Home Cart 0 Sign in  

[ CAS No. 10406-24-3 ] {[proInfo.proName]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]}
Chemical Structure| 10406-24-3
Chemical Structure| 10406-24-3
Structure of 10406-24-3 * Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
Cart0 Add to My Favorites Add to My Favorites Bulk Inquiry Inquiry Add To Cart

Quality Control of [ 10406-24-3 ]

Related Doc. of [ 10406-24-3 ]

Alternatived Products of [ 10406-24-3 ]

Product Details of [ 10406-24-3 ]

CAS No. :10406-24-3 MDL No. :MFCD06797832
Formula : C8H8N2 Boiling Point : -
Linear Structure Formula :- InChI Key :XFKPORAVEUOIRF-UHFFFAOYSA-N
M.W : 132.16 Pubchem ID :457594
Synonyms :

Calculated chemistry of [ 10406-24-3 ]

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms : 10
Num. arom. heavy atoms : 6
Fraction Csp3 : 0.12
Num. rotatable bonds : 1
Num. H-bond acceptors : 2.0
Num. H-bond donors : 1.0
Molar Refractivity : 38.83
TPSA : 49.81 Ų

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption : High
BBB permeant : Yes
P-gp substrate : Yes
CYP1A2 inhibitor : Yes
CYP2C19 inhibitor : No
CYP2C9 inhibitor : No
CYP2D6 inhibitor : No
CYP3A4 inhibitor : No
Log Kp (skin permeation) : -10.66 cm/s

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP) : 1.44
Log Po/w (XLOGP3) : -5.01
Log Po/w (WLOGP) : 0.87
Log Po/w (MLOGP) : 0.85
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT) : 1.41
Consensus Log Po/w : -0.09

Druglikeness

Lipinski : 0.0
Ghose : None
Veber : 0.0
Egan : 0.0
Muegge : 2.0
Bioavailability Score : 0.55

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL) : 2.12
Solubility : 17400.0 mg/ml ; 131.0 mol/l
Class : Highly soluble
Log S (Ali) : 4.6
Solubility : 5280000.0 mg/ml ; 40000.0 mol/l
Class : Highly soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT) : -2.49
Solubility : 0.424 mg/ml ; 0.00321 mol/l
Class : Soluble

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS : 0.0 alert
Brenk : 0.0 alert
Leadlikeness : 1.0
Synthetic accessibility : 1.16

Safety of [ 10406-24-3 ]

Signal Word:Warning Class:
Precautionary Statements:P261-P301+P312-P302+P352-P304+P340-P305+P351+P338 UN#:
Hazard Statements:H302-H315-H319-H335 Packing Group:
GHS Pictogram:

Application In Synthesis of [ 10406-24-3 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Upstream synthesis route of [ 10406-24-3 ]
  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 10406-24-3 ]

[ 10406-24-3 ] Synthesis Path-Upstream   1~16

  • 1
  • [ 10406-24-3 ]
  • [ 28188-41-2 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: US6187945, 2001, B1,
  • 2
  • [ 328552-90-5 ]
  • [ 10406-24-3 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
76% With hydrogen In ethyl acetate at 20℃; The 3-azidomethyl-benzonitrile (12.4 g, 0.078 mol) in ethyl acetate (40 mL) was hydrogenated at 45 psi in the presence of 5percent palladium on carbon (4.0 g) at room temperature overnight. The product was filtered through a celite pad and the solvent was evaporated to give 3-aminomethyl-benzonitrile as light brown solid (7.87 g, 76percent yield). 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.62-7.57 (m, 1H), 7.56-7.43 (m, 2H), 7.42-7.31 (m, 1H), 3.87 (s, 2H).
Reference: [1] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2015, vol. 58, # 3, p. 1067 - 1088
[2] Patent: WO2016/7966, 2016, A2, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0031
[3] Patent: US2006/94749, 2006, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 11
[4] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2003, vol. 13, # 20, p. 3477 - 3482
  • 3
  • [ 626-17-5 ]
  • [ 1477-55-0 ]
  • [ 10406-24-3 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
92.8% With hydrogen In methanol; ammonia at 65℃; for 4 h; The same type of sponge nickel catalyst as used in Comparative Example 5 was charged into a glass tube with a 10-mm inner diameter in an amount of 3 g and dried at 200° C. in a nitrogen stream. Then, a mixed gas (methanol:nitrogen=4:96 by volume) was allowed to pass through the catalyst bed to pretreat the catalyst under the conditions of atmospheric pressure, 200° C., a flow rate of 1.5 NL/h, and 3 h. After the pretreatment, the catalyst was cooled to 30° C. in a nitrogen gas flow. The pretreated catalyst was slurried in 60 g of methanol in a nitrogen atmosphere. The hydrogenation of isophthalonitrile was conducted in the same manner as in Comparative Example 5 except for using the pretreated catalyst thus prepared. After 4 h of the hydrogenation, a part of the reaction liquid was sampled and analyzed. The conversion of isophthalonitrile was 100 mol percent, the yield of m-xylylenediamine was 92.8 mol percent, the yield of 3-cyanobenzylamine was 0.2 mol percent, and the yield of high-boiling condensation products was 7 mol percent.
87.3% With hydrogen In ammonia; 1,3,5-trimethyl-benzene at 50℃; EXAMPLE 1 Hydrogenation of Isophthalonitrile Into a 100-ml autoclave, were charged 3.2 g of isophthalonitrile, 10.4 g of mesitylene, 10.0 g of liquid ammonia and 2.0 g of Pd-alumina pellets (manufactured by N.E. Chemcat Corporation; Pd content = 5percent by weight), and the inner pressure was raised to 4.9 MPa by hydrogen gas. Then, the autoclave was shaken at 50°C until the change of pressure was no longer appreciated. The analysis on the reaction product solution showed that the conversion of isophthalonitrile was 95.7 molpercent, the yield of 3-cyanobenzylamine was 87.3 molpercent and the yield of m-xylynenediamine was 7.7 molpercent. The reaction solution separated from the catalyst was charged into a 100-ml autoclave together with 10.0 g of liquid ammonia and 2.0 g of Ni-diatomaceous earth pellets (manufactured by Nikki Chemical Co., Ltd.; Ni supported amount = 46percent by weight). The inner pressure was raised to 4.9 MPa by hydrogen gas. Then, the autoclave was shaken at 50°C until the change of pressure was no longer appreciated. The analysis on the reaction product solution showed that the conversion of isophthalonitrile was 100 molpercent, the yield of 3-cyanobenzylamine was 0.2 molpercent and the yield of m-xylynenediamine was 89.4 molpercent EXAMPLE 4 Hydrogenation of Isophthalonitrile Into a 100-ml autoclave, were charged 3.2 g of isophthalonitrile, 10.4 g of mesitylene, 10.0 g of liquid ammonia and 2.0 g of Pd-alumina pellets (manufactured by N.E. Chemcat Corporation; Pd content = 5percent by weight), and the inner pressure was raised to 4.9 MPa by hydrogen gas. Then, the autoclave was shaken at 50°C until the change of pressure was no longer appreciated. The analysis on the reaction product solution showed that the conversion of isophthalonitrile was 95.7 molpercent, the yield of 3-cyanobenzylamine was 87.3 molpercent and the yield of m-xylynenediamine was 7.7 molpercent. The reaction solution separated from the catalyst was charged into a 100-ml autoclave together with 10.0 g of liquid ammonia and 2.0 g of the catalyst A. The inner pressure was raised to 4.9 MPa by hydrogen gas. Then, the autoclave was shaken at 50°C until the change of pressure was no longer appreciated. The analysis on the reaction product solution showed that the conversion of isophthalonitrile was 100 molpercent, the yield of 3-cyanobenzylamine was 0.0 molpercent and the yield of m-xylynenediamine was 91.1 molpercent.
84.8% With hydrogen In methanol; ammonia at 65℃; for 4 h; autoclave Into a 300-ml SUS autoclave equipped with a stirrer, 10 g of isophthalonitrile was charged. Then, a slurry prepared by dispersing 3 g of a leached sponge nickel catalyst ("NDHT" available from Kawaken Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd.) in 60 g of methanol was charged and the autoclave was closed. After replacing the air in the autoclave with nitrogen, 30 g of ammonia was charged. The inner pressure was raised to 5 MPaG by hydrogen, and the hydrogenation was allowed to proceed at 65° C. The pressure was maintained at 5 MPaG by introducing hydrogen to supplement the consumed hydrogen. After 4 h of the hydrogenation, a part of the reaction liquid was sampled and analyzed. The conversion of isophthalonitrile was 100 mol percent, the yield of m-xylylenediamine was 84.8 mol percent, the yield of 3-cyanobenzylamine was 0.2 mol percent, and the yield of high-boilig condensation products was 15 mol percent.
Reference: [1] Patent: US2008/39658, 2008, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 6
[2] Patent: EP1449825, 2004, A1, . Location in patent: Page 5
[3] Patent: US2008/39658, 2008, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 6
[4] Patent: EP1454895, 2004, A1, . Location in patent: Page 8
[5] Patent: EP1454895, 2004, A1, . Location in patent: Page 5-7
[6] Patent: US2008/9654, 2008, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 3-7
[7] Patent: US2008/9654, 2008, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 7
[8] Patent: EP2325162, 2011, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 8; 11
  • 4
  • [ 220324-83-4 ]
  • [ 10406-24-3 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
82% With sulfuric acid In 1,4-dioxane; methanol at 25℃; for 0.25 h; 3- (DI-TERT-BUTOXYCARBONYLAMINO) BENZONITRILE (2g, 6. Ommoles) (prepared as described in Preparative Example 246, Step A above) was dissolved in methanol (30mL) and 10percent (v/v) (10percent CONC. sulfuric acid in 1,4-dioxane) (79mL) was added. The solution was stirred at 25 C for 0.25h and worked up as described in Preparative Example 89, Step C above). The residue was chromatographed on a SILICA GEL COLUMN (15X5CM) using 3percent (10percent CONC. ammonium hydroxide in METHANOL)-DICHLOROMETHANE as the eluant to give the title compound (651.4mg, 82percent): FABMS: m/z 133.1 (MH+) ; HRFABMS: m/z 133.0762 (MH+). Calcd. for C8H9N2 : m/z 133.0766 ; 8H (CDCI3) 2.57 (2H, S,-CH2NH2), 3.92 (2H, s,- CH2NH2), 7.46 (1 H, m, Ar-H), 7.57 (2H, m, Ar-H) and 7.64 ppm (1 H, m, Ar-H); BC (CDC13) CH2: 45.2 ; CH: 129.4, 130.7, 130.7, 131.8 ; C: 112.4, 118.8, 143.8.
Reference: [1] Patent: WO2004/22561, 2004, A1, . Location in patent: Page 112
  • 5
  • [ 626-17-5 ]
  • [ 7664-41-7 ]
  • [ 108-38-3 ]
  • [ 1477-55-0 ]
  • [ 10406-24-3 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
91% at 55℃; tube reactor; feed rate = 1.5 t/h; supplying hydrogen rate = 100 Nm3/h EXAMPLE 2 [0055] Hydrogenation Test [0056] A tubular insulated reactor having an inner diameter of 0.4 m was filled with 0.9 t of a commercially available catalyst (Ni-3266E manufactured by Harshaw Co., Ltd.; nickel content: about 50percent) to a packing height of 8 m. After activating the catalyst by reduction at 200° C. under a hydrogen flow, hydrogen gas and a hydrogenation raw material (IPN:MX:NH3=6:21:73 by weight) each pre-heated to 55° C. were fed into the reactor from the top thereof at respective feed rates of 100 Nm3/h and 1.5 t/h to allow the hydrogenation to proceed. The reaction pressure was 15 MPa. The reaction solution sampled from the outlet of the reactor was analyzed by gas chromatography. The conversion of isophthalonitrile was 100percent, the yield of m-xylylenediamine was 92 mol percent, and the yield of 3-cyanobenzyldiamine was 0.1 mol percent. The reaction was further continued by raising the pre-heating temperature only of the raw material so as to maintain the yield of 3-cyanobenzyldiamine at 0.5 mol percent or lower. After 28 days, the pressure difference between the inlet and the outlet of the catalyst layer was increased to 0.4 MPa, and the reaction was interrupted by stopping the supply of the hydrogenation raw material and hydrogen gas. [0057] Regeneration of Catalyst [0058] After cooling the catalyst layer to 45° C. and returning the inner pressure of the reactor to atmospheric pressure, nitrogen was flowed through the catalyst layer at a rate of 10 Nm3/h. The temperature of nitrogen gas being fed was raised from room temperature to 140° C. over 3 h. While maintaining the feed of nitrogen gas, hydrogen gas was fed at a rate of 0.1 Nm3/h. The temperature of the feed gas was raised to 200° C. over 2 h at a speed of 0.5° C./min. The average treating temperature during the temperature rise was 170° C. The temperature of the feed gas was successively raised to a final temperature of 340° C. over 6 h. While maintaining the feed gas at 340° C., the flow rate of hydrogen gas was increased stepwise to 3 Nm3/h and the feed amount of nitrogen gas was reduced stepwise to zero. During the course of maintaining the catalyst between 200° C. and 340° C., hydrogen gas was fed for 15 h. The feeding of hydrogen gas was carried out by monitoring the catalyst temperature. No steep temperature rise over 10° C./min was observed throughout the regeneration treatment. [0059] Hydrogenation Test after Regeneration [0060] After regenerating the catalyst, the hydrogenation was performed again by feeding the raw material of 55° C. under the same conditions as described above. The conversion of isophthalonitrile was 100percent, the yield of m-xylylenediamine was 91 mol percent, and the yield of 3-cyanobenzylamine was 0.1 mol percent, indicating that the regenerated catalyst was equivalent to the fresh catalyst in their catalytic activity. The pressure drop through the catalyst layer was 0.00 MPa, indicating that the pressure drop was completely got rid of. COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2 [0061] Hydrogenation Test [0062] A tubular insulated reactor having an inner diameter of 0.4 m was filled with 0.9 t of a commercially available catalyst (Ni-3266E manufactured by Harshaw Co., Ltd.; nickel content: about 50percent) to a packing height of 8 m. After activating the catalyst by reduction at 200° C. under a hydrogen flow, hydrogen gas and a hydrogenation raw material (IPN:MX:NH3=6:21:73 by weight) each pre-heated to 55° C. were fed into the reactor from the top thereof at respective feed rates of 100 Nm3/h and 1.5 t/h to allow the hydrogenation to proceed. The reaction pressure was 15 MPa. The reaction solution sampled from the outlet of the reactor was analyzed by gas chromatography. The conversion of isophthalonitrile was 100percent, the yield of m-xylylenediamine was 92 mol percent, and the yield of 3-cyanobenzyldiamine was 0.1 mol percent. The reaction was further continued by raising the pre-heating temperature only of the raw material so as to maintain the yield of 3-cyanobenzyldiamine at 0.5 mol percent or lower. After 31 days, the pressure difference between the inlet and the outlet of the catalyst layer was increased to 0.4 MPa, and the reaction was interrupted by stopping the supply of the hydrogenation raw material and hydrogen gas. [0063] Regeneration of Catalyst [0064] After reducing the inner pressure of the reactor to atmospheric pressure, hydrogen gas per-heated to 280° C. was fed to the catalyst layer at a rate of 10 Nm3/h. Immediately after beginning the feeding of hydrogen gas, a steep temperature rise occurred in the upper portion of the catalyst. The catalyst temperature was raised to 370° C. at highest to make the operation out of control. The temperature rise speed of the catalyst during the feed of hydrogen gas was 59° C. at highest. The feed of hydrogen gas was stopped and the catalyst layer was cooled to 140° C. by allowing nitrogen gas of room temperature to pass through the catalyst layer. [0065] Then, nitrogen gas and hydrogen gas were fed again at respective rates of 10 Nm3/h and 0.1 Nm3/h. The temperature of the feed gas was raised to 340° C. at a speed of 0.5° C./min, and finally the feed of the hydrogen-containing gas was continued at 340° C. for 2 h. While maintaining the feed gas at 340° C., the flow rate of hydrogen gas was increased stepwise to 3 Nm3/h and the feed amount of nitrogen gas was reduced stepwise to zero. Thereafter, the feed of gas was continued for 5 h in total. The feeding of hydrogen gas was carried out by monitoring the catalyst temperature. No steep temperature rise over 10° C./min was observed throughout the repetitive treatment. [0066] Hydrogenation Test after Regeneration [0067] After regenerating the catalyst, the hydrogenation was performed again by feeding the raw material of 55° C. under the same conditions as described above. The conversion of isophthalonitrile was 100percent, the yield of m-xylylenediamine was 82 mol percent, and the yield of 3-cyanobenzylamine was 6 mol percent, indicating the deterioration of the catalyst performance.
90.9% at 55℃; tube reactor; feed rate = 32 g/h; supplying hydrogen rate = 20 NL/h EXAMPLE 1 [0041] Preparation of Catalyst [0042] Into an aqueous solution prepared by dissolving 305.0 g of nickel nitrate hexahydrate (Ni(NO3)2.6H2O), 6.5 g of copper nitrate trihydrate (Cu(NO3)2.3H2O) and 7.1 g of chromium nitrate nonahydrate (Cr(NO3)3.9H2O) into 1 kg of pure water at 40° C., 29.6 g of diatomaceous earth was dispersed under stirring at 40° C. Then, an aqueous solution prepared by dissolving 128.6 g of sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) in 1 kg of pure water at 40° C. was poured into the resultant suspension under thorough stirring to prepare a precipitate slurry. After heated to 80° C. and held at that temperature for 30 min, the precipitate slurry was filtered to separate the precipitates, which were then washed with water, dried at 110° C. overnight, and then calcined in air at 380° C. for 18 h. The calcined powder was mixed with 3percent by weight of graphite and made into 3.0 mm 0.x.2.5 mm tablets by a tablet machine. The tablets were reduced at 400° C. under a hydrogen flow, and then, stabilized by an oxidation treatment overnight at a temperature from room temperature to 40° C. under a flow of diluted oxygen gas (oxygen/nitrogen={fraction (1/99)} by volume). Then, the tablets were crushed and sieved to have a particle size of 12 to 28 mesh, thereby obtaining a catalyst A. [0043] Hydrogenation Test [0044] A tube reactor having an inner diameter of 10 mm was filled with 10 g of the catalyst A (packing height: 130 mm). The catalyst A was activated by reduction at 200° C. under hydrogen flow. Then, a hydrogenation raw material consisting of a mixed solution of isophthalonitrile (IPN), m-xylene (MX) and ammonia (NH3) in a weight ratio of IPN:MX:NH3=6:54:40 was introduced into the tube reactor from the top thereof at a feed rate of 32 g/h. The hydrogenation was allowed to proceed at 55° C. under a reaction pressure of 7 MPa by supplying hydrogen gas under pressure in a rate of 20 NL/h. The reaction solution sampled from the outlet of the reactor was analyzed by gas chromatography. The conversion of isophthalonitrile was 100percent, the yield of m-xylylenediamine was 91.6 mol percent, and the yield of 3-cyanobenzyldiamine was 0.1 mol percent. The reaction was further continued by raising the temperature so as to maintain the above yields. After 24 days, the pressure difference between the inlet and the outlet of the catalyst layer was increased to 0.5 MPa, and the reaction was interrupted by stopping the supply of the hydrogenation raw material and hydrogen gas. [0045] Regeneration of Catalyst [0046] After cooling the catalyst layer to room temperature and returning the inner pressure of the reactor to atmospheric pressure, hydrogen was flowed through the catalyst layer at a rate of 5 NL/h. After heating the catalyst layer to 150° C., hydrogen was further allowed to continuously flow though the catalyst layer for 2 h (two-hour treatment at an average temperature of 150° C.). Thereafter, the temperature of the catalyst layer was raised to 260° C. at a rate of 4° C./min, and then, hydrogen was continuously flowed though the catalyst layer for 40 h. Finally, the catalyst layer was cooled to room temperature. [0047] Hydrogenation Test after Regeneration [0048] After regenerating the catalyst, the hydrogenation was performed again at 55° C. under the same conditions as described above. The conversion of isophthalonitrile was 100percent, the yield of m-xylylenediamine was 90.9 mol percent, and the yield of 3-cyanobenzylamine was 0.1 mol percent, indicating that the regenerated catalyst was equivalent to the fresh catalyst in their catalytic activity. The pressure drop through the catalyst layer was 0.00 MPa, indicating that the pressure drop was completely got rid of. COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1 [0049] Hydrogenation Test [0050] A tube reactor having an inner diameter of 10 mm was filled with 10 g of the catalyst A (packing height: 130 mm). The catalyst A was activated by reduction at 200° C. under hydrogen flow. Then, a hydrogenation raw material consisting of a mixed solution of isophthalonitrile (IPN), m-xylene (MX) and ammonia (NH3) in a weight ratio of IPN:MX:NH3=6:54:40 was introduced into the tube reactor from the top thereof at a feed rate of 32 g/h. The hydrogenation was allowed to proceed at 55° C. under a reaction pressure of 7 MPa by supplying hydrogen gas under pressure in a rate of 20 NL/h. The reaction solution sampled from the outlet of the reactor was analyzed by gas chromatography. The conversion of isophthalonitrile was 100percent, the yield of m-xylylenediamine was 90.9 mol percent, and the yield of 3-cyanobenzyldiamine was 0.1 mol percent. The reaction was further continued by raising the temperature so as to maintain the above yields. After 22 days, the pressure difference between the inlet and the outlet of the catalyst layer was increased to 0.5 MPa, and the reaction was interrupted by stopping the supply of the hydrogenation raw material and hydrogen gas. [0051] Regeneration of Catalyst [0052] After cooling the catalyst layer to room temperature and returning the inner pressure of the reactor to atmospheric pressure, hydrogen was flowed through the catalyst layer at a rate of 5 NL/h. After heating the catalyst layer to 150° C., hydrogen was further allowed to continuously flow though the catalyst layer for 2 h. Thereafter, the catalyst layer was cooled to room temperature. [0053] Hydrogenation Test after Regeneration [0054] After regenerating the catalyst, the hydrogenation was performed again at 55° C. under the same conditions as described above. The conversion of isophthalonitrile was 45.1percent, the yield of m-xylylenediamine was 0.1 mol percent, and the yield of 3-cyanobenzylamine was 28.6 mol percent. The pressure drop through the catalyst layer was 0.4 MPa.
Reference: [1] Patent: US2004/39232, 2004, A1, . Location in patent: Page 4-5
[2] Patent: US2004/39232, 2004, A1, . Location in patent: Page 4
  • 6
  • [ 626-17-5 ]
  • [ 1477-55-0 ]
  • [ 10406-24-3 ]
  • [ 100-81-2 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: EP1762561, 2007, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 7-8
[2] Patent: EP1762561, 2007, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 10
[3] Patent: EP1762561, 2007, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 9
[4] Patent: EP1762561, 2007, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 8-9
[5] Patent: EP1762561, 2007, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 7-9
[6] Patent: EP1762561, 2007, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 9
[7] Patent: EP1857434, 2007, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 8
  • 7
  • [ 62898-68-4 ]
  • [ 10406-24-3 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1991, vol. 113, # 11, p. 4208 - 4218
[2] Patent: WO2006/55951, 2006, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 37
  • 8
  • [ 28188-41-2 ]
  • [ 10406-24-3 ]
Reference: [1] Chemical Communications, 2015, vol. 51, # 39, p. 8253 - 8256
[2] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2003, vol. 13, # 20, p. 3477 - 3482
[3] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1991, vol. 113, # 11, p. 4208 - 4218
[4] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2015, vol. 58, # 3, p. 1067 - 1088
[5] Patent: WO2016/7966, 2016, A2,
  • 9
  • [ 916213-93-9 ]
  • [ 10406-24-3 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: WO2009/42694, 2009, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 118
  • 10
  • [ 626-17-5 ]
  • [ 10406-24-3 ]
Reference: [1] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2010, vol. 352, # 14-15, p. 2394 - 2398
[2] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2012, vol. 77, # 8, p. 4029 - 4034
  • 11
  • [ 873-62-1 ]
  • [ 10406-24-3 ]
Reference: [1] Organic Letters, 2012, vol. 14, # 11, p. 2818 - 2821
[2] Organic Letters, 2012, vol. 14, # 11, p. 2818 - 2821
  • 12
  • [ 90390-50-4 ]
  • [ 10406-24-3 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1984, vol. 27, # 9, p. 1111 - 1118
  • 13
  • [ 1235553-97-5 ]
  • [ 10406-24-3 ]
Reference: [1] Organic Letters, 2012, vol. 14, # 11, p. 2818 - 2821
  • 14
  • [ 766-84-7 ]
  • [ 10406-24-3 ]
Reference: [1] Organic Letters, 2012, vol. 14, # 11, p. 2818 - 2821
  • 15
  • [ 49584-07-8 ]
  • [ 10406-24-3 ]
Reference: [1] Organic Letters, 2012, vol. 14, # 11, p. 2818 - 2821
  • 16
  • [ 1156122-53-0 ]
  • [ 10406-24-3 ]
Reference: [1] Organic Letters, 2012, vol. 14, # 11, p. 2818 - 2821
Same Skeleton Products
Historical Records

Related Functional Groups of
[ 10406-24-3 ]

Aryls

Chemical Structure| 15996-76-6

[ 15996-76-6 ]

4-(Aminomethyl)benzonitrile hydrochloride

Similarity: 0.97

Chemical Structure| 34403-48-0

[ 34403-48-0 ]

4-((Methylamino)methyl)benzonitrile

Similarity: 0.91

Chemical Structure| 90389-96-1

[ 90389-96-1 ]

3-((Methylamino)methyl)benzonitrile

Similarity: 0.91

Chemical Structure| 1134529-25-1

[ 1134529-25-1 ]

2-(Aminomethyl)benzonitrile hydrochloride

Similarity: 0.88

Chemical Structure| 911372-78-6

[ 911372-78-6 ]

(R)-4-(1-Aminoethyl)benzonitrile hydrochloride

Similarity: 0.83

Amines

Chemical Structure| 15996-76-6

[ 15996-76-6 ]

4-(Aminomethyl)benzonitrile hydrochloride

Similarity: 0.97

Chemical Structure| 34403-48-0

[ 34403-48-0 ]

4-((Methylamino)methyl)benzonitrile

Similarity: 0.91

Chemical Structure| 90389-96-1

[ 90389-96-1 ]

3-((Methylamino)methyl)benzonitrile

Similarity: 0.91

Chemical Structure| 1134529-25-1

[ 1134529-25-1 ]

2-(Aminomethyl)benzonitrile hydrochloride

Similarity: 0.88

Chemical Structure| 911372-78-6

[ 911372-78-6 ]

(R)-4-(1-Aminoethyl)benzonitrile hydrochloride

Similarity: 0.83

Nitriles

Chemical Structure| 15996-76-6

[ 15996-76-6 ]

4-(Aminomethyl)benzonitrile hydrochloride

Similarity: 0.97

Chemical Structure| 34403-48-0

[ 34403-48-0 ]

4-((Methylamino)methyl)benzonitrile

Similarity: 0.91

Chemical Structure| 90389-96-1

[ 90389-96-1 ]

3-((Methylamino)methyl)benzonitrile

Similarity: 0.91

Chemical Structure| 1134529-25-1

[ 1134529-25-1 ]

2-(Aminomethyl)benzonitrile hydrochloride

Similarity: 0.88

Chemical Structure| 1159823-51-4

[ 1159823-51-4 ]

Isoindoline-5-carbonitrile hydrochloride

Similarity: 0.83