Home Cart Sign in  
Chemical Structure| 76114-73-3 Chemical Structure| 76114-73-3

Structure of 76114-73-3

Chemical Structure| 76114-73-3

*Storage: {[sel_prStorage]}

*Shipping: {[sel_prShipping]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}

4.5 *For Research Use Only !

{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]} Purity: {[proInfo.pro_purity]}

Change View

Size Price VIP Price

US Stock

Global Stock

In Stock
{[ item.pr_size ]} Inquiry {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.vip_usd) ]}

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 5-7 days

  • {[ item.pr_size ]}

In Stock

- +

Please Login or Create an Account to: See VIP prices and availability

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 2 weeks

  • 1-2 Day Shipping
  • High Quality
  • Technical Support
Product Citations

Alternative Products

Product Details of [ 76114-73-3 ]

CAS No. :76114-73-3
Formula : C8H13NO2
M.W : 155.19
SMILES Code : O=C(OCC#C)NCCCC
MDL No. :MFCD06411065
InChI Key :JTDBXHIIVZZXDH-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Pubchem ID :10877354

Safety of [ 76114-73-3 ]

GHS Pictogram:
Signal Word:Warning
Hazard Statements:H302-H317-H412
Precautionary Statements:P273-P280

Computational Chemistry of [ 76114-73-3 ] Show Less

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms 11
Num. arom. heavy atoms 0
Fraction Csp3 0.62
Num. rotatable bonds 6
Num. H-bond acceptors 2.0
Num. H-bond donors 1.0
Molar Refractivity 43.21
TPSA ?

Topological Polar Surface Area: Calculated from
Ertl P. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.

38.33 Ų

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP)?

iLOGP: in-house physics-based method implemented from
Daina A et al. 2014 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

2.5
Log Po/w (XLOGP3)?

XLOGP3: Atomistic and knowledge-based method calculated by
XLOGP program, version 3.2.2, courtesy of CCBG, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry

1.31
Log Po/w (WLOGP)?

WLOGP: Atomistic method implemented from
Wildman SA and Crippen GM. 1999 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

1.23
Log Po/w (MLOGP)?

MLOGP: Topological method implemented from
Moriguchi I. et al. 1992 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Moriguchi I. et al. 1994 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Lipinski PA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev.

1.38
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Hybrid fragmental/topological method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

1.05
Consensus Log Po/w?

Consensus Log Po/w: Average of all five predictions

1.49

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL):?

ESOL: Topological method implemented from
Delaney JS. 2004 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-1.23
Solubility 9.11 mg/ml ; 0.0587 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Very soluble
Log S (Ali)?

Ali: Topological method implemented from
Ali J. et al. 2012 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-1.72
Solubility 2.99 mg/ml ; 0.0193 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Very soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Fragmental method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

-1.7
Solubility 3.13 mg/ml ; 0.0202 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption?

Gatrointestinal absorption: according to the white of the BOILED-Egg

High
BBB permeant?

BBB permeation: according to the yolk of the BOILED-Egg

Yes
P-gp substrate?

P-glycoprotein substrate: SVM model built on 1033 molecules (training set)
and tested on 415 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.72 / AUC=0.77
External: ACC=0.88 / AUC=0.94

No
CYP1A2 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9145 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.83 / AUC=0.90
External: ACC=0.84 / AUC=0.91

No
CYP2C19 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9272 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.86
External: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP2C9 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibitor: SVM model built on 5940 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2075 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.71 / AUC=0.81

No
CYP2D6 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor: SVM model built on 3664 molecules (training set)
and tested on 1068 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.79 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.81 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP3A4 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor: SVM model built on 7518 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2579 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.77 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.86

No
Log Kp (skin permeation)?

Skin permeation: QSPR model implemented from
Potts RO and Guy RH. 1992 Pharm. Res.

-6.32 cm/s

Druglikeness

Lipinski?

Lipinski (Pfizer) filter: implemented from
Lipinski CA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
MW ≤ 500
MLOGP ≤ 4.15
N or O ≤ 10
NH or OH ≤ 5

0.0
Ghose?

Ghose filter: implemented from
Ghose AK. et al. 1999 J. Comb. Chem.
160 ≤ MW ≤ 480
-0.4 ≤ WLOGP ≤ 5.6
40 ≤ MR ≤ 130
20 ≤ atoms ≤ 70

None
Veber?

Veber (GSK) filter: implemented from
Veber DF. et al. 2002 J. Med. Chem.
Rotatable bonds ≤ 10
TPSA ≤ 140

0.0
Egan?

Egan (Pharmacia) filter: implemented from
Egan WJ. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.
WLOGP ≤ 5.88
TPSA ≤ 131.6

0.0
Muegge?

Muegge (Bayer) filter: implemented from
Muegge I. et al. 2001 J. Med. Chem.
200 ≤ MW ≤ 600
-2 ≤ XLOGP ≤ 5
TPSA ≤ 150
Num. rings ≤ 7
Num. carbon > 4
Num. heteroatoms > 1
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 15
H-bond acc. ≤ 10
H-bond don. ≤ 5

1.0
Bioavailability Score?

Abbott Bioavailability Score: Probability of F > 10% in rat
implemented from
Martin YC. 2005 J. Med. Chem.

0.55

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS?

Pan Assay Interference Structures: implemented from
Baell JB. & Holloway GA. 2010 J. Med. Chem.

0.0 alert
Brenk?

Structural Alert: implemented from
Brenk R. et al. 2008 ChemMedChem

1.0 alert: heavy_metal
Leadlikeness?

Leadlikeness: implemented from
Teague SJ. 1999 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
250 ≤ MW ≤ 350
XLOGP ≤ 3.5
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 7

No; 1 violation:MW<1.0
Synthetic accessibility?

Synthetic accessibility score: from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very difficult)
based on 1024 fragmental contributions (FP2) modulated by size and complexity penaties,
trained on 12'782'590 molecules and tested on 40 external molecules (r2 = 0.94)

2.28

Application In Synthesis of [ 76114-73-3 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 76114-73-3 ]

[ 76114-73-3 ] Synthesis Path-Downstream   1~12

  • 1
  • [ 109-73-9 ]
  • polymeric N-propargyloxycarbonyl-O-succinimide [ No CAS ]
  • [ 76114-73-3 ]
  • 2
  • [ 107-19-7 ]
  • [ 73330-93-5 ]
  • [ 76114-73-3 ]
  • 3
  • [ 35718-08-2 ]
  • [ 109-73-9 ]
  • [ 76114-73-3 ]
  • 4
  • [ 76114-73-3 ]
  • C8H13NO2 [ No CAS ]
  • 5
  • [ 76114-73-3 ]
  • [ 55406-53-6 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
93.2 - 93.5% EXAMPLE I; A reactor was charged with 330g of water which was then cooled to a temperature of 0-8C. To the cooled water, while stirring was added 3.4 grams of a nonionic surfactant agent MERPOL HCS and 16. 85g of butyl PROPYNYL carbamate while maintaining the temperature between 0-8 C. The reactor was further charged with 8.85g of a 50% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide and 16.28 grams of sodium iodide which had been previously dissolved in 50g of water. The temperature was maintained between 5-8C. The reactor with strong agitation was slowly charged with 70.2g of a 13.6% solution of sodium hypochlorite while maintaining the reaction mass at a temperature of between 6 and 11 C. The temperature was allowed to ramp up slightly to 15-20C and the reaction mass was agitated for 90 minutes. The reaction mass was then slowly heated to a temperature of 35-40 C. The ramping up of the temperature was effected at a rate of 0.25 to 0. 75C per minute. With agitation the pH of the reaction mass was then adjusted to 6.9 with acetic acid. The pH reaction mass was then adjusted to 6.6 with sodium bisulfite. The temperature was then ramped up to 55 to 59C at a rate of. 25 to. 75C per minute. When a temperature reached a range of 55-59C cooling was applied to the reaction mass to ramp the temperature of the reaction mass down to 25-30 C, at a ramp down rate of 0.33-0. 75C per minute. The reaction mass was then agitated for 10 minutes and then the reaction mass was filtered. The filtration cake was washed twice with 100 mi of water. The cake was then dried at 35 C to a constant weight. The reaction achieved a yield of 93.5% of IPBC which assayed at 98.7% IPBC; EXAMPLE 3; A reactor was charged with 1400 gal of water which was then cooled to a temperature of 0-8 C. To the cooled water, while stirring was added to 87 pounds of a nonionic surfactant agent Merpol HCS and 429 pounds of <strong>[76114-73-3]butyl propynyl carbamate</strong> while maintaining the temperature between 0-8 C. The reactor was further charged with 214 pounds of a 50% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide and 853 pounds of 50% sodium iodide solution. The temperature was maintained between 5-8 C. The reactor with strong agitation was slowly charged with 1780 pounds of a 13.6% solution of sodium of sodium hypochlorite while maintaining the reaction mass at a temperature of between 6 and 11C. The temperature was allowed to ramp up slightly to 15-20C and the reaction mass was agitated for 90 minutes. The reaction mass was then slowly heated to a temperature of 35-40C. The ramping up of the temperature was effected at a rate of 0.25 to 0. 75 C per minute. With agitation the pH of the reaction mass was then adjusted to 6.9 with acetic acid. The pH reaction mass was then adjusted to 6.6 with sodium bisulfite. The temperature was then tamped up to 55 to 59C at a rate of 0.25 to 0. 75C per minute. With agitation the pH of the reaction mass was then adjusted to 6.9 with acetic acid. The pH reaction mass was then adjusted to 6.6 with sodium bisulfite. The temperature was then ramped up to 55 to 59C at a rate of 0.25 to 0. 75C per minute. When a temperature reached a range of 55-59C, cooling was applied to the reaction mass to ramp the temperature of the reaction mass down to 25-30C, at a ramp down rate of 33-75C per minute. When a temperature reached a range of 55-59C, cooling was applied to the reaction mass to ramp the temperature of the reaction mass down to 25-30C, at a ramp down rate of 33-75C per minute. The reaction mass was then agitated and then the reaction mass was centrifuged with water for 10 minutes. The cake was washed. The cake was then dried at 30-45C to a constant weight. The reaction achieved a yield of 93.2% of IPBC which assayed at 98.7% IPBC
93.5% EXAMPLE 2; [0058] The reaction procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that in the iodination step potassium iodide was substituted for sodium iodine. The procedure produced IPBC at a yield of 93.5% wherein the resulting IPBC assayed at 98.7%.
93.2 - 93.5% EXAMPLE 1; [0050] A reactor was charged with 330 g of water which was then cooled to a temperature of 0-8 C. [0051] To the cooled water, while stirring was added 3.4 grams of a nonionic surfactant agent Merpol HCS and 16.85 g of <strong>[76114-73-3]butyl propynyl carbamate</strong> while maintaining the temperature between 0-8 C. [0052] The reactor was further charged with 8.85 g of a 50% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide and 16.28 grams of sodium iodide which had been previously dissolved in 50 g of water. The temperature was maintained between 5-8 C. [0053] The reactor with strong agitation was slowly charged with 70.2 g of a 13.6% solution of sodium hypochlorite while maintaining the reaction mass at a temperature of between 6 and 11 C. [0054] The temperature was allowed to ramp up slightly to 15-20 C. and the reaction mass was agitated for 90 minutes. The reaction mass was then slowly heated to a temperature of 35-40 C. The ramping up of the temperature was effected at a rate of 0.25 to 0.75 C. per minute. [0055] With agitation the pH of the reaction mass was then adjusted to 6.9 with acetic acid. The pH reaction mass was then adjusted to 6.6 with sodium bisulfite. The temperature was then ramped up to 55 to 59 C. at a rate of 0.25 to 0.75 C. per minute. [0056] When a temperature reached a range of 55-59 C. cooling was applied to the reaction mass to ramp the temperature of the reaction mass down to 25-30 C., at a ramp down rate of 0.33-0.75 C. per minute. [0057] The reaction mass was then agitated for 10 minutes and then the reaction mass was filtered. The filtration cake was washed twice with 100 ml of water. The cake was then dried at 35 C. to a constant weight. The reaction achieved a yield of 93.5% of IPBC which assayed at 98.7% IPBC.; A reactor was charged with 1400 gal of water which was then cooled to a temperature of 0-8 C. [0060] To the cooled water, while stirring was added to 87 pounds of a nonionic surfactant agent Merpol HCS and 429 pounds of <strong>[76114-73-3]butyl propynyl carbamate</strong> while maintaining the temperature between 0-8 C. [0061] The reactor was further charged with 214 pounds of a 50% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide and 853 pounds of 50% sodium iodide solution. The temperature was maintained between 5-8 C. [0062] The reactor with strong agitation was slowly charged with 1780 pounds of a 13.6% solution of sodium of sodium hypochlorite while maintaining the reaction mass at a temperature of between 6 and 11 C. [0063] The temperature was allowed to ramp up slightly to 15-20 C. and the reaction mass was agitated for 90 minutes. The reaction mass was then slowly heated to a temperature of 35-40 C. The ramping up of the temperature was effected at a rate of 0.25 to 0.75 C. per minute. [0064] With agitation the pH of the reaction mass was then adjusted to 6.9 with acetic acid. The pH reaction mass was then adjusted to 6.6 with sodium bisulfite. The temperature was then tamped up to 55 to 59 C. at a rate of 0.25 to 0.75 C. per minute. [0065] With agitation the pH of the reaction mass was then adjusted to 6.9 with acetic acid. The pH reaction mass was then adjusted to 6.6 with sodium bisulfite. The temperature was then ramped up to 55 to 59 C. at a rate of 0.25 to 0.75 C. per minute. [0066] When a temperature reached a range of 55-59 C., cooling was applied to the reaction mass to ramp the temperature of the reaction mass down to 25-30 C., at a ramp down rate of 33-75 C. per minute. [0067] When a temperature reached a range of 55-59 C., cooling was applied to the reaction mass to ramp the temperature of the reaction mass down to 25-30 C., at a ramp down rate of 33-75 C. per minute. [0068] The reaction mass was then agitated and then the reaction mass was centrifuged with water for 10 minutes. The cake was washed. The cake was then dried at 30-45 C. to a constant weight. The reaction achieved a yield of 93.2% of IPBC which assayed at 98.7% IPBC.
83% With chlorine; sodium iodide; sodium hydroxide; In C12-C16-alcohol ethoxylate;Product distribution / selectivity; Example 1At 5 C., 4.5 g of C12-C16-alcohol ethoxylate, 16.9 g of <strong>[76114-73-3]propargyl butylcarbamate</strong> (0.107 mol), 40.7 g of NaI solution (40% strength, 0.108 mol) and 25.8 g of NaOH solution (50% strength, 0.322 mol) are introduced as initial charge in 330 g of water. Chlorine (10.3 g, 0.145 mol) is then slowly introduced into the reaction mixture such that the temperature remains below 5 C. When the introduction is complete, the mixture is slowly heated to 20 C. and stirred at this temperature for 4 h. The precipitated solid is then isolated by filtration, washed with water and dried in vacuo.This gives 26.1 g of 3-iodo-2-propynyl N-10 butylcarbamate (purity: 95.4% (HPLC), polyiodized compounds: <0.1% (HPLC), yield:83%).
With sodium hydroxide; sodium chloride; Iodine monochloride; In methanol; EXAMPLE 1 A reactor (having a capacity of 200 ml and fitted with a condenser and a stirrer) was charged with 7.75 g (0.050 mole) of <strong>[76114-73-3]prop-1-yn-3-yl N-n-butylcarbamate</strong> and 80 g of methanol, followed by the addition of 8.3 g (equivalent to 0.073 mole) of a 35% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. While this solution was cooled to and maintained at 10 C., 30.5 g of a 15% aqueous solution of sodium chloride containing 28% iodine monochloride (equivalent to 0.053 mole) was added thereto over a period of 20 minutes. Furthermore, the solution was reacted at 15 C. for 2 hours. Thereafter, the reacted solution was neutralized with hydrochloric acid and extracted with 40 g of toluene. The reacted solution was further extracted five times with toluene and the combined toluene extract was dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. Finally, the toluene was removed by evaporation under reduced pressure to obtain 13.8 g of 1-iodo<strong>[76114-73-3]prop-1-yn-3-yl N-n-butylcarbamate</strong>. This product had a melting point of 65-67 C., its yield was 98.3 mole %, and no impurity was detected by its purity analysis.
With sodium hydroxide; sodium hypochlorite; iodine; In methanol; COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 4 A reactor (having a capacity of 200 ml and fitted with a condenser and a stirrer) was charged with 7.75 g (0.050 mole) of <strong>[76114-73-3]prop-1-yn-3-yl N-n-butylcarbamate</strong> and 80 g of methanol, followed by the addition of 8.3 g (equivalent to 0.073 mole) of a 35% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. While this solution was cooled to and maintained at 10 C., 6.73 g (equivalent to 0.027 mole) of iodine was added thereto. After 20.5 g of a 6% aqueous solution of sodium hypochlorite was subsequently added thereto, the solution was reacted for 2 hours while its temperature was maintained at 10 C. Thereafter, the reacted solution was neutralized with hydrochloric acid and extracted with 40 g of toluene. The reacted solution was further extracted five times with toluene and the combined toluene extract was dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. Finally, the toluene was removed by evaporation under reduced pressure to obtain 11.4 g of 1-iodo<strong>[76114-73-3]prop-1-yn-3-yl N-n-butylcarbamate</strong>. Its yield was 81.2 mole %, and its purity analysis revealed the presence of 0.5% of polyiodinated products (impurities).

  • 6
  • [ 109-65-9 ]
  • [ 107-19-7 ]
  • [ 76114-73-3 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
53% With tetrabutylammomium bromide; In acetonitrile; EXAMPLE I Synthesis of N-Butyl Propargyl Carbamate: A mixture of n-butyl bromide (8.8 g, 0.064 mole), propargyl alcohol (3 g, 0.054 mole), potassium cyanide (6.5 g, 0.08 mole) and tetrabutylammonium bromide (1.7 g, 0.005 mole) in acetonitrile (45 mL) was heated at 70C. under nitrogen for 22 hours. The insoluble precipitate was filtered off and the filtrate was concentrated on a rotary evaporator to give a yellow oil (6.7 g). Column chromatography (silica gel, 15/85 of ethyl acetate/hexane) gave a colourless oil (4.4 g, 53 %) of N-butyl propargyl carbamate. NMR (CDC13, ppm): 4.75 (2H, s), 3.2 (2H, m), 2.5 (1H, s), 1.4 (4H, m), 1.0 (3H, t).; GC/MS (m/e): 155 (M+), 112 (100 %), 74, 57, 56.
  • 7
  • [ 107-19-7 ]
  • [ 111-36-4 ]
  • [ 76114-73-3 ]
  • 8
  • [ 39078-72-3 ]
  • [ 107-19-7 ]
  • [ 76114-73-3 ]
  • 9
  • [ 57011-48-0 ]
  • [ 76114-73-3 ]
  • [ 1313994-70-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
68% With copper(l) iodide; sodium hydroxide; In methanol; at 20℃; for 24.0h; Typical procedure. A solution of the appropriate azide (2 mmol) in MeOH (3.0 mL) was added to a stirred mixture of the corresponding alkyne (2.1 mmol), a 0.5 N solution of NaOH (0.5 mL, 0.25 mmol) and CuI (0.019g, 0.1 mmol) in MeOH (2.0 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24h. The reaction mixture was filtered through celite, and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The final product was purified by column chromatography (SiO2, hexane/AcOEt 8:2).
  • 10
  • [ 622-79-7 ]
  • [ 76114-73-3 ]
  • [ 1313994-71-6 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
93% With C19H18N6O*Cu(1+)*I(1-); In dichloromethane; at 20℃; for 24.0h; General procedure: The copper complex 4 (0.0268 g, 0.025mmol) was added to a stirred solution containing the corresponding alkyne (1.0mmol) and the appropriate azide (1.05mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL). The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. The mixture was filtered through celite-activated charcoal. The solvent was removedunder reduced pressure and the final product was purified by crystallization.
43% With copper(l) iodide; sodium hydroxide; In methanol; at 20℃; for 24.0h; Typical procedure. A solution of the appropriate azide (2 mmol) in MeOH (3.0 mL) was added to a stirred mixture of the corresponding alkyne (2.1 mmol), a 0.5 N solution of NaOH (0.5 mL, 0.25 mmol) and CuI (0.019g, 0.1 mmol) in MeOH (2.0 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24h. The reaction mixture was filtered through celite, and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The final product was purified by column chromatography (SiO2, hexane/AcOEt 8:2).
  • 11
  • [ 34583-63-6 ]
  • [ 76114-73-3 ]
  • [ 1322786-98-0 ]
  • 12
  • [ 66172-16-5 ]
  • [ 76114-73-3 ]
  • [ 1428739-57-4 ]
 

Historical Records

Technical Information

Categories