Home Cart 0 Sign in  
X

[ CAS No. 17392-83-5 ] {[proInfo.proName]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]}
HazMat Fee +

There will be a HazMat fee per item when shipping a dangerous goods. The HazMat fee will be charged to your UPS/DHL/FedEx collect account or added to the invoice unless the package is shipped via Ground service. Ship by air in Excepted Quantity (each bottle), which is up to 1g/1mL for class 6.1 packing group I or II, and up to 25g/25ml for all other HazMat items.

Type HazMat fee for 500 gram (Estimated)
Excepted Quantity USD 0.00
Limited Quantity USD 15-60
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), Domestic USD 80+
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), International USD 150+
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), Domestic USD 100+
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), International USD 200+
3d Animation Molecule Structure of 17392-83-5
Chemical Structure| 17392-83-5
Chemical Structure| 17392-83-5
Structure of 17392-83-5 * Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
Cart0 Add to My Favorites Add to My Favorites Bulk Inquiry Inquiry Add To Cart

Quality Control of [ 17392-83-5 ]

Related Doc. of [ 17392-83-5 ]

Alternatived Products of [ 17392-83-5 ]

Product Details of [ 17392-83-5 ]

CAS No. :17392-83-5 MDL No. :MFCD00004517
Formula : C4H8O3 Boiling Point : -
Linear Structure Formula :- InChI Key :LPEKGGXMPWTOCB-GSVOUGTGSA-N
M.W : 104.10 Pubchem ID :637514
Synonyms :

Calculated chemistry of [ 17392-83-5 ]

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms : 7
Num. arom. heavy atoms : 0
Fraction Csp3 : 0.75
Num. rotatable bonds : 2
Num. H-bond acceptors : 3.0
Num. H-bond donors : 1.0
Molar Refractivity : 23.79
TPSA : 46.53 Ų

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption : High
BBB permeant : No
P-gp substrate : No
CYP1A2 inhibitor : No
CYP2C19 inhibitor : No
CYP2C9 inhibitor : No
CYP2D6 inhibitor : No
CYP3A4 inhibitor : No
Log Kp (skin permeation) : -7.03 cm/s

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP) : 1.38
Log Po/w (XLOGP3) : -0.14
Log Po/w (WLOGP) : -0.46
Log Po/w (MLOGP) : -0.39
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT) : -0.35
Consensus Log Po/w : 0.01

Druglikeness

Lipinski : 0.0
Ghose : None
Veber : 0.0
Egan : 0.0
Muegge : 2.0
Bioavailability Score : 0.55

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL) : -0.27
Solubility : 56.5 mg/ml ; 0.543 mol/l
Class : Very soluble
Log S (Ali) : -0.38
Solubility : 43.1 mg/ml ; 0.414 mol/l
Class : Very soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT) : 0.26
Solubility : 187.0 mg/ml ; 1.8 mol/l
Class : Soluble

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS : 0.0 alert
Brenk : 0.0 alert
Leadlikeness : 1.0
Synthetic accessibility : 1.4

Safety of [ 17392-83-5 ]

Signal Word:Danger Class:3
Precautionary Statements:P261-P305+P351+P338 UN#:3272
Hazard Statements:H225-H319-H335 Packing Group:
GHS Pictogram:

Application In Synthesis of [ 17392-83-5 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Upstream synthesis route of [ 17392-83-5 ]
  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 17392-83-5 ]

[ 17392-83-5 ] Synthesis Path-Upstream   1~22

  • 1
  • [ 547-64-8 ]
  • [ 79-33-4 ]
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
98% With marine microbial esterase In aq. phosphate buffer at 37℃; for 1 h; Resolution of racemate; Enzymatic reaction A standard 500‐μL hydrolytic reaction system containing140 μg purified esterase PHE14, 50 mmol/L substrate (racemicmethyl lactate) and 50 mmol/L phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) wasincubated at 37 °C for 1 h. After the completion of the enzymaticreaction, reaction samples were extracted with an equalvolume of ethyl acetate and the organic phase was further analyzedto evaluate the enzymatic resolution of (±)‐methyl lactate.
Reference: [1] Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2016, vol. 37, # 8, p. 1396 - 1402
[2] Green Chemistry, 2013, vol. 15, # 10, p. 2817 - 2824
  • 2
  • [ 547-64-8 ]
  • [ 117-34-0 ]
  • [ 27871-49-4 ]
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
  • [ 1208982-48-2 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
68 % ee With 2,2-dimethylpropanoic anhydride; N-ethyl-N,N-diisopropylamine In diethyl ether at 20℃; for 12 h; Test Example 5Production of Optically Active 2-Hydroxy Ester Using Various Types of Racemic 2-Hydroxy Ester (3) As shown in the above reaction scheme, to diethyl ether (0.2 M) containing 0.6 equivalents of pivalic acid anhydride and 0.5 equivalents of diphenylacetic acid were added 1.2 equivalents of diisopropyl ethylamine, 5percent by mole of (+)-benzotetramisole (BTM), and a solution containing 1 equivalent of a racemic 2-hydroxy ester in diethyl ether at room temperature in this order, and this reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12 hrs. Thereafter, the reaction was stopped with a saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution. After the organic layer was fractionated, the aqueous layer was extracted with diethyl ether three to five times. After the organic layers were admixed, the mixture was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solution was filtered and thereafter vacuum concentrated. Thus obtained mixture was fractionated on silica gel thin layer chromatography (developing solvent: hexane/ethyl acetate=3/1) to afford a corresponding diester and unreacted optically active 2-hydroxy ester. The results are shown in Table 5. TABLE 5 Yield [percent] [a] cc [percent] No.R5 R6 5a; 5b 5a; 5b s 29 Et n-Pr 47; 47 97; 89 217 30 Me Me 47; 23 97; 68 119 [a] Isolation yieldAs is seen from Table 5, prominently high enantiomeric excess ee and reaction velocity ratio s were exhibited also when a material other than the benzyl ester was used (Entries 29 and 30).The physical properties of the optically active hydroxy esters and the diesters in Table 5 are shown below.(Entry 29)Ethyl (S)-2-hydroxypentanoate1H NMR (CDCl3): δ4.19 (dq, J=14.0, 7.0 Hz, 1H, Eta), 4.18 (dq, J=14.0, 7.5 Hz, 1H, Eta), 2.96 (br d, J=3.5 Hz, 1H, OH), 1.75-1.65 (m, 1H, 3-H), 1.62-1.52 (m, 1H, 3-H), 1.48-1.30 (m, 2H, 4-H), 1.24 (dd, J=7.5, 7.0 Hz, 3H, Eta), 0.89 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 3H, 5-H);13C NMR (CDCl3): δ175.3, 70.2, 61.4, 36.4, 17.9, 14.1, 13.6.Ethyl (R)-2-(diphenylacetyloxy)pentanoateHPLC (CHIRALCEL AD-H, i-PrOH/hexane=1/50, flow rate=1.0 mL/min): tR=15.0 min (1.4percent), tR=17.5 min (98.6percent);IR (neat): 1745, 1496, 1454, 745, 701 cm-1;1H NMR (CDCl3): δ7.33-7.17 (m, 10H, Ph), 5.08 (s, 1H, 2'-H), 4.98 (dd, J=7.0, 6.0 Hz, 1H, 2-H), 4.12 (dq, J=14.0, 7.5 Hz, 3H, Eta), 4.11 (dq, J=14.0, 7.0 Hz, 3H, Eta), 1.78-1.71 (m, 2H, 3-H), 1.32-1.28 (m, 2H, 4-H), 1.16 (dd, J=7.5, 7.0 Hz, 3H, Eta), 0.81 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 3H, 5-H);13C NMR (CDCl3): δ172.1, 170.1, 138.4, 138.3, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 127.3, 127.2, 120.4, 72.9, 61.2, 56.8, 33.0, 18.3, 14.0, 13.5;HR MS: calcd for C21H24O4Na (M+Na+) 363.1567. found 363.1569.(Entry 30)Methyl (S)-lactate1H NMR (CDCl3): δ4.24 (q, J=7.0 Hz, 1H, 2-H), 3.72 (s, 3H, MeO), 3.16 (br s, 1H, OH), 1.36 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H, 3-H);13C NMR (CDCl3): δ176.0, 66.6, 52.3, 20.2.Methyl (R)-2-(diphenylacetyloxy)propanoateHPLC (CHIRALCEL AD-H, i-PrOH/hexane=1/50, flow rate=0.75 mL/min): tR=16.4 min (98.3percent), tR=19.7 min (1.7percent);IR (neat): 1744, 1496, 1454, 748, 699 cm-1;1H NMR (CDCl3): δ7.28-7.20 (m, 8H, Ph), 7.19-7.13 (m, 2H, Ph), 5.07 (q, J=7.0 Hz, 1H, 2-H), 5.03 (s, 1H, 2'-H), 3.60 (s, 3H, MeO), 1.37 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H, 3-H);13C NMR (CDCl3): δ171.9, 170.9, 138.3, 138.2, 128.7, 128.63, 128.55, 128.4, 127.3, 127.2, 69.2, 56.6, 52.2, 16.8;HR MS: calcd for C18H18O4Na (M+Na+) 321.1097. found 321.1091.
Reference: [1] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2010, vol. 16, # 1, p. 167 - 172
[2] Patent: US2011/319650, 2011, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 11
  • 3
  • [ 600-22-6 ]
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
88.2 % ee
Stage #1: at 25℃; for 0.25 h;
Stage #2: With hydrogen In tetrahydrofuran for 6 h;
Methyl pyruvate (51 mg; 0.50 mmol) was dissolved in a reaction vessel in anhydrous THF (3.0 mL) and degassed with argon for 15 minutes. Bis(1,5-cycloocta-diene)rhodium trifluoromethanesulfonate (2.3 mg; 5 μmol; 0.01 equiv) and ligand 4a from Example 1 (3.7 mg; 6 μmol; 0.012 equiv) were combined and argon-degassed anhydrous THF (2.0 mL) was added. This solution was stirred at 25° C. under argon for 15 minutes and then added to the solution of 2-acetamidocinnamic acid. The resulting solution was then flushed with hydrogen and pressurized to 0.69-1.38 bars gauge (10-20 psig) hydrogen. The reaction mixture was stirred for 8 hours to afford 90.2percent conversion to methyl (R)-lactate with 88.2percent ee as determined by chiral GC analysis. The analytical properties of methyl lactate were identical to an authentic sample.Chiral GC [Cyclosil-B (JW Scientific) 30 m.x.0.25 mm ID, film thickness 0.25 μm, 75° C. isothermal, 15 psig He]: t&R[methyl (R)-lactate] 7.75 min, tR[methyl (S)-lactate] 9.16 min. tR(methyl pyruvate) 5.16 min.
99.2 % ee With hydrogen In methanol at 50℃; for 2 h; Autoclave General procedure: All catalytic reactions were carried out at 50 C in 25 mL ofmethanol solvent in a stainless steel autoclave reactorequipped with a gas inlet and outlet, pressure gauge, mechanicalstirrer and temperature controller thermocouple. The systemwas controlled by computerized software and an electronicmotherboard unit. For each reaction, 70 mg (0.1 mmol ofcatalytically active Pt metal) of solid catalyst and 100 mmol ofsubstrate were used. The catalytic hydrogenation reaction wascarried out under 5 MPa of hydrogen and the reaction time wasfixed at 2 h. At the end of the catalytic runs, the reaction mixturewas analyzed by GC and the conversion was calculated onthe basis of the areas of the starting material and product usingcalibration curve calculations.
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron Letters, 1998, vol. 39, # 14, p. 1941 - 1944
[2] Tetrahedron, 1999, vol. 55, # 25, p. 7787 - 7804
[3] Patent: US6906213, 2005, B1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 15
[4] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2011, vol. 50, # 21, p. 4913 - 4917
[5] Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 2011, vol. 9, # 11, p. 4070 - 4078
[6] Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2015, vol. 36, # 4, p. 634 - 638
[7] RSC Advances, 2015, vol. 5, # 124, p. 102481 - 102487
[8] Chemical Communications, 2017, vol. 53, # 23, p. 3346 - 3349
  • 4
  • [ 600-22-6 ]
  • [ 27871-49-4 ]
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
33 % ee With hydrogen In methanol at 50℃; for 15 h; The hydrogenation reaction of methyl pyruvate was performed by the same method as in Example 38 except that the sulfonate catalyst was changed to Ru(OTf)[(S,S)-Tsdpen](p-cymene). As a result, (S)-methyl lactate with 33percent ee was produced in a yield of only 25percent.
76 % ee With hydrogen In methanol at 50℃; for 15 h; In a stainless steel autoclave, Cp*Ir(OTf)[(S,S)-Tsdpen] (1.7 mg, 2.0 μmol) was charged, followed by purging with argon. Then, 1 ml of methanol and methyl pyruvate (0.18 ml, 2.0 mmol) were charged, and the autoclave was pressurized with hydrogen, followed by ten times of purging. Then, hydrogen was charged to 30 atm to initiate reaction. After stirring at 50° C. for 15 hours, the reaction pressure was returned to normal pressure. 1HNMR and GC analysis of the product showed that (S)-methyl lactate with 76percent ee was quantitatively produced. The spectral data of the resultant alcohol compound was as follows:1HNMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.42 (d, J=7 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.10 (br, 1H, OH), 3.79 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.30 (q, J=7 Hz, 1H, CHOH); GC (Chirasil-DEX CB; column temperature, 80° C.; injection temperature, 250° C.; detection temperature, 275° C.; helium pressure, 100 kPa); tR of (R)-methyl lactate, 3.11 minutes; tR of (S)-methyl lactate, 3.49 minutes.
53 % ee With hydrogen In methanol at 50℃; for 2 h; Autoclave General procedure: All catalytic reactions were carried out at 50 C in 25 mL ofmethanol solvent in a stainless steel autoclave reactorequipped with a gas inlet and outlet, pressure gauge, mechanicalstirrer and temperature controller thermocouple. The systemwas controlled by computerized software and an electronicmotherboard unit. For each reaction, 70 mg (0.1 mmol ofcatalytically active Pt metal) of solid catalyst and 100 mmol ofsubstrate were used. The catalytic hydrogenation reaction wascarried out under 5 MPa of hydrogen and the reaction time wasfixed at 2 h. At the end of the catalytic runs, the reaction mixturewas analyzed by GC and the conversion was calculated onthe basis of the areas of the starting material and product usingcalibration curve calculations.
56 % ee With bis(acetylacetonato)palladium(II); hydrogen; Cinchonidin In methanol; tolueneAutoclave General procedure: Hydrogenation reaction was performed in a Picoclave GlassUster cyclone 075 BUCHI autoclave. A solution of the precursor and the modifier: 0.0304 g (1×10–4 mol) of palladium acetylacetonate, ~10–4 mol of the modifier, 3 mL of toluene, and 19 mL of methanol was transferred to a 100 mL vessel being bubbled with hydrogen. The pale-yellow solution was stirred under hydrogen pressure of 5 atm during 30 min, then 0.5 mL of the substrate in 8 mL of methanol was added, and the “zero sample” was withdrawn. The mixture of hydrogenation products was then analyzed each 30 or 60 min using the chromato–mass spectrometer. Configuration of the prevailing enantiomer was determined by comparison with the reference data [43].

Reference: [1] Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, 1992, # 23, p. 1738 - 1740
[2] Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, 1994, # 21, p. 2431 - 2432
[3] Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas, 1994, vol. 113, # 10, p. 465 - 474
[4] Journal of Catalysis, 1994, vol. 150, # 2, p. 321 - 328
[5] Synthesis, 1998, # 1, p. 45 - 55
[6] Tetrahedron Letters, 1998, vol. 39, # 14, p. 1941 - 1944
[7] Chemical Communications, 1998, # 14, p. 1451 - 1452
[8] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1988, vol. 53, # 6, p. 1231 - 1238
[9] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1985, vol. 50, # 9, p. 1384 - 1394
[10] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1984, vol. 106, # 5, p. 1531 - 1533
[11] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1994, vol. 59, # 11, p. 3064 - 3076
[12] Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, 1995, # 6, p. 685 - 686
[13] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1996, vol. 61, # 18, p. 6244 - 6251
[14] Chemical Communications, 1998, # 14, p. 1451 - 1452
[15] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1990, vol. 55, # 26, p. 6328 - 6333
[16] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1988, vol. 110, # 2, p. 629 - 631
[17] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1994, vol. 59, # 11, p. 3064 - 3076
[18] Chemical Communications, 1998, # 14, p. 1451 - 1452
[19] Tetrahedron, 1999, vol. 55, # 25, p. 7787 - 7804
[20] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1999, vol. 121, # 20, p. 4920 - 4921
[21] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1999, vol. 121, # 20, p. 4920 - 4921
[22] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1999, vol. 64, # 18, p. 6603 - 6608
[23] Tetrahedron Letters, 2000, vol. 41, # 16, p. 2867 - 2870
[24] Tetrahedron Letters, 2000, vol. 41, # 16, p. 2867 - 2870
[25] Journal of Catalysis, 2004, vol. 221, # 2, p. 653 - 656
[26] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2005, vol. 70, # 5, p. 1872 - 1880
[27] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2006, vol. 128, # 17, p. 5955 - 5965
[28] Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 2005, vol. 83, # 6-7, p. 903 - 908
[29] Synlett, 2006, # 8, p. 1169 - 1172
[30] Chemistry Letters, 1987, p. 855 - 858
[31] Chemistry Letters, 1987, p. 855 - 858
[32] Chemical Communications, 2003, # 15, p. 1926 - 1927
[33] Organic Letters, 2002, vol. 4, # 14, p. 2421 - 2424
[34] Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2007, vol. 18, # 19, p. 2305 - 2312
[35] Patent: WO2004/78686, 2004, A1, . Location in patent: Page 20
[36] Patent: US2008/234525, 2008, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 10
[37] Patent: US2008/234525, 2008, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 10
[38] Patent: US2008/234525, 2008, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 10
[39] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2011, vol. 50, # 21, p. 4913 - 4917
[40] Dalton Transactions, 2011, vol. 40, # 13, p. 3325 - 3335
[41] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2014, vol. 356, # 9, p. 1943 - 1948
[42] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2014, vol. 356, # 9, p. 1943 - 1948
[43] Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2015, vol. 36, # 4, p. 634 - 638
[44] RSC Advances, 2015, vol. 5, # 124, p. 102481 - 102487
[45] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2015, vol. 357, # 16-17, p. 3513 - 3520
[46] Russian Journal of General Chemistry, 2018, vol. 88, # 2, p. 199 - 207[47] Zh. Obshch. Khim., 2018, vol. 88, # 2, p. 219 - 227,9
  • 5
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 10326-41-7 ]
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
10.62 g at 20℃; for 24 h; General procedure: was synthesized from corresponding from L-Lactic acid (20 g, 0.225 mole) (5) via diazotization using a reported procedure starting from Alanine (3).[8] The isolated L-lactic acid (10 g, 0.111 mole) was subjected to esterification in MeOH (100 mL, 10 v) with a catalytic amount of sulphuric acid (0.1 mL) to give methyl lactate (7); output: 11.09 g, Yield: 48percent (overall two stages). Similarly methyl-(R)-2-hydroxypropanoate (8) was synthesized by using above procedure from antipode (6), Output: 10.62 g Yield: 46percent (overall two stages). Colorless oil; R-methyl lactate (8) [α]D20 = +4.19° (c 1.7, CHCl3) & S-methyl lactate (7) [α]D20 = - 4.27° (c 2.3, CHCl3); IR (Neat): 3455, 2987, 2957, 1739, 1456, 1271, 1222, 1132, 1048, 979 cm-1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.30 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H), 3.28 (bs, 1H), 3.67 (S, 3H), 4.17 (q, J = 6.6 & 13.6 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 20.15, 52.30, 66.66, 176.0; GC-Ms : (104, M+).
Reference: [1] Bulletin de la Societe Chimique de France, 1893, vol. <3>9, p. 678
[2] Patent: CN106187756, 2016, A, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0013-0017
[3] Synthetic Communications, 2018, vol. 48, # 21, p. 2801 - 2808
  • 6
  • [ 547-64-8 ]
  • [ 79-33-4 ]
  • [ 27871-49-4 ]
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
84 % ee With marine microbial esterase In aq. phosphate buffer at 37℃; for 1 h; Resolution of racemate; Enzymatic reaction A standard 500‐μL hydrolytic reaction system containing140 μg purified esterase PHE14, 50 mmol/L substrate (racemicmethyl lactate) and 50 mmol/L phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) wasincubated at 37 °C for 1 h. After the completion of the enzymaticreaction, reaction samples were extracted with an equalvolume of ethyl acetate and the organic phase was further analyzedto evaluate the enzymatic resolution of (±)‐methyl lactate.
Reference: [1] Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2016, vol. 37, # 8, p. 1396 - 1402
  • 7
  • [ 547-64-8 ]
  • [ 27871-49-4 ]
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: US2008/234525, 2008, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 10
[2] ChemPlusChem, 2013, vol. 78, # 12, p. 1466 - 1474
[3] Chemical Communications, 2015, vol. 51, # 13, p. 2565 - 2568
[4] Chemical Communications, 2015, vol. 51, # 13, p. 2565 - 2568
[5] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2015, vol. 21, # 28, p. 10236 - 10240
[6] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2015, vol. 21, # 28, p. 10236 - 10240
  • 8
  • [ 10326-41-7 ]
  • [ 74-88-4 ]
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
Reference: [1] Organic Letters, 2014, vol. 16, # 20, p. 5434 - 5437
  • 9
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron Letters, 2006, vol. 47, # 37, p. 6517 - 6520
  • 10
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 18668-00-3 ]
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1987, vol. 52, # 22, p. 4978 - 4984
  • 11
  • [ 617-35-6 ]
  • [ 27871-49-4 ]
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
Reference: [1] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2010, vol. 352, # 9, p. 1503 - 1511
  • 12
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 170945-08-1 ]
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron, 1998, vol. 54, # 48, p. 14549 - 14564
  • 13
  • [ 10326-41-7 ]
  • [ 18107-18-1 ]
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
Reference: [1] European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2012, # 21, p. 3978 - 4017
  • 14
  • [ 3724-26-3 ]
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 91049-50-2 ]
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
  • [ 1454336-61-8 ]
Reference: [1] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2013, vol. 19, # 34, p. 11301 - 11309
  • 15
  • [ 186581-53-3 ]
  • [ 10326-41-7 ]
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2017, vol. 82, # 16, p. 8359 - 8370
  • 16
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 616-09-1 ]
  • [ 27871-49-4 ]
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
Reference: [1] Green Chemistry, 2013, vol. 15, # 10, p. 2817 - 2824
  • 17
  • [ 547-64-8 ]
  • [ 160289-70-3 ]
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1999, vol. 64, # 7, p. 2293 - 2300
  • 18
  • [ 186581-53-3 ]
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron, 1972, vol. 28, p. 3757 - 3766
  • 19
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
  • [ 73246-45-4 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
90% With pyridine; thionyl chloride In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 20 - 55℃; for 5 h; Step 1, Preparation of Vilmerier Reagent: To a 250 ml four-necked flask was added 71.4 g (0.6 mol 1) of thionyl chloride, ice Water was cooled to 5 to 10 ° C and 52.6 g (0.72 mol) of anhydrous N, N-dimethylformamide was added dropwise as a solvent at a temperature Increased, mechanical stirring 1 ~ 2h reaction to be colorless Vilmerier reagent solution; Step 2, Synthesis of S-2-Chloropropionic Acid Methyl Ester: At 20 to 30 ° C,A small amount of pyridine was added to the Vilmer ier reagent solution obtained in the first step using a constant pressure dropping funnel to obtain a mixed solution,To the mixed solution, 52 g (0.5 mol 1) of R-lactic acid methyl ester was added dropwise to the mixed solution, and the reaction temperature was significant and the gas was generated. After completion of the dropwise addition, the mixture was stirred at 55 ° C for 5 hours, 2 - chloropropionic acid methyl ester solution, gas phase tracking reaction process, after the end of the reaction cooling; Step 3: The S-2-chloropropionic acid methyl ester solution obtained in the second step was washed with water, and the residue was distilled to give the product S-2-chloropropionic acidMethyl ester 56.9 g, yield 90percent, optical purity 99percent.
Reference: [1] Patent: CN103232344, 2016, B, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0040-0042
  • 20
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
  • [ 73246-45-4 ]
  • [ 77287-29-7 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
86% With pyridine; thionyl chloride In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 20 - 55℃; for 6 h; Step I, prepared Vilmerier reagent: To a 250ml four-necked flask was added 71.4g (0.6mol) of thionyl chloride, ice-water was cooled to 5~10 ° C, and a solution of 50.4g (0.69mol) in dry N , N- dimethylformamide as a solvent, the temperature has increased significantly, mechanically stirred 2h to afford a colorless Vilmerier wide reagent solution;Step 2. Synthesis of S-2- chloropropionate: Under 20-30 ° C temperature, with constant pressure dropping funnel Vilmerier reagent solution obtained in the first step I added a small amount of dioxane to obtain a mixed solution , to the mixed solution was added dropwise 62.4g (0.6mol) (R)-lactic acid methyl ester, the reaction was warmed significantly, and there is a gas generation; the addition was complete, warmed to 55 ° C under stirring 6h, the reaction was carried out chloro product solution i.e. S -2-chloropropionate solution, gas phase reaction progress was followed, after the reaction was cooled;Step 3, the S-2- chloropropionate washing solution obtained in step 2, desolventizing distilled to give the product (S)-2-chloropropionic acid methyl ester 54.4g, 86percent yield, the optical purity of 87percent .
Reference: [1] Patent: CN103232344, 2016, B, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0036-0039
  • 21
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
  • [ 73246-45-4 ]
  • [ 20047-41-0 ]
Reference: [1] Synthetic Communications, 1992, vol. 22, # 15, p. 2187 - 2191
  • 22
  • [ 17392-83-5 ]
  • [ 18162-48-6 ]
  • [ 171230-81-2 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
100% With 1H-imidazole In dichloromethane at 20℃; for 2 h; A mixture of methyl noate (5.1 g, 48.99 mmol), (1226) dichloromethane (50 mL), imidazole (5 g, 75 mmol) and tert-butyldimethylsilyl chloride (8.85 g) was stirred for two hours at room temperature. The mixture was diluted with water and extracted three times with dichloromethane. The combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated. The resulting residue was purified by MPLC eluting with 5percent ethyl acetate in petroleum ether to afford methyl (R)-2-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)propanoate (10.67 g, 100percent) as a colorless oil.
93% With 1H-imidazole In dichloromethane at 0 - 20℃; for 6 h; To a solution of methyl (R)-2-hydroxylpropanoate 12 (2 g, 19.21 mmol) in dry DCM (60 mL) was added imidazole (1.96 g, 28.815 mmol), and the mixture was stirred for 10 min at 0 °C. To this solution tert-butyldimethylsilyl chloride (3.47 g, 23.05 mmol) was added at 0 °C and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 6 h. After completion of the reaction, the mixture was diluted with cold water and extracted into DCM (3 .x. 75 mL). The combined extract was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography using hexane/ethyl acetate (97:3) to give pure 13 (3.9 g, 93percent) as a colorless oil. (c 2.8, CHCl3) [Lit.15b +27.2 (c 1.89, CCl4)]; IR (neat, cm-1): νmax 2944, 2894, 2859, 1753, 1255, 1146, 838, 778; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.25 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 1.35 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.87 (s, 9H), 0.04 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.6, 67.5, 50.6, 25.0, 20.5, 17.5, -5.6, -6.0; ESI/MS (m/z): 241 (M+Na+).
85% With 1H-imidazole In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 20℃; for 18 h; Inert atmosphere To a solution of (R)-(+)-methyl lactate (2.95 g, 28.34 mmol) in DMF (20 mL) was added tert-butyldimethyl silyl chloride (6.41 g, 42.51 mmol) and imidazole (6.75 g, 99.18 mmol). After stirring at a room temperature for 18 hr, the reaction mixture was diluted with a saturated aqueous NaCl solution (90 mL) and extracted with petroleum ether (3.x.60 mL). The organic layer was washed with a cold 3percent HCl solution (30 mL) and a saturated aqueous NaCl solution (30 mL), dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated. The remaining residue was purified by silica gel (105 g) with petroleum ether (300 mL), followed by 3percent ethyl acetate in petroleum ether (600 mL). The 3percent ethyl acetate in the petroleum ether fractions was collected and the solvent was removed to give 5.26 g of (R)-(+)-Methyl 2-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)propanoate as colorless oil (85percent yield). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 4.26 (q, 1H, J=6.8 Hz, -CH), 3.65 (s, 3H, -OCH3), 1.32 (d, 3H, J=6.8 Hz, -CH3), 0.83 (s, 9H, Si-(CH3)3), 0.03 (s, 3H, Si-CH3), 0.00 (s, 3H, Si-CH3).
67% With 1H-imidazole In dichloromethane at 0 - 20℃; for 2 h; Step la: methyl (2R)-2-[(tert-butyIdimethyIsiIyl)oxy]propanoate: into a 250-mL round-bottom flask, was placed a solution of methyl (2R)-2-hydroxypropanoate (5 g, 48.03 mmol, 1 .00 equiv) and Imidazole (6.5 g, 95.59 mmol, 2.00 equiv) in dichloromethane (100 mL). This was followed by the addition of a solution of tert-butyl(chloro)dimethylsilane (8.7 g, 57.72 mmol, 1.20 equiv) in dichloromethane (50 mL) dropwise with stirring at 0 °C. The resulting solution was stirred for 2 hours at room temperature. The reaction was then quenched by the addition of 100 mL of water/ice. The resulting solution was extracted with dichloromethane (3x100 mL) and the organic layers combined. The resulting mixture was washed with brine (3x50 mL), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum. This resulted in 7 g (67percent) of methyl (2R)-2-[(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy]propanoate as colorless oil.
67% With 1H-imidazole In dichloromethane at 0 - 20℃; for 2 h; into a 250-mL round-bottom flask was placed a solution of methyl (2/?)-2-hydroxypropanoate (5 g, 48.03 mmol, 1.00 eq.) and imidazole (6.5 g, 95.59 mmol, 2.00 eq.) in dichloromethane (100 mL), followed by the dropwise addition of a solution of tert-butyl(chloro)dimethylsilane (8.7 g, 57.72 mmol, 1.20 eq.) in dichloromethane (50 mL) at 0 °C. The resulting solution was stirred for 2 h at room temperature. The reaction was quenched by the addition of 100 mL of water/ice. The resulting solution was extracted with dichloromethane (3 x 100 mL) and the organic layers combined. The resulting mixture was washed with brine (3 x 50 mL), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum to afford 7 g (67percent) of methyl (2R)- 2-[(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy]propanoate as a colorless oil
67% With 1H-imidazole In dichloromethane at 0 - 20℃; for 2 h; into a 250-mL round-bottom flask, was placed a solution of methyl (2R)-2-hydroxypropanoate (5 g, 48.03mmol, 1.00 equiv) and Imidazole (6.5 g, 95.59 mmol, 2.00 equiv) in dichloromethane (100 mL). This was followed by the addition of a solution of tert-butyl(chloro)dimethylsilane (8.7 g, 57.72 mmol, 1.20 equiv) in dichloromethane (50 mL) dropwise with stirring at 0 °C. The resulting solution was stirred for 2 hours at room temperature. The reaction was then quenched by the addition of 100 mL of water/ice. The resulting solution was extracted withdichloromethane (3x100 mL) and the organic layers combined. The resulting mixture waswashed with brine (3x50 mL), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum. This resulted in 7 g (67percent) of methyl (2R)-2-[(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy]propanoate as colorless oil.
67% With 1H-imidazole In dichloromethane at 0 - 20℃; for 2 h; into a 250-mL round-bottom flask, was placed a solution of methyl (2R)-2-hydroxypropanoate (5 g, 48.03mmol, 1.00 equiv) and imidazole (6.5 g, 95.59 mmol, 2.00 equiv) in dichloromethane (100 mL). This was followed by the addition of a solution of tert-butyl(chloro)dimethylsilane (8.7 g, 57.72 mmol, 1.20 equiv) in dichloromethane (50 mL) dropwise with stirring at 0 °C. The resulting solution was stirred for 2 hours at room temperature. The reaction was then quenched by the addition of 100 mL of water/ice. The resulting solution was extracted with dichloromethane (3 x 100 mL) and the organic layers combined. The resulting mixture was washed with brine (3 x 50 mL), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated undervacuum to give 7 g (67percent) of methyl (2R)-2-[(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxyjpropanoate as colorless oil.
67% With 1H-imidazole In dichloromethane at 0 - 20℃; for 2 h; into a 250-mLround-bottom flask was placed a solution of methyl (2R)-2-hydroxypropanoate (5 g, 48.03mmol, 1.00 eq.) and imidazole (6.5 g, 95.59 mmol, 2.00 eq.) in dichloromethane (100 mL), followed by the dropwise addition of a solution of tert-butyl(chloro)dimethylsilane (8.7 g, 57.72 mmol, 1.20 eq.) in dichloromethane (50 mL) at 0 °C. The resulting solution was stirred for 2 h at room temperature. The reaction was quenched by the addition of 100 mL ofwater/ice. The resulting solution was extracted with dichloromethane (3 x 100 mL) and the organic layers combined. The resulting mixture was washed with brine (3 x 50 mL), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum to afford 7 g (67percent) of methyl (2R)- 2-[(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxyjpropanoate as a colorless oil.

Reference: [1] Patent: WO2015/171610, 2015, A2, . Location in patent: Paragraph 000507
[2] Chemical Communications, 1997, # 13, p. 1219 - 1220
[3] Patent: WO2016/154533, 2016, A1, . Location in patent: Paragraph 00176
[4] Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2012, vol. 23, # 2, p. 117 - 123
[5] European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2013, # 3, p. 525 - 532
[6] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2000, vol. 65, # 19, p. 5910 - 5916
[7] Tetrahedron Letters, 2000, vol. 41, # 35, p. 6859 - 6863
[8] Patent: US2010/227877, 2010, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 5
[9] Organic Letters, 2006, vol. 8, # 23, p. 5279 - 5282
[10] Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 2015, vol. 13, # 34, p. 9050 - 9054
[11] Patent: WO2016/105468, 2016, A1, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0164
[12] Patent: WO2016/105485, 2016, A2, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0149
[13] Patent: WO2016/105477, 2016, A1, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0151
[14] Patent: WO2017/19589, 2017, A1, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0124
[15] Patent: WO2017/112853, 2017, A1, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0124
[16] Tetrahedron Letters, 1995, vol. 36, # 16, p. 2733 - 2736
[17] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1995, vol. 60, # 22, p. 7230 - 7237
[18] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2003, vol. 42, # 42, p. 5230 - 5234
[19] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2002, vol. 67, # 3, p. 772 - 781
[20] Tetrahedron Letters, 2008, vol. 49, # 36, p. 5273 - 5275
[21] Organic Letters, 2009, vol. 11, # 4, p. 839 - 842
[22] Synlett, 2010, # 1, p. 158 - 160
[23] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2014, vol. 79, # 23, p. 11700 - 11713
[24] Patent: WO2018/13597, 2018, A1, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0672
[25] Patent: US2017/1993, 2017, A1, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0211
Same Skeleton Products
Historical Records

Related Functional Groups of
[ 17392-83-5 ]

Aliphatic Chain Hydrocarbons

Chemical Structure| 27871-49-4

[ 27871-49-4 ]

(S)-Methyl 2-hydroxypropanoate

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 10303-88-5

[ 10303-88-5 ]

(S)-Methyl 2,3-dihydroxypropanoate

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 18289-89-9

[ 18289-89-9 ]

(R)-Methyl 2,3-dihydroxypropanoate

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 7699-00-5

[ 7699-00-5 ]

(R)-Ethyl 2-hydroxypropanoate

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 17639-76-8

[ 17639-76-8 ]

Methyl 2-methoxypropanoate

Similarity: 0.92

Alcohols

Chemical Structure| 27871-49-4

[ 27871-49-4 ]

(S)-Methyl 2-hydroxypropanoate

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 10303-88-5

[ 10303-88-5 ]

(S)-Methyl 2,3-dihydroxypropanoate

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 18289-89-9

[ 18289-89-9 ]

(R)-Methyl 2,3-dihydroxypropanoate

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 7699-00-5

[ 7699-00-5 ]

(R)-Ethyl 2-hydroxypropanoate

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 138-22-7

[ 138-22-7 ]

Butyl 2-hydroxypropanoate

Similarity: 0.85

Esters

Chemical Structure| 27871-49-4

[ 27871-49-4 ]

(S)-Methyl 2-hydroxypropanoate

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 10303-88-5

[ 10303-88-5 ]

(S)-Methyl 2,3-dihydroxypropanoate

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 18289-89-9

[ 18289-89-9 ]

(R)-Methyl 2,3-dihydroxypropanoate

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 7699-00-5

[ 7699-00-5 ]

(R)-Ethyl 2-hydroxypropanoate

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 17639-76-8

[ 17639-76-8 ]

Methyl 2-methoxypropanoate

Similarity: 0.92