Home Cart 0 Sign in  
X

[ CAS No. 15484-46-5 ] {[proInfo.proName]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]}
HazMat Fee +

There will be a HazMat fee per item when shipping a dangerous goods. The HazMat fee will be charged to your UPS/DHL/FedEx collect account or added to the invoice unless the package is shipped via Ground service. Ship by air in Excepted Quantity (each bottle), which is up to 1g/1mL for class 6.1 packing group I or II, and up to 25g/25ml for all other HazMat items.

Type HazMat fee for 500 gram (Estimated)
Excepted Quantity USD 0.00
Limited Quantity USD 15-60
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), Domestic USD 80+
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), International USD 150+
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), Domestic USD 100+
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), International USD 200+
3d Animation Molecule Structure of 15484-46-5
Chemical Structure| 15484-46-5
Chemical Structure| 15484-46-5
Structure of 15484-46-5 * Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
Cart0 Add to My Favorites Add to My Favorites Bulk Inquiry Inquiry Add To Cart

Quality Control of [ 15484-46-5 ]

Related Doc. of [ 15484-46-5 ]

Alternatived Products of [ 15484-46-5 ]

Product Details of [ 15484-46-5 ]

CAS No. :15484-46-5 MDL No. :MFCD12545894
Formula : C5H8O3 Boiling Point : -
Linear Structure Formula :- InChI Key :RFUCOAQWQVDBEU-UHFFFAOYSA-N
M.W : 116.12 Pubchem ID :11815329
Synonyms :

Calculated chemistry of [ 15484-46-5 ]

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms : 8
Num. arom. heavy atoms : 0
Fraction Csp3 : 0.4
Num. rotatable bonds : 3
Num. H-bond acceptors : 3.0
Num. H-bond donors : 1.0
Molar Refractivity : 28.12
TPSA : 46.53 Ų

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption : High
BBB permeant : No
P-gp substrate : No
CYP1A2 inhibitor : No
CYP2C19 inhibitor : No
CYP2C9 inhibitor : No
CYP2D6 inhibitor : No
CYP3A4 inhibitor : No
Log Kp (skin permeation) : -7.13 cm/s

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP) : 1.6
Log Po/w (XLOGP3) : -0.17
Log Po/w (WLOGP) : -0.29
Log Po/w (MLOGP) : -0.09
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT) : 0.02
Consensus Log Po/w : 0.21

Druglikeness

Lipinski : 0.0
Ghose : None
Veber : 0.0
Egan : 0.0
Muegge : 1.0
Bioavailability Score : 0.55

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL) : -0.25
Solubility : 64.6 mg/ml ; 0.556 mol/l
Class : Very soluble
Log S (Ali) : -0.35
Solubility : 51.6 mg/ml ; 0.445 mol/l
Class : Very soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT) : -0.18
Solubility : 77.1 mg/ml ; 0.664 mol/l
Class : Soluble

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS : 0.0 alert
Brenk : 1.0 alert
Leadlikeness : 1.0
Synthetic accessibility : 1.59

Safety of [ 15484-46-5 ]

Signal Word:Danger Class:8,6.1
Precautionary Statements:P501-P270-P210-P264-P280-P370+P378-P361+P364-P332+P313-P301+P312+P330-P302+P352+P312-P305+P351+P338+P310-P403+P235-P405 UN#:2922
Hazard Statements:H311-H302-H315-H318-H227 Packing Group:
GHS Pictogram:

Application In Synthesis of [ 15484-46-5 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Upstream synthesis route of [ 15484-46-5 ]
  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 15484-46-5 ]

[ 15484-46-5 ] Synthesis Path-Upstream   1~23

  • 1
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
  • [ 80657-57-4 ]
Reference: [1] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2008, vol. 350, # 10, p. 1610 - 1614
[2] Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2009, vol. 20, # 2, p. 210 - 213
[3] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2008, vol. 350, # 16, p. 2533 - 2543
[4] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2010, vol. 16, # 22, p. 6509 - 6517
[5] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2010, vol. 16, # 22, p. 6495 - 6508
[6] Organometallics, 2011, vol. 30, # 24, p. 6718 - 6725
[7] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2012, vol. 354, # 16, p. 3025 - 3035
[8] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2015, vol. 357, # 8, p. 1775 - 1786
[9] ChemBioChem, 2017, vol. 18, # 7, p. 685 - 691
  • 2
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
  • [ 80657-57-4 ]
  • [ 72657-23-9 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
58 % ee With (cycloocta-1,5-diene)-[(S,S)-2,2'-bis(ferrocenyl-phenylphosphino)-1,1'-biphenyl] rhodium tetrafluoroborate; hydrogen In dichloromethane at 20℃; for 16 h; Autoclave K.3. Asymmetric catalyzed hydrogenationTypical procedure A solution of [Rh(COD)L*]BF4 (0.005 mmol, 1 molpercent) and substrate (0.5 mmol) in dry solvent (7.5 mL) was introduced in a stainless steel autoclave. The autoclave was closed, purged with hydrogen and then pressurized with hydrogen. After 16h of stirring at room temperature, the pressure was released to atmospheric pressure and the solution was transferred to a round bottom flask. The solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator to give a residue which was purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford the hydrogenated product. The enantiomeric excess was determined by HPLC on chiral column.Results of aymmetric catalyzed hydrogenations by rhodium complexes of ligands (1-48) or (1-49) are presented in table 9 and 10. Table 9. Asymmetric catalyzed hydrogenation by rhodium complexes of ligands (1-48)Substrate Diphosphine 48 Cond. (RT 16h) ProductR R2 R R8 Solvant P Conv ee(¾) (percent) (percent)63 48a Ph oAn Ph Ph MeOH 4 64 93 61 (R)10 100 63 (R)20 100 60 (R)THF 10 6 ndCH2C12 7 nd Table 10. Asymmetric catalyzed hydrogenation by rhodium complex of ligand (I'-49c)
Reference: [1] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2003, vol. 345, # 1-2, p. 185 - 189
[2] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2007, vol. 349, # 10, p. 1592 - 1596
[3] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2007, vol. 349, # 10, p. 1592 - 1596
[4] Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2009, vol. 20, # 2, p. 210 - 213
[5] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2008, vol. 350, # 10, p. 1610 - 1614
[6] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2009, vol. 48, # 12, p. 2162 - 2165
[7] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2008, vol. 350, # 16, p. 2525 - 2532
[8] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2008, vol. 350, # 16, p. 2525 - 2532
[9] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2008, vol. 350, # 16, p. 2533 - 2543
[10] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2008, vol. 350, # 16, p. 2533 - 2543
[11] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2009, vol. 15, # 39, p. 10272 - 10279
[12] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2010, vol. 352, # 14-15, p. 2663 - 2666
[13] Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2010, vol. 21, # 21-22, p. 2671 - 2674
[14] Organometallics, 2011, vol. 30, # 24, p. 6718 - 6725
[15] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2012, vol. 18, # 5, p. 1383 - 1400
[16] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2012, vol. 18, # 5, p. 1383 - 1400
[17] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2012, vol. 354, # 1, p. 59 - 64
[18] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2012, vol. 354, # 10, p. 1949 - 1960
[19] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2012, vol. 18, # 33, p. 10368 - 10381
[20] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2012, vol. 18, # 33, p. 10368 - 10381
[21] European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2012, # 26, p. 4963 - 4968
[22] European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2012, # 29, p. 4684 - 4693
[23] Patent: WO2013/7724, 2013, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 88; 89; 90
[24] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2014, vol. 356, # 4, p. 795 - 804
[25] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2015, vol. 357, # 8, p. 1775 - 1786
[26] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2015, vol. 357, # 8, p. 1775 - 1786
[27] ChemBioChem, 2017, vol. 18, # 7, p. 685 - 691
  • 3
  • [ 50-00-0 ]
  • [ 5927-18-4 ]
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
44% With potassium carbonate In water at 20℃; for 2 h; Example 106: methyl 2-(hydroxymethyl)acrylate44percentA saturated aqueous solution (10 mL) of K2CO3 (3.5 g, 117 mmol, 1.6 eq.) was slowly added to a rapidly stirred solution of trimethylphosphonoacetate (5.46 g, 30 mmol, 1.0 eq.) and paraformaldehyde (6.63 g, 48 mmol, 4.0 eq.) at r.t.. After the addition the mixture was stirred for 2 h. Then the mixture was extracted with DCM. The organic layer was concentrated to give the compound (1.5 g, 44percent) as a yellow oil. 1U NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ: 6.29 (s, IH), 5.83 (s, IH), 3.75 (s, 3H), 3.72 (s, 2H).
Reference: [1] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2015, vol. 54, # 6, p. 1929 - 1932[2] Angew. Chem., 2015, vol. 127, # 6, p. 1949 - 1952,4
[3] Tetrahedron, 2008, vol. 64, # 17, p. 3701 - 3712
[4] Patent: WO2011/17561, 2011, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 72
[5] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1998, vol. 41, # 18, p. 3539 - 3545
  • 4
  • [ 50-00-0 ]
  • [ 1779-58-4 ]
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
85% With potassium carbonate In water at 10 - 20℃; for 6 h; Three bottle adding 119.2 g methoxy carbonyl methylene triphenyl bromination phosphorus, 300 ml water and 58 g 30percent formaldehyde aqueous solution, control 10 - 15 °C slowly dropping 30percent potassium carbonate aqueous solution to 266.8 g, then completing 15 - 20 °C lower heat insulating 6 hours, filtering to remove the insoluble matter (triphenyl phosphate). The filtrate by adding dichloromethane 500 ml extraction, the organic phase is concentrated, after removing the solvent control 70 - 90 °C, vacuum degree 0.098 mpa under reduced pressure distillation, to obtain 2 - hydroxy methyl methacrylate 25.7 g (yield 85percent).
Reference: [1] Patent: CN106336357, 2017, A, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0031; 0034; 0035
  • 5
  • [ 50-00-0 ]
  • [ 292638-85-8 ]
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
83% at 45 - 55℃; for 15 h; Large scale In a 200 liter clean reactor, 65 kg of methyl acrylate, 2.52 kg of sodium bicarbonate, 2.8 kg of DABCO (anhydrous), 0.5 kg of hydroquinone, 7.5 kg of paraformaldehyde,Reflux heating steam heated to between 45-55 degrees incubated for 15 hours,Cool to room temperature, add 15 kg of saturated salt water, add about 6 kg of concentrated hydrochloric acid, adjustPH3-4.The layers were separated, the organic phase was washed with 10 kg of saturated brine, dried over 10 kg of sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated to remove acrylic acidMethyl esters gave a colorless liquid 28 kg, high vacuum distillation product 24 kg, GC purity of 95percent, the yield of 83percentFurther high vacuum distillation can be 97percent purity products.
68% With 1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-2H-pyrimido[1,2-a]pyrimidine In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 5 h; 3.0 g of paraformaldehyde, 15 ml of methyl acrylate were dissolved in 25 ml of dioxane, and then 3.2 g of 1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene (TBD) was added. The reaction was carried out at room temperature for 5 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated to dryness, a small amount of a polymerization inhibitor was added, and distilled under reduced pressure to obtain 10.2 g of methyl 2-hydroxymethyl acrylate,n a yield of 68percent.
19% at 25℃; Inert atmosphere General procedure: Into a round bottom flask charged with a stirbar was added 1.0 equiv. aldehyde, followed by 2.0 equiv. methyl acrylate and 0.5 equiv. DABCO. The reaction mixture was stirred until judged complete by TLC, then was partitioned between 1.0 M acetic acid and CH2Cl2. The organic layer was set aside, and the residual product was extracted from the aqueous layer with an additional portion of CH2Cl2. The combined organic layers were washed with deionized water then brine, then concentrated and purified via column chromatography.
87 %Chromat. With 4-methoxy-phenol; lithium chloride In N,N-dimethyl acetamide; water at 50℃; for 4 h; [Examples 2 to 16] ; The process was performed under the same conditions except for changing the starting acrylate compound, solvent added (aprotic polar solvent), tertiary amine compound catalyst, inorganic salt and reaction time in Example 1. The yields of the objective compounds are shown together with the reaction conditions in Table 1.
87 %Chromat. With 4-methoxy-phenol In 1-methyl-pyrrolidin-2-one; water at 50℃; for 4 h; [Examples 2 to 16] ; The process was performed under the same conditions except for changing the starting acrylate compound, solvent added (aprotic polar solvent), tertiary amine compound catalyst, inorganic salt and reaction time in Example 1. The yields of the objective compounds are shown together with the reaction conditions in Table 1.
82 %Chromat. With potassium chloride; 4-methoxy-phenol In water; acetonitrile at 50℃; for 6 h; [Examples 2 to 16] ; The process was performed under the same conditions except for changing the starting acrylate compound, solvent added (aprotic polar solvent), tertiary amine compound catalyst, inorganic salt and reaction time in Example 1. The yields of the objective compounds are shown together with the reaction conditions in Table 1.
85 %Chromat. With 4-methoxy-phenol; lithium chloride In methanol; N,N-dimethyl acetamide; water at 50℃; for 6.5 h; [Examples 2 to 16] ; The process was performed under the same conditions except for changing the starting acrylate compound, solvent added (aprotic polar solvent), tertiary amine compound catalyst, inorganic salt and reaction time in Example 1. The yields of the objective compounds are shown together with the reaction conditions in Table 1.
83 %Chromat. With 4-methoxy-phenol; calcium chloride In water; acetonitrile at 50℃; for 6.5 h; [Examples 2 to 16] ; The process was performed under the same conditions except for changing the starting acrylate compound, solvent added (aprotic polar solvent), tertiary amine compound catalyst, inorganic salt and reaction time in Example 1. The yields of the objective compounds are shown together with the reaction conditions in Table 1.
3.3 kg at 70℃; for 8 h; Industrial scale 17.3 kg of methyl acrylate (hereinafter also referred to as AM), 1.54 kg of paraformaldehyde 1.54 Kg, and 0.99 kg of 30percent trimethylamine (hereinafter also referred to as TMA) aqueous solution were placed in a 20 L reaction vessel and stirred at 70 ° C. for 8 hours to continue the reaction. The α-hydroxymethylacrylic acid ester obtained by the reaction was 4.49 kg. After the reaction, it was separated into an AM phase and an aqueous phase by standing, and the aqueous phase was removed. Thereafter, the AM layer was washed with 1000 g of water, and the obtained AM layer was subjected to simple distillation (while blowing a mixed gas (7percent O 2 / N 2) for 6 hours It was distilled off. The obtained bottom liquid contained 3.67 kg of α-hydroxymethylacrylic acid ester, and precision distillation (at a column top temperature of 86 to 87 ° C / 13 hPa while blowing a mix gas (7percent O 2 / N 2) Precision distillation) to obtain 3.30 kg of α-hydroxymethylacrylic acid ester. The dimer content of trimethylamine and α-hydroxymethylacrylic acid ester was measured by the above method.

Reference: [1] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2001, vol. 66, # 16, p. 5413 - 5418
[2] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2010, vol. 352, # 9, p. 1539 - 1553
[3] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2018, vol. 57, # 2, p. 555 - 559[4] Angew. Chem., 2018, vol. 130, # 2, p. 564 - 568,5
[5] Patent: CN107417531, 2017, A, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0028; 0029; 0030; 0031
[6] Tetrahedron Letters, 2005, vol. 46, # 17, p. 3071 - 3072
[7] Organic Letters, 2011, vol. 13, # 15, p. 3864 - 3867
[8] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2010, vol. 20, # 19, p. 5757 - 5762
[9] Tetrahedron, 2002, vol. 58, # 37, p. 7437 - 7447
[10] Tetrahedron Letters, 2008, vol. 49, # 23, p. 3744 - 3748
[11] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2008, vol. 350, # 16, p. 2533 - 2543
[12] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2008, vol. 350, # 16, p. 2525 - 2532
[13] Patent: CN107915668, 2018, A, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0017
[14] Organic Letters, 2009, vol. 11, # 3, p. 575 - 578
[15] Chemical Communications, 2012, vol. 48, # 91, p. 11232 - 11234
[16] Organic Preparations and Procedures International, 2005, vol. 37, # 3, p. 231 - 237
[17] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2007, vol. 72, # 16, p. 6143 - 6148
[18] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2018, vol. 360, # 13, p. 2566 - 2570
[19] Synthetic Communications, 2000, vol. 30, # 11, p. 2061 - 2069
[20] Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2013, vol. 24, # 7, p. 395 - 401
[21] Chemical Communications, 2006, # 26, p. 2756 - 2758
[22] Tetrahedron, 2010, vol. 66, # 51, p. 9733 - 9737
[23] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1994, vol. 59, # 12, p. 3408 - 3412
[24] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2016, vol. 358, # 3, p. 380 - 385
[25] Tetrahedron, 1992, vol. 48, # 38, p. 8317 - 8328
[26] Tetrahedron Letters, 2014, vol. 55, # 13, p. 2075 - 2077
[27] Chemical Communications, 2014, vol. 50, # 96, p. 15216 - 15219
[28] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2010, vol. 352, # 14-15, p. 2663 - 2666
[29] Organic Letters, 2006, vol. 8, # 15, p. 3359 - 3362
[30] Patent: EP1832571, 2007, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 7; 8
[31] Patent: EP1832571, 2007, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 7; 9
[32] Patent: EP1832571, 2007, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 7; 9
[33] Patent: EP1832571, 2007, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 7; 8
[34] Patent: EP1832571, 2007, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 7; 9
[35] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009, vol. 131, # 35, p. 12562 - 12563
[36] Tetrahedron Letters, 2010, vol. 51, # 34, p. 4482 - 4485
[37] Chemical Communications, 2011, vol. 47, # 11, p. 3219 - 3221
[38] Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry, 2013, vol. 50, # 4, p. 814 - 820
[39] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, vol. 136, # 1, p. 119 - 121
[40] Letters in Organic Chemistry, 2015, vol. 12, # 3, p. 217 - 221
[41] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2015, vol. 357, # 8, p. 1775 - 1786
[42] Organic Letters, 2015, vol. 17, # 18, p. 4432 - 4435
[43] Organic Letters, 2016, vol. 18, # 10, p. 2355 - 2358
[44] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2015, vol. 25, # 24, p. 5777 - 5780
[45] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2015, vol. 25, # 23, p. 5504 - 5507
[46] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, vol. 138, # 24, p. 7698 - 7704
[47] Tetrahedron Letters, 2016, vol. 57, # 48, p. 5359 - 5362
[48] Patent: JP2017/43555, 2017, A, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0051
[49] Organic Letters, 2018, vol. 20, # 17, p. 5380 - 5383
  • 6
  • [ 50-00-0 ]
  • [ 5927-18-4 ]
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
  • [ 292638-85-8 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
56% With potassium carbonate In water at 23℃; Acrylate 20. Synthesized by a method adapted from Villieras and Rambaud.2 To around-bottom flask equipped with a stir bar were added trimethyl phosphonoacetate (S1,9.1 mL, 63 mmol, 1.00 equiv) and formaldehyde (S2, 20.5g, 37percent in water, 252 mmol,4.00 equiv). The flask was lowered into a ambient-temperature water bath. To themixture was added a saturated solution of potassium carbonate in water (15.3 g, 110mmol, 1.75 equiv) dropwise via addition funnel over the course of one hour, and stirringwas continued for an additional hour. The reaction mixture was quenched by addition ofsaturated aqueous ammonium chloride (30 mL), then extracted three times with diethylether. The combined organics were washed with brine, dried over anhydrous magnesiumsulfate, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. Methyl acrylate, produced as a side-product,was removed by azeotropic distillation with methanol. The residue was purified byvacuum distillation (~0.5 torr, 44 °C) to afford acrylate 20 as a clear oil (4.07 g, 56percentyield) with minor impurities which were carried forward to the next reaction. Thecharacterization data matched those reported in the literature.3
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron Letters, 2015, vol. 56, # 23, p. 2983 - 2990
  • 7
  • [ 280-57-9 ]
  • [ 292638-85-8 ]
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
77% With formaldehyd; paraformaldehyde In diethyl ether; nitrogen Preparation of Methyl 3-hydroxy-2-methylidene-propanoate
To a mixture containing 27 ml (25.83 g, 0.30 mmoles of methyl acrylate and 2.5 g (22.29 mmoles) of 1,4-diazabicyclo[2,2,2]-octane (DABCO), formaldehyde was added (generated by pyrolysis of paraformaldehyde at 200° C.) in a nitrogen current for 1 h.
The mixture was then left to react for 7 days at room temperature.
At the end of that time an extraction was performed with diethyl ether (2*100 ml) and the result was washed with water (2*400 ml).
The ether extracts were dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate, filtered and vacuum concentrated, giving 19.5 g (77percent yield) of methyl 3-hydroxy-2-methylidene-propanoate in oil form.

Reference: [1] Patent: US2003/199575, 2003, A1,
  • 8
  • [ 280-57-9 ]
  • [ 292638-85-8 ]
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: US4654432, 1987, A,
  • 9
  • [ 50-00-0 ]
  • [ 292638-85-8 ]
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
  • [ 109669-53-6 ]
Reference: [1] Synthetic Communications, 1987, vol. 17, # 3, p. 291 - 298
  • 10
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 10029-04-6 ]
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
Reference: [1] Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 2002, vol. 66, # 7, p. 1501 - 1514
  • 11
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 107-19-7 ]
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
Reference: [1] Molecular Catalysis, 2017, vol. 443, p. 38 - 42
  • 12
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 107-19-7 ]
  • [ 29576-13-4 ]
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
  • [ 25328-81-8 ]
Reference: [1] Molecular Catalysis, 2017, vol. 443, p. 38 - 42
[2] Molecular Catalysis, 2017, vol. 443, p. 38 - 42
  • 13
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 107-19-7 ]
  • [ 29576-13-4 ]
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
Reference: [1] Molecular Catalysis, 2017, vol. 443, p. 38 - 42
  • 14
  • [ 50-00-0 ]
  • [ 140-88-5 ]
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
  • [ 109669-53-6 ]
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron, 1997, vol. 53, # 45, p. 15367 - 15396
  • 15
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 201230-82-2 ]
  • [ 107-19-7 ]
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
  • [ 25328-81-8 ]
Reference: [1] Molecular Catalysis, 2017, vol. 443, p. 38 - 42
  • 16
  • [ 89533-83-5 ]
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of the Chemical Society, 1950, p. 236,240
  • 17
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 107-19-7 ]
  • [ 13463-39-3 ]
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1963, vol. 28, p. 2835 - 2838
  • 18
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
  • [ 4224-69-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
86% With phosphorus tribromide In acetonitrile at 20℃; for 4 h; 10.2 g of 2-hydroxymethyl methacrylate obtained in the previous step was dissolved in 150 ml of acetonitrile, and then 4 ml of phosphorus tribromide was carefully added thereto.After the addition was completed, the reaction was continued at room temperature for 4 hours.Carefully quenched with water and desolvated to remove acetonitrile.The residue was added with 100 ml of water, extracted twice with ethyl acetate, and desolvated to obtain 13.5 g of a colorless liquid in a yield of 86percent.
79% at 25℃; Inert atmosphere General procedure: Into a round bottom flask charged with a magnetic stirbar was added 1 equiv. MBH adduct, followed by 3 equiv. 33wt percent HBr (in HOAc). The solution was vigorously stirred until judged complete by TLC, then was poured into a 1 : 1 (volumetric) mixture of deionized water and CH2Cl2. The organic layer was separated, then the residual product was extracted from the aqueous layer with an additional portion of CH2Cl2. The combined organic layers were washed with deionized water then brine, then were dried with Na2SO4, filtered, concentrated, and purified via column chromatography.
72% With phosphorus tribromide In dichloromethane at 0℃; for 2.25 h; Inert atmosphere Methyl(2-bromomethyl)acrylate, Method B: The desiredMBH adduct (1.5715g, 13.53 mmol, 1.00 eq.) was weighed into a round-bottomflask that had been dried and flushed with N2. Dry CH2Cl2 (45 mL, 0.3M)was added and the mixture was cooled to 0 °C in an ice bath. PBr3(0.64 mL, 6.77 mmol, 0.50 eq.) was added slowly and the ice bath was removedshortly after complete addition. Thereaction as stirred and monitored by TLC analysis and determined to be completeafter approximately 2h and 15 min. The reactionwas quenched by opening to air and adding ice. It was extracted with CH2Cl2(2 x 50 mL) and the combined organic layers were washed with brine and driedover sodium sulfate. Solvent was removeden vacuo and the residue purified viachromatography. The product was notdried on vacuum for very long due to volatility. The product was isolated as alight yellow oil in 72percent yield (1.7284g, 9.66 mmol).
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2013, vol. 24, # 7, p. 395 - 401
[2] Patent: CN107915668, 2018, A, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0018
[3] Organic Letters, 2011, vol. 13, # 15, p. 3864 - 3867
[4] Tetrahedron Letters, 2014, vol. 55, # 13, p. 2075 - 2077
[5] Chemical Communications, 2014, vol. 50, # 96, p. 15216 - 15219
[6] Synthetic Communications, 1987, vol. 17, # 3, p. 291 - 298
[7] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2015, vol. 25, # 19, p. 4270 - 4273
[8] Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, 2006, vol. 691, # 24-25, p. 5406 - 5422
[9] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2010, vol. 20, # 19, p. 5757 - 5762
[10] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1998, vol. 41, # 18, p. 3539 - 3545
[11] Synthetic Communications, 1987, vol. 17, # 3, p. 291 - 298
[12] Chemical Communications, 2006, # 26, p. 2756 - 2758
[13] Tetrahedron Letters, 2010, vol. 51, # 34, p. 4482 - 4485
[14] Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry, 2013, vol. 50, # 4, p. 814 - 820
[15] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2015, vol. 80, # 5, p. 2796 - 2803
[16] Letters in Organic Chemistry, 2015, vol. 12, # 3, p. 217 - 221
[17] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2015, vol. 25, # 24, p. 5777 - 5780
  • 19
  • [ 75-18-3 ]
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
  • [ 4224-69-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
89% With N-Bromosuccinimide; sodium chloride In diethyl ether; dichloromethane Preparation of Methyl 2-bromomethyl-2-propenoate
To a solution of N-bromosuccinimide (5.17 g, 26.8 mmoles) in dry dichloromethane (40 ml) were added dimethyl sulphide (4 ml) in dichloromethane (50 ml), drop by drop with stirring at 0° C. for 10 min.
To the resulting mixture was added methyl 3-hydroxy-2-metylidene-propanoate (3.15 g, 31.50 mmoles) dissolved in dichloromethane (40 ml), leaving it for 24 hours at room temperature.
At the end of that time, it was poured into an aqueous solution of sodium chloride and ice.
An extraction was performed with diethyl ether (3*100 ml), and the result was washed with water and dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate.
Following vacuum concentration, 4.33 g of a yellow oil was obtained (89percent yield) of methyl 2-bromomethyl-2-propenoate.
Reference: [1] Patent: US2003/199575, 2003, A1,
  • 20
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
  • [ 108-24-7 ]
  • [ 30982-08-2 ]
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron, 1992, vol. 48, # 38, p. 8317 - 8328
[2] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2010, vol. 352, # 9, p. 1539 - 1553
[3] Patent: EP2415751, 2012, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 63
[4] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2018, vol. 24, # 19, p. 4810 - 4814
[5] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2018, vol. 24, # 32, p. 8076 - 8080
  • 21
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
  • [ 75-36-5 ]
  • [ 30982-08-2 ]
Reference: [1] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2018, vol. 360, # 13, p. 2566 - 2570
[2] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2008, vol. 350, # 10, p. 1610 - 1614
[3] Organic Letters, 2006, vol. 8, # 15, p. 3359 - 3362
  • 22
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
  • [ 72657-23-9 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
> 90 % ee With flavin mononucleotide; alpha-D-glucopyranose; glucose dehydrogenase from Thermoplasma acidophilum; old yellow enzyme 1 from Saccharomyces pastorianus; nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate In aq. buffer at 20℃; for 24 h; Enzymatic reaction General procedure: Ene-reductase activity assays were performed at ambient temperature under anaerobic conditions (Coy Laboratory, Grass Lake, MI). For preparing reaction stock solution, individual substrates (see below) were dissolved in 50mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), supplemented with 200μM NADP+, 100mM glucose, and glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) from Thermoplasma acidophilum (2 units for IVTT reactions, 5 units for purified enzyme reactions). Individual substrate concentrations were chosen to ensure vmax conditions or maximum solubility. At these substrate levels, reaction times were adjusted for 10–50percent substrate conversion. To assay OYE activity in IVTT experiments, 20μL of the reaction stock solution was mixed with 2–10μL IVTT reaction mixture and the total assay volume was adjusted to 30μl with 50mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5). To assay purified OYE1 variants, the enzyme (final concentration: 250nM) was added to 500μl reaction stock solution. Reaction progress was monitored by removing 30-μl aliquots from the assay solution and quenching them by mixing thoroughly with 30μL of ethyl acetate containing 1mM cyclohexanone as internal standard. A sample of the organic phase was collected and analyzed by GC (protocols: see below). The enantio/diasteriomeric excess were calculated by integration of product and substrate peak areas. Relative rates of conversion for individual substrates were calculated by dividing the measured rate of conversion for OYE1 variant over the corresponding rate for wild type OYE1.
Reference: [1] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2015, vol. 357, # 8, p. 1775 - 1786
[2] Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2009, vol. 20, # 2, p. 210 - 213
[3] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2009, vol. 48, # 12, p. 2162 - 2165
[4] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2008, vol. 350, # 16, p. 2533 - 2543
[5] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2010, vol. 352, # 14-15, p. 2663 - 2666
[6] Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2010, vol. 21, # 21-22, p. 2671 - 2674
[7] Tetrahedron, 2016, vol. 72, # 46, p. 7282 - 7287
[8] ChemBioChem, 2017, vol. 18, # 7, p. 685 - 691
  • 23
  • [ 15484-46-5 ]
  • [ 80657-57-4 ]
  • [ 72657-23-9 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
58 % ee With (cycloocta-1,5-diene)-[(S,S)-2,2'-bis(ferrocenyl-phenylphosphino)-1,1'-biphenyl] rhodium tetrafluoroborate; hydrogen In dichloromethane at 20℃; for 16 h; Autoclave K.3. Asymmetric catalyzed hydrogenationTypical procedure A solution of [Rh(COD)L*]BF4 (0.005 mmol, 1 molpercent) and substrate (0.5 mmol) in dry solvent (7.5 mL) was introduced in a stainless steel autoclave. The autoclave was closed, purged with hydrogen and then pressurized with hydrogen. After 16h of stirring at room temperature, the pressure was released to atmospheric pressure and the solution was transferred to a round bottom flask. The solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator to give a residue which was purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford the hydrogenated product. The enantiomeric excess was determined by HPLC on chiral column.Results of aymmetric catalyzed hydrogenations by rhodium complexes of ligands (1-48) or (1-49) are presented in table 9 and 10. Table 9. Asymmetric catalyzed hydrogenation by rhodium complexes of ligands (1-48)Substrate Diphosphine 48 Cond. (RT 16h) ProductR R2 R R8 Solvant P Conv ee(¾) (percent) (percent)63 48a Ph oAn Ph Ph MeOH 4 64 93 61 (R)10 100 63 (R)20 100 60 (R)THF 10 6 ndCH2C12 7 nd Table 10. Asymmetric catalyzed hydrogenation by rhodium complex of ligand (I'-49c)
Reference: [1] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2003, vol. 345, # 1-2, p. 185 - 189
[2] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2007, vol. 349, # 10, p. 1592 - 1596
[3] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2007, vol. 349, # 10, p. 1592 - 1596
[4] Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2009, vol. 20, # 2, p. 210 - 213
[5] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2008, vol. 350, # 10, p. 1610 - 1614
[6] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2009, vol. 48, # 12, p. 2162 - 2165
[7] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2008, vol. 350, # 16, p. 2525 - 2532
[8] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2008, vol. 350, # 16, p. 2525 - 2532
[9] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2008, vol. 350, # 16, p. 2533 - 2543
[10] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2008, vol. 350, # 16, p. 2533 - 2543
[11] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2009, vol. 15, # 39, p. 10272 - 10279
[12] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2010, vol. 352, # 14-15, p. 2663 - 2666
[13] Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2010, vol. 21, # 21-22, p. 2671 - 2674
[14] Organometallics, 2011, vol. 30, # 24, p. 6718 - 6725
[15] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2012, vol. 18, # 5, p. 1383 - 1400
[16] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2012, vol. 18, # 5, p. 1383 - 1400
[17] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2012, vol. 354, # 1, p. 59 - 64
[18] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2012, vol. 354, # 10, p. 1949 - 1960
[19] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2012, vol. 18, # 33, p. 10368 - 10381
[20] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2012, vol. 18, # 33, p. 10368 - 10381
[21] European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2012, # 26, p. 4963 - 4968
[22] European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2012, # 29, p. 4684 - 4693
[23] Patent: WO2013/7724, 2013, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 88; 89; 90
[24] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2014, vol. 356, # 4, p. 795 - 804
[25] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2015, vol. 357, # 8, p. 1775 - 1786
[26] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2015, vol. 357, # 8, p. 1775 - 1786
[27] ChemBioChem, 2017, vol. 18, # 7, p. 685 - 691
Same Skeleton Products
Historical Records

Related Functional Groups of
[ 15484-46-5 ]

Alkenes

Chemical Structure| 30982-08-2

[ 30982-08-2 ]

Methyl 2-(acetoxymethyl)acrylate

Similarity: 0.93

Chemical Structure| 10029-04-6

[ 10029-04-6 ]

Ethyl 2-(hydroxymethyl)acrylate

Similarity: 0.93

Chemical Structure| 3377-20-6

[ 3377-20-6 ]

Diethyl 2-methylenemalonate

Similarity: 0.90

Chemical Structure| 1462-12-0

[ 1462-12-0 ]

Diethyl 2-ethylidenemalonate

Similarity: 0.79

Chemical Structure| 617-52-7

[ 617-52-7 ]

Dimethyl itaconate

Similarity: 0.76

Aliphatic Chain Hydrocarbons

Chemical Structure| 30982-08-2

[ 30982-08-2 ]

Methyl 2-(acetoxymethyl)acrylate

Similarity: 0.93

Chemical Structure| 10029-04-6

[ 10029-04-6 ]

Ethyl 2-(hydroxymethyl)acrylate

Similarity: 0.93

Chemical Structure| 3377-20-6

[ 3377-20-6 ]

Diethyl 2-methylenemalonate

Similarity: 0.90

Chemical Structure| 1462-12-0

[ 1462-12-0 ]

Diethyl 2-ethylidenemalonate

Similarity: 0.79

Chemical Structure| 617-52-7

[ 617-52-7 ]

Dimethyl itaconate

Similarity: 0.76

Alcohols

Chemical Structure| 10029-04-6

[ 10029-04-6 ]

Ethyl 2-(hydroxymethyl)acrylate

Similarity: 0.93

Chemical Structure| 6149-41-3

[ 6149-41-3 ]

Methyl 3-hydroxypropanoate

Similarity: 0.70

Chemical Structure| 623-72-3

[ 623-72-3 ]

Ethyl 3-Hydroxypropanoate

Similarity: 0.66

Chemical Structure| 3976-69-0

[ 3976-69-0 ]

(R)-Methyl 3-hydroxybutanoate

Similarity: 0.65

Chemical Structure| 53562-86-0

[ 53562-86-0 ]

(S)-Methyl 3-hydroxybutanoate

Similarity: 0.65

Esters

Chemical Structure| 30982-08-2

[ 30982-08-2 ]

Methyl 2-(acetoxymethyl)acrylate

Similarity: 0.93

Chemical Structure| 10029-04-6

[ 10029-04-6 ]

Ethyl 2-(hydroxymethyl)acrylate

Similarity: 0.93

Chemical Structure| 3377-20-6

[ 3377-20-6 ]

Diethyl 2-methylenemalonate

Similarity: 0.90

Chemical Structure| 1462-12-0

[ 1462-12-0 ]

Diethyl 2-ethylidenemalonate

Similarity: 0.79

Chemical Structure| 617-52-7

[ 617-52-7 ]

Dimethyl itaconate

Similarity: 0.76