Alternatived Products of [ 638-68-6 ]
Product Details of [ 638-68-6 ]
CAS No. : | 638-68-6 |
MDL No. : | MFCD00009410 |
Formula : |
C30H62
|
Boiling Point : |
- |
Linear Structure Formula : | - |
InChI Key : | - |
M.W : |
422.81
|
Pubchem ID : | - |
Synonyms : |
|
Application In Synthesis of [ 638-68-6 ]
* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.
- Upstream synthesis route of [ 638-68-6 ]
- Downstream synthetic route of [ 638-68-6 ]
- 1
-
[ 60-29-7 ]
-
[ 4101-68-2 ]
-
[ 112-95-8 ]
-
[ 638-68-6 ]
-
[ 4181-95-7 ]
-
[ 6596-40-3 ]
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
|
zuletzt in Dibutylaether;Produkt5-6:Hexacontan,Heptacontan; |
|
- 2
-
[ 18451-85-9 ]
-
[ 57-10-3 ]
-
[ 638-68-6 ]
-
[ 629-83-4 ]
-
[ 24397-43-1 ]
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
|
With sodium methylate In methanol at 27℃; Electrochemical reaction; Pt anode; graphite cathode; |
|
- 3
-
[ 110-40-7 ]
-
[ 638-68-6 ]
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
1: 22.54%
2: 23.22%
3: 16.95%
4: 8.85%
5: 3.71%
6: 1.38%
7: 0.5% |
With triisobutylaluminum at 110 - 130℃; for 13h; |
|
- 5
-
[ 3041-23-4 ]
-
[ 74-85-1 ]
-
[ 1070-00-4 ]
-
[ 111-65-9 ]
-
[ 124-18-5 ]
-
[ 112-40-3 ]
-
[ 112-95-8 ]
-
[ 629-97-0 ]
-
[ 630-01-3 ]
-
[ 110-54-3 ]
-
[ 629-59-4 ]
-
[ 544-76-3 ]
-
[ 593-45-3 ]
-
[ 646-31-1 ]
-
[ 630-02-4 ]
-
[ 638-68-6 ]
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
1: 8.59%
2: 11.49%
3: 8.97%
4: 4.71%
5: 1.86%
6: 0.6%
7: 0.17%
8: 1.31%
9: 6.85%
10: 11.49%
11: 10.27%
12: 6.01%
13: 2.59% |
Stage #1: tri(octadecyl)aluminium; ethene; trioctylaluminum In toluene at 20 - 116℃; for 2.33333h;
Stage #2: With sulfuric acid; water at 40℃; |
|
- 6
-
[ 3041-23-4 ]
-
[ 74-85-1 ]
-
[ 112-95-8 ]
-
[ 629-97-0 ]
-
[ 630-01-3 ]
-
[ 593-45-3 ]
-
[ 646-31-1 ]
-
[ 630-02-4 ]
-
[ 638-68-6 ]
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
1: 10.19%
2: 13.39%
3: 9.99%
4: 3.02%
5: 0.69%
6: 0.13%
7: 0.02% |
Stage #1: tri(octadecyl)aluminium; ethene In toluene at 20 - 116℃; for 2 - 3h;
Stage #2: With sulfuric acid; water at 40℃; |
|
- 7
-
[ 112-95-8 ]
-
[ 629-97-0 ]
-
[ 630-01-3 ]
-
[ 593-45-3 ]
-
[ 646-31-1 ]
-
[ 630-02-4 ]
-
[ 638-68-6 ]
-
[ 112-92-5 ]
-
[ 629-96-9 ]
-
[ 593-50-0 ]
-
[ 661-19-8 ]
-
[ 506-51-4 ]
-
[ 506-52-5 ]
-
[ 557-61-9 ]
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
1: 12.4%
2: 13.4%
3: 7.8%
4: 3.2%
5: 1%
6: 0.2%
7: 0.05% |
Stage #1: icosane; n-docosane; n-hexacosane; octadecane; tetracosane; octacosane; n-triacontane With oxygen at 30 - 50℃; for 3h;
Stage #2: With sulfuric acid; water |
|
- 8
-
[ 112-95-8 ]
-
[ 629-97-0 ]
-
[ 630-01-3 ]
-
[ 629-50-5 ]
-
[ 593-45-3 ]
-
[ 646-31-1 ]
-
[ 630-02-4 ]
-
[ 638-68-6 ]
-
[ 112-92-5 ]
-
[ 629-96-9 ]
-
[ 593-50-0 ]
-
[ 661-19-8 ]
-
[ 506-51-4 ]
-
[ 506-52-5 ]
-
[ 557-61-9 ]
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
1: 17.66%
2: 19.46%
3: 13.62%
4: 6.93%
5: 2.04%
6: 0.48%
7: 0.1% |
Stage #1: icosane; n-docosane; n-hexacosane; octadecane; tetracosane; octacosane; n-triacontane With oxygen at 30 - 50℃; for 0.5h;
Stage #2: Tridecane With titanium(IV) isopropylate at 30 - 50℃; for 6.86667h;
Stage #3: With sulfuric acid; water at 80℃; |
|
- 9
-
[ 124-18-5 ]
-
[ 630-01-3 ]
-
[ 593-49-7 ]
-
[ 630-04-6 ]
-
[ 630-03-5 ]
-
[ 638-67-5 ]
-
[ 646-31-1 ]
-
[ 629-99-2 ]
-
[ 630-02-4 ]
-
[ 638-68-6 ]
-
[ 544-85-4 ]
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
|
With C22H41IrN2O2P2; Re2O7/Al2O3; 1,3,5-trimethyl-benzene at 175℃; for 168h; Inert atmosphere; |
|
Reference:
[1]Location in patent: experimental part
Huang, Zheng; Rolfe, Eleanor; Carson, Emily C.; Brookhart, Maurice; Goldman, Alan S; El-Khalafy, Sahar H.; Roy MacArthur, Amy H.
[Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2010, vol. 352, # 1, p. 125 - 135]
- 10
-
[ 85721-33-1 ]
-
[ 112-80-1 ]
-
[ 638-68-6 ]
-
[ 3910-35-8 ]
-
heptyl octyl phthalate
[ No CAS ]
-
3-methyl-2-propionylbenzoic acid
[ No CAS ]
-
3-(2-hydroxy-2-methylpropyl)cyclohex-2-enone
[ No CAS ]
-
[ 68-12-2 ]
-
[ 108-90-7 ]
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
|
With dipotassium peroxodisulfate; sulfuric acid; sodium hydroxide; In water; at 25℃; for 0.333333h;pH 5.0;UV-irradiation;Catalytic behavior; Kinetics; |
The experimental set-up for the photocatalytic degradation ofCIP by immobilized TiO2nanoparticles on MMT is schematicallyFig. 2. Schematic representation of the reactor used for different processes.shown in Fig. 2. Photocatalysis of CIP was performed in a batchphotoreactor with a 500 mL working volume. A 16 W UV-A, UV-B or UV-C lamp (Sylvania, Japan) was applied as the light source.Batch studies were performed to evaluate the effect of CIP concen-tration, TiO2/MMT dose, the initial pH, UV light region, differentscavengers and enhancers on degradation efficiency. For each pho-tocatalytic experiment, 500 mL of an aqueous solution containingCIP in the range of 5-25 mg L-1with 0.025-0.150 g L-1of theTiO2/MMT nanocomposite was added in the reaction vessel. TheUV-A, UV-B or UV-C lamp was turned on at the beginning of eachexperiment. The pH of the solution was set to the desired valuewith H2SO4and NaOH (1 M). The solution pH was regulated witha Mettler Toledo pH meter (China). 5 mL samples were taken fromthe reactor at different intervals and residuals concentration of CIPwas measured using Varian Cary 100 UV-vis spectrophotometer(Australia) at the maximum wavelength of 276 nm. Degradationefficiency (%) = [(C0-Ct)/C0] × 100 was used to determine the degra-dation of CIP, where C0was the initial concentration of CIP solutionand Ctwas its concentration after a certain time (t). Adsorptionexperiments were conducted using the method applied for photo-catalytic degradation experiment without UV radiation. The zeropoint of charge (pHzpc) of the TiO2/MMT nanocomposite was mea-sured using the method described by Bessekhouad et al. with somemodifications [28]. In this approach, 500 mL 0.01 M NaCl was pre-pared and divided into five solutions with the pH ranging from 3to 10. A two hundred milligram catalyst was added to each solu-tion. Finally, the final pH of each solution was measured after 48 hshaking and plotted against the initial pH to determine the pHzpcof the catalyst. Electrophoretic mobility and the surface charge ofthe samples were carried out with the relation of the zeta poten-tial measurements. Zeta potentials of the samples were measuredusing a Zeta Meter 3.0+ (Zeta-Meter, Inc., USA). The zeta potentialof pure MMT, TiO2and TiO2/MMT was obtained to be -30.7, +21.06and -16.4 mV, respectively. |