Home Cart 0 Sign in  

[ CAS No. 73842-99-6 ] {[proInfo.proName]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]}
Chemical Structure| 73842-99-6
Chemical Structure| 73842-99-6
Structure of 73842-99-6 * Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
Cart0 Add to My Favorites Add to My Favorites Bulk Inquiry Inquiry Add To Cart

Quality Control of [ 73842-99-6 ]

Related Doc. of [ 73842-99-6 ]

Alternatived Products of [ 73842-99-6 ]

Product Details of [ 73842-99-6 ]

CAS No. :73842-99-6 MDL No. :MFCD00187968
Formula : C9H22O2Si Boiling Point : -
Linear Structure Formula :- InChI Key :NETUFVYVNJNFMU-UHFFFAOYSA-N
M.W : 190.36 Pubchem ID :4077791
Synonyms :

Calculated chemistry of [ 73842-99-6 ]

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms : 12
Num. arom. heavy atoms : 0
Fraction Csp3 : 1.0
Num. rotatable bonds : 5
Num. H-bond acceptors : 2.0
Num. H-bond donors : 1.0
Molar Refractivity : 55.49
TPSA : 29.46 Ų

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption : High
BBB permeant : Yes
P-gp substrate : No
CYP1A2 inhibitor : No
CYP2C19 inhibitor : No
CYP2C9 inhibitor : No
CYP2D6 inhibitor : No
CYP3A4 inhibitor : No
Log Kp (skin permeation) : -5.66 cm/s

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP) : 2.8
Log Po/w (XLOGP3) : 2.53
Log Po/w (WLOGP) : 2.39
Log Po/w (MLOGP) : 1.61
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT) : 0.48
Consensus Log Po/w : 1.96

Druglikeness

Lipinski : 0.0
Ghose : None
Veber : 0.0
Egan : 0.0
Muegge : 1.0
Bioavailability Score : 0.55

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL) : -2.28
Solubility : 0.99 mg/ml ; 0.0052 mol/l
Class : Soluble
Log S (Ali) : -2.8
Solubility : 0.305 mg/ml ; 0.0016 mol/l
Class : Soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT) : -2.35
Solubility : 0.848 mg/ml ; 0.00446 mol/l
Class : Soluble

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS : 0.0 alert
Brenk : 1.0 alert
Leadlikeness : 1.0
Synthetic accessibility : 4.53

Safety of [ 73842-99-6 ]

Signal Word:Warning Class:N/A
Precautionary Statements:P305+P351+P338 UN#:N/A
Hazard Statements:H227-H315-H319-H335 Packing Group:N/A
GHS Pictogram:

Application In Synthesis of [ 73842-99-6 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Upstream synthesis route of [ 73842-99-6 ]
  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 73842-99-6 ]

[ 73842-99-6 ] Synthesis Path-Upstream   1~12

  • 1
  • [ 18162-48-6 ]
  • [ 504-63-2 ]
  • [ 73842-99-6 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
100% With sodium hydride In tetrahydrofuran The synthesis of an exemplary "bottom fragment" 15 for making dictyostatin and analogs is shown in Figure 1.1,3-Propanediol 3 was elaborated via Evans chiral auxiliary-based methods to the known, bis-TBS-protected Homer-Wadsworth-Emmons product 10 in nine steps. See, Phukan, P. ; Sasmal, S. ; Maier, M. E. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 1733, and Andrus, M. B. ; Argade, A. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 5049.
99%
Stage #1: With sodium hydride In tetrahydrofuran; mineral oil for 0.916667 h; Inert atmosphere
Stage #2: at 20℃; for 0.833333 h; Inert atmosphere
To a dried 250 mL RBF under an atmosphere of argon at room temperature was added 1 00 mL of distilled THF and 2.1 g of sodium hydride (60percent dispersion in mineral oil; Aldrich). The mixture was stirred vigorously and 1 ,3-propanediol (4.0 g, 50 mmol; Aldrich) was added over 1 0 minutes via syringe. The reaction was allowed to stir for 45 minutes before tert-butyldimethylsilyl chloride (7.9 g, 52.7 mmol; Aldrich) was added portion wise over 5 minutes. The reaction was then allowed to stir for a further 45 minutes at room temperature before being quenched slowly with 20 mL of 10percent aqueous sodium carbonate solution. This mixture was then transferred to a separatory funnel. After being vigorously shaken, the biphasic mixture was separated and the aqueous phase was further extracted with two 50 mL portions of ether. The combined organic phases are then dried with sodium sulfate and filtered through a plug of 1 inch of Celite and 1 inch of flash silica (silica gel 60, EMD) via a 100 mL sinter funnel under vacuum into a 500 mL RBF, with the sodium sulfate residue washed with a further 50 mL of ether. The collected solution was then reduced under vacuum on a Buchi rotary evaporator to give compound L, as a light yellow oil in 99percent yield and >95percent purity
99%
Stage #1: With sodium hydride In tetrahydrofuran; mineral oil at 20℃; for 0.916667 h; Inert atmosphere
Stage #2: at 20℃; for 0.833333 h; Inert atmosphere
Synthesis of Intermediate L Compound L was prepared according to the procedure of McDougal, P. G.; Rico, J. G.; Oh, Y.-L; Condon, B. J. Org. Chem., 1986, 51, 3388-3390. To a dried 250 mL RBF under an atmosphere of argon at room temperature was added 100 mL of distilled THF and 2.1 g of sodium hydride (60percent dispersion in mineral oil; Aldrich). The mixture was stirred vigorously and 1,3-propanediol (4.0 g, 50 mmol; Aldrich) was added over 10 minutes via syringe. The reaction was allowed to stir for 45 minutes before tert-butyldimethylsilyl chloride (7.9 g, 52.7 mmol; Aldrich) was added portion wise over 5 minutes. The reaction was then allowed to stir for a further 45 minutes at room temperature before being quenched slowly with 20 mL of 10percent aqueous sodium carbonate solution. This mixture was then transferred to a separatory funnel. After being vigorously shaken, the biphasic mixture was separated and the aqueous phase was further extracted with two 50 mL portions of ether. The combined organic phases are then dried with sodium sulfate and filtered through a plug of 1 inch of Celite and 1 inch of flash silica (silica gel 60, EMD) via a 100 mL sinter funnel under vacuum into a 500 mL RBF, with the sodium sulfate residue washed with a further 50 mL of ether. The collected solution was then reduced under vacuum on a Buchi rotary evaporator to give compound L, as a light yellow oil in 99percent yield and >95percent purity. The 1H NMR spectrum in CDCI3 agreed with the previously reported data. (See, McDougal, P. G.; Rico, J. G.; Oh, Y.-L; Condon, B. J. Org. Chem., 1986, 51, 3388-3390.)
98%
Stage #1: With sodium hydride In tetrahydrofuran; mineral oil at 0℃; for 2 h; Inert atmosphere
Stage #2: at 20℃;
To a solution of 60 sodium hydride (2.1g, 60percent disp. in 61 mineral oil, 52.6mmol) in dry 48 THF (60mL), a solution of 62 propane-1,3-diol (3.9mL, 52.6mmol) in dry THF (20mL) was added under argon at 0°C. The reaction mixture was stirred for 120min at the same temperature, and then a solution of 63 tert-butyldimethylsilyl chloride (7.9g, 52.6mmol) in dry THF (20ml) was added dropwise. After stirring overnight, the reaction was quenched with satd aq NaHCO3 (50ml). The aqueous layer was washed with Et2O (3×20mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (30ml), dried over Na2SO4, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to give 9.81g (98percent) of alcohol 49 9 as a yellow oil, which was pure enough to be used for Mitsunobu reaction. 1H NMR (300MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.84–3.76 (m, 4H), 2.60 (s, 1H), 1.82–1.73 (m, 2H), 0.89 (s, 9H), 0.07 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (75MHz, CDCl3) δ 63.4, 62.8, 34.9, 26.5, 18.8, −4.9
90%
Stage #1: With sodium hydride In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 2.5 h; Inert atmosphere
Stage #2: at 20℃; Inert atmosphere
Stage #3: With methanol; sodium hydrogencarbonate In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; Inert atmosphere
To a solution of 1,3-propanediol (3 mL, 40 mmol) in THF (60 mL) was added NaH (1.2 g, 60percent, 20 mmol) at rt. After stirring for 2.5 h, TBSCl (630 mg, 4.3 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred overnight before the addition of NaHCO3 solution in MeOH. The solution was then extracted with DCM, washed with water and brine, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, concentrated and purified by flash chromatography (30percent EtOAc in hexanes) to afford 2-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)ethanol ether (800 mg, 90percent based on TBSCl) as a colorless oil. To a solution of this TBS ether (590 mg, 3.11 mmol) in DCM (29 mL) was added NaHCO3 and Dess-Martin periodinane at rt. After stirring for 30 min, the solution was concentrated, diluted with hexane to participate byproduct, filtered and concentrated carefully to give crude 2-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)acetaldehyde. A solution of this crude aldehyde in t-BuOH (13 mL) and 2-methyl-2-butene (1.5 mL) was treated with a solution of NaClO2 (500 mg, 5.5 mmol) and NaH2PO4 (1.85 g, 15.4 mmol) in water (12 mL) dropwise. After stirring for 1 h, the reaction was partitioned between brine and DCM. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, concentrated and purified by flash chromatography (30percent EtOAc in hexanes) to afford acid 11 (431 mg, 68percent over 2 steps) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.91 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz), 2.58 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz), 0.89 (9H, s), 0.09 (6H, s).
90%
Stage #1: With sodium hydride In tetrahydrofuran at 0 - 20℃; for 0.75 h; Inert atmosphere
Stage #2: at 0 - 20℃; for 12 h; Inert atmosphere
To a stirred solution of 1,3-propane diol 17 (3.0 g, 39.42 mmol) in dry THF (40 mL) at 0 °C was added oil free NaH (0.95 g, 39.42 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in portions over 15 min. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min, then cooled to 0 °C after which TBDMSCl (5.94 g, 39.42 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. It was then quenched with ice cold water (10 mL) and the solution extracted with EtOAc (3 .x. 30 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with water, brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using petroleum ether/EtOAc (9:1 to 4:1) as eluent to give 18 (6.75 g, 90percent) as a colorless oil. IR (CHCl3) ν = 3368, 2931, 2859, 1473, 1257, 1065, 985, 838, 774 cm-1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3/TMS): δ = 0.033 (s, 6H), 0.86 (s, 9H), 1.71-1.74 (m, 2H), 2.93 (br s, 1H), 3.73 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H), 3.78 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = -5.4 (2C), 18.1, 25.7 (3C), 34.1, 62.4, 62.8.
71% With 1H-imidazole; dmap In dichloromethane at 25℃; for 18 h; Inert atmosphere General procedure: A mixture of (S)-3 (2.38 g, 13.52 mmol), imidazole (1.11 g, 16.38 mmol), TBSCl (2.26 g, 15.0 mmol) and DMAP (catalytic) in CH2Cl2 (30 mL) was magnetically stirred for 18 h. The mixture was poured into water (20 mL), and extracted with Et2O (3 * 10 mL). The ether layer was washed with water (2 * 10 mL) and brine (1 * 5 mL), and dried. Removal of the solvent followed by chromatography of the residue (silica gel, 0-10percent Et2O/hexane) afforded pure 5. Yield: 3.60 g (92percent).
63%
Stage #1: With sodium hydride In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 1 h; Inert atmosphere
Stage #2: at 0 - 20℃; for 12 h; Inert atmosphere
To a suspension of NaH (1.1 g, 27.3 mmol) in THF (40 mL) at RT was added 1,3-propanediol (2.28 g, 30 mmol) in THF (8 mL). The suspension was stirred for 1 h before being cooled to 0 °C. TBSCl (4.11 g, 27.3 mmol) in THF (10 mL) was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to RT and was stirred for 12 h. The reaction was quenched by the addition of 10percent (w/w) aqueous K2CO3 (10 mL). The aqueous solution was concentrated in vacuo to remove the THF component and then was extracted with Et2O (100 mL). The combined organic extracts were washed with H2O (20 mL), dried (MgSO4), filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by FC on silica gel (hexanes/EtOAc = 100:1-5:1) to afford the TBS ether 21 (3.27 g, 63percent) as a colorless oil
51% With triethylamine In hexane; acetonitrile at 20℃; for 24 h; Inert atmosphere General procedure: In a flame-dried100 mL round-bottom flask equipped with a teflon magnetic stir bar,diol(5.0 mmol) was added to acetonitrile (12.5 mL) and hexanes (37.5 mL).Triethylamine (Et3N, 0.84 mL, 6.00 mmol, 1.2 equiv) and tertbutyldimethylsilylchloride (TBSCl, 0.53 g, 5.0 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were addedto the solution and the resulting biphasic mixture was stirred vigorously atroom temperature for 24 h under a N2 atmosphere. The reaction was quenchedwith saturated aqueous ammonium chloride (NH4Cl, 50 mL), and extractedwith ethyl acetate (EtOAc, 3 50 mL). The combined organic phase waswashed with brine (3 50 mL) and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate(Na2SO4). The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography(10–15percent EtOAc/hexanes).

Reference: [1] Patent: WO2005/117588, 2005, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 31
[2] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2004, vol. 126, # 37, p. 11440 - 11441
[3] Organic Letters, 2007, vol. 9, # 16, p. 3105 - 3108
[4] Patent: WO2014/145302, 2014, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 34; 35; 38; 39
[5] Patent: WO2016/44558, 2016, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 51; 52; 54; 55
[6] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1998, vol. 63, # 7, p. 2401 - 2406
[7] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2016, vol. 55, # 42, p. 13189 - 13194[8] Angew. Chem., 2016, vol. 128, p. 13383 - 13388,6
[9] Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2017, vol. 28, # 12, p. 1765 - 1773
[10] Organic Letters, 2005, vol. 7, # 14, p. 3099 - 3102
[11] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2006, vol. 45, # 33, p. 5506 - 5510
[12] Organic Letters, 2007, vol. 9, # 4, p. 615 - 618
[13] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2011, vol. 76, # 20, p. 8364 - 8375
[14] Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, 2011, vol. 54, # 8, p. 401 - 407
[15] Tetrahedron Letters, 1998, vol. 39, # 48, p. 8771 - 8774
[16] Organic Letters, 2004, vol. 6, # 12, p. 1939 - 1942
[17] Synlett, 2004, # 15, p. 2689 - 2692
[18] Tetrahedron Letters, 2011, vol. 52, # 3, p. 458 - 460
[19] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2011, vol. 76, # 24, p. 9900 - 9918
[20] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013, vol. 135, # 17, p. 6677 - 6693
[21] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2014, vol. 53, # 41, p. 11075 - 11078
[22] Chemical Communications, 2015, vol. 51, # 58, p. 11693 - 11696
[23] Organic Letters, 2010, vol. 12, # 20, p. 4686 - 4689
[24] Chemical Communications, 2012, vol. 48, # 51, p. 6414 - 6416
[25] Heterocycles, 2014, vol. 89, # 2, p. 399 - 412
[26] Tetrahedron Letters, 1998, vol. 39, # 25, p. 4421 - 4424
[27] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2011, vol. 50, # 34, p. 7940 - 7943
[28] Synthesis, 2011, # 22, p. 3706 - 3710
[29] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, 2011, vol. 19, # 17, p. 5247 - 5254
[30] Organic Letters, 2011, vol. 13, # 21, p. 5924 - 5927
[31] Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2011, vol. 22, # 12, p. 1312 - 1319
[32] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, vol. 138, # 50, p. 16486 - 16492
[33] Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 2005, vol. 3, # 20, p. 3812 - 3824
[34] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2007, vol. 72, # 11, p. 4135 - 4148
[35] Synthesis (Germany), 2015, vol. 47, # 20, p. 3231 - 3240
[36] Synthesis, 1995, # 9, p. 1081 - 1088
[37] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2013, vol. 19, # 46, p. 15604 - 15614
[38] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2018, vol. 57, # 33, p. 10712 - 10717[39] Angew. Chem., 2018, vol. 130, # 33, p. 10872 - 10877,6
[40] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009, vol. 131, # 35, p. 12550 - 12551
[41] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2013, vol. 52, # 36, p. 9534 - 9538[42] Angew. Chem., 2013, vol. 125, # 36, p. 9713 - 9717,5
[43] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2015, vol. 21, # 6, p. 2398 - 2408
[44] Organic Letters, 2015, vol. 17, # 24, p. 6278 - 6281
[45] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2017, vol. 82, # 6, p. 3019 - 3045
[46] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1992, vol. 57, # 7, p. 2114 - 2121
[47] Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2010, vol. 21, # 3, p. 320 - 324
[48] Green Chemistry, 2013, vol. 15, # 10, p. 2830 - 2842
[49] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015, vol. 137, # 28, p. 8892 - 8895
[50] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1980, vol. 102, p. 4743
[51] Tetrahedron, 1992, vol. 48, # 27, p. 5557 - 5564
[52] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1994, vol. 59, # 5, p. 1139 - 1148
[53] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2013, vol. 78, # 11, p. 5492 - 5504
[54] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2017, vol. 82, # 24, p. 13121 - 13140
[55] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1999, vol. 64, # 2, p. 373 - 381
[56] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2017, vol. 82, # 3, p. 1743 - 1760
[57] Tetrahedron, 2010, vol. 66, # 43, p. 8458 - 8463
[58] Organic Letters, 2016, vol. 18, # 13, p. 3210 - 3213
[59] Tetrahedron, 2005, vol. 61, # 50, p. 11910 - 11923
[60] Tetrahedron, 1992, vol. 48, # 19, p. 3991 - 4004
[61] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2008, vol. 73, # 18, p. 6983 - 6993
[62] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2018, vol. 24, # 36, p. 9066 - 9074
[63] Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 2004, vol. 2, # 24, p. 3573 - 3583
[64] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2010, vol. 75, # 8, p. 2429 - 2444
[65] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2013, vol. 52, # 49, p. 13033 - 13036[66] Angew. Chem., 2013, vol. 125, # 49, p. 13271 - 13274,4
[67] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2018, [68] Angew. Chem., 2018, vol. 130, # 48, p. 16092 - 16096,5
[69] Tetrahedron Letters, 2010, vol. 51, # 8, p. 1185 - 1186
[70] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2014, vol. 20, # 28, p. 8594 - 8598
[71] Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2012, vol. 23, # 14, p. 1093 - 1099
[72] Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 2016, vol. 14, # 40, p. 9554 - 9559
[73] Organic and biomolecular chemistry, 2004, vol. 2, # 15, p. 2220 - 2228
[74] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2015, vol. 58, # 10, p. 4204 - 4219
[75] Organic Letters, 2017, vol. 19, # 16, p. 4163 - 4166
[76] Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 2016, vol. 14, # 5, p. 1579 - 1583
[77] Tetrahedron, 2011, vol. 67, # 27-28, p. 5046 - 5053
[78] European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2005, # 22, p. 4773 - 4788
[79] Synthesis, 2011, # 14, p. 2321 - 2333
[80] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2012, vol. 51, # 10, p. 2382 - 2386
[81] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, 2017, vol. 25, # 1, p. 116 - 125
[82] Tetrahedron Letters, 2014, vol. 55, # 16, p. 2600 - 2602
[83] Chimia, 2012, vol. 66, # 4, p. 201 - 204
[84] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2011, vol. 54, # 20, p. 7280 - 7288
[85] Organic Letters, 2014, vol. 16, # 3, p. 724 - 726
[86] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2010, vol. 49, # 5, p. 967 - 970
[87] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1986, vol. 51, # 17, p. 3388 - 3390
[88] Tetrahedron, 1995, vol. 51, # 38, p. 10601 - 10626
[89] Tetrahedron, 1997, vol. 53, # 48, p. 16545 - 16552
[90] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1999, vol. 64, # 25, p. 9080 - 9089
[91] Tetrahedron Letters, 1998, vol. 39, # 45, p. 8349 - 8352
[92] Tetrahedron Letters, 2003, vol. 44, # 48, p. 8729 - 8732
[93] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2005, vol. 127, # 12, p. 4326 - 4335
[94] Organic Letters, 2005, vol. 7, # 10, p. 2011 - 2014
[95] Organic Letters, 2006, vol. 8, # 9, p. 1949 - 1951
[96] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2006, vol. 12, # 4, p. 1185 - 1204
[97] Organic Letters, 2002, vol. 4, # 10, p. 1747 - 1750
[98] Organic letters, 2002, vol. 4, # 21, p. 3655 - 3658
[99] Organic Letters, 2007, vol. 9, # 19, p. 3857 - 3858
[100] Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 2007, vol. 5, # 16, p. 2678 - 2689
[101] Patent: US6458783, 2002, B1,
[102] Patent: US5554746, 1996, A,
[103] Organic Letters, 2010, vol. 12, # 3, p. 508 - 511
[104] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2009, vol. 15, # 44, p. 12065 - 12081
[105] Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, 2010, vol. 31, # 7, p. 1841 - 1842
[106] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2011, vol. 133, # 5, p. 1484 - 1505
  • 2
  • [ 203738-77-6 ]
  • [ 73842-99-6 ]
Reference: [1] Chemical Communications, 2003, # 5, p. 654 - 655
[2] Tetrahedron, 2004, vol. 60, # 32, p. 6901 - 6911
  • 3
  • [ 203738-77-6 ]
  • [ 73842-99-6 ]
  • [ 504-63-2 ]
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron Letters, 1998, vol. 39, # 51, p. 9461 - 9464
[2] Chemical Communications, 2003, # 5, p. 654 - 655
  • 4
  • [ 18162-48-6 ]
  • [ 504-63-2 ]
  • [ 73842-99-6 ]
  • [ 82112-22-9 ]
Reference: [1] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2008, vol. 47, # 35, p. 6707 - 6711
  • 5
  • [ 1178887-86-9 ]
  • [ 73842-99-6 ]
Reference: [1] European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2009, # 19, p. 3138 - 3140
  • 6
  • [ 1071936-49-6 ]
  • [ 78878-05-4 ]
  • [ 1071936-05-4 ]
  • [ 73842-99-6 ]
Reference: [1] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2008, vol. 47, # 35, p. 6707 - 6711
  • 7
  • [ 504-63-2 ]
  • [ 73842-99-6 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: EP3418282, 2018, A1,
  • 8
  • [ 288-32-4 ]
  • [ 18162-48-6 ]
  • [ 504-63-2 ]
  • [ 73842-99-6 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: US6258360, 2001, B1,
  • 9
  • [ 203738-77-6 ]
  • [ 4799-68-2 ]
  • [ 73842-99-6 ]
  • [ 504-63-2 ]
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron Letters, 1998, vol. 39, # 51, p. 9461 - 9464
  • 10
  • [ 102191-92-4 ]
  • [ 73842-99-6 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of the Chemical Society - Perkin Transactions 1, 1998, # 20, p. 3359 - 3363
  • 11
  • [ 73842-99-6 ]
  • [ 89031-84-5 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Chemical Research, Miniprint, 1998, # 3, p. 614 - 634
  • 12
  • [ 32315-10-9 ]
  • [ 73842-99-6 ]
  • [ 121-44-8 ]
  • [ 89031-82-3 ]
Reference: [1] Organic Letters, 2012, vol. 14, # 14, p. 3676 - 3679
Same Skeleton Products
Historical Records

Related Functional Groups of
[ 73842-99-6 ]

Organosilicon

Chemical Structure| 89031-84-5

[ 89031-84-5 ]

(3-Bromopropoxy)-tert-butyldimethylsilane

Similarity: 0.84

Chemical Structure| 89031-82-3

[ 89031-82-3 ]

tert-Butyl(3-chloropropoxy)dimethylsilane

Similarity: 0.84

Chemical Structure| 101166-65-8

[ 101166-65-8 ]

tert-Butyl(2-iodoethoxy)dimethylsilane

Similarity: 0.81

Chemical Structure| 101711-55-1

[ 101711-55-1 ]

2-((tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)ethanamine

Similarity: 0.81

Chemical Structure| 1394119-83-5

[ 1394119-83-5 ]

3-[[(1,1-Dimethylethyl)dimethylsilyl]oxy]cyclobutanemethanol

Similarity: 0.76