[12]Hoshi, Takashi; Fujita, Masataka; Matsushima, Shouta; Hagiwara, Hisahiro; Suzuki, Toshio [Chemistry Letters, 2018, vol. 47, # 6, p. 800 - 802]
  • 19
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • trans-3-nonene-2,5-dione [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
84% With tert.-butylhydroperoxide In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 20 - 40℃; for 16 - 44h; 2 Example 2 Optimization of Aqueous Allylic Oxidation Conditions of Non-Steroidal CompoundsIn order to determine aqueous allylic oxidation reaction conditions for non-steroidal compounds, trans-3-nonene-2-one, whose fire bee toxin (Russell, G. A. (1957) “Deuterium-isotope Effects in the Autoxidation of Aralkyl Hydrocarbons. Mechanism of the Interaction of Peroxy Radicals,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79:3871-3877; Caudle, M. T. et al. (1996) “Mechanism for the Homolytic Cleavage of Alkyl Hydroperoxides by the Manganese(III) Dimer MnIII2(2-OHsalpn)2,” Inorg. Chem. 35:3577-3584) product trans-3-nonene-2,5-dione (1) has been previously prepared by anhydrous allylic oxidation (Catino, A. J. et al. (2004) “Dirhodium(II) Caprolactamate: An Exceptional Catalyst for Allylic Oxidation,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:13622-13623) was selected for optimization: Using T-HYDRO as the oxidant and Rh2(cap)4 as the catalyst at 40° C., various solvents were examined for suitability. 1,2-Dichloroethane (DCE), nitromethane, and water all led to comparable conversions to product (1) after 16 hours when 8 equivalents of TBHP were employed. In contrast to previous reports of catalytic TBHP oxidations under anhydrous conditions (Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2002) “Diverse Pathways for the Palladium(II)-Mediated Oxidation of Olefins by tert-Butylhydroperoxide,” Org. Lett. 4:2727-2730; Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2005) “Pd(OH)2/C-Mediated Selective Oxidation of Silyl Enol Ethers by tert-Butylhydroperoxide, a Useful Method for the Conversion of Ketones to α,β-Enones or β-Silyloxy-α,β-enones,” Org. Lett. 7:1415-1417; Blanksby, S. J. et al. (2003) “Bond Dissociation Energies Of Organic Molecules,” Acc. Chem. Res. 36:255-263) the addition of weak bases such as sodium bicarbonate, pyridine, or triethylamine lowered percent conversions. Two factors limited the efficiency of this allylic oxidation: (1) the slow rate of oxidation of the substrate relative to radical chain decomposition of TBHP (kP/kD, Scheme 1) (Timmons, D. et al. In METAL BONDS BETWEEN METAL ATOMS, 3rd Ed.; Cotton, F. A. et al. Eds.; Springer Science and Business Media: New York; (2005) Chapter 13) and (2) the decrease in the concentration of the catalytically active dirhodium species (FIG. 2). For the former, increasing the number of molar equivalents of TBHP increased percent conversion, and increasing the reaction temperature from room temperature to 40° C. increased the rate of oxidation. For the latter, adding Rh2(cap)4 in two portions, 0.5 mol % to initiate the reaction and the second 0.5 mol % portion after 16 h, ensured complete conversion and high product yield. Subsequent studies revealed that complete conversion could be achieved using as little as 0.1 mol % Rh2(cap)4 if applied twice, each with 5.0 molar equiv of TBHP, after the initial addition (22 and 44 h). The role of dirhodium caprolactamate in these oxidation reactions is suggested from the spectral observations revealed in FIG. 2. The conversion of Rh2(cap)4 to its oxidized Rh(cap)4RhOH form by TBHP has been reported by Choi, H. et al., (2007) “Optimal TBHP Allylic Oxidation of Δ5-Steroids Catalyzed by Dirhodium Caprolactamate,” Org. Lett. 9:5349-5352). One aspect of the present invention relates to the recognition that Rh(cap)4RhOH is converted back to Rh2(cap)4 via TBHP. The observation of Rh2(cap)4 in FIG. 2, combined with confirmation of its initial formation and presence throughout the course of oxidation through HPLC analysis, confirms the catalytic role for Rh2(cap)4 that is described in Scheme 2. Thus, the Example demonstrates that dirhodium caprolactamate is effective and efficient for the production of the tert-butylperoxy radical. Optimized conditions were selected for oxidation of α,β-unsaturated substrates (0.54 M in DCE) that included initial addition of 0.5 mol % Rh2(cap)4 and 4.0 or 5.0 equiv T-HYDRO followed by the same portion of catalyst and oxidant after 16 hours. Reactions were performed at 40° C. and terminated 40 hours after the initial catalyst/oxidant addition. Percent conversion at 16 hours was only half that at 40 hours, and using acetonitrile or nitromethane as solvent resulted in lower conversions than that achieved in DCE. Selected α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds were oxidized according to this methodology, and the results are reported in Table 3. Noteworthy are the relatively high yields of oxidized product obtained with acyclic compounds. For example, trans-4-oxo-2-nonenoic acid (3), reported to have antibiotic activity (Pfefferle, C. et al. (1996) “(E)-4-Oxonon-2-Enoic Acid, An Antibiotically Active Fatty Acid Produced By Streptomyces olivaceus Tü 4018,” J. Antibiotics 49:826-828), is efficiently prepared in one transformation (entry 3), improving upon the previously described multistep syntheses (Ballini, R. et al. (1998) “Synthesis of (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid, a Natural Antibiotic Produced by Streptomyces olivaceus,” J. Nat. Prod. 61:673-674; Shet, J. et al. (2004) “Domino Primary Alcohol Oxidation-Wittig Reaction: Total Synthesis of ABT-418 and (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid,” Synthesis 11:1859-1863; Obrect, D. et al. (1989) “A New Method for the Preparation of (E)-3-Acylprop-2-enoic Acids,” Helv. Chim. Acta 72:117-122). Oxidation of methyl crotonate under the same conditions yielded monomethyl fumaric acid (entry 8) in modest isolated yield.Reactions were performed with 1.36 mmol of substrate in 2.5 mL of DCE to which was added 4.0 or 5.0 equiv of TBHP (70% in water) and 0.50 mol % Rh2(cap)4 and the solution was heated at 40° C. After 16 hours an additional 4.0 or 5.0 equiv of TBHP (70% in water) and 0.50 mol % Rh2(cap)4 was added, and reaction was continued for an additional 24 hours. Isolated yield after column chromatography; carboxylic acids were purified by recrystallization from ethyl acetate and the mass yield after recrystallation is given.General Procedure for the Oxidation of α,β-Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds. A 10 mL vial equipped with a stirbar was charged with substrate (1.36 mmol) and Rh2(cap)4 (5 mg, 0.007 mmol). Solvent (2.5 mL) was added followed by the addition of TBHP (0.75 mL, 5.5 mmol, 4 equiv). The vial was loosely capped and stirred for 16 hrs, then the second portion of Rh2(cap)4 (5 mg, 0.007 mmol) and TBHP (0.75 mL, 5.5 mmol, 4 equiv) was added. After an additional 24 hrs, the solution was concentrated and purified by column chromatography to obtain analytically pure compounds whose spectral characteristics were identical to those previously reported: trans-3-nonen-2,5-dione (1) (Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2003) “A Mild, Catalytic, and Highly Selective Method for the Oxidation of α,β-Enones to 1,4-Enediones, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:3232-3233) ethyl (E)-4-oxo-2-decenoate (2) (Manfredini, S. et al. (1988) “A Convenient Synthesis Of λ-Oxo-Acrylates,” Tetrahedron Lett. 29:3997-4000), (E)-4-oxo-2-pentenamide (5) (Scheffold, R. et al. (1967) “Synthese Von Azaprotoanemoninen,” Helv. Chim. Acta. 50:798-808), 4-androsten-17-3,6-dione (28) (Jasiczak, J. (1988) “Oxidations Of Enone Systems In Steroids By Oxidizers With Reversible Redox Potential,” J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 10, 2687-2692), 17β-acetoxyandrost-4-en-3,6-dione (29) (Marwah, P. et al. (2004) “An Economical And Green Approach For The Oxidation Of Olefins To Enones,” Green Chem. 570-577), 4-androstene-3,6,17-trione (30) (Kiran, I. J. (2004) “An Alternative Preparation Of Steroidal Δ4-3,6-Diones,” Chem. Res. 3:208-209), 4-cholesten-3,6-dione (31) (Hunter, C. A. et al. (2006) “An Efficient One-Pot Synthesis Generating 4-Ene-3,6-Dione Functionalised Steroids From Steroidal 5-En-3β-ols UsingA Modified Jones Oxidation Methodology,” Steroids 71:30-33) and acids were purified by recrystallization in ethyl acetate and matched with those in the literature: (E)-4-oxo-2-nonenoic acid (3) (Ballini, R. et al. (1998) “Synthesis of (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid, a Natural Antibiotic Produced by Streptomyces olivaceus,” J. Nat. Prod. 61:673-674), (E)-4-oxo-2-pentenoic acid (4) (Lüüond, R. M. et al. (1992) “Assessment Of The Active-Site Requirements Of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Dehydratase: Evaluation Of Substrate And Product Analogs As Competitive Inhibitors,” J. Org. Chem. 57:5005-5013), 2-cyclohexenone-1-carboxylic acid (7) (Webster, F. X. et al. (1987) “Control Of The Birch Reduction Of m-Anisic Acid To Produce Specific 3-Oxocyclohexenecarboxylic Acids,” Synthesis 10:922-923) and fumaric acid monomethyl ester (8) (Davis, R. A. (2005) “Isolation and Structure Elucidation of the New Fungal Metabolite (-)-Xylariamide A,” J. Nat. Prod. 68:769-772).
84% With tert.-butylhydroperoxide; [Rh2(cap)4*2CH3CN] In water; 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 40℃; for 40h;
81% With tert.-butylhydroperoxide; potassium carbonate In dichloromethane at 24℃; for 72h;
76% With tert.-butylhydroperoxide In water; 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 40℃; for 40h; 2.1 Example 2 Optimization of Aqueous Allylic Oxidation Conditions of Non-Steroidal CompoundsIn order to determine aqueous allylic oxidation reaction conditions for non-steroidal compounds, trans-3-nonene-2-one, whose fire bee toxin (Russell, G. A. (1957) “Deuterium-isotope Effects in the Autoxidation of Aralkyl Hydrocarbons. Mechanism of the Interaction of Peroxy Radicals,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79:3871-3877; Caudle, M. T. et al. (1996) “Mechanism for the Homolytic Cleavage of Alkyl Hydroperoxides by the Manganese(III) Dimer MnIII2(2-OHsalpn)2,” Inorg. Chem. 35:3577-3584) product trans-3-nonene-2,5-dione (1) has been previously prepared by anhydrous allylic oxidation (Catino, A. J. et al. (2004) “Dirhodium(II) Caprolactamate: An Exceptional Catalyst for Allylic Oxidation,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:13622-13623) was selected for optimization: Using T-HYDRO as the oxidant and Rh2(cap)4 as the catalyst at 40° C., various solvents were examined for suitability. 1,2-Dichloroethane (DCE), nitromethane, and water all led to comparable conversions to product (1) after 16 hours when 8 equivalents of TBHP were employed. In contrast to previous reports of catalytic TBHP oxidations under anhydrous conditions (Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2002) “Diverse Pathways for the Palladium(II)-Mediated Oxidation of Olefins by tert-Butylhydroperoxide,” Org. Lett. 4:2727-2730; Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2005) “Pd(OH)2/C-Mediated Selective Oxidation of Silyl Enol Ethers by tert-Butylhydroperoxide, a Useful Method for the Conversion of Ketones to α,β-Enones or β-Silyloxy-α,β-enones,” Org. Lett. 7:1415-1417; Blanksby, S. J. et al. (2003) “Bond Dissociation Energies Of Organic Molecules,” Acc. Chem. Res. 36:255-263) the addition of weak bases such as sodium bicarbonate, pyridine, or triethylamine lowered percent conversions. Two factors limited the efficiency of this allylic oxidation: (1) the slow rate of oxidation of the substrate relative to radical chain decomposition of TBHP (kP/kD, Scheme 1) (Timmons, D. et al. In METAL BONDS BETWEEN METAL ATOMS, 3rd Ed.; Cotton, F. A. et al. Eds.; Springer Science and Business Media: New York; (2005) Chapter 13) and (2) the decrease in the concentration of the catalytically active dirhodium species (FIG. 2). For the former, increasing the number of molar equivalents of TBHP increased percent conversion, and increasing the reaction temperature from room temperature to 40° C. increased the rate of oxidation. For the latter, adding Rh2(cap)4 in two portions, 0.5 mol % to initiate the reaction and the second 0.5 mol % portion after 16 h, ensured complete conversion and high product yield. Subsequent studies revealed that complete conversion could be achieved using as little as 0.1 mol % Rh2(cap)4 if applied twice, each with 5.0 molar equiv of TBHP, after the initial addition (22 and 44 h). The role of dirhodium caprolactamate in these oxidation reactions is suggested from the spectral observations revealed in FIG. 2. The conversion of Rh2(cap)4 to its oxidized Rh(cap)4RhOH form by TBHP has been reported by Choi, H. et al., (2007) “Optimal TBHP Allylic Oxidation of Δ5-Steroids Catalyzed by Dirhodium Caprolactamate,” Org. Lett. 9:5349-5352). One aspect of the present invention relates to the recognition that Rh(cap)4RhOH is converted back to Rh2(cap)4 via TBHP. The observation of Rh2(cap)4 in FIG. 2, combined with confirmation of its initial formation and presence throughout the course of oxidation through HPLC analysis, confirms the catalytic role for Rh2(cap)4 that is described in Scheme 2. Thus, the Example demonstrates that dirhodium caprolactamate is effective and efficient for the production of the tert-butylperoxy radical. Optimized conditions were selected for oxidation of α,β-unsaturated substrates (0.54 M in DCE) that included initial addition of 0.5 mol % Rh2(cap)4 and 4.0 or 5.0 equiv T-HYDRO followed by the same portion of catalyst and oxidant after 16 hours. Reactions were performed at 40° C. and terminated 40 hours after the initial catalyst/oxidant addition. Percent conversion at 16 hours was only half that at 40 hours, and using acetonitrile or nitromethane as solvent resulted in lower conversions than that achieved in DCE. Selected α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds were oxidized according to this methodology, and the results are reported in Table 3. Noteworthy are the relatively high yields of oxidized product obtained with acyclic compounds. For example, trans-4-oxo-2-nonenoic acid (3), reported to have antibiotic activity (Pfefferle, C. et al. (1996) “(E)-4-Oxonon-2-Enoic Acid, An Antibiotically Active Fatty Acid Produced By Streptomyces olivaceus Tü 4018,” J. Antibiotics 49:826-828), is efficiently prepared in one transformation (entry 3), improving upon the previously described multistep syntheses (Ballini, R. et al. (1998) “Synthesis of (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid, a Natural Antibiotic Produced by Streptomyces olivaceus,” J. Nat. Prod. 61:673-674; Shet, J. et al. (2004) “Domino Primary Alcohol Oxidation-Wittig Reaction: Total Synthesis of ABT-418 and (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid,” Synthesis 11:1859-1863; Obrect, D. et al. (1989) “A New Method for the Preparation of (E)-3-Acylprop-2-enoic Acids,” Helv. Chim. Acta 72:117-122). Oxidation of methyl crotonate under the same conditions yielded monomethyl fumaric acid (entry 8) in modest isolated yield.Reactions were performed with 1.36 mmol of substrate in 2.5 mL of DCE to which was added 4.0 or 5.0 equiv of TBHP (70% in water) and 0.50 mol % Rh2(cap)4 and the solution was heated at 40° C. After 16 hours an additional 4.0 or 5.0 equiv of TBHP (70% in water) and 0.50 mol % Rh2(cap)4 was added, and reaction was continued for an additional 24 hours. Isolated yield after column chromatography; carboxylic acids were purified by recrystallization from ethyl acetate and the mass yield after recrystallation is given.General Procedure for the Oxidation of α,β-Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds. A 10 mL vial equipped with a stirbar was charged with substrate (1.36 mmol) and Rh2(cap)4 (5 mg, 0.007 mmol). Solvent (2.5 mL) was added followed by the addition of TBHP (0.75 mL, 5.5 mmol, 4 equiv). The vial was loosely capped and stirred for 16 hrs, then the second portion of Rh2(cap)4 (5 mg, 0.007 mmol) and TBHP (0.75 mL, 5.5 mmol, 4 equiv) was added. After an additional 24 hrs, the solution was concentrated and purified by column chromatography to obtain analytically pure compounds whose spectral characteristics were identical to those previously reported: trans-3-nonen-2,5-dione (1) (Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2003) “A Mild, Catalytic, and Highly Selective Method for the Oxidation of α,β-Enones to 1,4-Enediones, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:3232-3233) ethyl (E)-4-oxo-2-decenoate (2) (Manfredini, S. et al. (1988) “A Convenient Synthesis Of λ-Oxo-Acrylates,” Tetrahedron Lett. 29:3997-4000), (E)-4-oxo-2-pentenamide (5) (Scheffold, R. et al. (1967) “Synthese Von Azaprotoanemoninen,” Helv. Chim. Acta. 50:798-808), 4-androsten-17-3,6-dione (28) (Jasiczak, J. (1988) “Oxidations Of Enone Systems In Steroids By Oxidizers With Reversible Redox Potential,” J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 10, 2687-2692), 17β-acetoxyandrost-4-en-3,6-dione (29) (Marwah, P. et al. (2004) “An Economical And Green Approach For The Oxidation Of Olefins To Enones,” Green Chem. 570-577), 4-androstene-3,6,17-trione (30) (Kiran, I. J. (2004) “An Alternative Preparation Of Steroidal Δ4-3,6-Diones,” Chem. Res. 3:208-209), 4-cholesten-3,6-dione (31) (Hunter, C. A. et al. (2006) “An Efficient One-Pot Synthesis Generating 4-Ene-3,6-Dione Functionalised Steroids From Steroidal 5-En-3β-ols UsingA Modified Jones Oxidation Methodology,” Steroids 71:30-33) and acids were purified by recrystallization in ethyl acetate and matched with those in the literature: (E)-4-oxo-2-nonenoic acid (3) (Ballini, R. et al. (1998) “Synthesis of (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid, a Natural Antibiotic Produced by Streptomyces olivaceus,” J. Nat. Prod. 61:673-674), (E)-4-oxo-2-pentenoic acid (4) (Lüüond, R. M. et al. (1992) “Assessment Of The Active-Site Requirements Of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Dehydratase: Evaluation Of Substrate And Product Analogs As Competitive Inhibitors,” J. Org. Chem. 57:5005-5013), 2-cyclohexenone-1-carboxylic acid (7) (Webster, F. X. et al. (1987) “Control Of The Birch Reduction Of m-Anisic Acid To Produce Specific 3-Oxocyclohexenecarboxylic Acids,” Synthesis 10:922-923) and fumaric acid monomethyl ester (8) (Davis, R. A. (2005) “Isolation and Structure Elucidation of the New Fungal Metabolite (-)-Xylariamide A,” J. Nat. Prod. 68:769-772).
With tert.-butylhydroperoxide; triethylamine 2 Example 2 Optimization of Aqueous Allylic Oxidation Conditions of Non-Steroidal CompoundsIn order to determine aqueous allylic oxidation reaction conditions for non-steroidal compounds, trans-3-nonene-2-one, whose fire bee toxin (Russell, G. A. (1957) “Deuterium-isotope Effects in the Autoxidation of Aralkyl Hydrocarbons. Mechanism of the Interaction of Peroxy Radicals,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79:3871-3877; Caudle, M. T. et al. (1996) “Mechanism for the Homolytic Cleavage of Alkyl Hydroperoxides by the Manganese(III) Dimer MnIII2(2-OHsalpn)2,” Inorg. Chem. 35:3577-3584) product trans-3-nonene-2,5-dione (1) has been previously prepared by anhydrous allylic oxidation (Catino, A. J. et al. (2004) “Dirhodium(II) Caprolactamate: An Exceptional Catalyst for Allylic Oxidation,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:13622-13623) was selected for optimization: Using T-HYDRO as the oxidant and Rh2(cap)4 as the catalyst at 40° C., various solvents were examined for suitability. 1,2-Dichloroethane (DCE), nitromethane, and water all led to comparable conversions to product (1) after 16 hours when 8 equivalents of TBHP were employed. In contrast to previous reports of catalytic TBHP oxidations under anhydrous conditions (Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2002) “Diverse Pathways for the Palladium(II)-Mediated Oxidation of Olefins by tert-Butylhydroperoxide,” Org. Lett. 4:2727-2730; Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2005) “Pd(OH)2/C-Mediated Selective Oxidation of Silyl Enol Ethers by tert-Butylhydroperoxide, a Useful Method for the Conversion of Ketones to α,β-Enones or β-Silyloxy-α,β-enones,” Org. Lett. 7:1415-1417; Blanksby, S. J. et al. (2003) “Bond Dissociation Energies Of Organic Molecules,” Acc. Chem. Res. 36:255-263) the addition of weak bases such as sodium bicarbonate, pyridine, or triethylamine lowered percent conversions. Two factors limited the efficiency of this allylic oxidation: (1) the slow rate of oxidation of the substrate relative to radical chain decomposition of TBHP (kP/kD, Scheme 1) (Timmons, D. et al. In METAL BONDS BETWEEN METAL ATOMS, 3rd Ed.; Cotton, F. A. et al. Eds.; Springer Science and Business Media: New York; (2005) Chapter 13) and (2) the decrease in the concentration of the catalytically active dirhodium species (FIG. 2). For the former, increasing the number of molar equivalents of TBHP increased percent conversion, and increasing the reaction temperature from room temperature to 40° C. increased the rate of oxidation. For the latter, adding Rh2(cap)4 in two portions, 0.5 mol % to initiate the reaction and the second 0.5 mol % portion after 16 h, ensured complete conversion and high product yield. Subsequent studies revealed that complete conversion could be achieved using as little as 0.1 mol % Rh2(cap)4 if applied twice, each with 5.0 molar equiv of TBHP, after the initial addition (22 and 44 h). The role of dirhodium caprolactamate in these oxidation reactions is suggested from the spectral observations revealed in FIG. 2. The conversion of Rh2(cap)4 to its oxidized Rh(cap)4RhOH form by TBHP has been reported by Choi, H. et al., (2007) “Optimal TBHP Allylic Oxidation of Δ5-Steroids Catalyzed by Dirhodium Caprolactamate,” Org. Lett. 9:5349-5352). One aspect of the present invention relates to the recognition that Rh(cap)4RhOH is converted back to Rh2(cap)4 via TBHP. The observation of Rh2(cap)4 in FIG. 2, combined with confirmation of its initial formation and presence throughout the course of oxidation through HPLC analysis, confirms the catalytic role for Rh2(cap)4 that is described in Scheme 2. Thus, the Example demonstrates that dirhodium caprolactamate is effective and efficient for the production of the tert-butylperoxy radical. Optimized conditions were selected for oxidation of α,β-unsaturated substrates (0.54 M in DCE) that included initial addition of 0.5 mol % Rh2(cap)4 and 4.0 or 5.0 equiv T-HYDRO followed by the same portion of catalyst and oxidant after 16 hours. Reactions were performed at 40° C. and terminated 40 hours after the initial catalyst/oxidant addition. Percent conversion at 16 hours was only half that at 40 hours, and using acetonitrile or nitromethane as solvent resulted in lower conversions than that achieved in DCE. Selected α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds were oxidized according to this methodology, and the results are reported in Table 3. Noteworthy are the relatively high yields of oxidized product obtained with acyclic compounds. For example, trans-4-oxo-2-nonenoic acid (3), reported to have antibiotic activity (Pfefferle, C. et al. (1996) “(E)-4-Oxonon-2-Enoic Acid, An Antibiotically Active Fatty Acid Produced By Streptomyces olivaceus Tü 4018,” J. Antibiotics 49:826-828), is efficiently prepared in one transformation (entry 3), improving upon the previously described multistep syntheses (Ballini, R. et al. (1998) “Synthesis of (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid, a Natural Antibiotic Produced by Streptomyces olivaceus,” J. Nat. Prod. 61:673-674; Shet, J. et al. (2004) “Domino Primary Alcohol Oxidation-Wittig Reaction: Total Synthesis of ABT-418 and (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid,” Synthesis 11:1859-1863; Obrect, D. et al. (1989) “A New Method for the Preparation of (E)-3-Acylprop-2-enoic Acids,” Helv. Chim. Acta 72:117-122). Oxidation of methyl crotonate under the same conditions yielded monomethyl fumaric acid (entry 8) in modest isolated yield.Reactions were performed with 1.36 mmol of substrate in 2.5 mL of DCE to which was added 4.0 or 5.0 equiv of TBHP (70% in water) and 0.50 mol % Rh2(cap)4 and the solution was heated at 40° C. After 16 hours an additional 4.0 or 5.0 equiv of TBHP (70% in water) and 0.50 mol % Rh2(cap)4 was added, and reaction was continued for an additional 24 hours. Isolated yield after column chromatography; carboxylic acids were purified by recrystallization from ethyl acetate and the mass yield after recrystallation is given.General Procedure for the Oxidation of α,β-Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds. A 10 mL vial equipped with a stirbar was charged with substrate (1.36 mmol) and Rh2(cap)4 (5 mg, 0.007 mmol). Solvent (2.5 mL) was added followed by the addition of TBHP (0.75 mL, 5.5 mmol, 4 equiv). The vial was loosely capped and stirred for 16 hrs, then the second portion of Rh2(cap)4 (5 mg, 0.007 mmol) and TBHP (0.75 mL, 5.5 mmol, 4 equiv) was added. After an additional 24 hrs, the solution was concentrated and purified by column chromatography to obtain analytically pure compounds whose spectral characteristics were identical to those previously reported: trans-3-nonen-2,5-dione (1) (Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2003) “A Mild, Catalytic, and Highly Selective Method for the Oxidation of α,β-Enones to 1,4-Enediones, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:3232-3233) ethyl (E)-4-oxo-2-decenoate (2) (Manfredini, S. et al. (1988) “A Convenient Synthesis Of λ-Oxo-Acrylates,” Tetrahedron Lett. 29:3997-4000), (E)-4-oxo-2-pentenamide (5) (Scheffold, R. et al. (1967) “Synthese Von Azaprotoanemoninen,” Helv. Chim. Acta. 50:798-808), 4-androsten-17-3,6-dione (28) (Jasiczak, J. (1988) “Oxidations Of Enone Systems In Steroids By Oxidizers With Reversible Redox Potential,” J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 10, 2687-2692), 17β-acetoxyandrost-4-en-3,6-dione (29) (Marwah, P. et al. (2004) “An Economical And Green Approach For The Oxidation Of Olefins To Enones,” Green Chem. 570-577), 4-androstene-3,6,17-trione (30) (Kiran, I. J. (2004) “An Alternative Preparation Of Steroidal Δ4-3,6-Diones,” Chem. Res. 3:208-209), 4-cholesten-3,6-dione (31) (Hunter, C. A. et al. (2006) “An Efficient One-Pot Synthesis Generating 4-Ene-3,6-Dione Functionalised Steroids From Steroidal 5-En-3β-ols UsingA Modified Jones Oxidation Methodology,” Steroids 71:30-33) and acids were purified by recrystallization in ethyl acetate and matched with those in the literature: (E)-4-oxo-2-nonenoic acid (3) (Ballini, R. et al. (1998) “Synthesis of (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid, a Natural Antibiotic Produced by Streptomyces olivaceus,” J. Nat. Prod. 61:673-674), (E)-4-oxo-2-pentenoic acid (4) (Lüüond, R. M. et al. (1992) “Assessment Of The Active-Site Requirements Of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Dehydratase: Evaluation Of Substrate And Product Analogs As Competitive Inhibitors,” J. Org. Chem. 57:5005-5013), 2-cyclohexenone-1-carboxylic acid (7) (Webster, F. X. et al. (1987) “Control Of The Birch Reduction Of m-Anisic Acid To Produce Specific 3-Oxocyclohexenecarboxylic Acids,” Synthesis 10:922-923) and fumaric acid monomethyl ester (8) (Davis, R. A. (2005) “Isolation and Structure Elucidation of the New Fungal Metabolite (-)-Xylariamide A,” J. Nat. Prod. 68:769-772).
With tert.-butylhydroperoxide In nitromethane at 40℃; for 16h; 2 Example 2 Optimization of Aqueous Allylic Oxidation Conditions of Non-Steroidal CompoundsIn order to determine aqueous allylic oxidation reaction conditions for non-steroidal compounds, trans-3-nonene-2-one, whose fire bee toxin (Russell, G. A. (1957) “Deuterium-isotope Effects in the Autoxidation of Aralkyl Hydrocarbons. Mechanism of the Interaction of Peroxy Radicals,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79:3871-3877; Caudle, M. T. et al. (1996) “Mechanism for the Homolytic Cleavage of Alkyl Hydroperoxides by the Manganese(III) Dimer MnIII2(2-OHsalpn)2,” Inorg. Chem. 35:3577-3584) product trans-3-nonene-2,5-dione (1) has been previously prepared by anhydrous allylic oxidation (Catino, A. J. et al. (2004) “Dirhodium(II) Caprolactamate: An Exceptional Catalyst for Allylic Oxidation,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:13622-13623) was selected for optimization: Using T-HYDRO as the oxidant and Rh2(cap)4 as the catalyst at 40° C., various solvents were examined for suitability. 1,2-Dichloroethane (DCE), nitromethane, and water all led to comparable conversions to product (1) after 16 hours when 8 equivalents of TBHP were employed. In contrast to previous reports of catalytic TBHP oxidations under anhydrous conditions (Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2002) “Diverse Pathways for the Palladium(II)-Mediated Oxidation of Olefins by tert-Butylhydroperoxide,” Org. Lett. 4:2727-2730; Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2005) “Pd(OH)2/C-Mediated Selective Oxidation of Silyl Enol Ethers by tert-Butylhydroperoxide, a Useful Method for the Conversion of Ketones to α,β-Enones or β-Silyloxy-α,β-enones,” Org. Lett. 7:1415-1417; Blanksby, S. J. et al. (2003) “Bond Dissociation Energies Of Organic Molecules,” Acc. Chem. Res. 36:255-263) the addition of weak bases such as sodium bicarbonate, pyridine, or triethylamine lowered percent conversions. Two factors limited the efficiency of this allylic oxidation: (1) the slow rate of oxidation of the substrate relative to radical chain decomposition of TBHP (kP/kD, Scheme 1) (Timmons, D. et al. In METAL BONDS BETWEEN METAL ATOMS, 3rd Ed.; Cotton, F. A. et al. Eds.; Springer Science and Business Media: New York; (2005) Chapter 13) and (2) the decrease in the concentration of the catalytically active dirhodium species (FIG. 2). For the former, increasing the number of molar equivalents of TBHP increased percent conversion, and increasing the reaction temperature from room temperature to 40° C. increased the rate of oxidation. For the latter, adding Rh2(cap)4 in two portions, 0.5 mol % to initiate the reaction and the second 0.5 mol % portion after 16 h, ensured complete conversion and high product yield. Subsequent studies revealed that complete conversion could be achieved using as little as 0.1 mol % Rh2(cap)4 if applied twice, each with 5.0 molar equiv of TBHP, after the initial addition (22 and 44 h). The role of dirhodium caprolactamate in these oxidation reactions is suggested from the spectral observations revealed in FIG. 2. The conversion of Rh2(cap)4 to its oxidized Rh(cap)4RhOH form by TBHP has been reported by Choi, H. et al., (2007) “Optimal TBHP Allylic Oxidation of Δ5-Steroids Catalyzed by Dirhodium Caprolactamate,” Org. Lett. 9:5349-5352). One aspect of the present invention relates to the recognition that Rh(cap)4RhOH is converted back to Rh2(cap)4 via TBHP. The observation of Rh2(cap)4 in FIG. 2, combined with confirmation of its initial formation and presence throughout the course of oxidation through HPLC analysis, confirms the catalytic role for Rh2(cap)4 that is described in Scheme 2. Thus, the Example demonstrates that dirhodium caprolactamate is effective and efficient for the production of the tert-butylperoxy radical. Optimized conditions were selected for oxidation of α,β-unsaturated substrates (0.54 M in DCE) that included initial addition of 0.5 mol % Rh2(cap)4 and 4.0 or 5.0 equiv T-HYDRO followed by the same portion of catalyst and oxidant after 16 hours. Reactions were performed at 40° C. and terminated 40 hours after the initial catalyst/oxidant addition. Percent conversion at 16 hours was only half that at 40 hours, and using acetonitrile or nitromethane as solvent resulted in lower conversions than that achieved in DCE. Selected α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds were oxidized according to this methodology, and the results are reported in Table 3. Noteworthy are the relatively high yields of oxidized product obtained with acyclic compounds. For example, trans-4-oxo-2-nonenoic acid (3), reported to have antibiotic activity (Pfefferle, C. et al. (1996) “(E)-4-Oxonon-2-Enoic Acid, An Antibiotically Active Fatty Acid Produced By Streptomyces olivaceus Tü 4018,” J. Antibiotics 49:826-828), is efficiently prepared in one transformation (entry 3), improving upon the previously described multistep syntheses (Ballini, R. et al. (1998) “Synthesis of (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid, a Natural Antibiotic Produced by Streptomyces olivaceus,” J. Nat. Prod. 61:673-674; Shet, J. et al. (2004) “Domino Primary Alcohol Oxidation-Wittig Reaction: Total Synthesis of ABT-418 and (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid,” Synthesis 11:1859-1863; Obrect, D. et al. (1989) “A New Method for the Preparation of (E)-3-Acylprop-2-enoic Acids,” Helv. Chim. Acta 72:117-122). Oxidation of methyl crotonate under the same conditions yielded monomethyl fumaric acid (entry 8) in modest isolated yield.Reactions were performed with 1.36 mmol of substrate in 2.5 mL of DCE to which was added 4.0 or 5.0 equiv of TBHP (70% in water) and 0.50 mol % Rh2(cap)4 and the solution was heated at 40° C. After 16 hours an additional 4.0 or 5.0 equiv of TBHP (70% in water) and 0.50 mol % Rh2(cap)4 was added, and reaction was continued for an additional 24 hours. Isolated yield after column chromatography; carboxylic acids were purified by recrystallization from ethyl acetate and the mass yield after recrystallation is given.General Procedure for the Oxidation of α,β-Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds. A 10 mL vial equipped with a stirbar was charged with substrate (1.36 mmol) and Rh2(cap)4 (5 mg, 0.007 mmol). Solvent (2.5 mL) was added followed by the addition of TBHP (0.75 mL, 5.5 mmol, 4 equiv). The vial was loosely capped and stirred for 16 hrs, then the second portion of Rh2(cap)4 (5 mg, 0.007 mmol) and TBHP (0.75 mL, 5.5 mmol, 4 equiv) was added. After an additional 24 hrs, the solution was concentrated and purified by column chromatography to obtain analytically pure compounds whose spectral characteristics were identical to those previously reported: trans-3-nonen-2,5-dione (1) (Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2003) “A Mild, Catalytic, and Highly Selective Method for the Oxidation of α,β-Enones to 1,4-Enediones, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:3232-3233) ethyl (E)-4-oxo-2-decenoate (2) (Manfredini, S. et al. (1988) “A Convenient Synthesis Of λ-Oxo-Acrylates,” Tetrahedron Lett. 29:3997-4000), (E)-4-oxo-2-pentenamide (5) (Scheffold, R. et al. (1967) “Synthese Von Azaprotoanemoninen,” Helv. Chim. Acta. 50:798-808), 4-androsten-17-3,6-dione (28) (Jasiczak, J. (1988) “Oxidations Of Enone Systems In Steroids By Oxidizers With Reversible Redox Potential,” J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 10, 2687-2692), 17β-acetoxyandrost-4-en-3,6-dione (29) (Marwah, P. et al. (2004) “An Economical And Green Approach For The Oxidation Of Olefins To Enones,” Green Chem. 570-577), 4-androstene-3,6,17-trione (30) (Kiran, I. J. (2004) “An Alternative Preparation Of Steroidal Δ4-3,6-Diones,” Chem. Res. 3:208-209), 4-cholesten-3,6-dione (31) (Hunter, C. A. et al. (2006) “An Efficient One-Pot Synthesis Generating 4-Ene-3,6-Dione Functionalised Steroids From Steroidal 5-En-3β-ols UsingA Modified Jones Oxidation Methodology,” Steroids 71:30-33) and acids were purified by recrystallization in ethyl acetate and matched with those in the literature: (E)-4-oxo-2-nonenoic acid (3) (Ballini, R. et al. (1998) “Synthesis of (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid, a Natural Antibiotic Produced by Streptomyces olivaceus,” J. Nat. Prod. 61:673-674), (E)-4-oxo-2-pentenoic acid (4) (Lüüond, R. M. et al. (1992) “Assessment Of The Active-Site Requirements Of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Dehydratase: Evaluation Of Substrate And Product Analogs As Competitive Inhibitors,” J. Org. Chem. 57:5005-5013), 2-cyclohexenone-1-carboxylic acid (7) (Webster, F. X. et al. (1987) “Control Of The Birch Reduction Of m-Anisic Acid To Produce Specific 3-Oxocyclohexenecarboxylic Acids,” Synthesis 10:922-923) and fumaric acid monomethyl ester (8) (Davis, R. A. (2005) “Isolation and Structure Elucidation of the New Fungal Metabolite (-)-Xylariamide A,” J. Nat. Prod. 68:769-772).
With tert.-butylhydroperoxide In water at 40℃; for 16h; 2 Example 2 Optimization of Aqueous Allylic Oxidation Conditions of Non-Steroidal CompoundsIn order to determine aqueous allylic oxidation reaction conditions for non-steroidal compounds, trans-3-nonene-2-one, whose fire bee toxin (Russell, G. A. (1957) “Deuterium-isotope Effects in the Autoxidation of Aralkyl Hydrocarbons. Mechanism of the Interaction of Peroxy Radicals,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79:3871-3877; Caudle, M. T. et al. (1996) “Mechanism for the Homolytic Cleavage of Alkyl Hydroperoxides by the Manganese(III) Dimer MnIII2(2-OHsalpn)2,” Inorg. Chem. 35:3577-3584) product trans-3-nonene-2,5-dione (1) has been previously prepared by anhydrous allylic oxidation (Catino, A. J. et al. (2004) “Dirhodium(II) Caprolactamate: An Exceptional Catalyst for Allylic Oxidation,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:13622-13623) was selected for optimization: Using T-HYDRO as the oxidant and Rh2(cap)4 as the catalyst at 40° C., various solvents were examined for suitability. 1,2-Dichloroethane (DCE), nitromethane, and water all led to comparable conversions to product (1) after 16 hours when 8 equivalents of TBHP were employed. In contrast to previous reports of catalytic TBHP oxidations under anhydrous conditions (Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2002) “Diverse Pathways for the Palladium(II)-Mediated Oxidation of Olefins by tert-Butylhydroperoxide,” Org. Lett. 4:2727-2730; Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2005) “Pd(OH)2/C-Mediated Selective Oxidation of Silyl Enol Ethers by tert-Butylhydroperoxide, a Useful Method for the Conversion of Ketones to α,β-Enones or β-Silyloxy-α,β-enones,” Org. Lett. 7:1415-1417; Blanksby, S. J. et al. (2003) “Bond Dissociation Energies Of Organic Molecules,” Acc. Chem. Res. 36:255-263) the addition of weak bases such as sodium bicarbonate, pyridine, or triethylamine lowered percent conversions. Two factors limited the efficiency of this allylic oxidation: (1) the slow rate of oxidation of the substrate relative to radical chain decomposition of TBHP (kP/kD, Scheme 1) (Timmons, D. et al. In METAL BONDS BETWEEN METAL ATOMS, 3rd Ed.; Cotton, F. A. et al. Eds.; Springer Science and Business Media: New York; (2005) Chapter 13) and (2) the decrease in the concentration of the catalytically active dirhodium species (FIG. 2). For the former, increasing the number of molar equivalents of TBHP increased percent conversion, and increasing the reaction temperature from room temperature to 40° C. increased the rate of oxidation. For the latter, adding Rh2(cap)4 in two portions, 0.5 mol % to initiate the reaction and the second 0.5 mol % portion after 16 h, ensured complete conversion and high product yield. Subsequent studies revealed that complete conversion could be achieved using as little as 0.1 mol % Rh2(cap)4 if applied twice, each with 5.0 molar equiv of TBHP, after the initial addition (22 and 44 h). The role of dirhodium caprolactamate in these oxidation reactions is suggested from the spectral observations revealed in FIG. 2. The conversion of Rh2(cap)4 to its oxidized Rh(cap)4RhOH form by TBHP has been reported by Choi, H. et al., (2007) “Optimal TBHP Allylic Oxidation of Δ5-Steroids Catalyzed by Dirhodium Caprolactamate,” Org. Lett. 9:5349-5352). One aspect of the present invention relates to the recognition that Rh(cap)4RhOH is converted back to Rh2(cap)4 via TBHP. The observation of Rh2(cap)4 in FIG. 2, combined with confirmation of its initial formation and presence throughout the course of oxidation through HPLC analysis, confirms the catalytic role for Rh2(cap)4 that is described in Scheme 2. Thus, the Example demonstrates that dirhodium caprolactamate is effective and efficient for the production of the tert-butylperoxy radical. Optimized conditions were selected for oxidation of α,β-unsaturated substrates (0.54 M in DCE) that included initial addition of 0.5 mol % Rh2(cap)4 and 4.0 or 5.0 equiv T-HYDRO followed by the same portion of catalyst and oxidant after 16 hours. Reactions were performed at 40° C. and terminated 40 hours after the initial catalyst/oxidant addition. Percent conversion at 16 hours was only half that at 40 hours, and using acetonitrile or nitromethane as solvent resulted in lower conversions than that achieved in DCE. Selected α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds were oxidized according to this methodology, and the results are reported in Table 3. Noteworthy are the relatively high yields of oxidized product obtained with acyclic compounds. For example, trans-4-oxo-2-nonenoic acid (3), reported to have antibiotic activity (Pfefferle, C. et al. (1996) “(E)-4-Oxonon-2-Enoic Acid, An Antibiotically Active Fatty Acid Produced By Streptomyces olivaceus Tü 4018,” J. Antibiotics 49:826-828), is efficiently prepared in one transformation (entry 3), improving upon the previously described multistep syntheses (Ballini, R. et al. (1998) “Synthesis of (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid, a Natural Antibiotic Produced by Streptomyces olivaceus,” J. Nat. Prod. 61:673-674; Shet, J. et al. (2004) “Domino Primary Alcohol Oxidation-Wittig Reaction: Total Synthesis of ABT-418 and (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid,” Synthesis 11:1859-1863; Obrect, D. et al. (1989) “A New Method for the Preparation of (E)-3-Acylprop-2-enoic Acids,” Helv. Chim. Acta 72:117-122). Oxidation of methyl crotonate under the same conditions yielded monomethyl fumaric acid (entry 8) in modest isolated yield.Reactions were performed with 1.36 mmol of substrate in 2.5 mL of DCE to which was added 4.0 or 5.0 equiv of TBHP (70% in water) and 0.50 mol % Rh2(cap)4 and the solution was heated at 40° C. After 16 hours an additional 4.0 or 5.0 equiv of TBHP (70% in water) and 0.50 mol % Rh2(cap)4 was added, and reaction was continued for an additional 24 hours. Isolated yield after column chromatography; carboxylic acids were purified by recrystallization from ethyl acetate and the mass yield after recrystallation is given.General Procedure for the Oxidation of α,β-Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds. A 10 mL vial equipped with a stirbar was charged with substrate (1.36 mmol) and Rh2(cap)4 (5 mg, 0.007 mmol). Solvent (2.5 mL) was added followed by the addition of TBHP (0.75 mL, 5.5 mmol, 4 equiv). The vial was loosely capped and stirred for 16 hrs, then the second portion of Rh2(cap)4 (5 mg, 0.007 mmol) and TBHP (0.75 mL, 5.5 mmol, 4 equiv) was added. After an additional 24 hrs, the solution was concentrated and purified by column chromatography to obtain analytically pure compounds whose spectral characteristics were identical to those previously reported: trans-3-nonen-2,5-dione (1) (Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2003) “A Mild, Catalytic, and Highly Selective Method for the Oxidation of α,β-Enones to 1,4-Enediones, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:3232-3233) ethyl (E)-4-oxo-2-decenoate (2) (Manfredini, S. et al. (1988) “A Convenient Synthesis Of λ-Oxo-Acrylates,” Tetrahedron Lett. 29:3997-4000), (E)-4-oxo-2-pentenamide (5) (Scheffold, R. et al. (1967) “Synthese Von Azaprotoanemoninen,” Helv. Chim. Acta. 50:798-808), 4-androsten-17-3,6-dione (28) (Jasiczak, J. (1988) “Oxidations Of Enone Systems In Steroids By Oxidizers With Reversible Redox Potential,” J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 10, 2687-2692), 17β-acetoxyandrost-4-en-3,6-dione (29) (Marwah, P. et al. (2004) “An Economical And Green Approach For The Oxidation Of Olefins To Enones,” Green Chem. 570-577), 4-androstene-3,6,17-trione (30) (Kiran, I. J. (2004) “An Alternative Preparation Of Steroidal Δ4-3,6-Diones,” Chem. Res. 3:208-209), 4-cholesten-3,6-dione (31) (Hunter, C. A. et al. (2006) “An Efficient One-Pot Synthesis Generating 4-Ene-3,6-Dione Functionalised Steroids From Steroidal 5-En-3β-ols UsingA Modified Jones Oxidation Methodology,” Steroids 71:30-33) and acids were purified by recrystallization in ethyl acetate and matched with those in the literature: (E)-4-oxo-2-nonenoic acid (3) (Ballini, R. et al. (1998) “Synthesis of (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid, a Natural Antibiotic Produced by Streptomyces olivaceus,” J. Nat. Prod. 61:673-674), (E)-4-oxo-2-pentenoic acid (4) (Lüüond, R. M. et al. (1992) “Assessment Of The Active-Site Requirements Of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Dehydratase: Evaluation Of Substrate And Product Analogs As Competitive Inhibitors,” J. Org. Chem. 57:5005-5013), 2-cyclohexenone-1-carboxylic acid (7) (Webster, F. X. et al. (1987) “Control Of The Birch Reduction Of m-Anisic Acid To Produce Specific 3-Oxocyclohexenecarboxylic Acids,” Synthesis 10:922-923) and fumaric acid monomethyl ester (8) (Davis, R. A. (2005) “Isolation and Structure Elucidation of the New Fungal Metabolite (-)-Xylariamide A,” J. Nat. Prod. 68:769-772).
With tert.-butylhydroperoxide; sodium hydrogencarbonate 2 Example 2 Optimization of Aqueous Allylic Oxidation Conditions of Non-Steroidal CompoundsIn order to determine aqueous allylic oxidation reaction conditions for non-steroidal compounds, trans-3-nonene-2-one, whose fire bee toxin (Russell, G. A. (1957) “Deuterium-isotope Effects in the Autoxidation of Aralkyl Hydrocarbons. Mechanism of the Interaction of Peroxy Radicals,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79:3871-3877; Caudle, M. T. et al. (1996) “Mechanism for the Homolytic Cleavage of Alkyl Hydroperoxides by the Manganese(III) Dimer MnIII2(2-OHsalpn)2,” Inorg. Chem. 35:3577-3584) product trans-3-nonene-2,5-dione (1) has been previously prepared by anhydrous allylic oxidation (Catino, A. J. et al. (2004) “Dirhodium(II) Caprolactamate: An Exceptional Catalyst for Allylic Oxidation,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:13622-13623) was selected for optimization: Using T-HYDRO as the oxidant and Rh2(cap)4 as the catalyst at 40° C., various solvents were examined for suitability. 1,2-Dichloroethane (DCE), nitromethane, and water all led to comparable conversions to product (1) after 16 hours when 8 equivalents of TBHP were employed. In contrast to previous reports of catalytic TBHP oxidations under anhydrous conditions (Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2002) “Diverse Pathways for the Palladium(II)-Mediated Oxidation of Olefins by tert-Butylhydroperoxide,” Org. Lett. 4:2727-2730; Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2005) “Pd(OH)2/C-Mediated Selective Oxidation of Silyl Enol Ethers by tert-Butylhydroperoxide, a Useful Method for the Conversion of Ketones to α,β-Enones or β-Silyloxy-α,β-enones,” Org. Lett. 7:1415-1417; Blanksby, S. J. et al. (2003) “Bond Dissociation Energies Of Organic Molecules,” Acc. Chem. Res. 36:255-263) the addition of weak bases such as sodium bicarbonate, pyridine, or triethylamine lowered percent conversions. Two factors limited the efficiency of this allylic oxidation: (1) the slow rate of oxidation of the substrate relative to radical chain decomposition of TBHP (kP/kD, Scheme 1) (Timmons, D. et al. In METAL BONDS BETWEEN METAL ATOMS, 3rd Ed.; Cotton, F. A. et al. Eds.; Springer Science and Business Media: New York; (2005) Chapter 13) and (2) the decrease in the concentration of the catalytically active dirhodium species (FIG. 2). For the former, increasing the number of molar equivalents of TBHP increased percent conversion, and increasing the reaction temperature from room temperature to 40° C. increased the rate of oxidation. For the latter, adding Rh2(cap)4 in two portions, 0.5 mol % to initiate the reaction and the second 0.5 mol % portion after 16 h, ensured complete conversion and high product yield. Subsequent studies revealed that complete conversion could be achieved using as little as 0.1 mol % Rh2(cap)4 if applied twice, each with 5.0 molar equiv of TBHP, after the initial addition (22 and 44 h). The role of dirhodium caprolactamate in these oxidation reactions is suggested from the spectral observations revealed in FIG. 2. The conversion of Rh2(cap)4 to its oxidized Rh(cap)4RhOH form by TBHP has been reported by Choi, H. et al., (2007) “Optimal TBHP Allylic Oxidation of Δ5-Steroids Catalyzed by Dirhodium Caprolactamate,” Org. Lett. 9:5349-5352). One aspect of the present invention relates to the recognition that Rh(cap)4RhOH is converted back to Rh2(cap)4 via TBHP. The observation of Rh2(cap)4 in FIG. 2, combined with confirmation of its initial formation and presence throughout the course of oxidation through HPLC analysis, confirms the catalytic role for Rh2(cap)4 that is described in Scheme 2. Thus, the Example demonstrates that dirhodium caprolactamate is effective and efficient for the production of the tert-butylperoxy radical. Optimized conditions were selected for oxidation of α,β-unsaturated substrates (0.54 M in DCE) that included initial addition of 0.5 mol % Rh2(cap)4 and 4.0 or 5.0 equiv T-HYDRO followed by the same portion of catalyst and oxidant after 16 hours. Reactions were performed at 40° C. and terminated 40 hours after the initial catalyst/oxidant addition. Percent conversion at 16 hours was only half that at 40 hours, and using acetonitrile or nitromethane as solvent resulted in lower conversions than that achieved in DCE. Selected α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds were oxidized according to this methodology, and the results are reported in Table 3. Noteworthy are the relatively high yields of oxidized product obtained with acyclic compounds. For example, trans-4-oxo-2-nonenoic acid (3), reported to have antibiotic activity (Pfefferle, C. et al. (1996) “(E)-4-Oxonon-2-Enoic Acid, An Antibiotically Active Fatty Acid Produced By Streptomyces olivaceus Tü 4018,” J. Antibiotics 49:826-828), is efficiently prepared in one transformation (entry 3), improving upon the previously described multistep syntheses (Ballini, R. et al. (1998) “Synthesis of (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid, a Natural Antibiotic Produced by Streptomyces olivaceus,” J. Nat. Prod. 61:673-674; Shet, J. et al. (2004) “Domino Primary Alcohol Oxidation-Wittig Reaction: Total Synthesis of ABT-418 and (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid,” Synthesis 11:1859-1863; Obrect, D. et al. (1989) “A New Method for the Preparation of (E)-3-Acylprop-2-enoic Acids,” Helv. Chim. Acta 72:117-122). Oxidation of methyl crotonate under the same conditions yielded monomethyl fumaric acid (entry 8) in modest isolated yield.Reactions were performed with 1.36 mmol of substrate in 2.5 mL of DCE to which was added 4.0 or 5.0 equiv of TBHP (70% in water) and 0.50 mol % Rh2(cap)4 and the solution was heated at 40° C. After 16 hours an additional 4.0 or 5.0 equiv of TBHP (70% in water) and 0.50 mol % Rh2(cap)4 was added, and reaction was continued for an additional 24 hours. Isolated yield after column chromatography; carboxylic acids were purified by recrystallization from ethyl acetate and the mass yield after recrystallation is given.General Procedure for the Oxidation of α,β-Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds. A 10 mL vial equipped with a stirbar was charged with substrate (1.36 mmol) and Rh2(cap)4 (5 mg, 0.007 mmol). Solvent (2.5 mL) was added followed by the addition of TBHP (0.75 mL, 5.5 mmol, 4 equiv). The vial was loosely capped and stirred for 16 hrs, then the second portion of Rh2(cap)4 (5 mg, 0.007 mmol) and TBHP (0.75 mL, 5.5 mmol, 4 equiv) was added. After an additional 24 hrs, the solution was concentrated and purified by column chromatography to obtain analytically pure compounds whose spectral characteristics were identical to those previously reported: trans-3-nonen-2,5-dione (1) (Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2003) “A Mild, Catalytic, and Highly Selective Method for the Oxidation of α,β-Enones to 1,4-Enediones, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:3232-3233) ethyl (E)-4-oxo-2-decenoate (2) (Manfredini, S. et al. (1988) “A Convenient Synthesis Of λ-Oxo-Acrylates,” Tetrahedron Lett. 29:3997-4000), (E)-4-oxo-2-pentenamide (5) (Scheffold, R. et al. (1967) “Synthese Von Azaprotoanemoninen,” Helv. Chim. Acta. 50:798-808), 4-androsten-17-3,6-dione (28) (Jasiczak, J. (1988) “Oxidations Of Enone Systems In Steroids By Oxidizers With Reversible Redox Potential,” J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 10, 2687-2692), 17β-acetoxyandrost-4-en-3,6-dione (29) (Marwah, P. et al. (2004) “An Economical And Green Approach For The Oxidation Of Olefins To Enones,” Green Chem. 570-577), 4-androstene-3,6,17-trione (30) (Kiran, I. J. (2004) “An Alternative Preparation Of Steroidal Δ4-3,6-Diones,” Chem. Res. 3:208-209), 4-cholesten-3,6-dione (31) (Hunter, C. A. et al. (2006) “An Efficient One-Pot Synthesis Generating 4-Ene-3,6-Dione Functionalised Steroids From Steroidal 5-En-3β-ols UsingA Modified Jones Oxidation Methodology,” Steroids 71:30-33) and acids were purified by recrystallization in ethyl acetate and matched with those in the literature: (E)-4-oxo-2-nonenoic acid (3) (Ballini, R. et al. (1998) “Synthesis of (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid, a Natural Antibiotic Produced by Streptomyces olivaceus,” J. Nat. Prod. 61:673-674), (E)-4-oxo-2-pentenoic acid (4) (Lüüond, R. M. et al. (1992) “Assessment Of The Active-Site Requirements Of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Dehydratase: Evaluation Of Substrate And Product Analogs As Competitive Inhibitors,” J. Org. Chem. 57:5005-5013), 2-cyclohexenone-1-carboxylic acid (7) (Webster, F. X. et al. (1987) “Control Of The Birch Reduction Of m-Anisic Acid To Produce Specific 3-Oxocyclohexenecarboxylic Acids,” Synthesis 10:922-923) and fumaric acid monomethyl ester (8) (Davis, R. A. (2005) “Isolation and Structure Elucidation of the New Fungal Metabolite (-)-Xylariamide A,” J. Nat. Prod. 68:769-772).
With pyridine; tert.-butylhydroperoxide 2 Example 2 Optimization of Aqueous Allylic Oxidation Conditions of Non-Steroidal CompoundsIn order to determine aqueous allylic oxidation reaction conditions for non-steroidal compounds, trans-3-nonene-2-one, whose fire bee toxin (Russell, G. A. (1957) “Deuterium-isotope Effects in the Autoxidation of Aralkyl Hydrocarbons. Mechanism of the Interaction of Peroxy Radicals,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79:3871-3877; Caudle, M. T. et al. (1996) “Mechanism for the Homolytic Cleavage of Alkyl Hydroperoxides by the Manganese(III) Dimer MnIII2(2-OHsalpn)2,” Inorg. Chem. 35:3577-3584) product trans-3-nonene-2,5-dione (1) has been previously prepared by anhydrous allylic oxidation (Catino, A. J. et al. (2004) “Dirhodium(II) Caprolactamate: An Exceptional Catalyst for Allylic Oxidation,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:13622-13623) was selected for optimization: Using T-HYDRO as the oxidant and Rh2(cap)4 as the catalyst at 40° C., various solvents were examined for suitability. 1,2-Dichloroethane (DCE), nitromethane, and water all led to comparable conversions to product (1) after 16 hours when 8 equivalents of TBHP were employed. In contrast to previous reports of catalytic TBHP oxidations under anhydrous conditions (Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2002) “Diverse Pathways for the Palladium(II)-Mediated Oxidation of Olefins by tert-Butylhydroperoxide,” Org. Lett. 4:2727-2730; Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2005) “Pd(OH)2/C-Mediated Selective Oxidation of Silyl Enol Ethers by tert-Butylhydroperoxide, a Useful Method for the Conversion of Ketones to α,β-Enones or β-Silyloxy-α,β-enones,” Org. Lett. 7:1415-1417; Blanksby, S. J. et al. (2003) “Bond Dissociation Energies Of Organic Molecules,” Acc. Chem. Res. 36:255-263) the addition of weak bases such as sodium bicarbonate, pyridine, or triethylamine lowered percent conversions. Two factors limited the efficiency of this allylic oxidation: (1) the slow rate of oxidation of the substrate relative to radical chain decomposition of TBHP (kP/kD, Scheme 1) (Timmons, D. et al. In METAL BONDS BETWEEN METAL ATOMS, 3rd Ed.; Cotton, F. A. et al. Eds.; Springer Science and Business Media: New York; (2005) Chapter 13) and (2) the decrease in the concentration of the catalytically active dirhodium species (FIG. 2). For the former, increasing the number of molar equivalents of TBHP increased percent conversion, and increasing the reaction temperature from room temperature to 40° C. increased the rate of oxidation. For the latter, adding Rh2(cap)4 in two portions, 0.5 mol % to initiate the reaction and the second 0.5 mol % portion after 16 h, ensured complete conversion and high product yield. Subsequent studies revealed that complete conversion could be achieved using as little as 0.1 mol % Rh2(cap)4 if applied twice, each with 5.0 molar equiv of TBHP, after the initial addition (22 and 44 h). The role of dirhodium caprolactamate in these oxidation reactions is suggested from the spectral observations revealed in FIG. 2. The conversion of Rh2(cap)4 to its oxidized Rh(cap)4RhOH form by TBHP has been reported by Choi, H. et al., (2007) “Optimal TBHP Allylic Oxidation of Δ5-Steroids Catalyzed by Dirhodium Caprolactamate,” Org. Lett. 9:5349-5352). One aspect of the present invention relates to the recognition that Rh(cap)4RhOH is converted back to Rh2(cap)4 via TBHP. The observation of Rh2(cap)4 in FIG. 2, combined with confirmation of its initial formation and presence throughout the course of oxidation through HPLC analysis, confirms the catalytic role for Rh2(cap)4 that is described in Scheme 2. Thus, the Example demonstrates that dirhodium caprolactamate is effective and efficient for the production of the tert-butylperoxy radical. Optimized conditions were selected for oxidation of α,β-unsaturated substrates (0.54 M in DCE) that included initial addition of 0.5 mol % Rh2(cap)4 and 4.0 or 5.0 equiv T-HYDRO followed by the same portion of catalyst and oxidant after 16 hours. Reactions were performed at 40° C. and terminated 40 hours after the initial catalyst/oxidant addition. Percent conversion at 16 hours was only half that at 40 hours, and using acetonitrile or nitromethane as solvent resulted in lower conversions than that achieved in DCE. Selected α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds were oxidized according to this methodology, and the results are reported in Table 3. Noteworthy are the relatively high yields of oxidized product obtained with acyclic compounds. For example, trans-4-oxo-2-nonenoic acid (3), reported to have antibiotic activity (Pfefferle, C. et al. (1996) “(E)-4-Oxonon-2-Enoic Acid, An Antibiotically Active Fatty Acid Produced By Streptomyces olivaceus Tü 4018,” J. Antibiotics 49:826-828), is efficiently prepared in one transformation (entry 3), improving upon the previously described multistep syntheses (Ballini, R. et al. (1998) “Synthesis of (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid, a Natural Antibiotic Produced by Streptomyces olivaceus,” J. Nat. Prod. 61:673-674; Shet, J. et al. (2004) “Domino Primary Alcohol Oxidation-Wittig Reaction: Total Synthesis of ABT-418 and (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid,” Synthesis 11:1859-1863; Obrect, D. et al. (1989) “A New Method for the Preparation of (E)-3-Acylprop-2-enoic Acids,” Helv. Chim. Acta 72:117-122). Oxidation of methyl crotonate under the same conditions yielded monomethyl fumaric acid (entry 8) in modest isolated yield.Reactions were performed with 1.36 mmol of substrate in 2.5 mL of DCE to which was added 4.0 or 5.0 equiv of TBHP (70% in water) and 0.50 mol % Rh2(cap)4 and the solution was heated at 40° C. After 16 hours an additional 4.0 or 5.0 equiv of TBHP (70% in water) and 0.50 mol % Rh2(cap)4 was added, and reaction was continued for an additional 24 hours. Isolated yield after column chromatography; carboxylic acids were purified by recrystallization from ethyl acetate and the mass yield after recrystallation is given.General Procedure for the Oxidation of α,β-Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds. A 10 mL vial equipped with a stirbar was charged with substrate (1.36 mmol) and Rh2(cap)4 (5 mg, 0.007 mmol). Solvent (2.5 mL) was added followed by the addition of TBHP (0.75 mL, 5.5 mmol, 4 equiv). The vial was loosely capped and stirred for 16 hrs, then the second portion of Rh2(cap)4 (5 mg, 0.007 mmol) and TBHP (0.75 mL, 5.5 mmol, 4 equiv) was added. After an additional 24 hrs, the solution was concentrated and purified by column chromatography to obtain analytically pure compounds whose spectral characteristics were identical to those previously reported: trans-3-nonen-2,5-dione (1) (Yu, J.-Q. et al. (2003) “A Mild, Catalytic, and Highly Selective Method for the Oxidation of α,β-Enones to 1,4-Enediones, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:3232-3233) ethyl (E)-4-oxo-2-decenoate (2) (Manfredini, S. et al. (1988) “A Convenient Synthesis Of λ-Oxo-Acrylates,” Tetrahedron Lett. 29:3997-4000), (E)-4-oxo-2-pentenamide (5) (Scheffold, R. et al. (1967) “Synthese Von Azaprotoanemoninen,” Helv. Chim. Acta. 50:798-808), 4-androsten-17-3,6-dione (28) (Jasiczak, J. (1988) “Oxidations Of Enone Systems In Steroids By Oxidizers With Reversible Redox Potential,” J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 10, 2687-2692), 17β-acetoxyandrost-4-en-3,6-dione (29) (Marwah, P. et al. (2004) “An Economical And Green Approach For The Oxidation Of Olefins To Enones,” Green Chem. 570-577), 4-androstene-3,6,17-trione (30) (Kiran, I. J. (2004) “An Alternative Preparation Of Steroidal Δ4-3,6-Diones,” Chem. Res. 3:208-209), 4-cholesten-3,6-dione (31) (Hunter, C. A. et al. (2006) “An Efficient One-Pot Synthesis Generating 4-Ene-3,6-Dione Functionalised Steroids From Steroidal 5-En-3β-ols UsingA Modified Jones Oxidation Methodology,” Steroids 71:30-33) and acids were purified by recrystallization in ethyl acetate and matched with those in the literature: (E)-4-oxo-2-nonenoic acid (3) (Ballini, R. et al. (1998) “Synthesis of (E)-4-Oxonon-2-enoic Acid, a Natural Antibiotic Produced by Streptomyces olivaceus,” J. Nat. Prod. 61:673-674), (E)-4-oxo-2-pentenoic acid (4) (Lüüond, R. M. et al. (1992) “Assessment Of The Active-Site Requirements Of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Dehydratase: Evaluation Of Substrate And Product Analogs As Competitive Inhibitors,” J. Org. Chem. 57:5005-5013), 2-cyclohexenone-1-carboxylic acid (7) (Webster, F. X. et al. (1987) “Control Of The Birch Reduction Of m-Anisic Acid To Produce Specific 3-Oxocyclohexenecarboxylic Acids,” Synthesis 10:922-923) and fumaric acid monomethyl ester (8) (Davis, R. A. (2005) “Isolation and Structure Elucidation of the New Fungal Metabolite (-)-Xylariamide A,” J. Nat. Prod. 68:769-772).

  • 20
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 18295-66-4 ]
  • 3-hydroxy-3-methyldec-4-enoic acid ethyl ester [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
85% Stage #1: (E)-non-3-en-2-one; 1-ethoxy-1-(trimethylsiloxy)ethene With triethoxyfluorosilane; (PPh<SUB>3</SUB>)<SUB>3</SUB>CuF In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 1h; Stage #2: With triethylamine tris(hydrogen fluoride) In tetrahydrofuran
  • 21
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 98-80-6 ]
  • [ 155816-67-4 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
100% With potassium hydroxide In 1,4-dioxane; water at 23℃; for 15h;
91% With sodium carbonate In toluene at 80℃; for 24h;
87% With potassium hydroxide In 1,4-dioxane at 70℃; for 1h;
76% With 1,5-cis,cis-cyclooctadiene In 1,4-dioxane at 150℃; for 8h;
With [Pd(1,2-bis(diphenylphosphanyl)ethane)(PhCN)2](SbF6)2 In tetrahydrofuran; water at 20℃; for 23h;

  • 22
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 98-80-6 ]
  • (R)-4-Phenyl-nonan-2-one [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
99% With triethylamine In 1,4-dioxane; water at 25℃; for 2h; 5.9 [Table 2]1,4-Addition of arylboronic acid to alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds Carbonyl compound employed ArB(OH)2 (X=) [RhCl(coe)2]2/KOH[a] [Rh(nbd)2]BF4/NEt3[b] yield/%[c] yield/%[c] %ee[d] 1 2-cyclopentenone 3-Cl 53 87 99 96 2 4-MeO - - 99 96 3 2-cyclohexenone H 84 98 99 99.6 [e] 4 3-MeO 77 99 90 99.5 5 5 4-MeO 88 98 99 99.8 6 3-Cl 95 98 86 99.8 7 2-cycloheptenone H 48 90 90 98 8 (E)-C5H11CH=CHCOCH3 H 84 67 87 (42[f]) 74 (84[f]) 9 H - - 99 5[g] 10 H - - trace -[h] 11 3-MeO 99 67 98 (65[f])) 80 (83[f] 12 3-MeO (80 C) 98 71 - - 13 3-F 89 75 97 81 14 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCOCH3 H 72 88 80 92 [i] 15 3-MeO 80 86 78 94[j] 16 3-F 66 81 71 90[j] 17 (E)-cyclo-C6H11CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 81 86 [k] 18 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCO-cyclo-C6H11 3-MeO - - 62 81 19 (E)-C5H11CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 91 85 20 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 98 85 [i] 21 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 99 78 22 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 98 66[i] 23 (E)-naphthyl-CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 93 89[l] 24 (Z)-C3H7CH=CHCOC2H5 3-MeO - - 64 1 25 (Z)-C3H7CH=CHCOCH(C2H5)C2H5 3-MeO - - 69 10[i] 26 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCO2Et 3-MeO - - 48 65[m] 27 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2Me 3-MeO - - 57 75[m] 28 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2Et 3-MeO 94 56 - - 29 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2iPr 3-MeO 90 57 33 70[m] 30 (E)-CH3CH=CHCHO 3-MeO 47 41 60 68[i] 31 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCHO 3-MeO - - 16 92[i] 32 5H-furan-2-one H - - 68 77[i] 33 5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one H - - 72 89[i] 34 5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one 3-MeO - - 61 91[n] 35 (E)-CH3CH=CHCONCH2C6H5 3-MeO 43 63[o] - - [a] The reaction was conducted in dioxane (2.6 mL) and H2O (0.43 mL) in the presence of enone (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), [RhCl(coe)2]2 (3 mol%, based on Rh), Compound 8 (3.3 mol%), and KOH (1 mmol) for 16 hours at 50 C. [b] The reaction was conducted in dioxane (2.6 mL) and H2O (0.43 mL) in the presence of enone (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), [Rh(nbd)2]BF4 (3 mol%, based on Rh), Compound 8 (3.3 mol%), and NEt3 (1 mmol) for 2 hours at 25 C. [c] Isolation yield, based on enone [d] HPLC analysis employed Dicel Chiralcel. [e] 0.5 h at 25 C. [f] 48 h at 5 C. [g] Compound 9 employed. [h] Compound 10 employed [i] 6 h at 25 C. [j] 16 h at 25 C. [k] 2.5 equivalent of arylboronic acid employed; 10 h at 25 C. [l] 3 h at 25 C. [m] 24 h at 25 C. [n] 12 h at 25 C. [o] Using K2HPO4 as base.
86% With bis(ethylene)rhodium acetylacetonate; (S)-P-Phos In 1,4-dioxane; water at 100℃; for 5h;
84% With potassium hydroxide In 1,4-dioxane; water at 50℃; for 16h; 5.8 [Table 2]1,4-Addition of arylboronic acid to alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds Carbonyl compound employed ArB(OH)2 (X=) [RhCl(coe)2]2/KOH[a] [Rh(nbd)2]BF4/NEt3[b] yield/%[c] yield/%[c] %ee[d] 1 2-cyclopentenone 3-Cl 53 87 99 96 2 4-MeO - - 99 96 3 2-cyclohexenone H 84 98 99 99.6 [e] 4 3-MeO 77 99 90 99.5 5 5 4-MeO 88 98 99 99.8 6 3-Cl 95 98 86 99.8 7 2-cycloheptenone H 48 90 90 98 8 (E)-C5H11CH=CHCOCH3 H 84 67 87 (42[f]) 74 (84[f]) 9 H - - 99 5[g] 10 H - - trace -[h] 11 3-MeO 99 67 98 (65[f])) 80 (83[f] 12 3-MeO (80 C) 98 71 - - 13 3-F 89 75 97 81 14 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCOCH3 H 72 88 80 92 [i] 15 3-MeO 80 86 78 94[j] 16 3-F 66 81 71 90[j] 17 (E)-cyclo-C6H11CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 81 86 [k] 18 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCO-cyclo-C6H11 3-MeO - - 62 81 19 (E)-C5H11CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 91 85 20 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 98 85 [i] 21 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 99 78 22 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 98 66[i] 23 (E)-naphthyl-CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 93 89[l] 24 (Z)-C3H7CH=CHCOC2H5 3-MeO - - 64 1 25 (Z)-C3H7CH=CHCOCH(C2H5)C2H5 3-MeO - - 69 10[i] 26 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCO2Et 3-MeO - - 48 65[m] 27 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2Me 3-MeO - - 57 75[m] 28 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2Et 3-MeO 94 56 - - 29 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2iPr 3-MeO 90 57 33 70[m] 30 (E)-CH3CH=CHCHO 3-MeO 47 41 60 68[i] 31 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCHO 3-MeO - - 16 92[i] 32 5H-furan-2-one H - - 68 77[i] 33 5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one H - - 72 89[i] 34 5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one 3-MeO - - 61 91[n] 35 (E)-CH3CH=CHCONCH2C6H5 3-MeO 43 63[o] - - [a] The reaction was conducted in dioxane (2.6 mL) and H2O (0.43 mL) in the presence of enone (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), [RhCl(coe)2]2 (3 mol%, based on Rh), Compound 8 (3.3 mol%), and KOH (1 mmol) for 16 hours at 50 C. [b] The reaction was conducted in dioxane (2.6 mL) and H2O (0.43 mL) in the presence of enone (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), [Rh(nbd)2]BF4 (3 mol%, based on Rh), Compound 8 (3.3 mol%), and NEt3 (1 mmol) for 2 hours at 25 C. [c] Isolation yield, based on enone [d] HPLC analysis employed Dicel Chiralcel. [e] 0.5 h at 25 C. [f] 48 h at 5 C. [g] Compound 9 employed. [h] Compound 10 employed [i] 6 h at 25 C. [j] 16 h at 25 C. [k] 2.5 equivalent of arylboronic acid employed; 10 h at 25 C. [l] 3 h at 25 C. [m] 24 h at 25 C. [n] 12 h at 25 C. [o] Using K2HPO4 as base.
42% With triethylamine In 1,4-dioxane; water at 5 - 25℃; for 2 - 48h; 5.8 [Table 2]1,4-Addition of arylboronic acid to alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds Carbonyl compound employed ArB(OH)2 (X=) [RhCl(coe)2]2/KOH[a] [Rh(nbd)2]BF4/NEt3[b] yield/%[c] yield/%[c] %ee[d] 1 2-cyclopentenone 3-Cl 53 87 99 96 2 4-MeO - - 99 96 3 2-cyclohexenone H 84 98 99 99.6 [e] 4 3-MeO 77 99 90 99.5 5 5 4-MeO 88 98 99 99.8 6 3-Cl 95 98 86 99.8 7 2-cycloheptenone H 48 90 90 98 8 (E)-C5H11CH=CHCOCH3 H 84 67 87 (42[f]) 74 (84[f]) 9 H - - 99 5[g] 10 H - - trace -[h] 11 3-MeO 99 67 98 (65[f])) 80 (83[f] 12 3-MeO (80 C) 98 71 - - 13 3-F 89 75 97 81 14 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCOCH3 H 72 88 80 92 [i] 15 3-MeO 80 86 78 94[j] 16 3-F 66 81 71 90[j] 17 (E)-cyclo-C6H11CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 81 86 [k] 18 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCO-cyclo-C6H11 3-MeO - - 62 81 19 (E)-C5H11CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 91 85 20 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 98 85 [i] 21 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 99 78 22 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 98 66[i] 23 (E)-naphthyl-CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 93 89[l] 24 (Z)-C3H7CH=CHCOC2H5 3-MeO - - 64 1 25 (Z)-C3H7CH=CHCOCH(C2H5)C2H5 3-MeO - - 69 10[i] 26 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCO2Et 3-MeO - - 48 65[m] 27 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2Me 3-MeO - - 57 75[m] 28 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2Et 3-MeO 94 56 - - 29 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2iPr 3-MeO 90 57 33 70[m] 30 (E)-CH3CH=CHCHO 3-MeO 47 41 60 68[i] 31 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCHO 3-MeO - - 16 92[i] 32 5H-furan-2-one H - - 68 77[i] 33 5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one H - - 72 89[i] 34 5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one 3-MeO - - 61 91[n] 35 (E)-CH3CH=CHCONCH2C6H5 3-MeO 43 63[o] - - [a] The reaction was conducted in dioxane (2.6 mL) and H2O (0.43 mL) in the presence of enone (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), [RhCl(coe)2]2 (3 mol%, based on Rh), Compound 8 (3.3 mol%), and KOH (1 mmol) for 16 hours at 50 C. [b] The reaction was conducted in dioxane (2.6 mL) and H2O (0.43 mL) in the presence of enone (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), [Rh(nbd)2]BF4 (3 mol%, based on Rh), Compound 8 (3.3 mol%), and NEt3 (1 mmol) for 2 hours at 25 C. [c] Isolation yield, based on enone [d] HPLC analysis employed Dicel Chiralcel. [e] 0.5 h at 25 C. [f] 48 h at 5 C. [g] Compound 9 employed. [h] Compound 10 employed [i] 6 h at 25 C. [j] 16 h at 25 C. [k] 2.5 equivalent of arylboronic acid employed; 10 h at 25 C. [l] 3 h at 25 C. [m] 24 h at 25 C. [n] 12 h at 25 C. [o] Using K2HPO4 as base.
With triethylamine In 1,4-dioxane; water at 25℃; for 2h; 5.10 [Table 2]1,4-Addition of arylboronic acid to alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds Carbonyl compound employed ArB(OH)2 (X=) [RhCl(coe)2]2/KOH[a] [Rh(nbd)2]BF4/NEt3[b] yield/%[c] yield/%[c] %ee[d] 1 2-cyclopentenone 3-Cl 53 87 99 96 2 4-MeO - - 99 96 3 2-cyclohexenone H 84 98 99 99.6 [e] 4 3-MeO 77 99 90 99.5 5 5 4-MeO 88 98 99 99.8 6 3-Cl 95 98 86 99.8 7 2-cycloheptenone H 48 90 90 98 8 (E)-C5H11CH=CHCOCH3 H 84 67 87 (42[f]) 74 (84[f]) 9 H - - 99 5[g] 10 H - - trace -[h] 11 3-MeO 99 67 98 (65[f])) 80 (83[f] 12 3-MeO (80 C) 98 71 - - 13 3-F 89 75 97 81 14 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCOCH3 H 72 88 80 92 [i] 15 3-MeO 80 86 78 94[j] 16 3-F 66 81 71 90[j] 17 (E)-cyclo-C6H11CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 81 86 [k] 18 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCO-cyclo-C6H11 3-MeO - - 62 81 19 (E)-C5H11CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 91 85 20 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 98 85 [i] 21 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 99 78 22 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 98 66[i] 23 (E)-naphthyl-CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 93 89[l] 24 (Z)-C3H7CH=CHCOC2H5 3-MeO - - 64 1 25 (Z)-C3H7CH=CHCOCH(C2H5)C2H5 3-MeO - - 69 10[i] 26 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCO2Et 3-MeO - - 48 65[m] 27 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2Me 3-MeO - - 57 75[m] 28 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2Et 3-MeO 94 56 - - 29 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2iPr 3-MeO 90 57 33 70[m] 30 (E)-CH3CH=CHCHO 3-MeO 47 41 60 68[i] 31 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCHO 3-MeO - - 16 92[i] 32 5H-furan-2-one H - - 68 77[i] 33 5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one H - - 72 89[i] 34 5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one 3-MeO - - 61 91[n] 35 (E)-CH3CH=CHCONCH2C6H5 3-MeO 43 63[o] - - [a] The reaction was conducted in dioxane (2.6 mL) and H2O (0.43 mL) in the presence of enone (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), [RhCl(coe)2]2 (3 mol%, based on Rh), Compound 8 (3.3 mol%), and KOH (1 mmol) for 16 hours at 50 C. [b] The reaction was conducted in dioxane (2.6 mL) and H2O (0.43 mL) in the presence of enone (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), [Rh(nbd)2]BF4 (3 mol%, based on Rh), Compound 8 (3.3 mol%), and NEt3 (1 mmol) for 2 hours at 25 C. [c] Isolation yield, based on enone [d] HPLC analysis employed Dicel Chiralcel. [e] 0.5 h at 25 C. [f] 48 h at 5 C. [g] Compound 9 employed. [h] Compound 10 employed [i] 6 h at 25 C. [j] 16 h at 25 C. [k] 2.5 equivalent of arylboronic acid employed; 10 h at 25 C. [l] 3 h at 25 C. [m] 24 h at 25 C. [n] 12 h at 25 C. [o] Using K2HPO4 as base.

  • 23
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 17873-01-7 ]
  • [ 182482-48-0 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
81% In 1,4-dioxane; water at 95℃; for 23h;
  • 24
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 35692-27-4 ]
  • [ 603984-42-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
77% In 1,4-dioxane; water at 75℃; for 23h;
  • 25
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • (2SR,3RS)-1-(3-pentyloxiran-2-yl)ethanone [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
74% With dihydrogen peroxide; sodium hydrogencarbonate In methanol; water at 20℃;
61% With sodium hydroxide; dihydrogen peroxide In methanol; water at 5 - 20℃; for 7.5h;
  • 26
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 128796-39-4 ]
  • (S)-4-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)nonan-2-one [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
93% With potassium hydroxide; (1R,4R)-2,5-dibenzylbicyclo[2.2.2]octa-2,5-diene In 1,4-dioxane; water at 30℃; for 1h;
  • 27
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 98-80-6 ]
  • [ 501919-45-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
99% With bis(norbornadiene)rhodium(l)tetrafluoroborate; (R,R)-3,3'-[methyliminobis(methylene)]bis(1,1'-binaphtylene-2,2'-diol); triethylamine In 1,2-dimethoxyethane; water at 25℃; for 16h; Inert atmosphere; enantioselective reaction;
94% With potassium hydroxide; (1R,4R)-2,5-dibenzylbicyclo[2.2.2]octa-2,5-diene In 1,4-dioxane; water at 30℃; for 1h;
91% With chlorobis(ethylene)rhodium(I) dimer; 4-((1R,4S)-bicyclo[2.2.2]octa-2,5-dien-2-yl)-2,6-dimethylheptan-4-ol; potassium hydroxide In 1,4-dioxane; water at 50℃; for 1h; Inert atmosphere; optical yield given as %ee; enantioselective reaction;
85% With potassium hydroxide In 1,4-dioxane at 30℃; for 1h;
66% With rhodium-(1R,4R,7R)-7-isopropyl-5-methylbicyclo[2.2.2]octa-2,5-diene-2-carboxylic acid complex immobilized on amphiphilic polystyrene-poly(ethylene glycol) resin In water at 50℃; for 3h; Inert atmosphere; enantioselective reaction;

  • 28
  • [ 872885-07-9 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 58879-43-9 ]
  • [ 211996-13-3 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
1: 84% 2: 4 % Spectr. 3: 3 % Spectr. With isopropyl alcohol In dichloromethane at 20℃; for 2h;
1: 7 % Spectr. 2: 50 % Spectr. 3: 42 % Spectr. With water In dichloromethane at 20℃; for 2h;
  • 29
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 557-20-0 ]
  • (S)-4-ethylnonan-2-one [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
93% With (1R,2S)-2-(dibenzylamino)-1-(2-(diphenylphosphino)phenyl)propan-1-ol; copper(II) bis(trifluoromethanesulfonate) In hexane; dichloromethane at 0℃; for 5h;
With sodium tert-leucine 2-diphenylphosphanylphenylazomethinylate In ethyl acetate at 30℃; for 4h;
  • 30
  • [ 4406-77-3 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 155816-67-4 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
53% With water; diphenyl acetylene In 1,4-dioxane at 60℃; for 24h;
  • 31
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • phenylmagnesium bromide [ No CAS ]
  • [ 155816-67-4 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
85% Stage #1: phenylmagnesium bromide With indium(III) chloride In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 0.5h; Stage #2: With water In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 0.166667h; Stage #3: (E)-non-3-en-2-one In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 6h;
  • 32
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 10365-98-7 ]
  • C16H24O2 [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
98% With potassium hydroxide In 1,4-dioxane; water at 50 - 80℃; for 16h; 5.11; 5.12 [Table 2]1,4-Addition of arylboronic acid to alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds Carbonyl compound employed ArB(OH)2 (X=) [RhCl(coe)2]2/KOH[a] [Rh(nbd)2]BF4/NEt3[b] yield/%[c] yield/%[c] %ee[d] 1 2-cyclopentenone 3-Cl 53 87 99 96 2 4-MeO - - 99 96 3 2-cyclohexenone H 84 98 99 99.6 [e] 4 3-MeO 77 99 90 99.5 5 5 4-MeO 88 98 99 99.8 6 3-Cl 95 98 86 99.8 7 2-cycloheptenone H 48 90 90 98 8 (E)-C5H11CH=CHCOCH3 H 84 67 87 (42[f]) 74 (84[f]) 9 H - - 99 5[g] 10 H - - trace -[h] 11 3-MeO 99 67 98 (65[f])) 80 (83[f] 12 3-MeO (80 C) 98 71 - - 13 3-F 89 75 97 81 14 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCOCH3 H 72 88 80 92 [i] 15 3-MeO 80 86 78 94[j] 16 3-F 66 81 71 90[j] 17 (E)-cyclo-C6H11CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 81 86 [k] 18 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCO-cyclo-C6H11 3-MeO - - 62 81 19 (E)-C5H11CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 91 85 20 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 98 85 [i] 21 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 99 78 22 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 98 66[i] 23 (E)-naphthyl-CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 93 89[l] 24 (Z)-C3H7CH=CHCOC2H5 3-MeO - - 64 1 25 (Z)-C3H7CH=CHCOCH(C2H5)C2H5 3-MeO - - 69 10[i] 26 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCO2Et 3-MeO - - 48 65[m] 27 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2Me 3-MeO - - 57 75[m] 28 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2Et 3-MeO 94 56 - - 29 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2iPr 3-MeO 90 57 33 70[m] 30 (E)-CH3CH=CHCHO 3-MeO 47 41 60 68[i] 31 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCHO 3-MeO - - 16 92[i] 32 5H-furan-2-one H - - 68 77[i] 33 5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one H - - 72 89[i] 34 5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one 3-MeO - - 61 91[n] 35 (E)-CH3CH=CHCONCH2C6H5 3-MeO 43 63[o] - - [a] The reaction was conducted in dioxane (2.6 mL) and H2O (0.43 mL) in the presence of enone (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), [RhCl(coe)2]2 (3 mol%, based on Rh), Compound 8 (3.3 mol%), and KOH (1 mmol) for 16 hours at 50 C. [b] The reaction was conducted in dioxane (2.6 mL) and H2O (0.43 mL) in the presence of enone (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), [Rh(nbd)2]BF4 (3 mol%, based on Rh), Compound 8 (3.3 mol%), and NEt3 (1 mmol) for 2 hours at 25 C. [c] Isolation yield, based on enone [d] HPLC analysis employed Dicel Chiralcel. [e] 0.5 h at 25 C. [f] 48 h at 5 C. [g] Compound 9 employed. [h] Compound 10 employed [i] 6 h at 25 C. [j] 16 h at 25 C. [k] 2.5 equivalent of arylboronic acid employed; 10 h at 25 C. [l] 3 h at 25 C. [m] 24 h at 25 C. [n] 12 h at 25 C. [o] Using K2HPO4 as base.
65% With triethylamine In 1,4-dioxane; water at 5 - 25℃; for 2 - 48h; 5.11 [Table 2]1,4-Addition of arylboronic acid to alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds Carbonyl compound employed ArB(OH)2 (X=) [RhCl(coe)2]2/KOH[a] [Rh(nbd)2]BF4/NEt3[b] yield/%[c] yield/%[c] %ee[d] 1 2-cyclopentenone 3-Cl 53 87 99 96 2 4-MeO - - 99 96 3 2-cyclohexenone H 84 98 99 99.6 [e] 4 3-MeO 77 99 90 99.5 5 5 4-MeO 88 98 99 99.8 6 3-Cl 95 98 86 99.8 7 2-cycloheptenone H 48 90 90 98 8 (E)-C5H11CH=CHCOCH3 H 84 67 87 (42[f]) 74 (84[f]) 9 H - - 99 5[g] 10 H - - trace -[h] 11 3-MeO 99 67 98 (65[f])) 80 (83[f] 12 3-MeO (80 C) 98 71 - - 13 3-F 89 75 97 81 14 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCOCH3 H 72 88 80 92 [i] 15 3-MeO 80 86 78 94[j] 16 3-F 66 81 71 90[j] 17 (E)-cyclo-C6H11CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 81 86 [k] 18 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCO-cyclo-C6H11 3-MeO - - 62 81 19 (E)-C5H11CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 91 85 20 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 98 85 [i] 21 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 99 78 22 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 98 66[i] 23 (E)-naphthyl-CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 93 89[l] 24 (Z)-C3H7CH=CHCOC2H5 3-MeO - - 64 1 25 (Z)-C3H7CH=CHCOCH(C2H5)C2H5 3-MeO - - 69 10[i] 26 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCO2Et 3-MeO - - 48 65[m] 27 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2Me 3-MeO - - 57 75[m] 28 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2Et 3-MeO 94 56 - - 29 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2iPr 3-MeO 90 57 33 70[m] 30 (E)-CH3CH=CHCHO 3-MeO 47 41 60 68[i] 31 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCHO 3-MeO - - 16 92[i] 32 5H-furan-2-one H - - 68 77[i] 33 5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one H - - 72 89[i] 34 5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one 3-MeO - - 61 91[n] 35 (E)-CH3CH=CHCONCH2C6H5 3-MeO 43 63[o] - - [a] The reaction was conducted in dioxane (2.6 mL) and H2O (0.43 mL) in the presence of enone (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), [RhCl(coe)2]2 (3 mol%, based on Rh), Compound 8 (3.3 mol%), and KOH (1 mmol) for 16 hours at 50 C. [b] The reaction was conducted in dioxane (2.6 mL) and H2O (0.43 mL) in the presence of enone (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), [Rh(nbd)2]BF4 (3 mol%, based on Rh), Compound 8 (3.3 mol%), and NEt3 (1 mmol) for 2 hours at 25 C. [c] Isolation yield, based on enone [d] HPLC analysis employed Dicel Chiralcel. [e] 0.5 h at 25 C. [f] 48 h at 5 C. [g] Compound 9 employed. [h] Compound 10 employed [i] 6 h at 25 C. [j] 16 h at 25 C. [k] 2.5 equivalent of arylboronic acid employed; 10 h at 25 C. [l] 3 h at 25 C. [m] 24 h at 25 C. [n] 12 h at 25 C. [o] Using K2HPO4 as base.
  • 33
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 768-35-4 ]
  • C15H21FO [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
97% With triethylamine In 1,4-dioxane; water at 25℃; for 2h; 5.13 [Table 2]1,4-Addition of arylboronic acid to alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds Carbonyl compound employed ArB(OH)2 (X=) [RhCl(coe)2]2/KOH[a] [Rh(nbd)2]BF4/NEt3[b] yield/%[c] yield/%[c] %ee[d] 1 2-cyclopentenone 3-Cl 53 87 99 96 2 4-MeO - - 99 96 3 2-cyclohexenone H 84 98 99 99.6 [e] 4 3-MeO 77 99 90 99.5 5 5 4-MeO 88 98 99 99.8 6 3-Cl 95 98 86 99.8 7 2-cycloheptenone H 48 90 90 98 8 (E)-C5H11CH=CHCOCH3 H 84 67 87 (42[f]) 74 (84[f]) 9 H - - 99 5[g] 10 H - - trace -[h] 11 3-MeO 99 67 98 (65[f])) 80 (83[f] 12 3-MeO (80 C) 98 71 - - 13 3-F 89 75 97 81 14 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCOCH3 H 72 88 80 92 [i] 15 3-MeO 80 86 78 94[j] 16 3-F 66 81 71 90[j] 17 (E)-cyclo-C6H11CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 81 86 [k] 18 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCO-cyclo-C6H11 3-MeO - - 62 81 19 (E)-C5H11CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 91 85 20 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 98 85 [i] 21 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 99 78 22 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 98 66[i] 23 (E)-naphthyl-CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 93 89[l] 24 (Z)-C3H7CH=CHCOC2H5 3-MeO - - 64 1 25 (Z)-C3H7CH=CHCOCH(C2H5)C2H5 3-MeO - - 69 10[i] 26 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCO2Et 3-MeO - - 48 65[m] 27 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2Me 3-MeO - - 57 75[m] 28 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2Et 3-MeO 94 56 - - 29 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2iPr 3-MeO 90 57 33 70[m] 30 (E)-CH3CH=CHCHO 3-MeO 47 41 60 68[i] 31 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCHO 3-MeO - - 16 92[i] 32 5H-furan-2-one H - - 68 77[i] 33 5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one H - - 72 89[i] 34 5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one 3-MeO - - 61 91[n] 35 (E)-CH3CH=CHCONCH2C6H5 3-MeO 43 63[o] - - [a] The reaction was conducted in dioxane (2.6 mL) and H2O (0.43 mL) in the presence of enone (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), [RhCl(coe)2]2 (3 mol%, based on Rh), Compound 8 (3.3 mol%), and KOH (1 mmol) for 16 hours at 50 C. [b] The reaction was conducted in dioxane (2.6 mL) and H2O (0.43 mL) in the presence of enone (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), [Rh(nbd)2]BF4 (3 mol%, based on Rh), Compound 8 (3.3 mol%), and NEt3 (1 mmol) for 2 hours at 25 C. [c] Isolation yield, based on enone [d] HPLC analysis employed Dicel Chiralcel. [e] 0.5 h at 25 C. [f] 48 h at 5 C. [g] Compound 9 employed. [h] Compound 10 employed [i] 6 h at 25 C. [j] 16 h at 25 C. [k] 2.5 equivalent of arylboronic acid employed; 10 h at 25 C. [l] 3 h at 25 C. [m] 24 h at 25 C. [n] 12 h at 25 C. [o] Using K2HPO4 as base.
89% With potassium hydroxide In 1,4-dioxane; water at 50℃; for 16h; 5.13 [Table 2]1,4-Addition of arylboronic acid to alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds Carbonyl compound employed ArB(OH)2 (X=) [RhCl(coe)2]2/KOH[a] [Rh(nbd)2]BF4/NEt3[b] yield/%[c] yield/%[c] %ee[d] 1 2-cyclopentenone 3-Cl 53 87 99 96 2 4-MeO - - 99 96 3 2-cyclohexenone H 84 98 99 99.6 [e] 4 3-MeO 77 99 90 99.5 5 5 4-MeO 88 98 99 99.8 6 3-Cl 95 98 86 99.8 7 2-cycloheptenone H 48 90 90 98 8 (E)-C5H11CH=CHCOCH3 H 84 67 87 (42[f]) 74 (84[f]) 9 H - - 99 5[g] 10 H - - trace -[h] 11 3-MeO 99 67 98 (65[f])) 80 (83[f] 12 3-MeO (80 C) 98 71 - - 13 3-F 89 75 97 81 14 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCOCH3 H 72 88 80 92 [i] 15 3-MeO 80 86 78 94[j] 16 3-F 66 81 71 90[j] 17 (E)-cyclo-C6H11CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 81 86 [k] 18 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCO-cyclo-C6H11 3-MeO - - 62 81 19 (E)-C5H11CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 91 85 20 (E)-i-C3H7CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 98 85 [i] 21 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 99 78 22 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCOC6H5 3-MeO - - 98 66[i] 23 (E)-naphthyl-CH=CHCOCH3 3-MeO - - 93 89[l] 24 (Z)-C3H7CH=CHCOC2H5 3-MeO - - 64 1 25 (Z)-C3H7CH=CHCOCH(C2H5)C2H5 3-MeO - - 69 10[i] 26 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCO2Et 3-MeO - - 48 65[m] 27 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2Me 3-MeO - - 57 75[m] 28 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2Et 3-MeO 94 56 - - 29 (E)-CH3CH=CHCO2iPr 3-MeO 90 57 33 70[m] 30 (E)-CH3CH=CHCHO 3-MeO 47 41 60 68[i] 31 (E)-C6H5CH=CHCHO 3-MeO - - 16 92[i] 32 5H-furan-2-one H - - 68 77[i] 33 5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one H - - 72 89[i] 34 5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one 3-MeO - - 61 91[n] 35 (E)-CH3CH=CHCONCH2C6H5 3-MeO 43 63[o] - - [a] The reaction was conducted in dioxane (2.6 mL) and H2O (0.43 mL) in the presence of enone (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), [RhCl(coe)2]2 (3 mol%, based on Rh), Compound 8 (3.3 mol%), and KOH (1 mmol) for 16 hours at 50 C. [b] The reaction was conducted in dioxane (2.6 mL) and H2O (0.43 mL) in the presence of enone (1 mmol), arylboronic acid (1.5 mmol), [Rh(nbd)2]BF4 (3 mol%, based on Rh), Compound 8 (3.3 mol%), and NEt3 (1 mmol) for 2 hours at 25 C. [c] Isolation yield, based on enone [d] HPLC analysis employed Dicel Chiralcel. [e] 0.5 h at 25 C. [f] 48 h at 5 C. [g] Compound 9 employed. [h] Compound 10 employed [i] 6 h at 25 C. [j] 16 h at 25 C. [k] 2.5 equivalent of arylboronic acid employed; 10 h at 25 C. [l] 3 h at 25 C. [m] 24 h at 25 C. [n] 12 h at 25 C. [o] Using K2HPO4 as base.
  • 34
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • 3,4-dideuterio-2-nonanone [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
80% With 1,1,1,2,2,2-hexamethyldisilane; water-d2; triphenylphosphine In N,N-dimethyl acetamide at 60℃; for 24h;
  • 35
  • [ 36519-50-3 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 60536-21-2 ]
  • [ 155816-67-4 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
86% In toluene at 110℃; for 3h;
  • 36
  • [ 947700-70-1 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 850409-89-1 ]
  • [ 60536-21-2 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
99% In toluene at 110℃; for 3h;
  • 37
  • [ 947700-71-2 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 60536-21-2 ]
  • [ 182482-50-4 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
99% In toluene at 110℃; for 3h;
  • 38
  • [ 947700-72-3 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 60536-21-2 ]
  • [ 182482-48-0 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
94% In toluene at 110℃; for 3h;
  • 39
  • [ 947700-74-5 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 60536-21-2 ]
  • [ 603984-42-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
94% In toluene at 110℃; for 3h;
  • 40
  • [ 947700-75-6 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • C16H22O3 [ No CAS ]
  • [ 60536-21-2 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
98% In toluene at 110℃; for 3h;
  • 41
  • [ 947700-76-7 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • C19H24O [ No CAS ]
  • [ 60536-21-2 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
91% In toluene at 110℃; for 3h;
  • 42
  • [ 947700-77-8 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • C15H21ClO [ No CAS ]
  • [ 60536-21-2 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
91% In toluene at 110℃; for 10h;
  • 43
  • [ 947700-78-9 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 60536-21-2 ]
  • [ 603984-45-8 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
94% In toluene at 110℃; for 10h;
  • 44
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 596-38-3 ]
  • [ 90-47-1 ]
  • [ 155816-67-4 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
22 % Spectr. In toluene at 110℃; for 3h;
  • 45
  • [ 853955-69-8 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 501919-45-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
94% With potassium hydroxide; (1R,4R)-2,5-dibenzylbicyclo[2.2.2]octa-2,5-diene In tetrahydrofuran at 40℃; for 5h;
  • 46
  • ethyl bromozincacetate;THF [ No CAS ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 566200-83-7 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
99% Stage #1: ethyl bromozincacetate;THF; (E)-non-3-en-2-one In tetrahydrofuran at 0 - 25℃; for 3h; Stage #2: With hydrogenchloride In tetrahydrofuran; water at 20℃; 26 Example 26: Preparation of ethyl (4E)-3-hydroxy-3-pentylhex-4-enoate Under nitrogen atmosphere, 15 ML of THF was added to 3.05 g (5 mmol, 1.0 equivalent) of (BrZnCH2COOEt·THF)2.. Under argon atmosphere, a solution of 0.70 g (5 mmol) oftrans-3-nonen-2-one in 2.5 ML of THF was added dropwise while stirring at 0∼5°C. The mixture was stirred at 20∼25°C for 3 hours. 8.5 ML of 1N hydrochloric acid was added dropwise at 20°C or lower, followed by dilution with 25 ML of ethyl acetate.. Then, the layers were separated.. The organic layer was washed successively with 5 ML (*2) of 1N hydrochloric acid, 5 ML of water, 10 ML (*2) of an aqueous saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, and 5 ML (*2) of an aqueous saturated sodium chloride solution.. After washing, the organic layer was dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate.. Concentration under reduced pressure afforded 1.13 g of the desired product (yield 99%).1H NMR (CDCl3), (ppm): δ 0.88 (3H, t, J=6.8 Hz), 1.23-1.40 (12H, m), 2.00 (2H, q, J=7.7 Hz), 2.54 (2H, dd, J=18.7, 15.5 Hz), 3.84 (1H, s), 4.15 (2H, q, J=7.1 Hz), 5.49-5.71 (2H, m).
  • 47
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 89343-06-6 ]
  • [ 1008534-00-6 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
90% In 1,4-dioxane at 80℃; for 24h;
  • 48
  • [ 496-64-0 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • 8-acetyl-4-hydroxy-7-pentyl-2-oxabicyclo[2.2.2]oct-5-en-3-one [ No CAS ]
  • 8-acetyl-4-hydroxy-7-pentyl-2-oxabicyclo[2.2.2]oct-5-en-3-one [ No CAS ]
  • 49
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 544-97-8 ]
  • [ 67639-92-3 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
78% Stage #1: (E)-non-3-en-2-one With palladium(II) trifluoroacetate In tetrahydrofuran at -78℃; for 0.166667h; Inert atmosphere; Stage #2: dimethyl zinc(II) In tetrahydrofuran at 25℃; for 19h; Inert atmosphere;
With copper(l) iodide; methyllithium In diethyl ether; hexane; toluene at -78 - 0℃; Inert atmosphere;
  • 50
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 557-20-0 ]
  • (R)-4-ethylnonan-2-one [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
64% With L-tert-butyl Dippam; copper(II) bis(trifluoromethanesulfonate) In ethyl acetate at 30℃; for 1.5h; optical yield given as %ee;
80 %Chromat. With C59H51NO8P2; copper(II) bis(trifluoromethanesulfonate) In diethyl ether; hexane; toluene at 20℃; for 12h; Inert atmosphere; optical yield given as %ee; enantioselective reaction;
Stage #1: (E)-non-3-en-2-one; diethylzinc With L-tert-butyl Dippam; copper(II) bis(trifluoromethanesulfonate) In hexanes; ethyl acetate at 20℃; for 1h; Inert atmosphere; Stage #2: With hydrogenchloride In hexanes; water; ethyl acetate optical yield given as %ee; enantioselective reaction; 4.2. General procedure for the Cu-catalysed ACA of enone with Et2Zn General procedure: A flame-dried Schlenk tube was charged with copper source (1-4 mol %) and ligand (1-4 mol %). Next, 3 mL of ethyl acetate was added and the resulting green mixture was stirred at room temperature for 15 min, after which Et2Zn (3 mmol) was added dropwise. Finally, acyclic enone (1 mmol, 1 equiv) was added at required temperature. The resulting brown solution was allowed to stir at the required temperature for 0.1-20 h and the reaction was quenched by the addition of 5-8 mL of a 1 N HCl solution. The product was extracted with AcOEt. The organic phase was washed with a saturated NaHCO3 solution and brine, dried over MgSO4, filtrated and concentrated under vacuo. The product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (pentane/Et2O).
  • 51
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 113-24-6 ]
  • 3-pentylhexane-2,5-dione [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
38% With water In tert-butyl methyl ether at 30℃; for 40h; Enzymatic reaction; 1; 2; 10; 16.1 PigD Catalyzed Conversion of (E)-non-3-en-2-one to 3-pentylhexane-2,5-dione The reactions were effected on the 12 ml scale but can be performed in any batch sizes.In each case, 20 mM acceptor substrate and 25 mM sodium pyruvate were used. The substrates were dissolved in 600 μl of methyl tert-butyl ether, and 11.4 ml of demineralized water were added. After adding the lyophilized protein PigD, the mixture was shaken at 30° C. and 300 rpm.In the mixtures for FIGS. 10, 12 and 13, 50% of the protein specified were added at the start, and the further 50% after 20 hours. The reaction mixture was worked up after 40 hours.In the mixtures of FIGS. 14 and 15, all of the protein was added at time zero and workup was effected after 20 hours.The protein lyophilizates contained 10% PigD protein. Reported at the bottom are the protein end concentrations actually present in the mixture.The desalinification in the course of protein purification was performed with the following buffer: 10 mM KPi, 2.5 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM ThDP, 0.005 mM FAD, pH 7.0. It is thus possible to calculate the buffer concentration of the mixtures as follows:FIG. 10:Hours 1-20: 30 mM KPi, 7.5 mM MgSO4, 0.3 mM ThDP, 0.015 mM FADHours 20-40: 60 mM KPi, 15 mM MgSO4, 0.6 mM ThDP, 0.03 mM FADWorkup:The protein was removed by filtration with suction through a Celite pad, and the crude product was converted to the organic phase by washing with 60 ml of ethyl acetate. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4, and the solvent was concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (SiO2, cyclohexane/ethyl acetate=5:1). The PigD-catalyzed conversion of (E)-non-3-en-2-one to 3-pentylhexane-2,5-dione is shown in FIG. 10. Reaction mixture and analysis of the product (see FIG. 11): 14 mg of protein; 48% yield of 3-pentylhexane-2,5-dione according to NMR analysis of the crude product; after purification by means of column chromatography (Rf(cyclohexane/ethyl acetate=5:1)=0.34): 17 mg of 3-pentylhexane-2,5-dione (38% yield);GC-MS Rt=8.49 min. MS (70 eV, El); m/z: 184 ([M+], 1%), 169 ([M+-CH3], 3%), 141 ([M+-C2H3O], 10%), 127 ([M+-C3H5O], 25%), 114 ([C6H10O2+], 80%), 71 ([C5H11+], 100%).1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ=3.07-2.98 (m, 1H, 3), 2.97 (dd, J=17.3 Hz, J=9.9 Hz, 1H, 4), 2.44 (dd, J=17.3 Hz, J=3.0 Hz, 1H, 4), 2.24 (s, 3H, 1), 2.15 (s, 3H, 6), 1.52-1.67 (m, 2H, 7), 1.20-1.35 (m, 6H, 8, 9, 10), 0.89 (t, 3H, 11).13C NMR (77.2 MHz, CDCl3): δ=211.6, 207.5, 46.8 (4), 44.7 (3), 31.7 (8), 31.2 (7), 29.9 (6), 29.7 (1), 26.7 (9), 22.4 (10), 13.9 (11).Chiral GC (FS-Lipodex D, isocratic, 90° C.) Rt=98.9 min (main enantiomer), 102.6 min (ent). ee=99.4% (according to column chromatography); ee>99.4% (extracted directly after 40 hours at 30° C.). The enantiomeric excess was determined by means of gas chromatography on a chiral phase with the chemically synthesized racemate as a reference.
  • 52
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 120072-87-9 ]
  • [ 1254192-27-2 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
92% With C27H37N5OS In toluene at 20℃; for 72h; optical yield given as %ee; enantioselective reaction;
  • 53
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 10328-92-4 ]
  • [ 115869-45-9 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
38% Stage #1: (E)-non-3-en-2-one With lithium diisopropyl amide In tetrahydrofuran; n-heptane; ethylbenzene at -78℃; for 1h; Inert atmosphere; Stage #2: N-Methylisatoic anhydride In tetrahydrofuran; n-heptane; ethylbenzene at -78℃; for 0.5h; 3.2.12. Synthesis of 1-methyl-2-[(E)-1-alkenyl]-4(1H)-quinolones (14) General procedure: To a stirred solution of LDA (1.8 M, in THF/heptane/ethylbenzene, 1 equiv) unsaturated methyl ketone (1 equiv) (7) in THF (20 mL) was added dropwise at -78 °C in argon. After stirring for 1 h, N-methyl isatoic anhydride (20) (0.75 equiv) in THF (10 mL) was applied dropwise at -78 °C and stirring continued for 30 min. The reaction was quenched with saturated NH4Cl solution and concentrated in vacuum. The resulting yellowish residue was extracted with diethyl ether (3 x 150 mL), dried, concentrated and purified by column chromatography eluting with cyclohexane/ethyl acetate mixture of increasing polarity to give the corresponding alkaloids (8a-‘o’).
  • 54
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 112641-20-0 ]
  • C17H20F4O2 [ No CAS ]
  • 55
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 105-53-3 ]
  • C14H18O4(2-)*Na(1+) [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
99% Stage #1: diethyl malonate With sodium ethanolate In ethanol at 27℃; for 0.583333h; Stage #2: (E)-non-3-en-2-one In ethanol at 45 - 70℃; for 7h; Stage #3: In ethanol at 0℃; 7 To a stirred mixture of anhydrous ethanol (10.5 L) and diethylmalonate (1.90 kg) at 20° C. was added, over 35 minutes, a sodium ethoxide solution (21% in ethanol, 4.2 L). The reaction temperature was allowed to rise to 27° C. To the resulting slurry was added 3-nonene-2-one (1.50 kg), over the course of three hours, allowing the temperature to rise to 45-50° C. The reaction mixture heated to 70° C. over two hours and held for an additional two hours. The reaction mixture was then cooled to 0° C. and held overnight. The solid product was then collected by filtration through a polypropylene filter. The solid cake was rinsed with MTBE (5.0 L) then dried under reduced pressure at 20-25° C. to constant weight affording 2.38 kg (99% yield) of sodium ethyl dihydroolivetolate as an off-white solid. 1H NMR 500 MHz (DMSO-d6) δ 0.85 (t, 3H), 1.1-1.5 (m, 11H), 1.7 (dd, 1H), 2.05, dd, 1H), 2.4 (m, 1H), 2.7 (d, 1H), 4.05 (q, 2H) and 4.4 ppm (s, 1H). HPLC analysis showed 100% product (Phenomenex (Houston, Tex.) HyperClone 5u BDS C18 column, 4.6×150 mm, 1 mL/min, gradient 100% water/0.1% TFA to 100% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA over 15 minutes, rt=8.0 min).
  • 56
  • [ 85920-63-4 ]
  • [ 66-25-1 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
190 mg With N,N`-dimethylethylenediamine; In tetrahydrofuran; water; at 55℃; for 12h; General procedure: To a round bottomed flask equipped with a magnetic bar, benzaldehyde 2a (200 mg, 1.15 mmol) and freshly prepared benzoyl Meldrum?s acid 4a (430 mg, 1.73 mmol) were added in 2 mL THF-H2O (5:1). Then the catalyst DMEDA (25 mL, 0.23 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was allowed to stir for 12 h at 55 C. After the complete consumption of benzaldehyde 2a (monitored by TLC), reaction mixture was filtered through anhydrous Na2SO4 and the residue was purified by column chromatography over silica gel using ethyl acetate in petroleum ether as eluent. The product 5a was obtained as pale yellow viscous oil in 82% yield (261 mg).
  • 57
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 108-59-8 ]
  • [ 58016-28-7 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
A solution of methanol (250 mL) at 0 C was treated with sodium (12.0 g, 0.52 mol) in portions and stirred until dissolved. Dimethyl malonate (67.7 mL, 0.59 mol) was then added followed by (E)-non-3-en-2-one (59 g, 0.42 mol) and the solution heated at reflux for 8 h. The methanol was removed then diluted with water (400 mL) and washed with CHCI3 (300 mL). The aqueous later was acidified and extracted with CHCI3 (3 x 250 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (MgS04) and concentrated to give a white solid. The white solid (8.17 g, 34.0 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (20 ml) and cooled to 0 C. A solution of Br2 (1 .75 mL, 34.0 mmol) in DMF (6.6 mL) was slowly added and the solution stirred at 20 C for 1 h. The solution was then heated to 80 C for 1 6 h before cooling and treatment with 5% Na2S203 aqueous solution (200 mL) and being extracted with ethyl acetate (3 x 100 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (MgS04) and concentrated. The crude material was recrystallized from DCM/hexane to give a white solid
(0075) A solution of methanol (250 mL) at 0 C was treated with sodium (12.0 g, 0.52 mol) in portions and stirred until dissolved. Dimethyl malonate (67.7 mL, 0.59 mol) was then added followed by (E)-non-3-en-2-one (59 g, 0.42 mol) and the solution heated at reflux for 8 h. The methanol was removed then diluted with water (400 mL) and washed with CHCI3 (300 mL). The aqueous later was acidified and extracted with CHCI3 (3 x 250 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (MgS04) and concentrated to give a white solid. (0076) The white solid (8.17 g, 34.0 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (20 ml) and cooled to 0 C. A solution of Br2 (1 .75 mL, 34.0 mmol) in DMF (6.6 mL) was slowly added and the solution stirred at 20 C for 1 h. The solution was then heated to 80 C for 1 6 h before cooling and treatment with 5% Na2S203 aqueous solution (200 mL) and being extracted with ethyl acetate (3 x 100 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (MgS04) and concentrated. The crude material was recrystallized from DCM/hexane to give a white solid.
  • 58
  • C20H33N3O7S [ No CAS ]
  • [ 4466-24-4 ]
  • [ 26447-67-6 ]
  • [ 7137-97-5 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 25564-22-1 ]
  • [ 14360-50-0 ]
  • 2-ethyl-5-(1-methylbutyl)thiophene [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
In aq. phosphate buffer; at 140.0℃; for 2.0h;pH 6.5;Sealed tube; General procedure: The amounts of reactants used were GSH (0.30 mmol), glucose(0.30 mmol), and aldehyde (0.70 mmol, each). The reactants were weighed according to the respective systems and dissolved in 5 mL of phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.5) in a 15-mL pressure resistant tube.Then the tubes were sealed and heated at 140 C while stirring for 0.16, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, or 4 h. Two replicates were performed.
  • 59
  • C25H41N5O9S2 [ No CAS ]
  • [ 4466-24-4 ]
  • [ 26447-67-6 ]
  • [ 7137-97-5 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 25564-22-1 ]
  • [ 14360-50-0 ]
  • 2-ethyl-5-(1-methylbutyl)thiophene [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
In aq. phosphate buffer; at 140.0℃; for 2.0h;pH 6.5;Sealed tube; General procedure: The amounts of reactants used were GSH (0.30 mmol), glucose(0.30 mmol), and aldehyde (0.70 mmol, each). The reactants were weighed according to the respective systems and dissolved in 5 mL of phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.5) in a 15-mL pressure resistant tube.Then the tubes were sealed and heated at 140 C while stirring for 0.16, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, or 4 h. Two replicates were performed.
  • 60
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • O-(tert-butyl) Se-phenyl selenocarbonate [ No CAS ]
  • [ 1292308-86-1 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
95% With hydrogenchloride In ethanol; water at 95℃; for 5h; Inert atmosphere; 4.11. Michael-type addition reactions General procedure: Conditions C: aqueous 37% hydrochloric acid (0.2 mL, 2.4 mmol) was added to a solution of 1 (0.31 g, 1.2 mmol) in 8 mL of degassed ethanol. The mixture was heated at 95 °C under Argon atmosphere until the selenocarbonate 1 disappeared (2,5-3 h). After cooling to room temperature sodium bicarbonate (0.34 g, 4 mmol) and the Michael acceptor 11 (1 mmol) were added. The resulting mixture was stirred until the Michael acceptor disappeared on TLC monitoring (Table 5). After the addition of water (10 mL) the mixture was extracted three times with 10 mL of EtOAc. The combined extracts were washed with brine, dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude mixture was purified by column chromatography on silica gel with a mixture of petroleum ether and ethy lether as eluant to give the corresponding β-phenylseleno adduct 12a and vinylselenides 13a-d. Conditions E: aqueous 37% hydrochloric acid (0.2 mL, 2.4 mmol) was added to a solution of 1 (0.31 g, 1.2 mmol) and the Michael acceptor 11 (1 mmol) in 8 mL of degassed ethanol. The mixture was heated at 95 °C under Argon atmosphere until the Michael acceptor disappeared on TLC monitoring (Table 5). After the addition of water (10 mL) the mixture was extracted three times with 10 mL o fEtOAc. The combined extracts were washed with brine, dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude mixture was purified by column chromatography on silica gel with a mixture of petroleum ether and ethyl ether as eluant to give the corresponding β-phenylseleno adduct 12a-d and vinyl selenide13e. Characterisation data for β-phenylseleno adducts 12a, [39] 12b, [40] 12c, [41] 12d [39] and vinyl selenide 13b [41], 13c [42] and 13e [43] matched the ones previously reported in literature for these compounds.
  • 61
  • [ 875-79-6 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • C16H23N [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
72% With o-tetrachloroquinone; C24H39OPRu(1+)*BF4(1-); isopropyl alcohol In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 125℃; for 36h; Glovebox; Schlenk technique; regioselective reaction;
  • 62
  • [ 65136-45-0 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • C17H25N [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
81% With o-tetrachloroquinone; C24H39OPRu(1+)*BF4(1-); isopropyl alcohol In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 125℃; for 36h; Glovebox; Schlenk technique; regioselective reaction;
  • 63
  • [ 17901-58-5 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • [ 1620230-60-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
66% With o-tetrachloroquinone; C24H39OPRu(1+)*BF4(1-); isopropyl alcohol In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 125℃; for 36h; Glovebox; Schlenk technique; regioselective reaction;
  • 64
  • [ 17591-06-9 ]
  • [ 18402-83-0 ]
  • C17H25NO [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
76% With o-tetrachloroquinone; C24H39OPRu(1+)*BF4(1-); isopropyl alcohol In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 125℃; for 36h; Glovebox; Schlenk technique; regioselective reaction;
Same Skeleton Products
Historical Records

Related Functional Groups of
[ 18402-83-0 ]

Alkenes

Chemical Structure| 10519-33-2

[ 10519-33-2 ]

Dec-3-en-2-one

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 169892-08-4

[ 169892-08-4 ]

(3E,10E)-Trideca-3,10-diene-2,12-dione

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 1669-44-9

[ 1669-44-9 ]

3-Octen-2-one

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 18402-82-9

[ 18402-82-9 ]

(E)-Oct-3-en-2-one

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 1119-44-4

[ 1119-44-4 ]

Hept-3-en-2-one

Similarity: 0.94

Aliphatic Chain Hydrocarbons

Chemical Structure| 10519-33-2

[ 10519-33-2 ]

Dec-3-en-2-one

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 169892-08-4

[ 169892-08-4 ]

(3E,10E)-Trideca-3,10-diene-2,12-dione

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 1669-44-9

[ 1669-44-9 ]

3-Octen-2-one

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 18402-82-9

[ 18402-82-9 ]

(E)-Oct-3-en-2-one

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 1119-44-4

[ 1119-44-4 ]

Hept-3-en-2-one

Similarity: 0.94

Ketones

Chemical Structure| 10519-33-2

[ 10519-33-2 ]

Dec-3-en-2-one

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 169892-08-4

[ 169892-08-4 ]

(3E,10E)-Trideca-3,10-diene-2,12-dione

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 1669-44-9

[ 1669-44-9 ]

3-Octen-2-one

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 18402-82-9

[ 18402-82-9 ]

(E)-Oct-3-en-2-one

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 1119-44-4

[ 1119-44-4 ]

Hept-3-en-2-one

Similarity: 0.94