Home Cart 0 Sign in  
X

[ CAS No. 79836-78-5 ] {[proInfo.proName]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]}
3d Animation Molecule Structure of 79836-78-5
Chemical Structure| 79836-78-5
Chemical Structure| 79836-78-5
Structure of 79836-78-5 * Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
Cart0 Add to My Favorites Add to My Favorites Bulk Inquiry Inquiry Add To Cart

Quality Control of [ 79836-78-5 ]

Related Doc. of [ 79836-78-5 ]

Alternatived Products of [ 79836-78-5 ]

Product Details of [ 79836-78-5 ]

CAS No. :79836-78-5 MDL No. :MFCD03840442
Formula : C7H9NO2S Boiling Point : -
Linear Structure Formula :- InChI Key :ORCQTMZHDQSNOJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
M.W : 171.22 Pubchem ID :12808791
Synonyms :

Calculated chemistry of [ 79836-78-5 ]

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms : 11
Num. arom. heavy atoms : 5
Fraction Csp3 : 0.43
Num. rotatable bonds : 3
Num. H-bond acceptors : 3.0
Num. H-bond donors : 0.0
Molar Refractivity : 43.17
TPSA : 67.43 Ų

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption : High
BBB permeant : Yes
P-gp substrate : No
CYP1A2 inhibitor : Yes
CYP2C19 inhibitor : No
CYP2C9 inhibitor : No
CYP2D6 inhibitor : No
CYP3A4 inhibitor : No
Log Kp (skin permeation) : -5.99 cm/s

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP) : 2.21
Log Po/w (XLOGP3) : 1.91
Log Po/w (WLOGP) : 1.63
Log Po/w (MLOGP) : 0.37
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT) : 2.64
Consensus Log Po/w : 1.75

Druglikeness

Lipinski : 0.0
Ghose : None
Veber : 0.0
Egan : 0.0
Muegge : 1.0
Bioavailability Score : 0.55

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL) : -2.24
Solubility : 0.978 mg/ml ; 0.00571 mol/l
Class : Soluble
Log S (Ali) : -2.95
Solubility : 0.192 mg/ml ; 0.00112 mol/l
Class : Soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT) : -2.16
Solubility : 1.19 mg/ml ; 0.00697 mol/l
Class : Soluble

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS : 0.0 alert
Brenk : 0.0 alert
Leadlikeness : 1.0
Synthetic accessibility : 2.46

Safety of [ 79836-78-5 ]

Signal Word:Warning Class:N/A
Precautionary Statements:P261-P305+P351+P338 UN#:N/A
Hazard Statements:H302-H315-H319-H335 Packing Group:N/A
GHS Pictogram:

Application In Synthesis of [ 79836-78-5 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Upstream synthesis route of [ 79836-78-5 ]
  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 79836-78-5 ]

[ 79836-78-5 ] Synthesis Path-Upstream   1~8

  • 1
  • [ 79836-78-5 ]
  • [ 1003-60-7 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: EP1186604, 2002, A1,
  • 2
  • [ 79836-78-5 ]
  • [ 40004-69-1 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
70%
Stage #1: With water; sodium hydroxide In 1,4-dioxane at 20℃; for 1 h;
Stage #2: With hydrogenchloride In 1,4-dioxane; water
b) 2-Methyl-thiazole-5-carboxylic acid To a stirred solution of 2-methyl-thiazole-5-carboxylic acid ethyl ester (1.3 g, 8.0 mmol) in dioxane (12 mL) at room temperature was added NaOH (2N, 12 mL). After 1 h the reaction mixture was neutralized with HCl (IN, 12 mL), then filtered and the collected solid dried in vacuo to give the title compound (758 mg, 70percent) as an off white solid. MS: m/e = 142.0 [M-H]".
41% With lithium hydroxide monohydrate; water In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 16 h; To a stirred solution of compound 97 (41 g, 239.76 mmol) in THF: H2O (7: 1, 400 mL) was added lithium hydroxide monohydrate (29.49 g, 719.29 mmol) at room temperature and stirred for 16 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion of the reaction, the volatiles were removed in vacuo. The residue was diluted with water and acidified with 2 N HCl to pH~2 and extracted using EtOAc. The combined organic extracts were dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated in vacuo to afford compound 98 (14 g, 41percent) as an off-white solid. TLC: 20percent EtOAc/ hexanes (Rf: 0.1); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): δ 13.29 (br.s, 1H), 8.16 (s, 1H), 2.69 (s, 3H); LCMS Calculated for C5H5NO2S: 143.00; Observed: 144.1 (M+1)+.
14 g With water; sodium hydroxide In tetrahydrofuran at 0 - 20℃; for 2.16 h; To a 0° C. solution of ethyl 2-methyl-thiazole-5-carboxylate (15 g, 88 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran (50 mL) was added aqueous sodium hydroxide solution (5 N, 50 mL) over 10 minutes, and the resulting solution was stirred at room temperature for another 2 hours.
It was then acidified with hydrochloric acid (2 N) to pH=1 and extracted with tetrahydrofuran (3*100 mL).
The combined organic layers were washed with brine (30 mL) and dried over sodium sulfate.
Most of the solvents were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was lyophilized to afford Compound (E) (14 g).
14 g With water; sodium hydroxide In tetrahydrofuran; water at 0 - 20℃; for 2.16667 h; To a 0°C. solution of ethyl 2-methyl-thiazole-5-carboxylate (15 g, 88 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran (50 ml) was added aqueous sodium hydroxide solution (5 N, 50ml) over 10 minutes, and the resulting solution was stirred at room temperature for another 2 hours. It was then acidified with hydrochloric acid (2 N) to pH=1 and extracted with tetrahydrofuran (3x100 ml). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (30 mL) and dried over sodium sulfate. Most of the solvents were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was lyophilized to afford Compound (E) (14g).
14 g With water; sodium hydroxide In tetrahydrofuran at 0℃; for 2.16667 h; To a 0° C. solution of ethyl 2-methyl-thiazole-5-carboxylate (15 g, 88 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran (50 mL) was added aqueous sodium hydroxide solution (5 N, 50 mL) over 10 minutes, and the resulting solution was stirred at room temperature for another 2 hours. It was then acidified with hydrochloric acid (2 N) to pH=1 and extracted with tetrahydrofuran (3×100 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (30 mL) and dried over sodium sulfate. Most of the solvents were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was lyophilized to afford Compound (E) (14 g).

Reference: [1] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, vol. 138, # 44, p. 14639 - 14649
[2] Patent: WO2010/127974, 2010, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 43; 44
[3] Patent: WO2018/160878, 2018, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 279
[4] Chemische Berichte, 1940, vol. 73, p. 1240,1252
[5] Australian Journal of Chemistry, 2004, vol. 57, # 6, p. 599 - 604
[6] Patent: US2009/131431, 2009, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 142
[7] Patent: US2010/240903, 2010, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 14
[8] Patent: WO2007/36733, 2007, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 212
[9] Journal of Chemical Research, 2011, vol. 35, # 5, p. 313 - 316
[10] Patent: US2014/113855, 2014, A1, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0279; 0288; 0289
[11] Patent: US2018/78532, 2018, A1, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0233; 0238
[12] Patent: US2018/161279, 2018, A1, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0474-0475
  • 3
  • [ 62-55-5 ]
  • [ 33142-21-1 ]
  • [ 79836-78-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
47% for 4 h; Reflux; Inert atmosphere Example 72- [2-(5-Methyl-3-phenyl-isoxazol-4-yl)-ethyl] -thiazole-5-carboxylic acid isopropyl- amidea) 2-Methyl-thiazole-5-carboxylic acid ethyl esterTo a stirred solution of ethyl 2-chloro-2-formyl acetate (5.0 g, 33 mmol) in benzene (50 mL) at reflux under argon was added thioamide (2.5 g, 33 mmol). After 4 h the reaction mixture was cooled, diluted with water (50 mL) and neutralized to pH 7 with a saturated solution of sodium hydro gencarbonate. The reaction mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate then the combined extracts were washed with water and brine, then dried, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by chromatography (silica, 0 to 50percent ethyl acetate in heptane) gave the title compound (2.68 g, 47percent) as a yellow liquid. MS: m/e = 172.0 [M+H]+.
35% With magnesium sulfate In ethanol for 24 h; Inert atmosphere; Reflux To a stirred solution of ethyl 2-chloro-3-oxopropanoate 61 (26 g, 173.33 mmol) in ethanol (200 mL) under argon atmosphere were added ethanethioamide 62 (10 g, 133.33 mmol), dry magnesium sulfate (10 g) at RT and heated to reflux for 24 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC; after completion of the reaction, the volatiles were removed in vacuo, diluted with EtOAc (500 mL). The combined organic extracts were washed with saturated sodium bicarbonatesolution (2 x 200 mL), brine (200 mL), dried over sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated invacuo to obtain the crude. The crude was purified through flash column chromatography using6percent EtOAc/ hexanes to afford compound 63 (8 g, 35percent) as brown syrup. TLC: 25percent EtOAc/hexanes (Rf: 0.7); ‘H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz): ö 8.24 (s, 1H), 4.27 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H),2.70 (s, 3H), 1.27 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H).
33% With magnesium sulfate In ethanol at 80℃; for 16 h; Inert atmosphere To a stirring solution of compound 96 (110 g, 733.33 mmol) in ethanol (1.2 L) under Ar atmosphere were added ethanethioamide (54.99 g, 733.33 mmol) and anhydrous magnesium sulfate (55 mg, 454.66 mmol) at room temperature, followed by heating to 80 oC for 16 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion of the reaction, the volatiles were removed in vacuo. The residue was diluted with water and extracted using EtOAc. The organic extract was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated in vacuo to obtain the crude. The crude was purified through silica gel column chromatography using 10percent EtOAc/hexanes to afford compound 97 (41 g, 33percent) as thick syrup. TLC: 20percent EtOAc/ hexanes (Rf: 0.3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.26 (s, 1H), 4.29 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.71 (s, 3H), 1.29 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H); LCMS Calculated for C7H9NO2S: 171.04; Observed: 172.1 (M+1)+.
Reference: [1] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1982, vol. 104, # 16, p. 4461 - 4465
[2] Patent: WO2010/127974, 2010, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 43
[3] Patent: WO2018/53157, 2018, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 108; 109
[4] Patent: WO2018/160878, 2018, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 278-279
[5] Journal of Chemical Research, 2011, vol. 35, # 5, p. 313 - 316
[6] Patent: WO2013/177668, 2013, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 55-56
[7] Patent: WO2014/5217, 2014, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 23; 24
[8] Patent: WO2014/29007, 2014, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 22; 23
[9] Chemical Communications, 2014, vol. 50, # 77, p. 11358 - 11361
[10] Patent: US2015/191473, 2015, A1, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0171
  • 4
  • [ 50496-34-9 ]
  • [ 62-55-5 ]
  • [ 79836-78-5 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: US2003/181496, 2003, A1,
[2] Patent: EP1479384, 2004, A1,
  • 5
  • [ 62-55-5 ]
  • [ 4504-12-5 ]
  • [ 79836-78-5 ]
Reference: [1] Australian Journal of Chemistry, 2004, vol. 57, # 6, p. 599 - 604
  • 6
  • [ 70-23-5 ]
  • [ 62-55-5 ]
  • [ 79836-78-5 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: EP1186604, 2002, A1, . Location in patent: Page 110
  • 7
  • [ 79836-78-5 ]
  • [ 838892-95-8 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: EP3181554, 2017, A1,
  • 8
  • [ 79836-78-5 ]
  • [ 935888-69-0 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: US2014/113855, 2014, A1,
[2] Patent: US2018/78532, 2018, A1,
[3] Patent: US2018/161279, 2018, A1,
Same Skeleton Products
Historical Records

Related Functional Groups of
[ 79836-78-5 ]

Esters

Chemical Structure| 32955-22-9

[ 32955-22-9 ]

Ethyl 5-thiazolecarboxylate

Similarity: 0.89

Chemical Structure| 131748-96-4

[ 131748-96-4 ]

Ethyl 2-(trifluoromethyl)thiazole-5-carboxylate

Similarity: 0.86

Chemical Structure| 14527-44-7

[ 14527-44-7 ]

Methyl thiazole-5-carboxylate

Similarity: 0.86

Chemical Structure| 20737-48-8

[ 20737-48-8 ]

Ethyl 4-hydroxy-2-methylthiazole-5-carboxylate

Similarity: 0.83

Chemical Structure| 152300-59-9

[ 152300-59-9 ]

Ethyl 4-aminothiazole-5-carboxylate

Similarity: 0.80

Related Parent Nucleus of
[ 79836-78-5 ]

Thiazoles

Chemical Structure| 40004-69-1

[ 40004-69-1 ]

2-Methyl-5-thiazolecarboxylic acid

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 32955-22-9

[ 32955-22-9 ]

Ethyl 5-thiazolecarboxylate

Similarity: 0.89

Chemical Structure| 131748-96-4

[ 131748-96-4 ]

Ethyl 2-(trifluoromethyl)thiazole-5-carboxylate

Similarity: 0.86

Chemical Structure| 14527-44-7

[ 14527-44-7 ]

Methyl thiazole-5-carboxylate

Similarity: 0.86

Chemical Structure| 20737-48-8

[ 20737-48-8 ]

Ethyl 4-hydroxy-2-methylthiazole-5-carboxylate

Similarity: 0.83