Home Cart 0 Sign in  

[ CAS No. 7517-19-3 ] {[proInfo.proName]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]}
Chemical Structure| 7517-19-3
Chemical Structure| 7517-19-3
Structure of 7517-19-3 * Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
Cart0 Add to My Favorites Add to My Favorites Bulk Inquiry Inquiry Add To Cart

Quality Control of [ 7517-19-3 ]

Related Doc. of [ 7517-19-3 ]

Alternatived Products of [ 7517-19-3 ]

Product Details of [ 7517-19-3 ]

CAS No. :7517-19-3 MDL No. :MFCD00012494
Formula : C7H16ClNO2 Boiling Point : -
Linear Structure Formula :- InChI Key :DODCBMODXGJOKD-RGMNGODLSA-N
M.W : 181.66 Pubchem ID :2723695
Synonyms :
H-Leu-OMe.HCl
Chemical Name :H-Leu-OMe.HCl

Calculated chemistry of [ 7517-19-3 ]

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms : 11
Num. arom. heavy atoms : 0
Fraction Csp3 : 0.86
Num. rotatable bonds : 4
Num. H-bond acceptors : 3.0
Num. H-bond donors : 1.0
Molar Refractivity : 46.72
TPSA : 52.32 Ų

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption : High
BBB permeant : Yes
P-gp substrate : No
CYP1A2 inhibitor : No
CYP2C19 inhibitor : No
CYP2C9 inhibitor : No
CYP2D6 inhibitor : No
CYP3A4 inhibitor : No
Log Kp (skin permeation) : -6.18 cm/s

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP) : 0.0
Log Po/w (XLOGP3) : 1.73
Log Po/w (WLOGP) : 1.33
Log Po/w (MLOGP) : 1.08
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT) : 0.4
Consensus Log Po/w : 0.91

Druglikeness

Lipinski : 0.0
Ghose : None
Veber : 0.0
Egan : 0.0
Muegge : 1.0
Bioavailability Score : 0.55

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL) : -1.79
Solubility : 2.93 mg/ml ; 0.0161 mol/l
Class : Very soluble
Log S (Ali) : -2.45
Solubility : 0.652 mg/ml ; 0.00359 mol/l
Class : Soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT) : -0.85
Solubility : 25.6 mg/ml ; 0.141 mol/l
Class : Soluble

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS : 0.0 alert
Brenk : 0.0 alert
Leadlikeness : 1.0
Synthetic accessibility : 1.83

Safety of [ 7517-19-3 ]

Signal Word:Warning Class:N/A
Precautionary Statements:P261-P305+P351+P338 UN#:N/A
Hazard Statements:H315-H319-H335 Packing Group:N/A
GHS Pictogram:

Application In Synthesis of [ 7517-19-3 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Upstream synthesis route of [ 7517-19-3 ]
  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 7517-19-3 ]

[ 7517-19-3 ] Synthesis Path-Upstream   1~24

  • 1
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
  • [ 1148-11-4 ]
  • [ 2873-37-2 ]
Reference: [1] Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 2007, vol. 5, # 5, p. 778 - 786
[2] Liebigs Annalen der Chemie, 1982, vol. No. 9, p. 1677 - 1699
[3] Organic Letters, 2004, vol. 6, # 13, p. 2285 - 2287
  • 2
  • [ 627-36-1 ]
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
  • [ 1148-11-4 ]
  • [ 2873-37-2 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: US3933783, 1976, A,
  • 3
  • [ 1059596-61-0 ]
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
  • [ 2873-37-2 ]
Reference: [1] Green Chemistry, 2011, vol. 13, # 10, p. 2723 - 2726
  • 4
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
  • [ 26607-48-7 ]
  • [ 2873-37-2 ]
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron, 1990, vol. 46, # 15, p. 5325 - 5332
  • 5
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
  • [ 7533-40-6 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
65% With sodium tetrahydroborate; sodium hydrogencarbonate In ethanol; water at 15℃; Heating / reflux To a mixture of (L)-leucine methyl ester HCl salt (254 g, 1.4 mol), NaHCO3, (118 g, 1.4 mol, 1.0 equiv.) and water (1.8 L) in EtOH (1.8 L) at 5° C. was added NaBH4, (159 g, 4.2 mol, 3.0 equiv.) in portions at such a rate that the reaction temp. did not exceed 15° C. (approximately 70 min). After the addition of NaBH4 was complete, the ice bath was removed and the reaction was heated to the reflux temp. overnight. The resulting mixture was cooled to room temp. with the aid of an ice bath. The resulting slurry was filtered and the solids were washed with EtOH (750 mL). The combined filtrates were concentrated to approximately 950 mL under reduced pressure. The residue was diluted with EtOAc (2.5 L) and extracted with a 1N NaOH solution (2.x.1 L). The aqueous layer was back-extracted with EtOAc (2.x.750 mL). The combined organics were dried (MgSO4) and concentrated under reduced pressure to yield (1S)-1-(hydroxymethyl)-3-methylbutylamine as a pale yellow oil (112 g, 65percent): 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ0.88-0.93 (m, 6H), 1.17 (t, J=7.7 Hz, 2H), 1.68-1.80 (m, 2H), 1.82 (br s, 2H), 2.86-2.91 (m, 1H), 3.22 (dd, J=10.7, 8.1 Hz 1H), 3.56, (dd, J=10.3, 3.6 Hz, 1H)
Reference: [1] Patent: US6353006, 2002, B1, . Location in patent: Page column 31
  • 6
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
  • [ 7533-40-6 ]
  • [ 16679-66-6 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
59.3 %Chromat.
Stage #1: With sodium carbonate In water
Stage #2: With CuZn0.3Mg0.1AlO(x); hydrogen In ethanol at 80℃; for 10 h; Autoclave
General procedure: The activity of catalyst for hydrogenation of R-phenylglycinemethyl ester was tested in a 0.5 L stainless steelautoclave under stirring at a speed of 500rpm. After 1g catalyst (20–40 mesh) was put in the reactor, the reactorwas swept with H2 five times to flush out air. Thenthe catalyst was reduced at 1MPa H2and 250 °C for 4h. After the autoclave was cooled in H2atmosphere to roomtemperature, 1.5g R-phenylglycine methyl esters (R-p-m)diluted in 150 mL ethanol was added (R-p-m/Cat = 1.5,wt.). The typical reaction conditions were at 5 MPa of H2 and 80 °C for 10 h. After the reaction was ended, theautoclave was cooled in H2atmosphere to room temperature.Then solid catalyst was separated by centrifugation.The product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel with ethyl acetate/methanol (3/2, v/v) as the eluent.Thus we obtained the light yellow powder product byrotary evaporation. Reactants and products were analyzedby High Performance Liquid Chromatograph (HPLC, Agilent1260 Infinity) equipped with an ultraviolet detector anda column (Eclipse XDB-C18, 150 × 4.6mm, 5mm particlesize), then the conversion of R-phenylglycine methyl ester(X), yield (Y) and chemoselectivity to R-phenylglycinol (S)were calculated [18, 19], in which the yield is the LC yield.And the ee value of products was determined by HPLCequipped with an ultraviolet detector (wavelength 258nm)and a chiral column (CHIRALPAK AY-H, 250 × 4.6mm,5m particle size) [19].
Reference: [1] Catalysis Letters, 2017, vol. 147, # 8, p. 2160 - 2166
  • 7
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
  • [ 687-51-4 ]
Reference: [1] European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1985, vol. 20, # 6, p. 509 - 512
[2] Chemistry - An Asian Journal, 2011, vol. 6, # 6, p. 1321 - 1324
  • 8
  • [ 24424-99-5 ]
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
  • [ 63096-02-6 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
96%
Stage #1: With potassium carbonate In water for 1 h;
Stage #2: With guanidine hydrochloride In ethanol at 35 - 40℃; for 0.366667 h;
General procedure: Amino acid ester hydrochlorides and K2CO3 were suspended in water and stirred for one hour. The free amino acid esters were extracted with CH2Cl2 and dried with MgSO4. Evaporation of CH2Cl2 under reduced pressure gives free amino acid ester which should be immediately used for N-Boc protection. The free amino acid esters (1 mmol) in 1mL ethanol was added to a solution of di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (1.2 mmol) and guanidine hydrochloride (15 molpercent) in ethanol (1 mL) at 35-40 °C and stirred for appropriate time. The work up was similar to same procedure for amines.
60%
Stage #1: With potassium carbonate In water at 20℃; for 0.166667 h;
Stage #2: With guanidine hydrochloride In ethanol at 35 - 40℃; for 1 h;
According to F. Jahani, M. Tajbakhsh, H. Golchoubian, S. Khaksar, Guanidine hydrochloride as an organocatalyst for N-Boc protection of amino Gross, Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 1260–1264. l‑Leucine methylester hydrochloride (1 g, 5.5 mmol) wasdissolved in water (10 mL) with K2CO3 (0.83 g, 6.05 mmol) and stirred at RT for 10 minutes. Reaction mixture was washed with dichloromethane (3 x 10 mL) and collected organic phase was dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was removed by distillation and L-Leucine methylester with liberated amino group was isolated as clear oil. L-Leucine methylester was dissolved in absolute ethanol (10 mL) and heated to 35-40 °C. Solution of di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (1.44 g, 6.6 mmol) and guanidine hydrochloride (0.078 g, 0.83 mmol) was added and reaction mixture was stirred for 60 minutes. Ethanol was then removed by distillation and reaction mixture was suspended in ethyl acetate (20 mL). Undissolved catalyst was removed by filtration and residual solution was washed with citric acid 5percent in water (3 x 15 mL), hydrochloric acid 10percent in water (4 x 15 mL), dried over Na2SO4 and the volume reduced to colourless oil. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (silica gel 70 g, n‑hexane/ethyl acetate (6:1)). The product was obtained in yield 60 percent. (S)-Methyl 2-((tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-4-methylpentanoate 8a. Colourless oil; yield 60 percent. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3‑d1): δ 5.02-4.93 (1H, m, NH), 4.40-4.30 (1H, m, NH‑CH), 3.76 (3H, s, O‑CH3), 1.80-1.50 (3H, m, NH‑CH‑CH2‑CH-(CH3)2, 1.47 (9H, s, C(CH3)3), 1.03‑0.94 (6H, m, CH-(CH3)2). 13C NMR (100.79 MHz, CDCl3‑d1): δ 174.2, 156.2, 146.8, 86.1, 78.7, 52.4, 52.3, 28.8, 27.5, 24.2, 22.2, 20.9. CNH Analysis: Calc. for C12H23NO4 (245.32): C, 58.75; H, 9.45; N, 5.71. Found: C, 58.69±0.01; H 9.41±0.01; N, 5.67±0.01. HRMS: m/z calc. for C12H23NO4: 268.15193 [M+Na]+; found: 268.15196 [M+Na]+.
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron Letters, 2011, vol. 52, # 12, p. 1260 - 1264
[2] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2013, vol. 19, # 12, p. 3817 - 3821
[3] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1995, vol. 60, # 24, p. 8074 - 8080
[4] Chemical Biology and Drug Design, 2012, vol. 79, # 2, p. 216 - 222
[5] European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2017, vol. 135, p. 142 - 158
[6] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2014, vol. 79, # 17, p. 8422 - 8427
  • 9
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
  • [ 63096-02-6 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2007, vol. 72, # 17, p. 6599 - 6601
[2] Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 2003, vol. 1, # 9, p. 1480 - 1485
  • 10
  • [ 58632-95-4 ]
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
  • [ 63096-02-6 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1999, vol. 64, # 23, p. 8468 - 8474
  • 11
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 61-90-5 ]
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
100%
Stage #1: for 1 h; Cooling with ice
Stage #2: at 20 - 66℃; for 6.5 h;
Under ice bath, 100 ml round-bottom flask was added with 60 ml of methanol, and then slowly added with 4 ml of SOCl2 through constant pressure dropping funnel (with a drying tube on the top), and NaOH solution was used to absorb exhaust.
After stirring for 1 h, 8 mmol of L-leucine was added and stirred at room temperature for 30 min, and then refluxed at 66° C. for 6 h.
The reaction was tracked by TLC until the raw material disappears, with a solution of 2percent ninhydrin in ethanol as chromogenic reagent.
The solvent was evaporated out to obtain L-leucine methyl ester hydrochloride. Yield: 100percent.
96%
Stage #1: at -13 - -10℃; for 2 h;
Stage #2: at 50℃; for 3 h;
Take 115mL methanol, added to 250mL three-necked flask, Cool to -13 ° C in a low temperature stirred reaction bath (Reaction should ensure that the environment is anhydrous, In the three-necked flask branch pipe connected to the drying tube; The reaction generates HCl and SO2 gases, To use lye absorption device), Then 9.5 mL (0.131 mol) of freshly distilled SOCl2 was slowly added dropwise, When dropping the reaction temperature is controlled below -10° C , To be added dropwise after completion, continue to react at -10° C 2h, rise to room temperature, 15.4 g (0.118 mol) of leucine was added, and the temperature was raised to 50 ° C. for 3 hours, followed by TLC (With methanol and methylene chloride 1: 1 mixture as a developer, To prevent tailing, drop a drop of diethylamine per ml) Until the end of the reaction (about 3h) Stop the reaction. After the solvent was distilled off by rotary evaporation, A large amount of white solid appears. The product was purified by recrystallization from methanol to give pure leucine methyl ester hydrochloride in 96percent yield.
95% at -5 - 20℃; General procedure: A suspension of L-amino acid (50mmol) in methanol (50mL) was stirred under ice cold conditions. Thionyl chloride (5mL) was slowly dropped to the solution at−5°C. Then, the mixture was allowed to slowly warm to room temperature while being stirred. The reaction was monitored by TLC (N-butanol: water: acetic acid=4:1:1). When the reaction was completed, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to afford the crude product, which was recrystallized from methanol/ether to give a white solid.
86% With thionyl chloride In methanol at -15 - 20℃; To a suspension of (L)-leucine, (315 g, 2.4 mol) in MeOH (3.2 L) at -15° C. was added SOCl2 (315 mL, 4.32 mol, 1.8 equiv.) dropwise at such a rate that the temp. of the reaction did not exceed 5° C. After the addition was complete, the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temp. and was stirred overnight. The resulting mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and Et2O (3 L) was slowly added to the residue to produce a precipitate. The mixture was cooled with an ice bath, then treated with additional MeOH (3 L) relatively rapidly. After 1 h at 0° C., the crystals were collected and dried to give (L)-leucine methyl ester HCl salt as a white crystalline solid (394 g, 86percent): mp 147-149° C.; 1H-NMR (CD3OD) δ0.78-0.98 (m, 6 h), 1.58-1.72 (m, 3H), 3.76 (g, 3H), 3.92 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 1H)
72.2% at -17 - 20℃; for 18 h; To a suspension of l-leusine 26 (1.12 g, 8.54 mmol) in MeOH (9 mL)at -17 °C was slowly added thionylchloride (2.2 mL, 30.3 mmol) with stirring. Then, the mixture was brought tor.t. and stirred for further 18 h. The solution was concentrated in vacuo to give a white solid. The solid was re-crystalized to yield methylester hydrochloride salt 27 (1.12 g, 6.17 mmol72.2 percent).
56% at 20℃; Cooling with ice This compound has previously been described5 and can be purchased from Toronto Research. To a round bottom flask containing MeOH (50 mL) and cooled in an ice bath was added SOCl2 (6.1 mL, 84 mmol) dropwise over 5 min. L-Leucine 1e (5.0 g, 38) was then added and the mixture was left to stir overnight at rt. The reaction mixture was concentrated on the rotovap using MeOH (2 x 50 mL) to chase away excess thionyl chloride. Diethyl ether (50 mL) was added to the resulting solids and followed by a combination of scratching and sonication to produce a white solid which was filtered, rinsing with diethyl ether (3 x 10 mL). Product was further purified by recrystallization by partially dissolving solids in hot EtOAc (50 mL) followed by cooling to rt and filtration. Yield: 3.9 g (56percent). [α]D24 +18.8° (c 0.50, MeOH). >98percent pure by NMR. 1H NMR ((CD3)2SO) δ 8.61 (br s, 3H), 3.95 (t, J = 7, 1H), 3.74 (s, 3H), 1.75 (m, 1H), 1.65 (m, 2H), 0.89 (d, J = 7, 6H).

Reference: [1] Patent: US2014/206741, 2014, A1, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0121
[2] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2003, vol. 68, # 12, p. 5006 - 5008
[3] Synthetic Communications, 2010, vol. 40, # 8, p. 1161 - 1179
[4] Bulletin des Societes Chimiques Belges, 1991, vol. 100, # 1, p. 63 - 77
[5] Chemical Biology and Drug Design, 2012, vol. 79, # 2, p. 216 - 222
[6] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2017, vol. 139, # 40, p. 14077 - 14089
[7] Organic Preparations and Procedures International, 2001, vol. 33, # 4, p. 341 - 349
[8] Organic Preparations and Procedures International, 2002, vol. 34, # 1, p. 87 - 94
[9] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2013, vol. 19, # 49, p. 16615 - 16624
[10] Indian Journal of Chemistry - Section B Organic and Medicinal Chemistry, 2006, vol. 45, # 8, p. 1942 - 1944
[11] Synthetic Communications, 2008, vol. 38, # 5, p. 684 - 696
[12] Patent: CN105061236, 2016, B, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0034; 0039-0041
[13] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1989, vol. 54, # 4, p. 937 - 947
[14] European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2016, vol. 112, p. 196 - 208
[15] Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2, 2001, # 9, p. 1863 - 1868
[16] Patent: US6353006, 2002, B1, . Location in patent: Page column 30
[17] Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, 1986, vol. 317, p. 93 - 104
[18] Indian Journal of Chemistry - Section B Organic and Medicinal Chemistry, 2007, vol. 46, # 7, p. 1137 - 1142
[19] Synthetic Communications, 2008, vol. 38, # 23, p. 4107 - 4115
[20] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2012, vol. 77, # 1, p. 317 - 331
[21] Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, 2017, vol. 88, p. 1163 - 1172
[22] Journal of Chemical Research, 2009, # 11, p. 665 - 667
[23] Tetrahedron Letters, 2014, vol. 55, # 32, p. 4445 - 4447
[24] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2016, vol. 26, # 20, p. 5000 - 5006
[25] New Journal of Chemistry, 2017, vol. 41, # 23, p. 14723 - 14729
[26] Tetrahedron, 1990, vol. 46, # 15, p. 5325 - 5332
[27] Tetrahedron Letters, 1980, vol. 21, p. 2077 - 2080
[28] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2005, vol. 15, # 6, p. 1629 - 1632
[29] Heterocycles, 1991, vol. 32, # 10, p. 1879 - 1895
[30] European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1985, vol. 20, # 6, p. 509 - 512
[31] Phytochemistry (Elsevier), 1988, vol. 27, # 1, p. 77 - 84
[32] Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1994, vol. 98, # 27, p. 6862 - 6864
[33] Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, 1987, vol. 326, p. 289 - 298
[34] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1997, vol. 62, # 20, p. 6862 - 6869
[35] Synthetic Communications, 1999, vol. 29, # 17, p. 3039 - 3049
[36] Indian Journal of Chemistry - Section B Organic and Medicinal Chemistry, 1999, vol. 38, # 4, p. 505 - 507
[37] Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2002, vol. 13, # 18, p. 2053 - 2059
[38] Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 2005, vol. 83, # 8, p. 1164 - 1170
[39] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2006, vol. 49, # 24, p. 7215 - 7226
[40] Tetrahedron, 2007, vol. 63, # 31, p. 7334 - 7348
[41] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2007, vol. 72, # 24, p. 9283 - 9290
[42] Chemical Communications, 2006, # 29, p. 3081 - 3083
[43] Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica - Drug Research, 2007, vol. 64, # 6, p. 509 - 516
[44] Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2009, vol. 20, # 5, p. 616 - 620
[45] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2008, vol. 14, # 35, p. 10888 - 10891
[46] European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2008, # 14, p. 2423 - 2429
[47] Synlett, 2009, # 8, p. 1227 - 1232
[48] European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2009, vol. 44, # 7, p. 2796 - 2806
[49] Zeitschrift fur Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie, 2010, vol. 636, # 1, p. 236 - 241
[50] Journal of Chemical Research, 2011, vol. 35, # 1, p. 47 - 50
[51] Synthetic Communications, 2011, vol. 41, # 23, p. 3485 - 3490
[52] Letters in Organic Chemistry, 2011, vol. 8, # 5, p. 358 - 360
[53] Chemistry - An Asian Journal, 2011, vol. 6, # 1, p. 189 - 197
[54] Archiv der Pharmazie, 2011, vol. 344, # 8, p. 494 - 504
[55] Letters in Organic Chemistry, 2011, vol. 8, # 3, p. 210 - 215
[56] Asian Journal of Chemistry, 2012, vol. 24, # 3, p. 1227 - 1236
[57] Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, 2012, vol. 27, # 2, p. 302 - 310
[58] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, 2012, vol. 20, # 12, p. 3807 - 3815
[59] Journal of Chemical Research, 2012, vol. 36, # 4, p. 206 - 209
[60] Biomacromolecules, 2012, vol. 13, # 8, p. 2446 - 2455
[61] Medicinal Chemistry Research, 2012, vol. 21, # 11, p. 3361 - 3368
[62] Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 2013, vol. 11, # 7, p. 1143 - 1148
[63] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, 2013, vol. 21, # 7, p. 1621 - 1627
[64] European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2016, vol. 108, p. 21 - 27
[65] Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, 2013, vol. 28, # 4, p. 717 - 726
[66] Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry, 2013, vol. 50, # 5, p. 1067 - 1070
[67] RSC Advances, 2013, vol. 3, # 40, p. 18332 - 18338
[68] RSC Advances, 2014, vol. 4, # 24, p. 12275 - 12286
[69] Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 2014, vol. 28, # 7, p. 545 - 551
[70] Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 2014, vol. 12, # 41, p. 8318 - 8324
[71] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2015, vol. 58, # 7, p. 3144 - 3155
[72] Oriental Journal of Chemistry, 2015, vol. 31, # 1, p. 417 - 421
[73] Medicinal Chemistry Research, 2015, vol. 24, # 7, p. 2825 - 2837
[74] Journal of Polymer Science, Part A: Polymer Chemistry, 2016, vol. 54, # 8, p. 1065 - 1077
[75] Tetrahedron, 2016, vol. 72, # 51, p. 8486 - 8492
[76] Patent: CN103864642, 2016, B, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0019-0021
[77] Organic Syntheses, 1988, vol. 66, p. 151 - 151
  • 12
  • [ 61-90-5 ]
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
98% With thionyl chloride In methanol (1)
Similarly to Example 20 and starting from 6.56 g (50.0 mmol) of D,L-leucine, 50 ml of methanol and 13.0 ml (180 mmol) of thionyl chloride, 8.93 g (yield: 98percent) of D,L-leucine methyl ester hydrochloride was obtained as a white powder.
1H-NMR (300 MHz, D2O); δ: 4.17 (1H, t, J=6.8 Hz), 3.87 (3H, s), 1.90 (1H, m), 1.78 (2H, m), 00 (3H, d, J=6.0 Hz), 0.99 (3H, d, J=6.0 Hz).
Reference: [1] Patent: US6420415, 2002, B1,
[2] Patent: US2012/135921, 2012, A1,
[3] Tetrahedron, 2007, vol. 63, # 41, p. 10282 - 10289
  • 13
  • [ 112018-28-7 ]
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1990, vol. 55, # 8, p. 2271 - 2272
  • 14
  • [ 128369-74-4 ]
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2007, vol. 72, # 17, p. 6599 - 6601
  • 15
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 13139-15-6 ]
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2017, vol. 139, # 43, p. 15539 - 15547
[2] Amino Acids, 2018, vol. 50, # 11, p. 1595 - 1605
  • 16
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 760-84-9 ]
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Asian Natural Products Research, 2017, vol. 19, # 12, p. 1160 - 1171
  • 17
  • [ 75-77-4 ]
  • [ 61-90-5 ]
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
Reference: [1] New Journal of Chemistry, 2016, vol. 40, # 11, p. 9054 - 9059
  • 18
  • [ 113089-14-8 ]
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: US5523463, 1996, A,
  • 19
  • [ 2666-93-5 ]
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
Reference: [1] Synlett, 2009, # 17, p. 2803 - 2808
  • 20
  • [ 51021-87-5 ]
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
Reference: [1] Synthesis, 2011, # 20, p. 3247 - 3254
  • 21
  • [ 61-90-5 ]
  • [ 77-76-9 ]
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2008, vol. 19, # 1, p. 67 - 81
  • 22
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 120335-08-2 ]
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron, 2007, vol. 63, # 41, p. 10282 - 10289
  • 23
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
  • [ 10466-61-2 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
60%
Stage #1: With ammonia In methanol at 50℃; for 48 h; Sealed tube
Stage #2: With hydrogenchloride In 1,4-dioxaneSonication
This is a modification of a previously published procedure.11 This compound is commercially available from Alfa Aesar. To a glass pressure tube containing compound 9e (1.0 g, 5.5 mmol) in MeOH (10 mL) was added 7N NH3 in MeOH (7.9 mL,55 mmol). Reaction was sealed and heated to 50 °C for 2d. Compound was then concentrated in vacuo. Crude product was converted to an HCl salt by suspensionin 1,4-dioxane (10 mL), followed by addition of 4N HCl in 1,4-dioxane (1.7 mL, 6.8 mmol). Mixture was sonicated to help mix. Solvents and excess HCl were removed by rotovap, using 1,4-dioxane (10 mL) to chase away excess HCl. Product was purified by recrystallization from hot isopropyl alcohol, allowing crystals to form slowly at rt. Placed recrystallized solid under high vacuum to remove residual solvent. Yield: 0.55 g (60percent). mp 216-218 °C, [α]D24 +12.0° (c 0.50, MeOH), HPLC Purity (200 nm): >99percent with <0.5percent parent Leu evident. 1H NMR ((CD3)2SO) δ 8.29 (br s, 3H), 7.96 (s, 1H), 7.48 (s, 1H), 3.66 (m, 1H), 1.67 (m, 1H), 1.56 (m, 2H), 0.92 (d, J = 3, 3H), 0.90 (d, J = 3, 3H).
Reference: [1] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2016, vol. 26, # 20, p. 5000 - 5006
[2] Journal fur Praktische Chemie - Chemiker - Zeitung, 1996, vol. 338, # 3, p. 251 - 256
  • 24
  • [ 7517-19-3 ]
  • [ 65391-42-6 ]
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron Letters, 1992, vol. 33, # 45, p. 6803 - 6806
Same Skeleton Products
Historical Records

Related Functional Groups of
[ 7517-19-3 ]

Amino Acid Derivatives

Chemical Structure| 18598-74-8

[ 18598-74-8 ]

H-Ile-OMe.HCl

Similarity: 0.97

Chemical Structure| 144644-00-8

[ 144644-00-8 ]

H-D-Cha-OMe.HCl

Similarity: 0.97

Chemical Structure| 14328-62-2

[ 14328-62-2 ]

(S)-Methyl 2-amino-2-cyclopentylacetate hydrochloride

Similarity: 0.95

Chemical Structure| 138326-68-8

[ 138326-68-8 ]

(S)-Methyl 2-amino-2-cyclopropylacetate hydrochloride

Similarity: 0.95

Chemical Structure| 535936-86-8

[ 535936-86-8 ]

Methyl 2-amino-2-cyclopropylacetate hydrochloride

Similarity: 0.95