Purity | Size | Price | VIP Price | USA Stock *0-1 Day | Global Stock *5-7 Days | Quantity | |||||
{[ item.p_purity ]} | {[ item.pr_size ]} |
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1) ]} {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate) ]} |
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1) ]} | Inquiry {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate) ]} {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,1,item.mem_rate) ]} | {[ item.pr_usastock ]} | Inquiry - | {[ item.pr_chinastock ]} | Inquiry - |
* Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
CAS No. : | 141-05-9 | MDL No. : | MFCD00009191 |
Formula : | C8H12O4 | Boiling Point : | - |
Linear Structure Formula : | - | InChI Key : | IEPRKVQEAMIZSS-WAYWQWQTSA-N |
M.W : | 172.18 | Pubchem ID : | 5271566 |
Synonyms : |
Maleic acid diethyl ester;Diethyl ester;AI3-00678;NSC 8394
|
Chemical Name : | Diethyl (Z)-2-butenedioate |
Num. heavy atoms : | 12 |
Num. arom. heavy atoms : | 0 |
Fraction Csp3 : | 0.5 |
Num. rotatable bonds : | 6 |
Num. H-bond acceptors : | 4.0 |
Num. H-bond donors : | 0.0 |
Molar Refractivity : | 42.67 |
TPSA : | 52.6 Ų |
GI absorption : | High |
BBB permeant : | Yes |
P-gp substrate : | No |
CYP1A2 inhibitor : | No |
CYP2C19 inhibitor : | No |
CYP2C9 inhibitor : | No |
CYP2D6 inhibitor : | No |
CYP3A4 inhibitor : | No |
Log Kp (skin permeation) : | -6.68 cm/s |
Log Po/w (iLOGP) : | 2.42 |
Log Po/w (XLOGP3) : | 0.94 |
Log Po/w (WLOGP) : | 0.67 |
Log Po/w (MLOGP) : | 0.84 |
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT) : | 0.99 |
Consensus Log Po/w : | 1.17 |
Lipinski : | 0.0 |
Ghose : | None |
Veber : | 0.0 |
Egan : | 0.0 |
Muegge : | 1.0 |
Bioavailability Score : | 0.55 |
Log S (ESOL) : | -1.1 |
Solubility : | 13.6 mg/ml ; 0.0788 mol/l |
Class : | Very soluble |
Log S (Ali) : | -1.63 |
Solubility : | 4.02 mg/ml ; 0.0234 mol/l |
Class : | Very soluble |
Log S (SILICOS-IT) : | -0.93 |
Solubility : | 20.3 mg/ml ; 0.118 mol/l |
Class : | Soluble |
PAINS : | 0.0 alert |
Brenk : | 2.0 alert |
Leadlikeness : | 1.0 |
Synthetic accessibility : | 2.34 |
Signal Word: | Warning | Class: | N/A |
Precautionary Statements: | P260-P264-P270-P271-P272-P273-P280-P301+P312+P330-P302+P352-P304+P340+P312-P305+P351+P338-P312-P333+P313-P337+P313-P403+P233-P405-P501 | UN#: | N/A |
Hazard Statements: | H302-H313-H317-H319-H335-H373-H401 | Packing Group: | N/A |
GHS Pictogram: |
* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
100% | at 55℃; for 16 h; | Synthesis of 2-(1-(2,4-dichlorophenylsulfonyl)-3-oxopiperazin-2-yl)acetic acid S11; Ethyl 2-(3-oxopiperazin-2-yl)acetate; Ethylenediamine (1.17 ml, 17.42 mmol) and diethyl maleate (3 g, 17.42 mmol) were stirred for 16 h at 55° C. in propanol (30 ml). The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was dried in vacuo. The product was used in the next stage without being purified further.Yield: 3.4 g (100percent) |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
99% | With diphenyldisulfane In hexane for 24h; Irradiation; reflux; | |
99% | With C16H25N3O2S In acetonitrile at 80℃; for 16h; | |
80% | With triphenylphosphine In water at 120℃; for 30h; other phosphines; |
With 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole at 140 - 160℃; | ||
With 4-methylthiazole-2-thiol at 140 - 160℃; | ||
With diisopropyl xanthogen disulfide at 200℃; | ||
With thionyl chloride | ||
With sulfur | ||
With 1-amino-2-phenylaziridine | ||
With carbon tetrafluoride; Bromoform for 0.833333h; ultrasonic irradiation; | ||
In benzene for 0.5h; Ambient temperature; Yield given; | ||
With 3-bromo-3-phenyl-3H-diazirine In tetrachloromethane at 30℃; other reagent; | ||
With carbon tetrafluoride; Bromoform for 0.833333h; ultrasonic irradiation; other gases, dependence on reaction time; | ||
With iodine | ||
With tetrachloromethane; bromine Irradiation.Durch Belichtung; | ||
With hydrogen In benzene at 150℃; for 24h; Autoclave; | ||
With Pd(2,6-(Cy<SUB>2</SUB>PCH<SUB>2</SUB>)<SUB>2</SUB>C<SUB>6</SUB>H<SUB>3</SUB>)(NH<SUB>2</SUB>) In benzene-d6 at 20℃; for 120h; | 4.4.7. Reaction of 3 with dialkyl maleate (cis-(CO2R)CH]CH(CO2R)) (R CH3, CH2CH3) General procedure: An excess of dialkyl maleate (cis-(CO2R)CH]CH(CO2R),R CH3, CH2CH3) was added to a d6-benzene (0.3 mL) solution of 3 (15 mg, 0.024 mmol) in a 5 mm screw-cappedNMR tube. The dialkyl maleate slowly isomerizes to dialkylfumarate (trans-(CO2R)CH]CH(CO2R), R CH3, CH2CH3) inthe presence of catalytic amounts of 3 at ambient temperature,as evidenced by 1H NMR spectroscopy. After 4 h, theobserved trans/cis ratio was 0.8 (for R Me) and 0.7 (forR Et), respectively. After 24 h, the trans/cis ratio was 8.9(for R Me). The conversion of dialkyl maleate (cis-isomer)into dialkyl fumarate (trans-isomer) was complete in 5days. For dimethyl maleate (cis-(CO2CH3)CH]CH(CO2CH3)): 1H NMR (C6D6): d 3.35 (s, 6H, CH3), d 5.71 (s,2H, CH). For dimethyl fumarate (trans-(CO2CH3)CH]CH(CO2CH3)): 1H NMR (C6D6): d 3.25 (s, 6H, CH3), d 6.87 (s,2H, CH). For diethyl maleate (cis-(CO2CH2CH3)CH]CH(CO2CH2CH3)): 1H NMR (C6D6): d 0.96 (t, 6H, CH3,3J(HH) 9.2 Hz), d 3.98 (q, 4H, CH2, 3J(HH) 9.2 Hz), d 5.77(s, 2H, CH). For diethyl fumarate (trans-(CO2CH2CH3)CH]CH(CO2CH2CH3)): 1H NMR (C6D6): d 0.89 (t, 6H, CH3,3J(HH) 7.6 Hz), d 3.88 (q, 4H, CH2, 3J(HH) 7.6 Hz), d 6.91(s, 2H, CH). | |
With 5%-palladium/activated carbon at 220℃; for 24h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
at 190℃; | ||
In neat (no solvent) at 170℃; for 1h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With sodium |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
93 % Chromat. | at 60℃; for 4h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
10% | With fluoride In acetonitrile at 0℃; Yield given; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 14.1 mol 2: 17.3 mol | With water at 140℃; for 30h; other phosphines and other additives; var. pH and reaction time;; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
100% | In acetonitrile at 20℃; for 20h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
100% | In acetonitrile at 20℃; for 20h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
51.4% | With pyridine In 1,4-dioxane at 75℃; for 3h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
100% | In propan-1-ol; at 55℃; for 16h; | Synthesis of 2-(1-(2,4-dichlorophenylsulfonyl)-3-oxopiperazin-2-yl)acetic acid S11; Ethyl 2-(3-oxopiperazin-2-yl)acetate; Ethylenediamine (1.17 ml, 17.42 mmol) and diethyl maleate (3 g, 17.42 mmol) were stirred for 16 h at 55 C. in propanol (30 ml). The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was dried in vacuo. The product was used in the next stage without being purified further.Yield: 3.4 g (100%) |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With 1-amino-2-phenylaziridine at 125℃; | ||
With diiron nonacarbonyl; tributylphosphine; Triethoxysilane In tetrahydrofuran at 60℃; for 48h; Inert atmosphere; optical yield given as %de; chemoselective reaction; | ||
68 % de | With hydrogen In ethanol at 50℃; for 12h; Overall yield = 92 %; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 82 % Chromat. 2: 18 % Chromat. 3: 93 % Chromat. 4: 7 % Chromat. | With 2,9-bis(2,6-bis(1,4,7-trioxaoctyl)phenyl)-1,10-phenanthroline In dichloromethane; 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 20℃; for 24h; var. of reagent, temp.; | |
at 100℃; for 4h; other olefins, other temperature and reaction time; competition with cyclooctene, other catalyst: Rh2(OAc)4; | ||
In dichloromethane; 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 20℃; for 24h; Yield given. Yields of byproduct given; |
In dichloromethane; 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 20℃; for 24h; Yield given. Yields of byproduct given. Title compound not separated from byproducts; | ||
With copper trifluoromethanesulfonate In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 20℃; | ||
With bimacrocyclic concave 1,10-phenanthroline ligand; copper trifluoromethanesulfonate In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 20℃; Title compound not separated from byproducts; | ||
With 1,10-phenanthroline-bridged calix[6]arene; copper trifluoromethanesulfonate In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 20℃; Title compound not separated from byproducts; | ||
In dichloromethane at 20℃; for 2.75h; | ||
In dichloromethane | ||
In dichloromethane at 25℃; | ||
In benzene at 50℃; for 16h; | ||
With gold In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 80℃; for 24h; Inert atmosphere; optical yield given as %de; | ||
With (tetra-n-butylammonium)4-[γ-H2SiW10O36Cu(II)2(μ-1,1-N3)2] In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 59.84℃; for 8.5h; Inert atmosphere; optical yield given as %de; chemoselective reaction; | ||
With Cu2(4,4'-bpy)2SO4*6H2O In n-undecan; dichloromethane at 20℃; for 24h; | ||
1: 59.8 % de 2: 23 % de | With C38H36ClN3OPRu(1+)*Cl(1-) In dichloromethane at 20℃; for 4h; Inert atmosphere; Schlenk technique; diastereoselective reaction; | |
1.47 % de | With C63H68Cl2N2P2Ru In toluene at 0 - 60℃; for 4h; chemoselective reaction; | General procedure: In a typical GC experiment the following operations were undertaken: from a preliminary prepared solution of catalyst in freshly distilled toluene, with known concentration, 2.5 μmol of catalyst were transferred under Ar-flow to an empty 15 ml vessel. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo affording a small amount of solid catalyst. Styrene (10 mmol) was next added. EDA (1 mmol) was dissolved in styrene (10 mmol), cooled to 0 °C and the solution added very slowly, at 0 °C (over 4 h, using a peristaltic pump) to the above reaction mixture. After addition of a few drops of the EDA solution, the mixture was heated to the reaction temperature and kept at this temperature overnight. Before GC-analysis, the reaction mixture was passed through a celite filter in order to remove the catalyst. Celite was washed with 20 ml toluene/EtOAc (1/1). The composition of the reaction mixture was determined by GC using authentic samples and diethyl adipate as internal standard. |
1: 30 % de 2: 60 % de | With [(tris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolylmethyl)amine)Cu]PF6 In dichloromethane at 20℃; for 3h; Inert atmosphere; diastereoselective reaction; | |
1: 38 % de 2: 78 % de | With μ-carbido-bis[2,3,9,10,16,17,23,24-octa-n-butoxyphthalocyaninatoruthenium(IV)] In dichloromethane; toluene at 90℃; for 6h; Inert atmosphere; | |
With HKUST-1 In chloroform-d1; dichloromethane at 150℃; for 3h; | ||
16.667 % de | With AuNPs functionalized with IPrpyr immobilized on graphene oxide In dichloromethane at 80℃; for 24h; Inert atmosphere; Darkness; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 53% 2: 36% 3: 9% | With [Fe(tpfc)Cl] at 22 - 25℃; | |
for 1h; Ambient temperature; various catalysts; also a chiral porphyrin as catalyst; | ||
for 1h; Ambient temperature; Title compound not separated from byproducts; |
15 %Chromat. | With Co(N-Me-NCTPP)py In toluene at 20℃; Inert atmosphere; optical yield given as %de; diastereoselective reaction; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
50% | In chloroform at -20℃; for 168h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
35% | In chloroform at 0℃; for 72h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
45% | In chloroform at 20℃; for 14h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
40% | In dichloromethane at 20℃; for 14h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
70% | Stage #1: 1-phenylsulfonyl-2-propanone With sodium hydride In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 0.166667h; Stage #2: o-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl triflate; Diethyl maleate With potassium fluoride; 18-crown-6 ether In tetrahydrofuran at 65℃; Further stages.; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 50% 2: 30% | In chloroform at 20℃; for 14h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 52% 2: 5% | In chloroform at 20℃; for 14h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 57% 2: 15% | In chloroform at 20℃; for 14h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
75% | With sodium In ethanol at 70℃; for 2h; | 1.2.c; 1.2.d (2) Preparation of ethyl 5-oxopiazolidine-2- (3-chloropyridin-2-yl) -3-carboxylate: c. Add 100 mL of absolute ethanol to a three-necked round bottom flask, add 0.08 mol of sodium metal in portions to give sodium ethoxide, then add 0.05 mol of 3-chloro-2-hydrazinopyridine, heat at 70 °C to reflux, In the reflux state, 0.07 mol of diethyl maleate was added dropwise, and the mixture was refluxed for 2 hours. d. After completion of the reaction, the mixture was cooled to 40 °C and 0.08 mol of glacial acetic acid was added thereto. The reaction solution was concentrated and recrystallized to give 5-oxopyraazolidin-2- (3-chloropyridin-2-yl) ethyl ester, yield 75%, purity ≥ 95% |
70% | With sodium ethanolate In ethanol at 70 - 80℃; | Step-2: Preparation of ethyl 2-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)-5- oxopyrazolidine-3-carboxylate To a solution of sodium ethoxide (745 g) and 3-chloro-2- hydrazinylpyridine (300 g) in ethanol (900 ml) was added diethyl maleate (396 g) at 70-80°C. Stir the reaction mass for 1 -2 h at 75- 80°C. The progress of the reaction was monitored by HPLC. After completion of the reaction, cool the reaction mass to 40-50°C. Acetic acid (313 g) was added to the reaction mass at 40-50°C and then cool the reaction mass to room temperature. Recovered the solvent at reduced pressure at 40-45°C. Added water (3 liters) to the residue and extracted the product in DCM. DCM was recovered at reduced pressure at 40-45°C to get the crude product. The crude was purified by recrystallization using IPA as solvent. Yield: 70%, and purity: 97% and melting range-138-139°C. |
62.6% | Stage #1: (3-chloro-2-pyridyl)hydrazine With sodium ethanolate In ethanol for 0.5h; Reflux; Stage #2: Diethyl maleate In ethanol for 0.5h; Reflux; |
62.6% | Stage #1: (3-chloro-2-pyridyl)hydrazine With sodium ethanolate In ethanol for 0.5h; Reflux; Stage #2: Diethyl maleate In ethanol for 0.5h; Reflux; | |
59% | With sodium In ethanol for 1h; Reflux; | 2.2 (2) Synthesis of ethyl 5-oxo-2-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)pyrazoline-3-carboxylate VII To a 250 ml single-necked round bottom flask was added 100 ml absolute ethanol,Add 1.77 grams of 55 millimoles of metallic sodium,The temperature rose slightly,After stirring for 10 minutes, a uniform clear solution was formed;A mixture of 7.1 g of 50 mmol of 3-chloro-2-hydrazinopyridine VI was added to form a yellow suspension,Heated to reflux,To the reflux was added dropwise 11.2 g of 65 mmol of diethyl maleate,Drop finished,Continue to return for 1 hour;After the TLC monitoring reaction was complete,Cooled to 40 degrees Celsius,Add 3.5 ml of glacial acetic acid;The reaction mixture was concentrated to near dryness,The crude product was recrystallized from ethanol to give 7.9 g of yellow solid VII,Yield 59% |
59% | With ethanol; sodium for 1h; Reflux; | 2.2 (2) Ethyl 5-oxo-2- (3-chloropyridin-2-yl) pyrazoline-3-carboxylateSynthesis of VII: To a 250 ml single-necked round bottom flask was added 100 ml of absolute ethanol,Add 1.77 grams or 55 millimoles of sodium metal in portions and the temperature rises slightly,After stirring for 10 minutes to form a uniform transparent solution;7.1 g (50 mmol) of 3-chloro-2-hydrazinopyridine VI was added to form a yellow suspension, which was heated to reflux.11.2 g or 65 mmol of diethyl maleate were added dropwise under reflux,Di completed, continue to reflow 1 hour; TLC monitoring reaction was completed, cooled to 40 degrees Celsius,3.5 ml glacial acetic acid was added; the reaction mixture was concentrated to near dryness,The crude product was recrystallized from ethanol to give 7.9 g of yellow solid VII in 59% yield; |
57.2% | With sodium In ethanol at 40 - 45℃; for 5h; | 3.4 (4) Synthesis of ethyl 2-(3-chloro-2-pyridyl)-5-carbonylpyrazolon-3-carboxylate Chopped sodium lumps (24 g, 1.04 mol) were added to absolute ethanol (920 g) in portions and warmed to reflux naturally. After the sodium was completely dissolved, the solution was cooled to below 40° C., and 3-chloro-2-pyridinylhydrazine (120 g, 0.836 mol) was added at a time. Diethyl maleate (210 g, 1.22 mol) was added dropwise over 1 h while the temperature was maintained at 40-45° C. The reaction was continued for 4 h while the temperature was maintained at 40-45° C. Then, the reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, and poured into glacial acetic acid in cold water batchwise with stirring. Ethanol (650-700 mL) was distilled off under reduced pressure, and then the solution was cooled to room temperature, stood, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with ethanol (65 mL×2), collected, and dried to obtain a finished product (120 g). The filtrate and washings were combined, and concentrated under reduced pressure to remove almost all ethanol and obtain a large amount of a dark green solution with black solid. The solution was extracted with chloroform (200 mL), dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated to dryness. Toluene (50 mL) was added, and heated to obtain a uniform solution. The solution was cooled to room temperature, frozen in a refrigerator overnight, filtered, washed with toluene (15 mL), and dried to obtain a dark green solid (9 g, total yield 57.2%). |
55% | Stage #1: (3-chloro-2-pyridyl)hydrazine; Diethyl maleate With sodium ethanolate In ethanol for 0.333333h; Heating / reflux; Stage #2: With acetic acid at 65℃; | 1.A EXAMPLE 1; PREPARATION OF 1- (3-CHLORO-2-PYRIDINYL)-N-R2, 4-DICHLORO-6-R (METHYLAMINO) CARBONYLLPHEN 3- (METHYLSULFONYL) OXYL-LH-PYRAZOLE-5-CARBOXAMIDE; Step A: Preparation of Ethyl 1-(3-CHLORO-2-PYRIDINYL)-3-PYRAZOLIDINONE-5-CARBOXYLATE A 2-L four-necked flask equipped with a mechanical stilTer, thermometer, addition funnel, reflux condenser, and nitrogen inlet was charged with absolute ethanol (250 mL) and an ethanolic solution of SODIUM ETHOXIDE (21%, 190 mL, 0.504 mol). The mixture was heated to reflux at about 83 C. It was then treated with 3-CHLORO-2-HYDRAZINOPYRIDINE (68.0 g, 0.474 mol). The mixture was re-heated to reflux over a period of 5 minutes. The yellow slurry was then treated dropwise with diethyl maleate (88.0 mL, 0.544 mol) over a period of 5 minutes. The reflux rate increased markedly during the addition. By the end of the addition all of the starting material had dissolved. The resulting orange-red solution was held at reflux for 10 minutes. After being cooled to 65 C, the reaction mixture was treated with glacial acetic acid (50.0 ML, 0.873 mol). A precipitate formed. The mixture was diluted with water (650 mL), causing the precipitate to dissolve. The orange solution was cooled in an ice bath. Product began to precipitate at 28 C. The slurry was held at about 2 C for 2 hours. The product was isolated via filtration, washed with aqueous ethanol (40%, 3 x 50 mL), then air-dried on the filter for about 1 hour. The title product compound was obtained as a highly crystalline, light orange powder (70.3 g, 55% yield). No significant impurities were observed by 1H NMR. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) 8 1.22 (t, 3H), 2.35 (d, LH), 2.91 (dd, LH), 4.20 (q, 2H), 4.84 (d, LH), 7.20 (dd, LH), 7.92 (d, LH), 8.27 (d, LH), 10.18 (s, LH). |
50% | With sodium ethanolate; acetic acid In ethanol Reflux; | |
49% | Stage #1: (3-chloro-2-pyridyl)hydrazine With sodium ethanolate In ethanol for 0.166667h; Reflux; Stage #2: Diethyl maleate In ethanol for 0.5h; Reflux; | |
49% | Stage #1: (3-chloro-2-pyridyl)hydrazine With ethanol; sodium for 0.166667h; Reflux; Stage #2: Diethyl maleate Reflux; | |
49% | Stage #1: (3-chloro-2-pyridyl)hydrazine With ethanol; sodium for 0.166667h; Reflux; Stage #2: Diethyl maleate In ethanol for 0.5h; Reflux; | |
46% | Stage #1: (3-chloro-2-pyridyl)hydrazine; Diethyl maleate With sodium In ethanol for 0.5h; Reflux; Stage #2: With acetic acid at 40℃; | |
45% | With bis-triphenylphosphine-palladium(II) chloride; sodium ethanolate; sodium In ethanol at 24 - 32℃; for 12h; | 1 EXAMPLE 1: 725 ml of absolute ethanol (1.4 litres/mole) was charged into the reactor followed by addition of sodium pieces (14.15 gms; 1.21 gm atom/mole), under stirring till complete dissolution to obtain solution containing sodium ethoxide. 3-chloro-2-hydrazinopyridine (73 gms; 0.5 mole) was added to the solution containing sodium ethoxide, followed by the addition of Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 catalyst (0.107gm; 0.0003 mole/mole) under stirring at 24°C to obtain reaction mixture. Diethyl maleate (106 gms; 1.21 mole/mole) was added slowly to the reaction mixture over a period of 3 hours keeping reaction temperature between 30-32 °C to obtain a reaction mass. The reaction mass was equilibrated at 30-32°C and monitored by HPLC. The reaction mass was maintained at 32 °C for 9 hours showed 57% product formation and worked up to obtain ethyl 2-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)-5-oxo-pyrazolidine-3-carboxylate. The yield of 2-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)-5-oxo-pyrazolidine-3-carboxylate was 45% and purity was 96%. |
Stage #1: (3-chloro-2-pyridyl)hydrazine With sodium ethanolate In ethanol for 0.0833333h; Reflux; Stage #2: Diethyl maleate In ethanol for 0.166667h; Reflux; Stage #3: With acetic acid In ethanol at 65℃; | 1.1 Example 1; Preparation of 3-bromo-N-(2-methyl-4-chloro-6-(methylcarbamoyl)phenyl)-1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide (Compound 13 in Table 1); (1) Synthesis of ethyl 1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-3-oxopyrazolidine-5-carboxylate; To a 1000 mL flask, anhydrous ethanol (300 mL), sodium ethoxide (16.97 g, 0.249 mol) and 3-chloro-2-hydrazinylpyridine (30.47 g, 98%, 0.21 mol) were added. The reaction mixture was heated to reflux for 5 minutes. Diethyl maleate (36.0 g, 0.31 mol) was added dropwise and heated to reflux for 10 minutes. After being cooled to 65° C., the reaction mixture was neutralized with glacial acetic acid (45.36 g, 0.42 mol) and then diluted with 300 mL water. The reaction mixture was cooled down to room temperature, solid is separated to be filtered, washed with 40% aqueous solution of ethanol (3×50 mL) and dried to give ethyl 1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-3-oxopyrazolidine-5-carboxylate (31.03 g) as an orange solid in 52% yield. HPLC area normalization method content is 94% (Analytical condition: chromatographic column: ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C8 4.6×150 mm 5 μm, mobile phase:the ratio of acetonitrile to water is 70:30).1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO): 8.289-8.269 (q, 1H), 7.956-7.190 (q, 1H), 7.231-7.190 (q, 1H), 4.862-4.816 (q, 1H), 4.236-4.165 (q, 2H), 2.967-2.879 (q, 1H), 2.396-2.336 (q, 1H), 1.250-1.202 (t, 3H). | |
With sodium ethanolate In ethanol Reflux; | ||
With sodium ethanolate In ethanol at 45℃; for 5h; | 1-(6-chloropyrazin-2-yl)-3-pyrazolidone-5-carboxylic acid ethyl ester (4a). General procedure: Sodium (0.70 g, 30.44 mmol) was dissolved in 50 mL of anhydrous ethanol, and 2-chloro-6-hydrazinylpyrazine (2a) (4.00 g, 27.67 mmol) was added. The reaction solution was heated to 60 °C until the mixture was totally dissolved. Keep the temperature of the reaction below 40 °C, and diethyl maleate (4.77 g, 27.67 mmol) was added dropwise. The reaction was heated to 45 °C and cooled to room temperature after 5 h. The reaction was quenched with glacial acetic acid (1.83 g, 30.44 mol) and stirred for 1 h. The resulting solution was evaporated in vacuo, dissolved in 50 mL of water, extracted with CH2Cl2 (3×50 mL). The extracts was washed with brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4 and evaporated to give the crude product, which was further purified with recrystallization (diehyl ether) as a yellow solid, 4.25 g. | |
With sodium ethanolate In ethanol Reflux; | ||
Stage #1: (3-chloro-2-pyridyl)hydrazine With sodium ethanolate In ethanol Reflux; Stage #2: Diethyl maleate In ethanol Reflux; | 1.b b. Preparation of 2-(3-chloro-2-pyridyl)-5-oxo-3-pyrazolidinecarboxylic acid ethyl ester With thermometer , Add sodium ethoxide and absolute ethanol into the reflux condenser and mechanically stirred three-necked flask, Then add 3-chloro-2-hydrazinopyridine, Stir for 20-25min, Slowly add diethyl maleate dropwise, Heat to reflux, reflux for 3-4h, After the reaction, the temperature is reduced to room temperature, Add acetic acid to adjust PH=6-7, When water is added dropwise, a solid will precipitate out. Stir and crystallize at 0-5°C for 1-2h. Suction filter, get 2-(3-chloro-2-pyridyl)-5-oxo-3-pyrazolidinecarboxylic acid ethyl ester; | |
With sodium ethanolate In ethanol at 60℃; | 1-3 Example one Put 2,3-dichloropyridine in a 500ml reaction flask, then put in hydrazine hydrate, reflux at 100°C for 10 hours, then cool to 10°C and centrifuge to obtain 3-chloro-2-pyridyl wet product, which is dried in a drying box. Put the ethanol into ethanol, raise the temperature to 20°C, pour in the maleic acid diethyl ester and sodium ethoxide at 60°C, cool down to 10°C, and centrifuge to obtain 2-(3-chloro-2-pyridyl)-5-oxo-3-pyrazolidine. 2-(3-Chloro-2-pyridyl)-5-oxo-3-pyrazolidine is reacted with tribromophosphorus bromide in acetonitrile to produce 3-bromo-1-(3-chloro-2-pyridyl) )-4,5-Dihydro-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxylic acid ethyl ester wet product. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
55% | Stage #1: 3-chloro-2(1H)-pyridinone hydrazone; Diethyl maleate With sodium ethanolate In ethanol at 83℃; for 0.333333h; Heating / reflux; Stage #2: With acetic acid at 65℃; Heating / reflux; | 1.A EXAMPLE 1; Preparation of ethyl 3-bromo-1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxylate by replacement of chlorine with bromine; Step A: Preparation of ethyl 2-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-5-oxo-3-pyrazolidine-carboxylate A 2-L four-necked flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer, thermometer, addition funnel, reflux condenser, and nitrogen inlet was charged with absolute ethanol (250 mL) and an ethanolic solution of sodium ethoxide (21%, 190mL, 0.504 mol). The mixture was heated to reflux at about 83 °C. It was then treated with 3-chloro-2-(1H)-pyridinone hydrazone (68.0 g, 0.474 mol). The mixture was re-heated to reflux over a period of 5 minutes. The yellow slurry was then treated dropwise with diethyl maleate (88.0 mL, 0.544 mol) over a period of 5 minutes. The reflux rate increased markedly during the addition. By the end of the addition all of the starting material had dissolved. The resulting orange-red solution was held at reflux for 10 minutes. After being cooled to 65 °C, the reaction mixture was treated with glacial acetic acid (50.0 mL, 0.873 mol). A precipitate formed. The mixture was diluted with water (650 mL), causing the precipitate to dissolve. The orange solution was cooled in an ice bath. Product began to precipitate at 28 °C. The slurry was held at about 2 °C for 2 hours. The product was isolated via filtration, washed with aqueous ethanol (40%, 3 x 50 mL), and then air-dried on the filter for about 1 hour. The title product compound was obtained as a highly crystalline, light orange powder (70.3 g, 55% yield). No significant impurities were observed by 1H NMR. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 1.22 (t, 3H), 2.35 (d, 1H), 2.91 (dd, 1H), 4.20 (q, 2H), 4.84 (d, 1H), 7.20 (dd, 1H), 7.92 (d, 1H), 8.27 (d, 1H), 10.18 (s, 1H). |
55% | Stage #1: 3-chloro-2(1H)-pyridinone hydrazone With sodium ethanolate In ethanol at 83℃; for 0.0833333h; Heating / reflux; Stage #2: Diethyl maleate In ethanol for 0.166667h; Heating / reflux; | 1.A EXAMPLE [1]; Preparation of [3-BROMO-N-[4-CHLORO-2-METHYL-6-[[[1-METHYL-2-] [ [ (trimethylsilyl) methyl] [THIO] ETHYL] AMINO] CARBONYL] PHENYL]-1- (3-CHLORO-2-PYRIDINYL)-1H-] [ PYRAZOLE-5-CARBOXAMIDE]; Step A: Preparation of Ethyl [2- (3-CHLORO-2-PYRIDINYL)-5-OXO-3-] [ PYRAZOLIDINECARBOXYLATE] A 2-L four-necked flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer, thermometer, addition funnel, reflux condenser, and nitrogen inlet was charged with absolute ethanol (250 mL) and an ethanolic solution of sodium ethoxide (21%, 190 [ML,] 0.504 mol). The mixture was heated to reflux at about [83 °C.] It was then treated with 3-chloro-2 (1H)-pyridinone hydrazone (68.0 g, 0.474 mol). The mixture was re-heated to reflux over a period of 5 minutes. The yellow slurry was then treated dropwise with diethyl maleate (88.0 mL, 0.544 mol) over a period of 5 minutes. The reflux rate increased markedly during the addition. By the end of the addition all of the starting material had dissolved. The resulting orange-red solution was held at reflux for 10 minutes. After being cooled to [65 °C,] the reaction mixture was treated with glacial acetic acid (50.0 [ML,] 0.873 mol). A precipitate formed. The mixture was diluted with water (650 mL), causing the precipitate to dissolve. The orange solution was cooled in an ice bath. Product began to precipitate at [28 °C.] The slurry was held at about [2 °C] for 2 hours. The product was isolated via filtration, washed with aqueous ethanol (40%, 3 x 50 mL), and then air-dried on the filter for about 1 hour. The title product compound was obtained as a highly crystalline, light orange powder (70.3 g, 55% yield). No significant impurities were observed by [1H] NMR. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) [O] 1.22 (t, 3H), 2.35 (d, 1H), 2.91 (dd, 1H), 4.20 (q, 2H), 4.84 (d, 1H), 7.20 (dd, 1H), 7.92 (d, 1H), 8.27 (d, 1H), 10.18 (s, [1H).] |
55% | Stage #1: 3-chloro-2(1H)-pyridinone hydrazone With sodium ethanolate In ethanol at 83℃; for 0.0833333h; Stage #2: Diethyl maleate In ethanol for 0.25h; Reflux; | 12.A Step A: Preparation of Ethyl 2-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-5-oxo-3-pyrazolidinecarboxylate (alternative named ethyl 1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-3-pyrazolidinone-5-carboxylate) Step A: Preparation of Ethyl 2-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-5-oxo-3-pyrazolidinecarboxylate (alternative named ethyl 1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-3-pyrazolidinone-5-carboxylate)A 2-L four-necked flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer, thermometer, addition funnel, reflux condenser, and nitrogen inlet was charged with absolute ethanol (250 mL) and an ethanolic solution of sodium ethoxide (21%, 190 mL, 0.504 mol). The mixture was heated to reflux at about 83° C. It was then treated with 3-chloro-2(1H)-pyridinone hydrazone (68.0 g, 0.474 mol). The mixture was re-heated to reflux over a period of 5 minutes. The yellow slurry was then treated dropwise with diethyl maleate (88.0 mL, 0.544 mol) over a period of 5 minutes. The reflux rate increased markedly during the addition. By the end of the addition all of the starting material had dissolved. The resulting orange-red solution was held at reflux for 10 minutes. After being cooled to 65° C. the reaction mixture was treated with glacial acetic acid (50.0 mL, 0.873 mol). A precipitate formed. The mixture was diluted with water (650 mL), causing the precipitate to dissolve. The orange solution was cooled in an ice bath. Product began to precipitate at 28° C. The slurry was held at about 2° C. for 2 hours. The product was isolated via filtration, washed with aqueous ethanol (40%, 3×50 mL), and then air-dried on the filter for about 1 hour. The title product compound was obtained as a highly crystalline, light orange powder (70.3 g, 55% yield). No significant impurities were observed by 1H NMR. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 1.22 (t, 3H), 2.35 (d, 1H), 2.91 (dd, 1H), 4.20 (q, 2H), 4.84 (d, 1H), 7.20 (dd, 1H), 7.92 (d, 1H), 8.27 (d, 1H), 10.18 (s, 1H). |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
40% | 30 Procedure with Acetic acid as Catalyst and Solvent EXAMPLE 30 Procedure with Acetic acid as Catalyst and Solvent Hydroxylamine free base (50% aqueous solution, 8.0 g, 0.12 mol) was added to diethyl maleate (17.8 g, 0.10 mol) at 25° C. The mixture was stirred for 15 minutes, then subjected to vacuum (0.25 mm Hg) for 15 minutes to remove water. Acetic acid (11.87 g, 0.18 mol) was added to bring the pH to about 3.8. 2-Ethylacrolein (10.05 g, 0.12 mol) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred for 5 hours at 105° C. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and the crude product (46.5 g) analyzed by NMR. The analysis showed that the reaction proceeded with 95% conversion to give diethyl 5-EPDC in about 40% yield (based on external standard). |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
51% | With sodium hydroxide; hydroxylamine sulfate; acetic acid | 32 Preparation of Diethyl 5-EPDC from Hydroxylamine Sulfate EXAMPLE 32 Preparation of Diethyl 5-EPDC from Hydroxylamine Sulfate Sodium hydroxide (40% aqueous solution, 13.0 g, 0.13 mol) was added over 15 minutes to a mixture of diethyl maleate (17.3 g, 0.100 mol) and hydroxylamine sulfate (25% aqueous solution, 39.10 g, 0.060 mol). The reaction temperature increased from 29° C. to 45° C. during the addition. After the reaction mixture had been stirred under nitrogen for an additional 30 minutes, 1-butanol (30.5 g) was added. The mixture was transferred to a separatory funnel, the layers were allowed to separate, and the organic layer (55.14 g) containing diethyl N-hydroxyasparate was collected. The pH of the organic layer was found to be 7.3. Acetic acid (7.4 g, 0.123 mol) was added to the crude product from the above reaction to adjust the pH to 3.8. Ethylacrolein (9.84 g, 0.11 mol) was added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 15 minutes at room temperature. The reaction was slowly warmed to 95°-96° C., stirred at this temperature for 20 hours, and then was concentrated under reduced pressure to give crude diethyl 5-EPDC (26.19 g). GLC analysis of this crude product indicated that the reaction had proceeded with 93% conversion to give diethyl 5-EPDC in about 51% yield. |
41% | With sodium hydroxide; hydroxylamine sulfate; acetic acid In toluene | 33 Preparation of Diethyl 5-EPDC from Hydroxylamine Sulfate in Toluene EXAMPLE 33 Preparation of Diethyl 5-EPDC from Hydroxylamine Sulfate in Toluene Sodium hydroxide (40% aqueous solution, 13.0 g, 0.13 mol) was added over 35 minutes to a mixture of diethyl maleate (17.3 g, 0.100 mol) and hydroxylamine sulfate (25% aqueous solution, 39.20 g, 0.060 mol). During the addition, the reaction temperature increased from 26° C. to 55° C. After the reaction mixture had been stirred under nitrogen for 30 additional minutes, after which toluene (36 mL) was added. The mixture was transferred to a separatory funnel, the layers were allowed to separate, and the organic layer (49.08) containing diethyl N-hydroxyaspartate was collected. The pH of the organic layer was found to be 6.6. Acetic acid (6.4 g, 0.106 mol) was added to the crude product from the above reaction to lower the pH to 3.0. Ethylacrolein (9.88 g, 0.11 mol) was added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 15 minutes at room temperature. The pH of the resulting mixture was 3.3. The reaction mixture was warmed slowly to 79°-80° C., stirred at this temperature for 20 hours, and then concentrated under reduced pressure to give crude diethyl 5-EPDC (25.67 g). GLC analysis of this crude product indicated that the reaction had proceeded with 94% conversion to give diethyl 5-EPDC in about 41% yield. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
for 2h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 99 % ee 2: 96% | With aluminum oxide; potassium carbonate In chloroform at 0 - 20℃; for 24 - 25h; | 2.1. Cyclopropanation and Purification of Compound 3; An improved Evans cyclopropanation protocol was used for this synthesis using the Cu catalyst prepared from copper (I) triflate and chiral ligand 10. Other ligands and Rh catalysts were tried but all afforded lower diastereoselectivity. The major by-products from the reaction were the cis-isomer, 11 and 12 from the dimerization of ethyl diazoacetate. Solvent plays a significant role in enantioselectivity, diastereoselectivity, and formation of the dimer impurities. As shown in Table 1, a variety of solvents, including coordinating and non-coordinating ones, gave good to excellent conversions (74-98%), except for THF (45%). The diastereoselectivity varied from 80:20 (trans:cis, 1,2-dichloroethane) to 93:7 (trans:cis, MTBE), and ee varied from 85% (1,2-dichloroethane) to 99% (many solvents including MTBE). MTBE gave the best results and was used as the solvent for our first GMP campaign. A significant amount of precipitate was formed when the catalyst was prepared in MTBE. In early studies, this precipitate was removed by filtration prior to the cyclopropanation. However, conversions and ethyl diazoacetate accumulation varied from batch to batch. The situation was greatly improved by generation of the catalyst in situ without filtration. The solid catalyst was completely dissolved after the addition of styrene, giving a clear solution before addition of ethyl diazoacetate. Similar diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity were obtained. In the prep lab, the cyclopropanation reaction was run in two batches. The first batch used the procedure with the solid catalyst removed and 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment, see below) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 92:8 and 98.8% ee for the trans. The conversion for the reaction was only 95% with 2.0 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate used. The second batch used the procedure with in situ generated catalyst without solid removal. Complete conversion was observed with the use of 1.5 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate. Again, 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 88:12 and 98.9% ee for the trans. |
1: 99 % ee 2: 97 % ee | In ethyl acetate at 0 - 20℃; for 24 - 25h; | 2.1. Cyclopropanation and Purification of Compound 3; An improved Evans cyclopropanation protocol was used for this synthesis using the Cu catalyst prepared from copper (I) triflate and chiral ligand 10. Other ligands and Rh catalysts were tried but all afforded lower diastereoselectivity. The major by-products from the reaction were the cis-isomer, 11 and 12 from the dimerization of ethyl diazoacetate. Solvent plays a significant role in enantioselectivity, diastereoselectivity, and formation of the dimer impurities. As shown in Table 1, a variety of solvents, including coordinating and non-coordinating ones, gave good to excellent conversions (74-98%), except for THF (45%). The diastereoselectivity varied from 80:20 (trans:cis, 1,2-dichloroethane) to 93:7 (trans:cis, MTBE), and ee varied from 85% (1,2-dichloroethane) to 99% (many solvents including MTBE). MTBE gave the best results and was used as the solvent for our first GMP campaign. A significant amount of precipitate was formed when the catalyst was prepared in MTBE. In early studies, this precipitate was removed by filtration prior to the cyclopropanation. However, conversions and ethyl diazoacetate accumulation varied from batch to batch. The situation was greatly improved by generation of the catalyst in situ without filtration. The solid catalyst was completely dissolved after the addition of styrene, giving a clear solution before addition of ethyl diazoacetate. Similar diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity were obtained. In the prep lab, the cyclopropanation reaction was run in two batches. The first batch used the procedure with the solid catalyst removed and 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment, see below) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 92:8 and 98.8% ee for the trans. The conversion for the reaction was only 95% with 2.0 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate used. The second batch used the procedure with in situ generated catalyst without solid removal. Complete conversion was observed with the use of 1.5 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate. Again, 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 88:12 and 98.9% ee for the trans. |
1: 99 % ee 2: 97 % ee | In toluene at 0 - 20℃; for 24 - 25h; Molecular sieve; | 2.1. Cyclopropanation and Purification of Compound 3; An improved Evans cyclopropanation protocol was used for this synthesis using the Cu catalyst prepared from copper (I) triflate and chiral ligand 10. Other ligands and Rh catalysts were tried but all afforded lower diastereoselectivity. The major by-products from the reaction were the cis-isomer, 11 and 12 from the dimerization of ethyl diazoacetate. Solvent plays a significant role in enantioselectivity, diastereoselectivity, and formation of the dimer impurities. As shown in Table 1, a variety of solvents, including coordinating and non-coordinating ones, gave good to excellent conversions (74-98%), except for THF (45%). The diastereoselectivity varied from 80:20 (trans:cis, 1,2-dichloroethane) to 93:7 (trans:cis, MTBE), and ee varied from 85% (1,2-dichloroethane) to 99% (many solvents including MTBE). MTBE gave the best results and was used as the solvent for our first GMP campaign. A significant amount of precipitate was formed when the catalyst was prepared in MTBE. In early studies, this precipitate was removed by filtration prior to the cyclopropanation. However, conversions and ethyl diazoacetate accumulation varied from batch to batch. The situation was greatly improved by generation of the catalyst in situ without filtration. The solid catalyst was completely dissolved after the addition of styrene, giving a clear solution before addition of ethyl diazoacetate. Similar diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity were obtained. In the prep lab, the cyclopropanation reaction was run in two batches. The first batch used the procedure with the solid catalyst removed and 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment, see below) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 92:8 and 98.8% ee for the trans. The conversion for the reaction was only 95% with 2.0 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate used. The second batch used the procedure with in situ generated catalyst without solid removal. Complete conversion was observed with the use of 1.5 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate. Again, 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 88:12 and 98.9% ee for the trans. |
1: 85 % ee 2: 94 % ee | In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 0 - 20℃; for 24 - 25h; Molecular sieve; | 2.1. Cyclopropanation and Purification of Compound 3; An improved Evans cyclopropanation protocol was used for this synthesis using the Cu catalyst prepared from copper (I) triflate and chiral ligand 10. Other ligands and Rh catalysts were tried but all afforded lower diastereoselectivity. The major by-products from the reaction were the cis-isomer, 11 and 12 from the dimerization of ethyl diazoacetate. Solvent plays a significant role in enantioselectivity, diastereoselectivity, and formation of the dimer impurities. As shown in Table 1, a variety of solvents, including coordinating and non-coordinating ones, gave good to excellent conversions (74-98%), except for THF (45%). The diastereoselectivity varied from 80:20 (trans:cis, 1,2-dichloroethane) to 93:7 (trans:cis, MTBE), and ee varied from 85% (1,2-dichloroethane) to 99% (many solvents including MTBE). MTBE gave the best results and was used as the solvent for our first GMP campaign. A significant amount of precipitate was formed when the catalyst was prepared in MTBE. In early studies, this precipitate was removed by filtration prior to the cyclopropanation. However, conversions and ethyl diazoacetate accumulation varied from batch to batch. The situation was greatly improved by generation of the catalyst in situ without filtration. The solid catalyst was completely dissolved after the addition of styrene, giving a clear solution before addition of ethyl diazoacetate. Similar diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity were obtained. In the prep lab, the cyclopropanation reaction was run in two batches. The first batch used the procedure with the solid catalyst removed and 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment, see below) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 92:8 and 98.8% ee for the trans. The conversion for the reaction was only 95% with 2.0 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate used. The second batch used the procedure with in situ generated catalyst without solid removal. Complete conversion was observed with the use of 1.5 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate. Again, 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 88:12 and 98.9% ee for the trans. |
1: 99 % ee 2: 97 % ee | In tert-butyl methyl ether at 0 - 20℃; for 24 - 25h; Molecular sieve; | 2.1. Cyclopropanation and Purification of Compound 3; An improved Evans cyclopropanation protocol was used for this synthesis using the Cu catalyst prepared from copper (I) triflate and chiral ligand 10. Other ligands and Rh catalysts were tried but all afforded lower diastereoselectivity. The major by-products from the reaction were the cis-isomer, 11 and 12 from the dimerization of ethyl diazoacetate. Solvent plays a significant role in enantioselectivity, diastereoselectivity, and formation of the dimer impurities. As shown in Table 1, a variety of solvents, including coordinating and non-coordinating ones, gave good to excellent conversions (74-98%), except for THF (45%). The diastereoselectivity varied from 80:20 (trans:cis, 1,2-dichloroethane) to 93:7 (trans:cis, MTBE), and ee varied from 85% (1,2-dichloroethane) to 99% (many solvents including MTBE). MTBE gave the best results and was used as the solvent for our first GMP campaign. A significant amount of precipitate was formed when the catalyst was prepared in MTBE. In early studies, this precipitate was removed by filtration prior to the cyclopropanation. However, conversions and ethyl diazoacetate accumulation varied from batch to batch. The situation was greatly improved by generation of the catalyst in situ without filtration. The solid catalyst was completely dissolved after the addition of styrene, giving a clear solution before addition of ethyl diazoacetate. Similar diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity were obtained. In the prep lab, the cyclopropanation reaction was run in two batches. The first batch used the procedure with the solid catalyst removed and 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment, see below) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 92:8 and 98.8% ee for the trans. The conversion for the reaction was only 95% with 2.0 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate used. The second batch used the procedure with in situ generated catalyst without solid removal. Complete conversion was observed with the use of 1.5 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate. Again, 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 88:12 and 98.9% ee for the trans. |
In Isopropyl acetate at 0 - 20℃; for 24 - 25h; Molecular sieve; | 2.1. Cyclopropanation and Purification of Compound 3; An improved Evans cyclopropanation protocol was used for this synthesis using the Cu catalyst prepared from copper (I) triflate and chiral ligand 10. Other ligands and Rh catalysts were tried but all afforded lower diastereoselectivity. The major by-products from the reaction were the cis-isomer, 11 and 12 from the dimerization of ethyl diazoacetate. Solvent plays a significant role in enantioselectivity, diastereoselectivity, and formation of the dimer impurities. As shown in Table 1, a variety of solvents, including coordinating and non-coordinating ones, gave good to excellent conversions (74-98%), except for THF (45%). The diastereoselectivity varied from 80:20 (trans:cis, 1,2-dichloroethane) to 93:7 (trans:cis, MTBE), and ee varied from 85% (1,2-dichloroethane) to 99% (many solvents including MTBE). MTBE gave the best results and was used as the solvent for our first GMP campaign. A significant amount of precipitate was formed when the catalyst was prepared in MTBE. In early studies, this precipitate was removed by filtration prior to the cyclopropanation. However, conversions and ethyl diazoacetate accumulation varied from batch to batch. The situation was greatly improved by generation of the catalyst in situ without filtration. The solid catalyst was completely dissolved after the addition of styrene, giving a clear solution before addition of ethyl diazoacetate. Similar diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity were obtained. In the prep lab, the cyclopropanation reaction was run in two batches. The first batch used the procedure with the solid catalyst removed and 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment, see below) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 92:8 and 98.8% ee for the trans. The conversion for the reaction was only 95% with 2.0 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate used. The second batch used the procedure with in situ generated catalyst without solid removal. Complete conversion was observed with the use of 1.5 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate. Again, 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 88:12 and 98.9% ee for the trans. | |
In α,α,α-trifluorotoluene at 0 - 20℃; for 24 - 25h; | 2.1. Cyclopropanation and Purification of Compound 3; An improved Evans cyclopropanation protocol was used for this synthesis using the Cu catalyst prepared from copper (I) triflate and chiral ligand 10. Other ligands and Rh catalysts were tried but all afforded lower diastereoselectivity. The major by-products from the reaction were the cis-isomer, 11 and 12 from the dimerization of ethyl diazoacetate. Solvent plays a significant role in enantioselectivity, diastereoselectivity, and formation of the dimer impurities. As shown in Table 1, a variety of solvents, including coordinating and non-coordinating ones, gave good to excellent conversions (74-98%), except for THF (45%). The diastereoselectivity varied from 80:20 (trans:cis, 1,2-dichloroethane) to 93:7 (trans:cis, MTBE), and ee varied from 85% (1,2-dichloroethane) to 99% (many solvents including MTBE). MTBE gave the best results and was used as the solvent for our first GMP campaign. A significant amount of precipitate was formed when the catalyst was prepared in MTBE. In early studies, this precipitate was removed by filtration prior to the cyclopropanation. However, conversions and ethyl diazoacetate accumulation varied from batch to batch. The situation was greatly improved by generation of the catalyst in situ without filtration. The solid catalyst was completely dissolved after the addition of styrene, giving a clear solution before addition of ethyl diazoacetate. Similar diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity were obtained. In the prep lab, the cyclopropanation reaction was run in two batches. The first batch used the procedure with the solid catalyst removed and 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment, see below) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 92:8 and 98.8% ee for the trans. The conversion for the reaction was only 95% with 2.0 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate used. The second batch used the procedure with in situ generated catalyst without solid removal. Complete conversion was observed with the use of 1.5 equiv of ethyl diazoacetate. Again, 2.4 kg (assayed, 85% yield after NaBH4 treatment) of 3 was obtained with a trans/cis ratio of 88:12 and 98.9% ee for the trans. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With potassium carbonate;palladium diacetate; tris-(o-tolyl)phosphine; In N,N-dimethyl-formamide; at 20 - 100℃; | Preparation 24: diethyl-2-(5-quinolinyl)-2-butenedioate (P24)To a stirred solution of 5-bromo-2-methylquinoline (2.87g) in DMF (6OmL) at room temperature, diethyl maleate (5.15 ml_), palladium acetate (0.16 g), tri(o-tolyl)phosphine (0.42 g) and potassium carbonate (3.80 g) were subsequently added then the reaction mixture was warmed to 100 0C and stirring continued overnight. After cooling, the reaction mixture was quenched with water and extracted twice with diethyl ether. The combined organic layers were collected, dried over sodium sulphate and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (eluting with cyclohexane-ethyl acetate from 100 to 60percent) to give 3.51 g of the title compound as a slightly yellow oil.MS (mlz): 300[MH]+. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With potassium carbonate;palladium diacetate; tris-(o-tolyl)phosphine; In N,N-dimethyl-formamide; at 100℃; for 16h; | Preparation 20: Diethyl-2-(6-quinoxalinyl)-2-butenedioate (P20)The title compound can be prepared through a palladium mediated coupling reaction, using diethyl maleate or fumarate as a common reagent (e.g. Tetrahedron, 2002, 58,6545). For example, a mixture of <strong>[50998-17-9]<strong>[50998-17-9]6-bromoquinoxalin</strong>e</strong> (1 eq.), diethyl maleate (2.3 eq.), palladium acetate (0.05 eq.), tri(o-tolyl)phosphine (0.1 eq.) and potassium carbonate (2 eq.) in DMF may be warmed to 100 0C and stirred for 16 hours. Quenching with water, extraction with diethyl ether and purification of the crude product by flash chromatography should provide the title compound. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With ammonia In tetrahydrofuran at 25℃; for 5h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
18.5% | In propan-1-ol for 75h; Heating / reflux; | b 2-(1-(3,4-Dichlorophenylsulfonyl)-3-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoxalin-2-yl)acetic acid S12; Methyl 2-(3-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoxalin-2-yl)acetate; Orthophenylenediamine (10 g, 92.4 mmol) and diethyl maleate (45 g, 646.8 mmol) were refluxed for 75 h in propanol. The solvent was removed using a rotary evaporator and the residue was purified by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/hexane 1:1).Yield: 4 g (18.5%) |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
Stage #1: furfural With vanadyl sulfate trihydrate; ethanol; dihydrogen peroxide at 60℃; Stage #2: ethanol With benzenesulfonic acid In chloroform Heating; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
Stage #1: 2-methylcadaverine; Diethyl maleate at 20 - 60℃; for 8h; Stage #2: N-Ethylmaleimide at 20 - 25℃; for 8h; | 1 A round bottom flask was fitted with stirrer, heating mantle, nitrogen inlet, thermocouple and addition funnel. 58 parts (1.0 eq. ) of 2-metyl-1, 5- pentandiamine was added to the fiask at room temperature. 137.7 parts (0.8 eq. ) of diethyl maleate was added through the addition funnel over a period of sixty minutes. The temperature of the flask rose to 35°C. The reaction was heated to 60°C and held for seven hours at which time an iodometric titration showed that the reaction was complete. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature. 25.02 parts (0.2 eq. ) of N- ethylmaleimide was added. The temperature was held at 25°C for eight hours until the reaction was complete. The clear, nearly colorless final product had a viscosity of 260 cps and an amine number of 251 (theoretical amine number: 253). |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
A round bottom flask was fitted with stirrer, heating mantle, nitrogen inlet, thermocouple and addition funnel. 105 parts (1.0 eq. ) of bis- (para- aminocyclohexyl) methane was added to the flask at room temperature. 129 parts (0.75 eq. ) of diethyl maleate was added through the addition funnel over a period of sixty minutes. The temperature of the flask rose to 33C. The reaction was heated to 60C and held for ten hours at which time an iodometric titration showed that the reaction was complete. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature. 31.28 parts (0.25 eq. ) of N-ethylmaleimide was added. The temperature was held at 25C for eight hours, after which time the reaction was complete. The clear, nearly colorless final product had a viscosity of 6300 cps and an amine number of 209 (theoretical amine number: 211). |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
47% | (2) Synthesis of ethyl 2-(3,5-dichloropyridin-2-yl)-5-oxopyrazolidine-3-carboxylate To a 500 mL flask, 300 mL anhydrous ethanol, sodium ethoxide (4.1 g, 61 mmol) and <strong>[104408-23-3]3,5-dichloro-2-hydrazinylpyridine</strong> (10.00 g, 56 mmol) were added. The reaction mixture was heated to reflux for 5 minutes. Diethyl maleate (10.64 g, 61.0 mmol) was added dropwise and heated to reflux for 10 minutes. After being cooled to 65 C., the reaction mixture was neutralized with glacial acetic acid (13 g, 224 mmol) and diluted with 300 mL water. The mixture was cooled down to room temperature and the a precipitate formed. The solid was isolated via filtration, washed with 40% aqueous solution of ethanol (3×50 mL) and dried to give the product (8.00 g) as an orange solid in 47% yield. Melting point: 105-108 C.1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): 8.146 (q, 1H), 7.658 (q, 1H), 5.073 (dd, 1H), 4.241 (q, 2H), 3.029 (dd, 1H), 2.721 (dd, 1H), 1.258 (t, 3H). | |
With sodium ethanolate; In ethanol; at 45℃; for 5h; | General procedure: Sodium (0.70 g, 30.44 mmol) was dissolved in 50 mL of anhydrous ethanol, and 2-chloro-6-hydrazinylpyrazine (2a) (4.00 g, 27.67 mmol) was added. The reaction solution was heated to 60 C until the mixture was totally dissolved. Keep the temperature of the reaction below 40 C, and diethyl maleate (4.77 g, 27.67 mmol) was added dropwise. The reaction was heated to 45 C and cooled to room temperature after 5 h. The reaction was quenched with glacial acetic acid (1.83 g, 30.44 mol) and stirred for 1 h. The resulting solution was evaporated in vacuo, dissolved in 50 mL of water, extracted with CH2Cl2 (3×50 mL). The extracts was washed with brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4 and evaporated to give the crude product, which was further purified with recrystallization (diehyl ether) as a yellow solid, 4.25 g. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
42% | With (tetra-n-butylammonium)4-[γ-H2SiW10O36Cu(II)2(μ-1,1-N3)2] at 59.84℃; Inert atmosphere; optical yield given as %de; chemoselective reaction; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
82% | With dichloro(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)rhodium (III) dimer; copper(II) acetate monohydrate; In toluene; at 130℃; for 24h;Inert atmosphere; | General procedure: N-Benzoylsulfonamide 1a (27.5 mg, 0.1 mmol), [RhCl2Cp*]2 (1.2 mg, 0.002 mmol), and Cu(OAc)2·H2O (40.0 mg, 0.20 mmol) were loaded in a dry vial, which was subjected to evacuation/flushing with dry argon three times. Anhydrous toluene (1.0 mL) solution of tert-butyl acrylate 2a (17.4 muL, 0.12 mmol) was syringed into the mixture, which was then stirred at 130 C for 24 h or until the starting material had been consumed as determined by TLC. Upon cooling to room temperature, all volatiles were evaporated and the residue was purified by preparative TLC (ethyl acetate/hexane 1:2) to give isoindolinone 3a in 88% yield |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
Example 9Production of CsM4Cyclosporin A (CsA) was kept under reflux for 45 hours with 0.1 equivalents of Hoveyda-Grubbs catalyst (2nd generation) and 20 equivalents of diethyl maleate in toluene. After removal of the toluene under vacuum, the residue was dissolved in DCM/MeOH (10:0.5) and filtered through silica gel. After removal of the organic solvent under vacuum, the residue was dissolved in 5 ml THF and mixed with a 0.2 M LiOH solution. After stirring overnight and neutralization of the solution with HCl, the product was able to be separated off by means of preparative HPLC. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
Example 10Production of Cs-1OM3Cyclosporin A (CsA) was kept under reflux for 45 hours with 0.1 equivalents of Hoveyda-Grubbs catalyst (2nd generation) and 20 equivalents of diethyl maleate in toluene. After removal of the toluene under vacuum, the residue was dissolved in DCM/MeOH (10:0.5) and filtered through silica gel. After removal of the organic solvent under vacuum, the residue was dissolved in 5 ml methanol and palladium activated carbon catalyst was added under H2. After completion of hydrogenation, filtering was carried out and 2 ml THF as well as 2 ml 0.2 M LiOH solution were added. After stirring overnight, neutralization with HCl was carried out and the product was separated off by means of preparative HPLC. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
75% | In acetonitrile at 20 - 60℃; | 50.a a) 1,4-diethyl 2-[2-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)ethyl]amino}butanedioate (I-23). a) 1,4-diethyl 2-[2-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)ethyl]amino}butanedioate (I-23). [0211] 2-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)ethan-1-amine (2.60 g; 23.4 mmol; 2.5 eq) was added to a solution of 1,4-diethyl (2Z)-but-2-enedioate (1.51 mL; 9.35 mmol; 1 eq) in acetonitrile (35 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The reaction mixture was stirred at 60°C for 2 hours. The layers were separated and the organic layer was concentrated to dryness. The crude was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel using dichloromethane/ methanol/30 % ammonium hydroxide (99/0/1 to 95/4/1) as an eluent. The title compound 1,4-diethyl 2-[2-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)ethyl] amino}butanedioate was obtained in 75 % yield (1.98 g) as a yellow gum. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ (ppm) 1.27 (m, 6H), 2.61 (m, 1H), 2.75 (m, 4H), 3.02 (m, 1H), 3.69 (m, 1H), 4.18 (m, 4H), 6.79 (s, 1H), 7.52 (s, 1H). |
75% | In acetonitrile at 20 - 60℃; | 50.a a) 4-diethyl 2-{ r2-(lH-imidazol-4-yl)ethyllamino|butanedioate (1-23). a) 4-diethyl 2-{ r2-(lH-imidazol-4-yl)ethyllamino|butanedioate (1-23). 2-(lH-imidazol-4-yl)ethan-l-amine (2.60 g; 23.4 mmol; 2.5 eq) was added to a solution of 1,4-diethyl (2Z)-but-2-enedioate (1.51 mL; 9.35 mmol; 1 eq) in acetonitrile (35 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The reaction mixture was stirred at 60°C for 2 hours. The layers were separated and the organic layer was concentrated to dryness. The crude was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel using dichloromethane/methanol/30% ammonium hydroxide (99/0/1 to 95/4/1) as an eluent. The title compound 1,4-diethyl 2-{ [2-(lH- imidazol-4-yl)ethyl] amino Jbutanedioate was obtained in 75% yield (1.98 g) as a yellow gum. 1H-NMR (CDC13): δ (ppm) 1.27 (m, 6H), 2.61 (m, IH), 2.75 (m, 4H), 3.02 (m, IH), 3.69 (m, IH), 4.18 (m, 4H), 6.79 (s, IH), 7.52 (s, IH). |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
99% | In acetonitrile at 20℃; for 16h; | 45.a a) 1,4-diethyl 2-[2-(thiophen-2-yl)ethyl]amino}butanedioate (I-15) a) 1,4-diethyl 2-[2-(thiophen-2-yl)ethyl]amino}butanedioate (I-15) [0173] 2-(Thiophen-2-yl)ethan-1-amine (4.08 g; 32.1 mmol; 2.5 eq) was added to a solution of 1,4-diethyl (2Z)-but-2-enedioate (2.08 mL; 12.8 mmol; 1 eq) in acetonitrile (45 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight and then, concentrated to dryness. The crude was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel using cyclohexane/ ethyl acetate (100/0 to 80/20) as an eluent. The title compound, 2-[1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2,5-dioxo-3-[2-(thiophen-2-yl)ethyl]imidazolidin-4-yl]-N-(4-methoxyphenyl)acetamide, was obtained in 99% yield (3.80 g) as a yellow oil. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ (ppm) 1.25 (m, 6H), 1.81 (m, 1H), 2.72 (m, 3H), 2.99 (s, 3H), 3.66 (m, 1H), 4.16 (m, 4H), 6.88 (m, 2H), 7.13 (dd, 1H, J = 5.0 Hz, 2.3 Hz). |
99% | In acetonitrile at 20℃; for 16h; | 45.a a) 4-diethyl 2-{ r2-(thiophen-2-yl)ethyllamino|butanedioate (1-15) a) 4-diethyl 2-{ r2-(thiophen-2-yl)ethyllamino|butanedioate (1-15) 2-(Thiophen-2-yl)ethan-l -amine (4.08 g; 32.1 mmol; 2.5 eq) was added to a solution of 1,4-diethyl (2Z)-but-2-enedioate (2.08 mL; 12.8 mmol; 1 eq) in acetonitrile (45 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight and then, concentrated to dryness. The crude was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel using cyclohexane/ethyl acetate (100/0 to 80/20) as an eluent. The title compound, 2-[l-(4-fluorophenyl)-2,5-dioxo-3-[2-(thiophen-2-yl)ethyl]imidazolidin- 4-yl]-N-(4-methoxyphenyl)acetamide, was obtained in 99% yield (3.80 g) as a yellow oil. 1H-NMR (CDC13): δ (ppm) 1.25 (m, 6H), 1.81 (m, IH), 2.72 (m, 3H), 2.99 (s, 3H), 3.66 (m, IH), 4.16 (m, 4H), 6.88 (m, 2H), 7.13 (dd, IH, J = 5.0 Hz, 2.3 Hz). |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1.81 % de | With tris(triphenylphosphine)ruthenium(II) chloride In toluene at 0 - 60℃; for 4h; chemoselective reaction; | General procedure: In a typical GC experiment the following operations were undertaken: from a preliminary prepared solution of catalyst in freshly distilled toluene, with known concentration, 2.5 μmol of catalyst were transferred under Ar-flow to an empty 15 ml vessel. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo affording a small amount of solid catalyst. Styrene (10 mmol) was next added. EDA (1 mmol) was dissolved in styrene (10 mmol), cooled to 0 °C and the solution added very slowly, at 0 °C (over 4 h, using a peristaltic pump) to the above reaction mixture. After addition of a few drops of the EDA solution, the mixture was heated to the reaction temperature and kept at this temperature overnight. Before GC-analysis, the reaction mixture was passed through a celite filter in order to remove the catalyst. Celite was washed with 20 ml toluene/EtOAc (1/1). The composition of the reaction mixture was determined by GC using authentic samples and diethyl adipate as internal standard. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
29% | In 1-methyl-pyrrolidin-2-one at 80℃; for 5h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
Multi-step reaction with 3 steps 1: dichloromethane 2: triethylamine 3: acetic acid / ethanol |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
91% | With (R)-3,3?-dichloro-1,1?-binaphthalene-2,2?-diol; n-butyllithium; In hexane; tert-butyl methyl ether; at 20℃; for 1h;Inert atmosphere; | General procedure: Under argon atmosphere, n-Butyllithium (0.1 mmol, 20 mol %) in hexane (0.15 M, 0.67 mL)was added to the solution of (R)-Cl2BINOL (17.8 mg, 0.05 mmol, 10 mol %) in TBME at rt.After stirring for 1 min, dibenzyl malonate (0.13 mL, 0.5 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and diethylmaleate (0.1 mL, 0.6 mmol, 1.2 equiv.) were successively added to the reaction mixture. Afterstirring for 1 h, the reaction was quenched with sat. NH4Cl aq (2 mL). The aqueous layer wasextracted by EtOAc (20 mL) and the combined organic layers were washed with brine (20mL). After drying over Na2SO4, filtration and concentration, the crude product was purifiedby column chromatography. |
91% | With (R)-3,3?-dichloro-1,1?-binaphthalene-2,2?-diol; n-butyllithium; In hexane; tert-butyl methyl ether; at 20℃; for 1h;Inert atmosphere; | General procedure: Under argon atmosphere, n-butyllithium (0.10 mmol,20 mol%) in hexane (0.15 M, 0.67 mL) was added to a solutionof (R)-3,3-Cl2-BINOL (17.8 mg, 0.05 mmol, 10 mol%)in TBME (5.0 mL) at 0C. After stirring for 1 min, dibenzylmalonate (1a) (0.125 mL, 0.5 mmol, 1.0 eq) and diethyl maleate(2a) (0.096 mL, 0.6 mmol, 1.2 eq) was successively added tothe mixture at room temperature (r.t.). After 1 h, the reactionwas quenched with sat. NH4Cl aq. (2 mL) and stirred for 0.5 h.The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). Thecombined organic layers were washed with brine (20 mL),and dried over Na2SO4. After filtration and concentration, thecrude product was purified by column chromatography (hexane-EtOAc = 9 : 1, SiO2: 10 g) to give product 3aa as a colorless oil (214 mg, 94% yield, 90% ee) |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With 3H(1+)*Mo10O40PV2(5-)*Cu(2+)*C8H14N2O3S; oxygen at 130℃; for 3h; Autoclave; | 11 The present embodiment differs from the first embodiment in that, The selective catalytic oxidation of the biomass-based furan compounds is: Accurately weighed 5.0 g of 2-methyl furfural, 50 mL of ethanol, 0.30 mmol of 1- (4-sulfonic acid butyl) -3-methylimidazolium molybdenum vanadate copper salt ion liquid (BSmimCuH2PMo10V2O40) was added to a 150 mL autoclave, Sealed, replaced with high purity oxygen 5 times, Pressure to 1.0MPa, 130 for 3h. After cooling, the reaction solution was separated and the aqueous phase was removed by rotary distillation to obtain a recovered ionic liquid catalyst, and dried at 60 ° C for 24 h for the catalyst cycle performance test. Organic phase to 50ml, take 10μL organic phase liquid, the use of qualitative analysis of gas chromatography, gas chromatography quantitative analysis to obtain 2 - methyl furfural conversion rate of 90.41% Diethyl dicarboxylate (diethyl maleate, Diethyl fumarate, diethyl succinate and diethyl malate) was 289.97 mmol / mol, The selectivity of diethyl maleate was 63.81%. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With 3H(1+)*Mo10O40PV2(5-)*Cu(2+)*C8H14N2O3S; oxygen at 130℃; for 2.5h; Autoclave; | 10 The present embodiment differs from the first embodiment in that, The selective catalytic oxidation of the biomass-based furan compounds is: Accurately weighed 5.0 g of 2-methyltetrahydrofuran, 50 mL of ethanol, (BSmimCuH2PMo10V2O40) was added to a 150 mL autoclave with 0.50 mmol of 1- (4-sulfonic acid butyl) -3-methylimidazolium molybdenum disodium vanadate Sealed, replaced with high purity oxygen 5 times, pressurized to 1.0MPa, 130 for 2.5h. After the reaction, the reaction mixture was cooled, Aqueous phase to spin the solvent to remove the ionic liquid catalyst, 60 vacuum drying 24h, for the catalyst cycle performance test. Organic phase to 50ml, take 10μL organic phase liquid, Qualitative analysis using gas chromatography, gas chromatography quantitative analysis, The conversion of 2-methyltetrahydrofuran was 93.85% The yield of diethyl dicarboxylic acid diethyl ester (diethyl maleate, diethyl fumarate, diethyl succinate and diethyl malate) was 316.03 mmol / mol, of which diethyl maleate The selectivity was 71.71%. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With 3H(1+)*Mo10O40PV2(5-)*Cu(2+)*C8H14N2O3S; oxygen at 130℃; for 3h; Autoclave; | 12 The present embodiment differs from the first embodiment in that, The selective catalytic oxidation of the biomass-based furan compounds is: Accurately weighed 5.0g 2,4-dimethyl furfural, 50 mL of ethanol, (BSmimCuH2PMo10V2O40) was added to a 150 mL autoclave, sealed, replaced with high purity oxygen for 5 times, and then added to a 150 mL autoclave. Pressure to 1.0MPa, 130 for 3h. After cooling, the reaction solution was separated and the aqueous phase was removed by rotary distillation to obtain a recovered ionic liquid catalyst, and dried at 60 ° C for 24 h for the catalyst cycle performance test. Organic phase to 50ml, take 10μL organic phase liquid, the use of qualitative analysis of qualitative analysis, gas chromatography quantitative analysis to obtain 2,4 - dimethyl furfural conversion rate of 91.27%, dicarboxylic acid diethyl ester (Diethyl maleate, diethyl fumarate, diethyl succinate and diethyl malate) and the selectivities of diethyl maleate were 298.44 mmol / mol and 62.38%, respectively. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With 3H(1+)*Mo10O40PV2(5-)*Cu(2+)*C8H14N2O3S; oxygen at 140℃; for 2.5h; Autoclave; | 9 The present embodiment differs from the first embodiment in that, The selective catalytic oxidation of the biomass-based furan compounds is: Accurately weighed 2.5g furfural, 25 mL of ethanol, (BSmimCuH2PMo10V2O40) was added to a 100 mL autoclave with 0.50 mmol of 1- (4-sulfonic acid butyl) -3-methylimidazolium molybdenum disodium vanadate Sealed, replaced with high purity oxygen 5 times, Pressurized to 0.8MPa, 140 for 2.5h. After cooling, the reaction solution was separated and the aqueous phase was removed by rotary distillation to obtain a recovered ionic liquid catalyst, and dried at 60 ° C for 24 h for the catalyst cycle performance test. The organic phase The conversion rate of furfural was 98.22%, and the conversion of diethyl dicarboxylate (diethyl maleate, rich in diethyl alcohol) was determined by qualitative analysis and gas chromatography. The yield of diethyl maleate, diethyl succinate and diethyl malate) was 302.03 mmol / mol, and the selectivity of diethyl maleate was 67.09% |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With tetramethyl ammoniumhydroxide; at 50℃; for 7h;Inert atmosphere; | (1) 315.54 g (1.5 mol) of <strong>[1761-71-3]4,4'-diaminodicyclohexylmethane</strong> and 0.137 g (1.5 mmol) of tetramethyl hydrogenThe ammonium oxide catalyst was added to a 1L three-necked flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer, a thermometer, a constant pressure dropping funnel, a N2 gas line tube, and a bubbler, and 516.54 g (3.0 mol) of diethyl maleate was added to the constant pressure. In the dropping funnel, N2 was introduced into the system for 20 minutes to replace the air in the system. Diethyl maleate was slowly added dropwise with stirring at 25 C. After completion of the dropwise addition, the temperature was raised to 50 C. for 7 hours to stop the reaction. | |
(1) According to mass parts, 45 parts of indium triflate and 13 parts of indium chloride, 8 parts of copper triflate, 5 parts of aluminum triflate and 29 parts of alumina Disperse together in 150 parts of ethanol, stir at 60C for 3.5h, distill off the solvent under reduced pressure at 1kPa and 40C, vacuum dry the product at 40C for 3h, then roast in nitrogen atmosphere at 500C for 3h to obtain the supported type Lewis acid catalyst.(2) Add 420.72g (2.0mol) <strong>[1761-71-3]4,4'-diaminodicyclohexylmethane</strong> to the reaction kettle equipped with mechanical stirring, thermometer, N2 gas pipe and bubbler, the system is continuously purged with nitrogen And observe the bubbler bubbling, start stirring and control the temperature of the reaction kettle at 40 , slowly add 723.16g (4.2mol) diethyl maleate into the reaction kettle slowly and evenly within 2h, after the addition is completed, 5.05g The supported Lewis acid catalyst was added to the reactor and the reaction was kept for 5 hours to stop the reaction.After filtering the reaction solution to remove the catalyst, the excess diethyl maleate in the filtrate was removed by vacuum distillation at 120C and 1 kPa pressure to obtain polyaspartate PAE-2.(3) PAE-2 characterization analysis result: the conversion rate of primary amine is 99.3%, the Hazen color is 24, and the gel time is 108 min. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With tetramethyl ammoniumhydroxide at 70℃; for 10h; Inert atmosphere; | 6.1 Example 6 (1) 357.62 g (1.5 mol) of 3,3'-dimethyl-4,4'-diaminodicyclohexylmethane and 0.137 g(1.5 mmol) tetramethylammonium hydroxide catalyst is added with mechanical stirrer, thermometer, constant pressure dropping funnel, connectedA 516.54 g (3.0 mol) of diethyl maleate was added to a constant pressure dropping funnel in a 1 L three-necked flask with an N2 gas line and a bubbler.In the system, N2 was introduced into the system for 20 minutes to displace the air in the system; diethyl maleate was slowly added dropwise with stirring at 25°C.After completion, the reaction was heated to 70°C for 10 hours to stop the reaction | |
Stage #1: bis-(4-amino-3-methylcyclohexyl)-methane; Diethyl maleate at 50℃; for 2h; Inert atmosphere; Stage #2: With lewis acid for 7h; | 3; 1 Example 3 (1) 60 parts of indium triflate and 5 parts of indium chloride, 8 parts of copper triflate, 7 parts of aluminum triflate and 20 parts of aluminum oxide Disperse together in 200 parts of ethanol, stir at 60°C for 4h, distill off the solvent under reduced pressure at 1kPa and 40°C, vacuum dry the product at 50°C for 5h, then roast at 550°C in a nitrogen atmosphere for 4h to obtain supported Lewis Acid catalyst.(2) Add 476.82g (2.0mol) 3,3'-dimethyl-4,4'-diaminodicyclohexylmethane to the reaction equipped with mechanical agitation, thermometer, N2 gas pipe and bubbler In the kettle, the system was continuously purged with nitrogen and bubbling was observed in the bubbler, stirring was started and the temperature of the reaction kettle was controlled at 50°C.Add 723.16g (4.2mol) diethyl maleate to the reaction kettle slowly and evenly within 2h,After the addition was completed, 23.84g of supported Lewis acid catalyst was added to the reactor, and the reaction was kept for 7 hours to stop the reaction.The reaction solution was filtered to remove the catalyst, and the excess diethyl maleate in the filtrate was removed by vacuum distillation at 120°C and 1 kPa pressure to obtain polyaspartate PAE-3.(3) PAE-3 characterization analysis result: the conversion rate of primary amine is 98.9%, Hazen color is 29, and gel time is 10.5h. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With tetramethyl ammoniumhydroxide at 40℃; for 2h; Inert atmosphere; | 1.1 Example 1 (1) Catalysis of 174.31 g (1.5 mol) 2-methyl pentamethylene diamine and 0.137 g (1.5 mmol) tetramethylammonium hydroxideAdd agent into a 1L three-neck flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer, thermometer, constant pressure dropping funnel, N2 gas line tube, bubbler, and add 516.54g (3.0mol) of diethyl maleate to constant pressure drops. In the funnel, N2 was introduced into the system for 20 minutes to displace the air in the system. Diethyl maleate was slowly added dropwise with stirring at 25° C. After the dropwise addition, the temperature was raised to 40° C. and the reaction was continued for 2 hours to stop the reaction. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
81.6% | With ethanol; sodium; at 15 - 60℃; for 3h; | [1485] to a mixture of compound 350a (2 g, 18.2 mmol) and na (1.46 g, 63.6 mmol) in EtOH (60 ml) was added diethyl maleate (3.75 g, 21.8 mmol) at 15 C. The mixture was stirred at 60 C for 3 hours. The reaction was cooled to 15 C and quenched with acetic acid to ph ~ 7. The mixture was concentrated to give residue. The residue was purified by prep- hplc (tfa condition) to give compound 350b (3.5 g, 14.8 mmol, yield: 81.6%) as brown oil. 1H NMR (400mhz, CDCl3) delta 8.49 (d, = 4.9 hz, 2h), 6.85 (t, = 5.0 hz, 1h), 5.23 (dd, = 4.2, 11.0 hz, 1h), 4.33- 4.20 (m, 2h), 3.41 -3.28 (m, 1h), 3.01 (dd, = 4.2, 17.6 hz, 1h), 2.05 - 1.96 (m, 1h), 1.32 - 1.21 (m, 3h). |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
82% | With iodine; zinc; In tetrahydrofuran; at 70℃; for 4h;Inert atmosphere; | 20.2 mmol of zinc powder and 0.85 mmol of iodine were added to anhydrous tetrahydrofuran, protected with nitrogen, and heated to 50 C for 30 minutes.Equivalent (16.8 mmol) of <strong>[13482-23-0]4-methoxycyclohexanone</strong> and diethyl maleate mixed with tetrahydrofuran solution were slowly added dropwise to the reaction flask, and the mixture was heated to 70 C for 4 hours. After cooling to room temperature, a small amount of 1 N hydrochloric acid solution was added. Stir at room temperature until the zinc powder disappeared, extracted with ethyl acetate, washed with water and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate.The final column chromatography gave the product V-28 in a yield of 82%. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With sodium ethanolate; In ethanol; at 45℃; for 5h; | General procedure: Sodium (0.70 g, 30.44 mmol) was dissolved in 50 mL of anhydrous ethanol, and 2-chloro-6-hydrazinylpyrazine (2a) (4.00 g, 27.67 mmol) was added. The reaction solution was heated to 60 C until the mixture was totally dissolved. Keep the temperature of the reaction below 40 C, and diethyl maleate (4.77 g, 27.67 mmol) was added dropwise. The reaction was heated to 45 C and cooled to room temperature after 5 h. The reaction was quenched with glacial acetic acid (1.83 g, 30.44 mol) and stirred for 1 h. The resulting solution was evaporated in vacuo, dissolved in 50 mL of water, extracted with CH2Cl2 (3×50 mL). The extracts was washed with brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4 and evaporated to give the crude product, which was further purified with recrystallization (diehyl ether) as a yellow solid, 4.25 g. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
57% | With sodium ethanolate In ethanol at 45℃; for 5h; | 1-(6-chloropyrazin-2-yl)-3-pyrazolidone-5-carboxylic acid ethyl ester (4a). Sodium (0.70 g, 30.44 mmol) was dissolved in 50 mL of anhydrous ethanol, and 2-chloro-6-hydrazinylpyrazine (2a) (4.00 g, 27.67 mmol) was added. The reaction solution was heated to 60 °C until the mixture was totally dissolved. Keep the temperature of the reaction below 40 °C, and diethyl maleate (4.77 g, 27.67 mmol) was added dropwise. The reaction was heated to 45 °C and cooled to room temperature after 5 h. The reaction was quenched with glacial acetic acid (1.83 g, 30.44 mol) and stirred for 1 h. The resulting solution was evaporated in vacuo, dissolved in 50 mL of water, extracted with CH2Cl2 (3×50 mL). The extracts was washed with brine, dried with anhydrous MgSO4 and evaporated to give the crude product, which was further purified with recrystallization (diehyl ether) as a yellow solid, 4.25 g. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
74% | With (R)-3,3?-dichloro-1,1?-binaphthalene-2,2?-diol; n-butyllithium; In hexane; tert-butyl methyl ether; at 20℃; for 2h;Inert atmosphere; | General procedure: Under argon atmosphere, n-butyllithium (0.10 mmol,20 mol%) in hexane (0.15 M, 0.67 mL) was added to a solutionof (R)-3,3-Cl2-BINOL (17.8 mg, 0.05 mmol, 10 mol%)in TBME (5.0 mL) at 0C. After stirring for 1 min, dibenzylmalonate (1a) (0.125 mL, 0.5 mmol, 1.0 eq) and diethyl maleate(2a) (0.096 mL, 0.6 mmol, 1.2 eq) was successively added tothe mixture at room temperature (r.t.). After 1 h, the reactionwas quenched with sat. NH4Cl aq. (2 mL) and stirred for 0.5 h.The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). Thecombined organic layers were washed with brine (20 mL),and dried over Na2SO4. After filtration and concentration, thecrude product was purified by column chromatography (hexane-EtOAc = 9 : 1, SiO2: 10 g) to give product 3aa as a colorless oil (214 mg, 94% yield, 90% ee) |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
21% | Stage #1: Diethyl maleate With tributylphosphine In dichloromethane at 0 - 20℃; for 0.666667h; Inert atmosphere; Stage #2: C20H12O4 In dichloromethane at 0℃; Inert atmosphere; Stage #3: n-butylmaleimide Further stages; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With [methyl-3-(butyl-4-sulfonate) imidazolium]CuPW12O40; oxygen; at 159.84℃; under 6000.6 Torr; for 5h; | General procedure: In a typical process, 0.25 g lignin, 0.9 mmol POM-IL catalyst and 20 mL 100% ethanol werecharged into a 100 mL stainless autoclave (Andorra MED1220, Premex Co. Ltd.). After airpurging with pure oxygen five times and pressurizing to 0.8 MPa, the reactor was heated to thedesignated temperature and maintained for the desired time. Once the latter elapsed, the autoclavewas cooled rapidly to room temperature in an ice water bath. The reaction mixture was removedand the reactor was washed with anhydrous ethanol (3 5.0 mL). The IL catalyst was precipitatedat room temperature and used for the next run after drying (extra fresh catalyst was added tooffset transfer losses). The liquid mixture was then diluted by ethanol to 50 mL for qualitative andquantitative analysis, while dimethyl phthalate was used as the internal standard. When aqueoussolutions of ethanol were used, the spent mixture was rotary evaporated under reduced pressurefor solvent recovery. The concentrated liquor was esterified with 10 mL anhydrous ethanol at 373K for 2 h and then diluted to 50 mL with ethanol. Volatile products were qualitatively andquantitatively analyzed via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and gaschromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID). Residual lignin can be obtained throughsimple precipitation processes. Organosolv lignin was recovered as follows: 60 mL deionized water was added into 20 mL of the above reaction mixture causing precipitation. The mixture wasthen separated using centrifugation and was dried until a constant weight was obtained. For therecovery of dealkaline lignin the mixture obtained after reaction was acidified to pH=2 with 1.0mol L-1 HCl solution and the same procedure described for organosolv lignin was conducted.In the atmosphere investigation, a mixture of nitrogen and oxygen with various molar ratioswas used, while depolymerization of lignin was conducted at 433 K for 5.0 h in the single stageexperiments. For a typical two-stage process, the lignin was first depolymerized employing theaforementioned conditions. When the mixture was cooled to room temperature, an extra 0.8 MPanitrogen or oxygen was purged into the reactor and the reaction was heated to 433 K for 1.0 or 2.0h. The product separation and analysis procedure remained unchanged to that describedpreviously. In comparative and control experiments, a series of model compounds (monolignolsand potential intermediate products) were tested under the same procedures as that for lignin (i.e.,0.25 g model compound, 0.9 mmol POM-IL catalyst and 20 mL 100% ethanol solvent). Triplicateexperiments were conducted and the data shown in this study is the average. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With [methyl-3-(butyl-4-sulfonate) imidazolium]CuPW12O40; oxygen at 159.84℃; for 5h; | General procedure for catalytic oxidation of lignin and model compound. General procedure: In a typical process, 0.25 g lignin, 0.9 mmol POM-IL catalyst and 20 mL 100% ethanol werecharged into a 100 mL stainless autoclave (Andorra MED1220, Premex Co. Ltd.). After airpurging with pure oxygen five times and pressurizing to 0.8 MPa, the reactor was heated to thedesignated temperature and maintained for the desired time. Once the latter elapsed, the autoclavewas cooled rapidly to room temperature in an ice water bath. The reaction mixture was removedand the reactor was washed with anhydrous ethanol (3 5.0 mL). The IL catalyst was precipitatedat room temperature and used for the next run after drying (extra fresh catalyst was added tooffset transfer losses). The liquid mixture was then diluted by ethanol to 50 mL for qualitative andquantitative analysis, while dimethyl phthalate was used as the internal standard. When aqueoussolutions of ethanol were used, the spent mixture was rotary evaporated under reduced pressurefor solvent recovery. The concentrated liquor was esterified with 10 mL anhydrous ethanol at 373K for 2 h and then diluted to 50 mL with ethanol. Volatile products were qualitatively andquantitatively analyzed via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and gaschromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID). Residual lignin can be obtained throughsimple precipitation processes. Organosolv lignin was recovered as follows: 60 mL deionized water was added into 20 mL of the above reaction mixture causing precipitation. The mixture wasthen separated using centrifugation and was dried until a constant weight was obtained. For therecovery of dealkaline lignin the mixture obtained after reaction was acidified to pH=2 with 1.0mol L-1 HCl solution and the same procedure described for organosolv lignin was conducted.In the atmosphere investigation, a mixture of nitrogen and oxygen with various molar ratioswas used, while depolymerization of lignin was conducted at 433 K for 5.0 h in the single stageexperiments. For a typical two-stage process, the lignin was first depolymerized employing theaforementioned conditions. When the mixture was cooled to room temperature, an extra 0.8 MPanitrogen or oxygen was purged into the reactor and the reaction was heated to 433 K for 1.0 or 2.0h. The product separation and analysis procedure remained unchanged to that describedpreviously. In comparative and control experiments, a series of model compounds (monolignolsand potential intermediate products) were tested under the same procedures as that for lignin (i.e.,0.25 g model compound, 0.9 mmol POM-IL catalyst and 20 mL 100% ethanol solvent). Triplicateexperiments were conducted and the data shown in this study is the average. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With [methyl-3-(butyl-4-sulfonate) imidazolium]CuPW12O40; oxygen; at 159.84℃; under 6000.6 Torr; for 5h; | General procedure: In a typical process, 0.25 g lignin, 0.9 mmol POM-IL catalyst and 20 mL 100% ethanol werecharged into a 100 mL stainless autoclave (Andorra MED1220, Premex Co. Ltd.). After airpurging with pure oxygen five times and pressurizing to 0.8 MPa, the reactor was heated to thedesignated temperature and maintained for the desired time. Once the latter elapsed, the autoclavewas cooled rapidly to room temperature in an ice water bath. The reaction mixture was removedand the reactor was washed with anhydrous ethanol (3 5.0 mL). The IL catalyst was precipitatedat room temperature and used for the next run after drying (extra fresh catalyst was added tooffset transfer losses). The liquid mixture was then diluted by ethanol to 50 mL for qualitative andquantitative analysis, while dimethyl phthalate was used as the internal standard. When aqueoussolutions of ethanol were used, the spent mixture was rotary evaporated under reduced pressurefor solvent recovery. The concentrated liquor was esterified with 10 mL anhydrous ethanol at 373K for 2 h and then diluted to 50 mL with ethanol. Volatile products were qualitatively andquantitatively analyzed via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and gaschromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID). Residual lignin can be obtained throughsimple precipitation processes. Organosolv lignin was recovered as follows: 60 mL deionized water was added into 20 mL of the above reaction mixture causing precipitation. The mixture wasthen separated using centrifugation and was dried until a constant weight was obtained. For therecovery of dealkaline lignin the mixture obtained after reaction was acidified to pH=2 with 1.0mol L-1 HCl solution and the same procedure described for organosolv lignin was conducted.In the atmosphere investigation, a mixture of nitrogen and oxygen with various molar ratioswas used, while depolymerization of lignin was conducted at 433 K for 5.0 h in the single stageexperiments. For a typical two-stage process, the lignin was first depolymerized employing theaforementioned conditions. When the mixture was cooled to room temperature, an extra 0.8 MPanitrogen or oxygen was purged into the reactor and the reaction was heated to 433 K for 1.0 or 2.0h. The product separation and analysis procedure remained unchanged to that describedpreviously. In comparative and control experiments, a series of model compounds (monolignolsand potential intermediate products) were tested under the same procedures as that for lignin (i.e.,0.25 g model compound, 0.9 mmol POM-IL catalyst and 20 mL 100% ethanol solvent). Triplicateexperiments were conducted and the data shown in this study is the average. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With [methyl-3-(butyl-4-sulfonate) imidazolium]CuPW12O40; oxygen at 159.84℃; for 5h; | General procedure for catalytic oxidation of lignin and model compound. General procedure: In a typical process, 0.25 g lignin, 0.9 mmol POM-IL catalyst and 20 mL 100% ethanol werecharged into a 100 mL stainless autoclave (Andorra MED1220, Premex Co. Ltd.). After airpurging with pure oxygen five times and pressurizing to 0.8 MPa, the reactor was heated to thedesignated temperature and maintained for the desired time. Once the latter elapsed, the autoclavewas cooled rapidly to room temperature in an ice water bath. The reaction mixture was removedand the reactor was washed with anhydrous ethanol (3 5.0 mL). The IL catalyst was precipitatedat room temperature and used for the next run after drying (extra fresh catalyst was added tooffset transfer losses). The liquid mixture was then diluted by ethanol to 50 mL for qualitative andquantitative analysis, while dimethyl phthalate was used as the internal standard. When aqueoussolutions of ethanol were used, the spent mixture was rotary evaporated under reduced pressurefor solvent recovery. The concentrated liquor was esterified with 10 mL anhydrous ethanol at 373K for 2 h and then diluted to 50 mL with ethanol. Volatile products were qualitatively andquantitatively analyzed via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and gaschromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID). Residual lignin can be obtained throughsimple precipitation processes. Organosolv lignin was recovered as follows: 60 mL deionized water was added into 20 mL of the above reaction mixture causing precipitation. The mixture wasthen separated using centrifugation and was dried until a constant weight was obtained. For therecovery of dealkaline lignin the mixture obtained after reaction was acidified to pH=2 with 1.0mol L-1 HCl solution and the same procedure described for organosolv lignin was conducted.In the atmosphere investigation, a mixture of nitrogen and oxygen with various molar ratioswas used, while depolymerization of lignin was conducted at 433 K for 5.0 h in the single stageexperiments. For a typical two-stage process, the lignin was first depolymerized employing theaforementioned conditions. When the mixture was cooled to room temperature, an extra 0.8 MPanitrogen or oxygen was purged into the reactor and the reaction was heated to 433 K for 1.0 or 2.0h. The product separation and analysis procedure remained unchanged to that describedpreviously. In comparative and control experiments, a series of model compounds (monolignolsand potential intermediate products) were tested under the same procedures as that for lignin (i.e.,0.25 g model compound, 0.9 mmol POM-IL catalyst and 20 mL 100% ethanol solvent). Triplicateexperiments were conducted and the data shown in this study is the average. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With [methyl-3-(butyl-4-sulfonate) imidazolium]CuPW12O40; oxygen at 159.84℃; for 5h; | General procedure for catalytic oxidation of lignin and model compound. General procedure: In a typical process, 0.25 g lignin, 0.9 mmol POM-IL catalyst and 20 mL 100% ethanol werecharged into a 100 mL stainless autoclave (Andorra MED1220, Premex Co. Ltd.). After airpurging with pure oxygen five times and pressurizing to 0.8 MPa, the reactor was heated to thedesignated temperature and maintained for the desired time. Once the latter elapsed, the autoclavewas cooled rapidly to room temperature in an ice water bath. The reaction mixture was removedand the reactor was washed with anhydrous ethanol (3 5.0 mL). The IL catalyst was precipitatedat room temperature and used for the next run after drying (extra fresh catalyst was added tooffset transfer losses). The liquid mixture was then diluted by ethanol to 50 mL for qualitative andquantitative analysis, while dimethyl phthalate was used as the internal standard. When aqueoussolutions of ethanol were used, the spent mixture was rotary evaporated under reduced pressurefor solvent recovery. The concentrated liquor was esterified with 10 mL anhydrous ethanol at 373K for 2 h and then diluted to 50 mL with ethanol. Volatile products were qualitatively andquantitatively analyzed via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and gaschromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID). Residual lignin can be obtained throughsimple precipitation processes. Organosolv lignin was recovered as follows: 60 mL deionized water was added into 20 mL of the above reaction mixture causing precipitation. The mixture wasthen separated using centrifugation and was dried until a constant weight was obtained. For therecovery of dealkaline lignin the mixture obtained after reaction was acidified to pH=2 with 1.0mol L-1 HCl solution and the same procedure described for organosolv lignin was conducted.In the atmosphere investigation, a mixture of nitrogen and oxygen with various molar ratioswas used, while depolymerization of lignin was conducted at 433 K for 5.0 h in the single stageexperiments. For a typical two-stage process, the lignin was first depolymerized employing theaforementioned conditions. When the mixture was cooled to room temperature, an extra 0.8 MPanitrogen or oxygen was purged into the reactor and the reaction was heated to 433 K for 1.0 or 2.0h. The product separation and analysis procedure remained unchanged to that describedpreviously. In comparative and control experiments, a series of model compounds (monolignolsand potential intermediate products) were tested under the same procedures as that for lignin (i.e.,0.25 g model compound, 0.9 mmol POM-IL catalyst and 20 mL 100% ethanol solvent). Triplicateexperiments were conducted and the data shown in this study is the average. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With [methyl-3-(butyl-4-sulfonate) imidazolium]CuPW12O40; oxygen at 159.84℃; for 5h; | General procedure for catalytic oxidation of lignin and model compound. General procedure: In a typical process, 0.25 g lignin, 0.9 mmol POM-IL catalyst and 20 mL 100% ethanol werecharged into a 100 mL stainless autoclave (Andorra MED1220, Premex Co. Ltd.). After airpurging with pure oxygen five times and pressurizing to 0.8 MPa, the reactor was heated to thedesignated temperature and maintained for the desired time. Once the latter elapsed, the autoclavewas cooled rapidly to room temperature in an ice water bath. The reaction mixture was removedand the reactor was washed with anhydrous ethanol (3 5.0 mL). The IL catalyst was precipitatedat room temperature and used for the next run after drying (extra fresh catalyst was added tooffset transfer losses). The liquid mixture was then diluted by ethanol to 50 mL for qualitative andquantitative analysis, while dimethyl phthalate was used as the internal standard. When aqueoussolutions of ethanol were used, the spent mixture was rotary evaporated under reduced pressurefor solvent recovery. The concentrated liquor was esterified with 10 mL anhydrous ethanol at 373K for 2 h and then diluted to 50 mL with ethanol. Volatile products were qualitatively andquantitatively analyzed via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and gaschromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID). Residual lignin can be obtained throughsimple precipitation processes. Organosolv lignin was recovered as follows: 60 mL deionized water was added into 20 mL of the above reaction mixture causing precipitation. The mixture wasthen separated using centrifugation and was dried until a constant weight was obtained. For therecovery of dealkaline lignin the mixture obtained after reaction was acidified to pH=2 with 1.0mol L-1 HCl solution and the same procedure described for organosolv lignin was conducted.In the atmosphere investigation, a mixture of nitrogen and oxygen with various molar ratioswas used, while depolymerization of lignin was conducted at 433 K for 5.0 h in the single stageexperiments. For a typical two-stage process, the lignin was first depolymerized employing theaforementioned conditions. When the mixture was cooled to room temperature, an extra 0.8 MPanitrogen or oxygen was purged into the reactor and the reaction was heated to 433 K for 1.0 or 2.0h. The product separation and analysis procedure remained unchanged to that describedpreviously. In comparative and control experiments, a series of model compounds (monolignolsand potential intermediate products) were tested under the same procedures as that for lignin (i.e.,0.25 g model compound, 0.9 mmol POM-IL catalyst and 20 mL 100% ethanol solvent). Triplicateexperiments were conducted and the data shown in this study is the average. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With [methyl-3-(butyl-4-sulfonate) imidazolium]CuPW12O40; oxygen; at 159.84℃; under 6000.6 Torr; for 5h; | General procedure: In a typical process, 0.25 g lignin, 0.9 mmol POM-IL catalyst and 20 mL 100% ethanol werecharged into a 100 mL stainless autoclave (Andorra MED1220, Premex Co. Ltd.). After airpurging with pure oxygen five times and pressurizing to 0.8 MPa, the reactor was heated to thedesignated temperature and maintained for the desired time. Once the latter elapsed, the autoclavewas cooled rapidly to room temperature in an ice water bath. The reaction mixture was removedand the reactor was washed with anhydrous ethanol (3 5.0 mL). The IL catalyst was precipitatedat room temperature and used for the next run after drying (extra fresh catalyst was added tooffset transfer losses). The liquid mixture was then diluted by ethanol to 50 mL for qualitative andquantitative analysis, while dimethyl phthalate was used as the internal standard. When aqueoussolutions of ethanol were used, the spent mixture was rotary evaporated under reduced pressurefor solvent recovery. The concentrated liquor was esterified with 10 mL anhydrous ethanol at 373K for 2 h and then diluted to 50 mL with ethanol. Volatile products were qualitatively andquantitatively analyzed via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and gaschromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID). Residual lignin can be obtained throughsimple precipitation processes. Organosolv lignin was recovered as follows: 60 mL deionized water was added into 20 mL of the above reaction mixture causing precipitation. The mixture wasthen separated using centrifugation and was dried until a constant weight was obtained. For therecovery of dealkaline lignin the mixture obtained after reaction was acidified to pH=2 with 1.0mol L-1 HCl solution and the same procedure described for organosolv lignin was conducted.In the atmosphere investigation, a mixture of nitrogen and oxygen with various molar ratioswas used, while depolymerization of lignin was conducted at 433 K for 5.0 h in the single stageexperiments. For a typical two-stage process, the lignin was first depolymerized employing theaforementioned conditions. When the mixture was cooled to room temperature, an extra 0.8 MPanitrogen or oxygen was purged into the reactor and the reaction was heated to 433 K for 1.0 or 2.0h. The product separation and analysis procedure remained unchanged to that describedpreviously. In comparative and control experiments, a series of model compounds (monolignolsand potential intermediate products) were tested under the same procedures as that for lignin (i.e.,0.25 g model compound, 0.9 mmol POM-IL catalyst and 20 mL 100% ethanol solvent). Triplicateexperiments were conducted and the data shown in this study is the average. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
81% | Stage #1: ethanol With sodium Stage #2: (3-chloro-2-pyridyl)hydrazine With iodotris(triphenylphosphine)silver(I) In ethanol at 30℃; Stage #3: Diethyl maleate In ethanol at 30 - 32℃; for 2h; | 6; 14 EXAMPLE 6: 375 ml of absolute Ethanol (0.750 litres/mole) was charged into the reactor followed by the addition of sodium pieces (12.65 gms; 1.1 gm atom/mole) under stirring till dissolution to obtain a solution containing sodium ethoxide. 3-chloro-2-hydrazinopyridine (71.75 gm; 0.50 mole) was added to the solution containing sodium ethoxide, followed by the addition of Ag(PPh3)3I catalyst (0.1021 gm; 0.0002 mole/mole) under stirring at 30°C to obtain reaction mixture. Di ethyl maleate (103.2 gms; 1.20 mole/mole) was added slowly to the reaction mixture over a period of 2 hours keeping reaction temperature between 30-32 °C to obtain a reaction mass. The reaction mass was equilibrated at 30-32°C and monitored by HPLC. The reaction was terminated and worked up when optimum formation of Ethyl-2-(3- chIoropyridin-2-yI)-5-oxo-pyrazoIidine-3-carboxyIate was observed. The yield of EthyI-2-(3- chloropyridin-2-yl)-5-oxo-pyrazolidine-3-carboxylate was 81% and purity was 96.1%. |
Tags: 141-05-9 synthesis path| 141-05-9 SDS| 141-05-9 COA| 141-05-9 purity| 141-05-9 application| 141-05-9 NMR| 141-05-9 COA| 141-05-9 structure
Precautionary Statements-General | |
Code | Phrase |
P101 | If medical advice is needed,have product container or label at hand. |
P102 | Keep out of reach of children. |
P103 | Read label before use |
Prevention | |
Code | Phrase |
P201 | Obtain special instructions before use. |
P202 | Do not handle until all safety precautions have been read and understood. |
P210 | Keep away from heat/sparks/open flames/hot surfaces. - No smoking. |
P211 | Do not spray on an open flame or other ignition source. |
P220 | Keep/Store away from clothing/combustible materials. |
P221 | Take any precaution to avoid mixing with combustibles |
P222 | Do not allow contact with air. |
P223 | Keep away from any possible contact with water, because of violent reaction and possible flash fire. |
P230 | Keep wetted |
P231 | Handle under inert gas. |
P232 | Protect from moisture. |
P233 | Keep container tightly closed. |
P234 | Keep only in original container. |
P235 | Keep cool |
P240 | Ground/bond container and receiving equipment. |
P241 | Use explosion-proof electrical/ventilating/lighting/equipment. |
P242 | Use only non-sparking tools. |
P243 | Take precautionary measures against static discharge. |
P244 | Keep reduction valves free from grease and oil. |
P250 | Do not subject to grinding/shock/friction. |
P251 | Pressurized container: Do not pierce or burn, even after use. |
P260 | Do not breathe dust/fume/gas/mist/vapours/spray. |
P261 | Avoid breathing dust/fume/gas/mist/vapours/spray. |
P262 | Do not get in eyes, on skin, or on clothing. |
P263 | Avoid contact during pregnancy/while nursing. |
P264 | Wash hands thoroughly after handling. |
P265 | Wash skin thouroughly after handling. |
P270 | Do not eat, drink or smoke when using this product. |
P271 | Use only outdoors or in a well-ventilated area. |
P272 | Contaminated work clothing should not be allowed out of the workplace. |
P273 | Avoid release to the environment. |
P280 | Wear protective gloves/protective clothing/eye protection/face protection. |
P281 | Use personal protective equipment as required. |
P282 | Wear cold insulating gloves/face shield/eye protection. |
P283 | Wear fire/flame resistant/retardant clothing. |
P284 | Wear respiratory protection. |
P285 | In case of inadequate ventilation wear respiratory protection. |
P231 + P232 | Handle under inert gas. Protect from moisture. |
P235 + P410 | Keep cool. Protect from sunlight. |
Response | |
Code | Phrase |
P301 | IF SWALLOWED: |
P304 | IF INHALED: |
P305 | IF IN EYES: |
P306 | IF ON CLOTHING: |
P307 | IF exposed: |
P308 | IF exposed or concerned: |
P309 | IF exposed or if you feel unwell: |
P310 | Immediately call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. |
P311 | Call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. |
P312 | Call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician if you feel unwell. |
P313 | Get medical advice/attention. |
P314 | Get medical advice/attention if you feel unwell. |
P315 | Get immediate medical advice/attention. |
P320 | |
P302 + P352 | IF ON SKIN: wash with plenty of soap and water. |
P321 | |
P322 | |
P330 | Rinse mouth. |
P331 | Do NOT induce vomiting. |
P332 | IF SKIN irritation occurs: |
P333 | If skin irritation or rash occurs: |
P334 | Immerse in cool water/wrap n wet bandages. |
P335 | Brush off loose particles from skin. |
P336 | Thaw frosted parts with lukewarm water. Do not rub affected area. |
P337 | If eye irritation persists: |
P338 | Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. |
P340 | Remove victim to fresh air and keep at rest in a position comfortable for breathing. |
P341 | If breathing is difficult, remove victim to fresh air and keep at rest in a position comfortable for breathing. |
P342 | If experiencing respiratory symptoms: |
P350 | Gently wash with plenty of soap and water. |
P351 | Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. |
P352 | Wash with plenty of soap and water. |
P353 | Rinse skin with water/shower. |
P360 | Rinse immediately contaminated clothing and skin with plenty of water before removing clothes. |
P361 | Remove/Take off immediately all contaminated clothing. |
P362 | Take off contaminated clothing and wash before reuse. |
P363 | Wash contaminated clothing before reuse. |
P370 | In case of fire: |
P371 | In case of major fire and large quantities: |
P372 | Explosion risk in case of fire. |
P373 | DO NOT fight fire when fire reaches explosives. |
P374 | Fight fire with normal precautions from a reasonable distance. |
P376 | Stop leak if safe to do so. Oxidising gases (section 2.4) 1 |
P377 | Leaking gas fire: Do not extinguish, unless leak can be stopped safely. |
P378 | |
P380 | Evacuate area. |
P381 | Eliminate all ignition sources if safe to do so. |
P390 | Absorb spillage to prevent material damage. |
P391 | Collect spillage. Hazardous to the aquatic environment |
P301 + P310 | IF SWALLOWED: Immediately call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. |
P301 + P312 | IF SWALLOWED: call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician IF you feel unwell. |
P301 + P330 + P331 | IF SWALLOWED: Rinse mouth. Do NOT induce vomiting. |
P302 + P334 | IF ON SKIN: Immerse in cool water/wrap in wet bandages. |
P302 + P350 | IF ON SKIN: Gently wash with plenty of soap and water. |
P303 + P361 + P353 | IF ON SKIN (or hair): Remove/Take off Immediately all contaminated clothing. Rinse SKIN with water/shower. |
P304 + P312 | IF INHALED: Call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician if you feel unwell. |
P304 + P340 | IF INHALED: Remove victim to fresh air and Keep at rest in a position comfortable for breathing. |
P304 + P341 | IF INHALED: If breathing is difficult, remove victim to fresh air and keep at rest in a position comfortable for breathing. |
P305 + P351 + P338 | IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. |
P306 + P360 | IF ON CLOTHING: Rinse Immediately contaminated CLOTHING and SKIN with plenty of water before removing clothes. |
P307 + P311 | IF exposed: call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. |
P308 + P313 | IF exposed or concerned: Get medical advice/attention. |
P309 + P311 | IF exposed or if you feel unwell: call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. |
P332 + P313 | IF SKIN irritation occurs: Get medical advice/attention. |
P333 + P313 | IF SKIN irritation or rash occurs: Get medical advice/attention. |
P335 + P334 | Brush off loose particles from skin. Immerse in cool water/wrap in wet bandages. |
P337 + P313 | IF eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention. |
P342 + P311 | IF experiencing respiratory symptoms: call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. |
P370 + P376 | In case of fire: Stop leak if safe to Do so. |
P370 + P378 | In case of fire: |
P370 + P380 | In case of fire: Evacuate area. |
P370 + P380 + P375 | In case of fire: Evacuate area. Fight fire remotely due to the risk of explosion. |
P371 + P380 + P375 | In case of major fire and large quantities: Evacuate area. Fight fire remotely due to the risk of explosion. |
Storage | |
Code | Phrase |
P401 | |
P402 | Store in a dry place. |
P403 | Store in a well-ventilated place. |
P404 | Store in a closed container. |
P405 | Store locked up. |
P406 | Store in corrosive resistant/ container with a resistant inner liner. |
P407 | Maintain air gap between stacks/pallets. |
P410 | Protect from sunlight. |
P411 | |
P412 | Do not expose to temperatures exceeding 50 oC/ 122 oF. |
P413 | |
P420 | Store away from other materials. |
P422 | |
P402 + P404 | Store in a dry place. Store in a closed container. |
P403 + P233 | Store in a well-ventilated place. Keep container tightly closed. |
P403 + P235 | Store in a well-ventilated place. Keep cool. |
P410 + P403 | Protect from sunlight. Store in a well-ventilated place. |
P410 + P412 | Protect from sunlight. Do not expose to temperatures exceeding 50 oC/122oF. |
P411 + P235 | Keep cool. |
Disposal | |
Code | Phrase |
P501 | Dispose of contents/container to ... |
P502 | Refer to manufacturer/supplier for information on recovery/recycling |
Physical hazards | |
Code | Phrase |
H200 | Unstable explosive |
H201 | Explosive; mass explosion hazard |
H202 | Explosive; severe projection hazard |
H203 | Explosive; fire, blast or projection hazard |
H204 | Fire or projection hazard |
H205 | May mass explode in fire |
H220 | Extremely flammable gas |
H221 | Flammable gas |
H222 | Extremely flammable aerosol |
H223 | Flammable aerosol |
H224 | Extremely flammable liquid and vapour |
H225 | Highly flammable liquid and vapour |
H226 | Flammable liquid and vapour |
H227 | Combustible liquid |
H228 | Flammable solid |
H229 | Pressurized container: may burst if heated |
H230 | May react explosively even in the absence of air |
H231 | May react explosively even in the absence of air at elevated pressure and/or temperature |
H240 | Heating may cause an explosion |
H241 | Heating may cause a fire or explosion |
H242 | Heating may cause a fire |
H250 | Catches fire spontaneously if exposed to air |
H251 | Self-heating; may catch fire |
H252 | Self-heating in large quantities; may catch fire |
H260 | In contact with water releases flammable gases which may ignite spontaneously |
H261 | In contact with water releases flammable gas |
H270 | May cause or intensify fire; oxidizer |
H271 | May cause fire or explosion; strong oxidizer |
H272 | May intensify fire; oxidizer |
H280 | Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated |
H281 | Contains refrigerated gas; may cause cryogenic burns or injury |
H290 | May be corrosive to metals |
Health hazards | |
Code | Phrase |
H300 | Fatal if swallowed |
H301 | Toxic if swallowed |
H302 | Harmful if swallowed |
H303 | May be harmful if swallowed |
H304 | May be fatal if swallowed and enters airways |
H305 | May be harmful if swallowed and enters airways |
H310 | Fatal in contact with skin |
H311 | Toxic in contact with skin |
H312 | Harmful in contact with skin |
H313 | May be harmful in contact with skin |
H314 | Causes severe skin burns and eye damage |
H315 | Causes skin irritation |
H316 | Causes mild skin irritation |
H317 | May cause an allergic skin reaction |
H318 | Causes serious eye damage |
H319 | Causes serious eye irritation |
H320 | Causes eye irritation |
H330 | Fatal if inhaled |
H331 | Toxic if inhaled |
H332 | Harmful if inhaled |
H333 | May be harmful if inhaled |
H334 | May cause allergy or asthma symptoms or breathing difficulties if inhaled |
H335 | May cause respiratory irritation |
H336 | May cause drowsiness or dizziness |
H340 | May cause genetic defects |
H341 | Suspected of causing genetic defects |
H350 | May cause cancer |
H351 | Suspected of causing cancer |
H360 | May damage fertility or the unborn child |
H361 | Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child |
H361d | Suspected of damaging the unborn child |
H362 | May cause harm to breast-fed children |
H370 | Causes damage to organs |
H371 | May cause damage to organs |
H372 | Causes damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure |
H373 | May cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure |
Environmental hazards | |
Code | Phrase |
H400 | Very toxic to aquatic life |
H401 | Toxic to aquatic life |
H402 | Harmful to aquatic life |
H410 | Very toxic to aquatic life with long-lasting effects |
H411 | Toxic to aquatic life with long-lasting effects |
H412 | Harmful to aquatic life with long-lasting effects |
H413 | May cause long-lasting harmful effects to aquatic life |
H420 | Harms public health and the environment by destroying ozone in the upper atmosphere |
Sorry,this product has been discontinued.
Home
* Country/Region
* Quantity Required :
* Cat. No.:
* CAS No :
* Product Name :
* Additional Information :