There will be a HazMat fee per item when shipping a dangerous goods. The HazMat fee will be charged to your UPS/DHL/FedEx collect account or added to the invoice unless the package is shipped via Ground service. Ship by air in Excepted Quantity (each bottle), which is up to 1g/1mL for class 6.1 packing group I or II, and up to 25g/25ml for all other HazMat items.
Type | HazMat fee for 500 gram (Estimated) |
Excepted Quantity | USD 0.00 |
Limited Quantity | USD 15-60 |
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), Domestic | USD 80+ |
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), International | USD 150+ |
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), Domestic | USD 100+ |
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), International | USD 200+ |
Purity | Size | Price | VIP Price | USA Stock *0-1 Day | Global Stock *5-7 Days | Quantity | |||||
{[ item.p_purity ]} | {[ item.pr_size ]} |
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1) ]} {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate) ]} |
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1) ]} | Inquiry {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate) ]} {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,1,item.mem_rate) ]} | {[ item.pr_usastock ]} | Inquiry - | {[ item.pr_chinastock ]} | Inquiry - |
* Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
CAS No. : | 112-41-4 | MDL No. : | MFCD00008961 |
Formula : | C12H24 | Boiling Point : | - |
Linear Structure Formula : | - | InChI Key : | CRSBERNSMYQZNG-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
M.W : | 168.32 | Pubchem ID : | 8183 |
Synonyms : |
|
Num. heavy atoms : | 12 |
Num. arom. heavy atoms : | 0 |
Fraction Csp3 : | 0.83 |
Num. rotatable bonds : | 9 |
Num. H-bond acceptors : | 0.0 |
Num. H-bond donors : | 0.0 |
Molar Refractivity : | 59.32 |
TPSA : | 0.0 Ų |
GI absorption : | Low |
BBB permeant : | No |
P-gp substrate : | No |
CYP1A2 inhibitor : | Yes |
CYP2C19 inhibitor : | No |
CYP2C9 inhibitor : | No |
CYP2D6 inhibitor : | No |
CYP3A4 inhibitor : | No |
Log Kp (skin permeation) : | -2.51 cm/s |
Log Po/w (iLOGP) : | 3.64 |
Log Po/w (XLOGP3) : | 6.78 |
Log Po/w (WLOGP) : | 4.7 |
Log Po/w (MLOGP) : | 5.25 |
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT) : | 4.43 |
Consensus Log Po/w : | 4.96 |
Lipinski : | 1.0 |
Ghose : | None |
Veber : | 0.0 |
Egan : | 0.0 |
Muegge : | 3.0 |
Bioavailability Score : | 0.55 |
Log S (ESOL) : | -4.56 |
Solubility : | 0.00463 mg/ml ; 0.0000275 mol/l |
Class : | Moderately soluble |
Log S (Ali) : | -6.59 |
Solubility : | 0.0000436 mg/ml ; 0.000000259 mol/l |
Class : | Poorly soluble |
Log S (SILICOS-IT) : | -4.35 |
Solubility : | 0.00754 mg/ml ; 0.0000448 mol/l |
Class : | Moderately soluble |
PAINS : | 0.0 alert |
Brenk : | 1.0 alert |
Leadlikeness : | 3.0 |
Synthetic accessibility : | 2.16 |
Signal Word: | Danger | Class: | 9 |
Precautionary Statements: | P501-P261-P273-P210-P271-P264-P280-P302+P352-P370+P378-P391-P331-P337+P313-P305+P351+P338-P362+P364-P332+P313-P301+P310-P304+P340+P312-P403+P233-P403+P235-P405 | UN#: | 3082 |
Hazard Statements: | H315-H319-H336-H304-H410-H227 | Packing Group: | Ⅲ |
GHS Pictogram: |
* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
97% | With Oxone; ammonium bromide In water; acetonitrile for 9h; Reflux; | General procedure for the synthesis of dibromides: General procedure: To a solution of olefin (2 mmol) in CH3CN (10 mL) were added NH4Br (4.4 mmol) and Oxone (2.2 mmol) and the mixture was stirred at reflux temperature for the time shown in Table 2. After completion (as indicated by TLC), the reaction mixture was filtered and the solvent evaporated under reduced pressure. The products were purified by column chromatography (Hexane/EtOAc, 98:2) over silica gel. |
95% | With di-(1,3-dimethyl-2-imidazolidinone)hydrotribromide; dimethyl sulfoxide In dichloromethane at 25℃; for 1h; | Typical procedure of bromination of alkenes using DITB/DMSO To a mixture of DITB (2, 517.0 mg, 1.10 mmol), DMSO (41.3 mg, 0.53 mmol), in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) was added 1-dodecene (4e, 253.7 mg, 1.50 mmol), and the mixture was stirred for 1 h at 25 °C. The reaction mixtures was then diluted with ether and quenched with aqueous NaHCO3, and extracted with ether (15 mL x 3). The combined organic layers were washed with water (15 mL x 1), dried over Na2SO4, filtrated, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (eluent: hexane) to afford 1,2-dibromododecane (5e, 468.0 mg, 95%). [S2] |
84% | With 1,1,1,3',3',3'-hexafluoro-propanol; N,N,N,N-tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate; ethylene dibromide In acetonitrile at 20℃; Inert atmosphere; Electrolysis; |
71% | With bromine In dichloromethane at 20℃; | Dodec-1-yne (1u) The title compound 1u was prepared from dodec-1-ene by two steps as follows. Bromine (47.9 g,300 mmol) was dropwise slowly added to a solution of dodec-1-ene (48.2 g, 286 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (300 mL) at room temperature. The mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight and then quenched with an aqueous solution of sodium thiosulfate (20 wt%, 100 mL). The mixture was extracted with hexane (3 × 50 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure. After purification of the residue by silica gel column chromatography (hexane) gave 1,2-dibromododecane as yellow liquid (66.6 g, 203 mmol, 71%). |
With bromine | ||
98 % Chromat. | With t-butyl bromide; dimethyl sulfoxide at 80℃; for 3h; | |
With bromine In chloroform at 20℃; | ||
97 % Chromat. | With 4DABCO*6HBr*4Br2 In chloroform for 0.916667h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
99% | With 4-methylmorpholine N-oxide In water; acetone at 100℃; for 3h; | General procedure for the dihydroxylation of alkenes General procedure: alkenesTo a stirred solution of alkene (1, 1 mmol) in a mixture ofacetone:H2O 2:1 (3 mL) in a pressure tube, OsO2-Fe3O4(10 mg,0.08% of osmium) and NMO (234 mg, 2 mmol) were added. Theresulting mixture was stirred at 100C during 3 h. The catalyst wasremoved by a magnet and the resulting solution was extracted withether. The organic phases were dried over MgSO4, and the solventswere removed under reduced pressure. The product was usuallypurified by chromatography on silica gel (hexane/ethyl acetate)to give the corresponding products 2 or 4. Physical and spectro-scopic data as well as literature for all compounds are includedas Appendices A and B. FT-IR spectra were obtained on a Nicoletimpact 400D spectrophotometer. NMR spectra were recorded ona Bruker AC-300 apparatus (300 MHz for1H and 75 MHz for13C)using CDCl3as a solvent and TMS as internal standard for1H and13C; chemical shifts are given in (parts per million) and couplingconstants (J) in Hertz. Mass spectra (EI) were obtained at 70 eVon a spectrometer Agilent GC/MS-5973N, giving fragment ions inm/z with relative intensities (%) in parentheses. Thin layer chro-matography (TLC) was carried out on DC-Fertigfolien ALUGRAMplates coated with a 0.2 mm layer of silica gel; detection by UV254light, staining with phosphomolybdic acid [25 g phosphomolybdicacid, 10 g Ce(SO4)2·4H2O, 60 mL of concentrated H2SO4and 940 mLH2O]. Column chromatography was performed using silica gel 60of 35-70 mesh. |
97% | With 4-methylmorpholine N-oxide In hexane; acetonitrile; <i>tert</i>-butyl alcohol at 20℃; for 36h; | |
97% | With potassium osmate(VI) dihydrate; water; iodine; potassium carbonate; 1,4-bis(9-O-dihydroquinidine)phthalazine In <i>tert</i>-butyl alcohol at 0 - 20℃; |
92% | With osmium(VIII) oxide; 4-methylmorpholine N-oxide In tetrahydrofuran; water at 0 - 20℃; Inert atmosphere; | |
92% | With osmium(VIII) oxide; 4-methylmorpholine N-oxide In tetrahydrofuran; water | |
92% | With osmium(VIII) oxide; 4-methylmorpholine N-oxide In tetrahydrofuran; water | 5B Examples 5A-5B Dehomologations of Olefin Feedstocks In Example 5B, 1-dodecene was subjected to a two-step process including (i) olefin dihydroxylation of 1-dodecene by established methods to yield 1,2-dodecanediol, and (ii) successive oxidative dehydroxymethylations of 1,2-dodecanediol according to the general experimental procedure described above for Inventive Example 1K, using twice the amount of sacrificial acceptor (4 molar equivalents) to account for the removal of an additional hydroxyl group (as in Example 2H). The two-step process yielded the Cm α-olefin in good yield (75%). |
82% | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With formic acid; water; dihydrogen peroxide at 55 - 65℃; for 11h; Stage #2: With ethanol at 75 - 85℃; for 3h; | |
81% | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With formic acid; water; dihydrogen peroxide at 100℃; for 2.75h; Stage #2: With ethanol for 0.5h; Heating / reflux; | |
71% | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With dichloro bis(acetonitrile) palladium(II); tert.-butylnitrite; oxygen; acetic acid at 25℃; Darkness; Stage #2: With potassium carbonate In methanol at -10 - 25℃; | |
58% | With 3-methylimidazolinium hydrogensulfate; tetramethylammonium perrhenate; dihydrogen peroxide at 80℃; Ionic liquid; Green chemistry; | |
With dichloromethane; trifluoroacetyl peroxide; triethylamine triflouroacetate beim Erwaermen des Reaktionsprodukts mit Chlorwasserstoff enthaltendem Methanol; | ||
With formic acid; dihydrogen peroxide at 40℃; anschliessende Verseifung mit alkoh.KOH; | ||
(i) O2, H3BO3, (ii) HCO2H, (iii) (saponification); Multistep reaction; | ||
With potassium hydroxide; formic acid; dihydrogen peroxide 1.) H2O, 40 deg C, 24 h, 2.) alcohol, reflux, 1 h; Multistep reaction; | ||
Multi-step reaction with 2 steps 1: C20H26FeN4(2+)*2CF3O3S(1-); dihydrogen peroxide; acetic acid / acetonitrile / 0.17 h / 0 °C 2: sulfuric acid / water / 0.5 h / 50 °C | ||
Stage #1: 1-dodecene With dihydrogen peroxide; acetic anhydride In water; toluene at 85℃; for 15h; Stage #2: With sodium hydroxide In water at 60℃; for 3h; Stage #3: With diethylene glycol dimethyl ether In water at 140℃; for 5h; | 8 Example 5 General procedure: Primary hydrolysis After adding 20 gr of an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide having a concentration of 33% to 150 gr of the reaction mixture obtained in Example 1, the temperature was raised to bring the internal temperature to 60°C. After stirring at the same temperature for 3 hours, analysis by gas chromatography confirmed that all of the hydroxyoctyl formate had disappeared. Secondary hydrolysis 100 gr of diglyme was added to 170 gr of the reaction solution obtained in the first hydrolysis, and the temperature was raised to 140°C. After stirring at the same temperature for 5 hours, the organic layer was concentrated and analyzed by gas chromatography, confirming that a mixture of 1,2-octanediol 96.4 wt% and impurities 3.1 wt% was obtained, and the mixture was fractionated to obtain purity 99% 1,2-octanediol was obtained, at which time the yield was 96.6%. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
95% | With ruthenium trichloride; sodium periodate In water; acetonitrile at 20℃; for 1.5h; | |
With 1,4-dioxane; osmium(VIII) oxide anschliessend mit Natriumperjodat; | ||
82 % Chromat. | With sodium periodate; ruthenium In water; 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 20℃; for 12h; |
Multi-step reaction with 3 steps 1: C20H26FeN4(2+)*2CF3O3S(1-); dihydrogen peroxide; acetic acid / acetonitrile / 0.17 h / 0 °C 2: sulfuric acid / water / 0.5 h / 50 °C 3: sodium hydrogencarbonate; sodium periodate / water / 0.5 h / 50 °C | ||
With dicarbonyl(acetylacotonato)rhodium(I); carbon monoxide; 2C20H36NO4(1+)*C39H30O7P2S2(2-); hydrogen at 100℃; for 0.5h; Autoclave; High pressure; | 16 Rh(acac)(CO)2/[Ph(OCH2CH2)16N(C2H5)3]2[(SO3-)2-12](o=p=2,n=2)/two-octene system Hydroformylation General procedure: In an inert atmosphere, add Rh(acac)(CO)2,[Ph(OCH2CH2)16N to the stainless steel autoclave(C2H5)3]2[(SO3-)2-12] and 1-octene, the ratio of which is:[Ph(OCH2CH2)16N(C2H5)3]2[(SO3-)2-12]/Rh(acac)(CO)2=5:1 (molar ratio),1-octene/Rh(acac)(CO)2=1000:1 (molar ratio),Then use synthesis gas (H2/CO=1:1) to pressurize to 5.0MPa, the reaction temperature is 100°C,The reaction time is 0.5 hours and then rapidly cools to room temperature.After the synthesis gas is vented, the system is naturally divided into two phases.The lower layer is an ionic liquid phase containing a ruthenium catalyst and the upper layer is an organic phase.N-heptane extraction can also be added, and a simple two-phase separation yields an organic phase containing the product aldehyde.Gas chromatography analysis showed that the conversion of 1-octene was 94.4%.The aldehyde selectivity was 70.7%, the molar ratio of n-aldehyde to isoaldehyde was 1.7:1, and the TOF was 1335 h-1.Olefins for 1-dodecene, the remaining reaction conditions and steps are the same as in Example 13; the gas chromatographic analysis showed that the conversion rate of 1-dodecene is 57.9%, selectivity of aldehydes 82.5%, the molar ratio of normal aldehyde and isomeric aldehyde is 1.9:1, and T0F value is 955h-1. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
85% | With Oxone; ammonium chloride In dichloromethane; water at 20℃; for 0.583333h; | Vicinal Dichlorination of Olefins 1 and 3; General Procedure General procedure: Oxone (1.35 g, 2.2 mmol) was slowly added to a well stirred solution of NH4Cl (4.4 mmol) and olefin 1 or 3 (2 mmol) in CH2Cl2/H2O (1:4; 10 mL) and the reaction mixture was allowed to stir at r.t., until the olefin had completely disappeared (monitored by TLC, eluent: n-hexane or n-hexane-EtOAc). The organic layer was separated, and the aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 × 15 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated.The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (100-200 mesh) using n-hexane or n-hexane-EtOAc as eluent to give the desired products. |
71% | With manganese(II) chloride tetrahydrate; 1,1,1,2-tetrachoroethane; N,N,N,N-tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate In acetonitrile at 50℃; Electrolysis; Inert atmosphere; | |
With chlorine |
95 % Chromat. | With t-butyl bromide; dimethyl sulfoxide; calcium chloride at 80℃; for 3h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
57% | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With trifluorormethanesulfonic acid; tetrabutylammomium bromide; tetrabutylammonium tetrafluoroborate; dimethyl sulfoxide In dichloromethane at -78 - 0℃; for 1h; Inert atmosphere; Electrochemical reaction; Stage #2: With sodium hydroxide In dichloromethane; water at 25℃; for 1h; Inert atmosphere; Electrochemical reaction; | Typical procedure for generation of 1-Br and synthesis of bromohydrins General procedure: In the anodic chamber were placed Bu4NBr (81.0 mg, 0.252 mmol), Bu4NBF4 (101 mg, 0.3 mmol),DMSO (1 mL), and 0.3 M Bu4NBF4/CH2Cl2 (9 mL). In the cathodic chamber were placed TfOH (60 μL,0.68 mmol) and 0.3 M Bu4NBF4/CH2Cl2 (10 mL). The constant current electrolysis (8.0 mA) was carried outat -78 °C with magnetic stirring until 2.1 F mol-1 of electricity was consumed. To the anodic chamber wasadded a solution of (Z)-5-decene (2a) (27.0 mg, 0.193 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (0.5 mL), and to the cathodicchamber 0.5 mL of CH2Cl2 was added at -78 °C. The solution was stirred for 30 min at -78 °C then stirringwas continued for 30 min at 0 °C. NaOH (2.5 M in H2O, 0.16 mL) was added to both the anodic and thecathodic chambers, and the resulting mixture was warmed to 25 °C and was stirred for 1 h. The solution inthe anodic chamber was collected and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue wasfiltered through a short column (2 x 4 cm) of silica gel to remove Bu4NBF4 by using hexane/EtOAc (1:1) asan eluent. After removal of the solvent under reduced pressure, the crude product was purified by flashchromatography (hexane/EtOAc 20:1) to obtain (5R*,6R*)-6-bromodecan-5-ol (5a-Br) in 87% yield(40.0 mg, 0.169 mmol). |
With N-Bromosuccinimide In water; acetone | ||
With N-Bromosuccinimide; iron(III) chloride In tetrahydrofuran for 5h; |
With N-Bromosuccinimide In water; acetonitrile at 25 - 30℃; for 12h; | 4.1 General procedures for α-bromoketones and α-azidoketones from olefins General procedure: To a solution of the olefin (0.5-1.2mmol) in 10-16mL of acetonitrile-water (1:1) mixture was added NBS (1.05equiv) at rt. The reaction mixture was stirred until all the olefin was consumed, as monitored by TLC analysis. Subsequently, TetMe-IA (10mol%) and Oxone (1.0equiv) were introduced into the reaction mixture, and the stirring was continued. After completion of the oxidation as judged by TLC analysis, the reaction mixture was washed with saturated NaHCO3 solution. The organic matter was extracted 2-3 times with ethyl acetate or dichloromethane, and the combined organic extract was dried over anhyd Na2SO4. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the resultant residue was subjected to a short-pad silica gel column chromatography to isolate pure α-bromoketone. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
95% | With 2-(N,N-dimethylamino)ethanol; samarium diiodide In tetrahydrofuran; N,N,N,N,N,N-hexamethylphosphoric triamide for 1.5h; Ambient temperature; | |
94% | With [hydrido-tris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)borate]ReO3; triphenylphosphine In benzene for 86h; Heating; | |
91% | With tetrabutylammomium bromide; acetic acid In tetrahydrofuran; water at 20℃; for 7.5h; Electrochemical reaction; |
41% | With niobium pentachloride; zinc In tetrahydrofuran; benzene at 23℃; for 2h; Inert atmosphere; | |
41% | With dioxomolybdenum(VI) dichloride; 1,2-bis-(diphenylphosphino)ethane In toluene at 150℃; for 2h; Sealed tube; Inert atmosphere; stereospecific reaction; | |
36% | With titanium tetrachloride; tetra-(n-butyl)ammonium iodide; allyl-trimethyl-silane In dichloromethane at 0℃; | |
50 % Chromat. | With sodium aluminum tetrahydride; niobium pentachloride at 80℃; for 15h; | |
With triphenylphosphine In toluene at 112℃; for 13h; Yield given; | ||
Multi-step reaction with 2 steps 1: potassium thioacyanate 2: zinc; molybdenum(V) chloride / tetrahydrofuran / 2 h / 20 °C |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 13% 2: 82% | In dichloromethane at 15 - 20℃; Irradiation; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
99% | With sodium percarbonate; acetic anhydride In toluene at 60℃; for 12h; | 5 Example 5 1-Dodecene (1. 68 g, 10 mmol) was dissolved in toluene (25 ml), and a composition containing sodium percarbonate (10.5 g, 66.7 mmol) and acetic anhydride (10.2 g, 100 mmol) was added thereto. The mixture was stirred at 60°C. After 12 hours, the reaction solution was washed with water to thereby completely remove acetic acid and sodium acetate, which were generated as by-products, and the remaining H2O2. Toluene was distilled off from the organic phase by distillation, and as a result, 1.82 g (99% yields) of 1-dodecene monoepoxide with a GC purity of 100% was obtained. |
99% | With acetonitrile complex of hypofluorous acid In dichloromethane; lithium hydroxide monohydrate; acetonitrile | 2-decyloxirane from 1-dodecene Under a flow of F2 (10% in N2) of 20.0 ml min-1 (3.33 mmol h-1) passed through conduit 12, MeCN:H2O (4:1, 4.95 ml) was added to conduit 16 at a rate of 9.90 ml h-1 (110.0 mmol h-1) and dodec-1-ene 24 (0.18 g, 1.07 mmol) (in a 1:1 mixture of DCM:MeCN) was added to conduit 38 at a rate of 9.90 ml h-1. All reaction fluids were collected in pot 22 containing sodium bicarbonate solution 25 (50 ml). The reaction mixture was then added to another 25 ml of sodium bicarbonate solution, washed with DCM (3×75 ml), dried over MgSO4 and filtered. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure to yield 2-decyloxirane (0.195 g, 1.06 mmol, 99%) as a yellow oil, with no further purification required.νmax (cm-1) 2923(sp3 C-H), 2854 (sp3 C-H), 1466, 916, 833 (C-O-C), 722; δH (400 MHz, CDCl3) 0.86 (3H, t, 3JHH 6.4, -CH2CH3), 1.24 (15H, m, -CH2-), 1.47 (3H, m, -CH2-), δC (100 MHz, CDCl3) 14.0 (1C, s, C1), 22.6 (1C, s, C2), 25.9 (1C, s, C9), 29.3, 29.4, 29.5, 29.6, 31.9 (5C, s, C4-8), 32.4 (1C, s, C3), 32.5 (1C, s, C10), 47.0 (1C, s, C12), 52.3 (1C, s, C11); m/z (EI) 184 (M+, 2%), 169 (M+-CH3, 100%). |
99% | With 3-chloro-benzenecarboperoxoic acid In dichloromethane at 0 - 20℃; for 16h; |
98% | With phosphoric acid; sulfuric acid; dihydrogen peroxide In lithium hydroxide monohydrate; 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 70℃; for 1h; microwave irradiation; | |
98% | With lithium hydroxide monohydrate; fluorine; acetonitrile In dichloromethane; nitrogen Gas/liquid reaction; Continuous flow microreactor; | |
97.2% | With Cumene hydroperoxide In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 90℃; for 12h; Flow reactor; | |
95% | With potassium peroxymonosulfate; C7F15C(O)CH3; Sodium hydrogenocarbonate In lithium hydroxide monohydrate at 25℃; | |
94% | With phosphoric acid disodium salt; dihydrogen peroxide; Hexafluoroacetone In 1,2-dichloro-ethane | |
94% | With methyltrioctylammonium tetrakis(diperoxotungsto)phosphate; dihydrogen peroxide In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 70℃; for 1h; | |
94% | With 1,1,1,3',3',3'-hexafluoro-propanol; urea-hydrogen peroxide at 40℃; for 24h; | |
94% | With C30H24N2O7W; dihydrogen peroxide; Sodium hydrogenocarbonate In lithium hydroxide monohydrate; propan-2-one; acetonitrile at 30℃; for 2.5h; | |
94% | With Peroxyacetic acid; C26H30F6MnN8O8S2 In dichloromethane; acetonitrile at 0℃; for 0.55h; | |
92% | With potassium peroxomonosulfate; 1,1,1,3',3',3'-hexafluoro-propanol In lithium hydroxide monohydrate at 25℃; for 0.5h; | |
91% | With oxygen; manganese(III) triacetate; 2,2-dimethypropanal In various solvent(s) at 25℃; for 3h; | |
91% | With 3-chloro-benzenecarboperoxoic acid In dichloromethane other reagents: H2O2/KHCO3/dicyclohexylcarbodiimide, H2O2/Na3PO4*12H2O/dicyclohexylcarbodiimide, H2O2/Amberlite IRC-50/dicyclohexylcarbodiimide, H2O2/KHCO3/benzonitrile, H2O2/p-TsOH/dicyclohexylcarbodiimide, H2O2/HCl/DCC, H2O2/Amberlite IR-120/DCC; | |
91% | With Peroxyacetic acid; manganese(II) perchlorate; ammonium hydrogen carbonate In lithium hydroxide monohydrate; glacial acetic acid; acetonitrile at 20℃; for 0.666667h; | |
90% | With fluorine In dichloromethane at 0℃; for 0.0166667h; | |
90% | With dihydrogen peroxide; glacial acetic acid In lithium hydroxide monohydrate; acetonitrile at 4℃; for 0.0833333h; | |
90% | With 1,1,2,2-tetrahydroperoxy-1,2-diphenylethane; potassium hydroxide In acetonitrile at 20℃; for 2h; | Epoxidation of alkenes (Scheme 2, entry 2) General procedure General procedure: To a stirred solution of alkene (1 mmol) and THPDPE (1.5 mmol) in CH3CN (4 mL), KOH (1 M, 1 mL) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for an appropriate time. After the completion of the reaction as monitored by TLC (hexane- Ethyl Acetate, 8:2) the mixture was quenched with Na2SO3 solution (3 M, 1 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 5 mL). All of the products were characterized on the basis of their melting points, IR, 1H NMR, and 13C NMR spectral analysis and compared with those reported |
88% | With 1,1,1,3',3',3'-hexafluoro-propanol; dihydrogen peroxide In lithium hydroxide monohydrate at 20℃; for 24h; | |
88% | With dihydrogen peroxide; tetraphenylphosphonium cation; Sodium hydrogenocarbonate In acetonitrile at 25℃; for 1.75h; | |
87.2% | With sodium wolframate; CH6NO3P; dihydrogen peroxide; methyl tri-n-octyl ammonium hydrogen sulfate at 90℃; for 2h; | |
87% | With Aminomethylphosphonic acid; dihydrogen peroxide In lithium hydroxide monohydrate at 90℃; for 2h; | |
87% | With C7H5MoNO8(2-)*2C24H20P(1+)*H2O; dihydrogen peroxide; Sodium hydrogenocarbonate In acetonitrile at 40℃; for 4h; Air; | |
87% | With 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium β-octamolybdate; dihydrogen peroxide In lithium hydroxide monohydrate; acetonitrile at 60℃; for 4h; Green chemistry; | |
86% | With 3-chloro-benzenecarboperoxoic acid In dichloromethane at -40℃; for 6h; | |
86% | With potassium peroxomonosulfate; 2,2,2-trifluoro-1-(3-fluorophenyl)ethan-1-one; Sodium hydrogenocarbonate In lithium hydroxide monohydrate; acetonitrile at 20℃; for 12h; | |
86% | With Oxone; ammonium hydrogen carbonate In lithium hydroxide monohydrate; acetonitrile at 20℃; for 2h; | |
86% | With oxygen; 2-Methylpropanal In acetonitrile at 60℃; for 24h; | |
86% | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With trifluorormethanesulfonic acid; tetra-n-butylammonium tetrafluoroborate; N,N,N-tributyl-1-butanaminium iodide; dimethyl sulfoxide In dichloromethane at -78 - 0℃; for 1h; Inert atmosphere; Electrochemical reaction; Stage #2: With sodium methoxide In methanol; dichloromethane at 25℃; for 0.0833333h; Inert atmosphere; Electrochemical reaction; | Typical procedure for the generation of 1-I and the synthesis of epoxides General procedure: In the anodic chamber were placed Bu4NI (91.7 mg, 0.248 mmol), Bu4NBF4 (102 mg, 0.3 mmol), DMSO(1 mL), and 0.3 M Bu4NBF4/CH2Cl2 (9 mL). In the cathodic chamber were placed TfOH (60 μL, 0.68 mmol)and 0.3 M Bu4NBF4/CH2Cl2 (10 mL). The constant current electrolysis (8.0 mA) was carried out at -78 °Cwith magnetic stirring until 2.1 F mol-1 of electricity was consumed. To the anodic chamber was added asolution of (Z)-5-decene (2a) (27.9 mg, 0.199 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (0.5 mL), and to the cathodic chamber 0.5mL of CH2Cl2 was added at -78 °C. The solution was stirred for 30 min at -78 °C then stirring wascontinued for 30 min at 0 °C. NaOMe (5.0 M in MeOH, 0.2 mL) was added to both the anodic and thecathodic chambers, and the resulting mixture was warmed to 25 °C and stirred for 5 min. The solution in theanodic chamber was filtered through a short column (2 x 4 cm) of silica gel to remove Bu4NBF4 by usingEt2O as an eluent. The GC analysis using hexadecane as an internal standard indicated that(5R*,6S*)-5,6-epoxydecane (6a) was obtained in 96% yield (0.191 mmol). |
85% | With C9H6NO(1-)*C24H20P(1+)*MoO(4+)*2O2(2-); dihydrogen peroxide; Sodium hydrogenocarbonate In propan-2-one; acetonitrile at 25℃; for 2.5h; | |
80% | With WO3(3.5 wt%)-ZnO(0.8 wt%)/SnO2; dihydrogen peroxide; carbonic acid dimethyl ester In lithium hydroxide monohydrate at 59.84℃; for 4h; chemoselective reaction; | |
79% | With tert.-butylhydroperoxide In toluene at 79.84℃; for 5.83333h; | |
79% | With sodium (meta)periodate In lithium hydroxide monohydrate; acetonitrile at 20℃; for 0.25h; Sonication; | General procedure for the epoxidation of alkeneswith sodium periodate in the presenceof [Ru(salophen)ClAp-MWCNT], [Ru(salophen)ClApy-MWCNT] and [Ru(salophen)ClDAB-MWCNT]catalysts. General procedure: In a 25 mL round-bottom flask, a mixture of alkene (0.5 mmol) and catalyst (250 mg) in acetonitrile (5 mL) was prepared. Then, NaIO4 (220 mg, 1 mmol) was dissolved in H2O (5 mL) and added to the above mixture. The mixture was stirred with a magnetic stirrer at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. The progress of the reaction was monitored by gas chromatography (GC). At the reaction, the catalyst was filtered and the catalyst were recovered. |
77% | With picoline; meso-tetrakis(2,6-dichlorophenyl)porphyrinatomanganese(III) acetate; magnesium monoperoxyphthalate hexahydrate In dichloromethane at 0℃; for 0.0666667h; | |
77% | With NHPI; oxygen; acetaldehyde In acetonitrile at 60℃; for 1h; Continuous flow reactor; | |
75% | With 3-chloro-benzenecarboperoxoic acid In dichloromethane | |
75% | With dihydrogen peroxide In lithium hydroxide monohydrate at 59.84℃; for 4h; Autoclave; | |
74% | With Isopropylbenzene at 105℃; for 24h; | 28 Example 28: Preparation of 1,2-epoxydodecane N-dodecene (168.32 mg, 1.0 mmol) was added to a 50 mL reaction tube, and 3 mL of cumene was added; then, the reaction was performed in an air atmosphere at 105 ° C. After 24 hours, the reaction was complete. Then CH3NO2 was added as an internal standard for NMR analysis. The yield was 74%. |
72% | With potassium carbonate; propan-2-one In lithium hydroxide monohydrate; benzene at 8 - 10℃; for 3h; | |
72% | With urea hydrogen peroxide; [1-heptyl-3-methylimidazolium][ReO4] at 70℃; for 6h; Ionic liquid; Green chemistry; | 2.4 Establishment of a catalytic system General procedure: Generally, the oxidant H2O2 was used in the epoxidationof olefins, however, the presence of free hydrogen ions H? in the system caused the epoxycompound to ring-open to produce diol, which led tothe decrease of the selectivity of the reaction.42 Toincrease the yield and selectivity of the epoxidation ofolefins, the UHP was used as an oxidant, which had agood oxidation effect without producing diol, and theselectivity almost up to 100%.43To evaluate the catalytic effect of rhenium ionic liquid[Smim][ReO4] on epoxidation of olefin, the synthesizedionic liquid [Smim][ReO4] was selected as agreen solvent and catalyst, cyclohexene and cyclooctenewere used as reaction substrates, and the UHP wasselected as an oxidant in this paper for homogeneouscatalyzed epoxidation of olefin. The reaction productswere detected by gas chromatography (GC). |
71% | With dirhodium(II) tetraacetate; oxygen; 3-methylbutyrylaldehyde In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 20℃; for 27h; | 4.3 General procedure for epoxidation of alkenes in Table 1, entries 2, 9, and 10 General procedure: The round bottom flask was charged with Rh2(OAc)4 (4.4 mg, 0.01 mmol), and alkene (1.0 mmol) followed by addition of dichloroethane (3.0 mL). Then, isovaleraldehyde (433 mL, 4.0 mmol) was added in one portion. Flask was capped with septa and balloon with oxygen was attached. Completion of reaction was monitored by GC-MS. When done, solvent was removed on rotary evaporator and oily residue was purified by flash chromatography using ether-hexanes solvent mixtures. All epoxide product spectroscopic data were in agreement with literature data. |
70% | With dihydrogen peroxide In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 40℃; for 24h; | |
70.8% | With Mn(N,N'-dimethyl-N,N'-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-1,2-ethanediamine)Cl<SUB>2</SUB>; [bis(acetoxy)iodo]benzene; scandium trifluoromethanesulphonate In dichloromethane; propan-2-one at -0.16℃; for 11.5h; | |
68% | With tert.-butylhydroperoxide; bis(acetylacetonato)dioxidomolybdenum(VI); N,N′-dimethylethylenediamine In Carbon tetrachloride; benzene at 70℃; for 1h; | |
68.7% | With {(N,N',N''-trimethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane)2Mn(IV)2(μ-O)3}(PF6)2*H2O; dihydrogen peroxide; scandium trifluoromethanesulphonate In lithium hydroxide monohydrate; acetonitrile at -0.16℃; for 2h; | |
68% | With tert.-butylhydroperoxide In lithium hydroxide monohydrate; acetonitrile at 82℃; for 12h; Sealed tube; | 5. Representative procedure for the epoxidation of alkenes General procedure: The CoNPs/MgO catalyst was activated by heating in an oven at 150 °C for 1 h. To avigorously stirred suspension of the CoNPs/MgO catalyst (10 mg) in MeCN (1.0mL) under air the corresponding alkene (0.5 mmol in 1.0 mL MeCN) and TBHP (63 μL of an 80 wt % solution in H2O, 0.5 mmol in 1.0 mL MeCN) were added and thesealed reaction flask was immersed in an oil bath at the reflux temperature ofMeCN (82 °C). The reaction mixture was stirred at this temperature until nofurther conversion of the starting alkene was observed (TLC, GC). Then, the reactionmixture was centrifuged and the supernatant removed. The solvent was evaporated invacuo, and the crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (silicagel, hexane/AcOEt) to give the corresponding epoxide. The recovered solid catalystwas washed with acetonitrile (3 × 2 mL) and dried in oven (150 °C, 1 h) for its reuse. |
62% | With oxygen; 2-oxocyclopentanecarboxylic acid methyl ester In acetonitrile at 25℃; for 25h; | |
62% | With oxygen; 2-Methylpropanal In acetonitrile Ambient temperature; | |
62% | With oxygen; 2-Methylpropanal In acetonitrile at 25℃; for 24h; | |
62% | With Co(II) complex with Schiff base from salicylaldehyde and L-serine methyl ester; oxygen; 2-oxocyclopentanecarboxylic acid methyl ester In acetonitrile at 25℃; for 25h; epoxidation of other alkenes; | |
62% | With tert.-butylhydroperoxide In lithium hydroxide monohydrate; acetonitrile at 50℃; for 4h; | General procedure for the catalytic oxidation reaction General procedure: In a typical experiment, a mixture of 2 mmol of tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP, 70% aqueous solution) oxidizing agent and 1 mmol of alkene or alkane and 0.028 mmol (100 mg) of γ-Fe2O3[VO(salenac-OH)] in 5 mL of CH3CN was preparedin a test tube. A magnetic hotplate stirrer was used to stirring the reaction mixture at 50 °C, and the reaction progress was supervised using thin layer chromatography (TLC) or gas chromatography (GC). Having the reaction completed, 20 mL of CH2Cl2 was added to the reaction mixture to dilute it and an external magnet was used to remove the catalyst. Using CH2Cl2, the catalyst was completely washed and the combined washings were passed through a silica gel column to purify the product. |
61% | With 2-hydroxypyridine; dihydrogen peroxide; diethyl dicarbonate In diethyl ether; dichloromethane for 3h; Ambient temperature; | |
60% | With manganese(II) p-aminobenzoate; oxygen; cobalt(II) p-aminobenzoate In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 130℃; for 14h; | |
59% | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With NBS; dimethyl sulfoxide at 10℃; for 0.416667h; Inert atmosphere; Stage #2: With 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene In dimethyl sulfoxide at 10℃; for 0.5h; Inert atmosphere; | |
58% | With tert.-butylhydroperoxide In lithium hydroxide monohydrate; 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 50℃; for 4h; chemoselective reaction; | General procedure for epoxidation of alkeneswith tert-BuOOH catalyzed by CoFe2O4SiO2[MoO2(salenac-OH)] General procedure: 2 mmol of tert-BuOOH (TBHP, 70% aqueous solution) wereadded to a mixture of alkenes (1 mmol) and CoFe2O4SiO2[MoO2(salenac-OH)] (0.030 g) in 4 mL of 1,2-dichloroethanesolvent. The mixture thus obtained was stirred at50 °C under ambient pressure, and the reaction progress wasmonitored by gas chromatography (GC). Upon completingthe reaction, the catalyst was collected using an externalmagnet, rinsed using CH2Cl2,dried at 80 °C in an oven,and reused under the same reaction conditions. The productswere finally extracted with Et2Oand purified by columnchromatography using silica gel. |
58% | With tert.-butylhydroperoxide In lithium hydroxide monohydrate; 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 50℃; for 4h; chemoselective reaction; | General procedure for epoxidation of alkeneswith tert-BuOOH catalyzed by CoFe2O4SiO2[MoO2(salenac-OH)] General procedure: 2 mmol of tert-BuOOH (TBHP, 70% aqueous solution) wereadded to a mixture of alkenes (1 mmol) and CoFe2O4SiO2[MoO2(salenac-OH)] (0.030 g) in 4 mL of 1,2-dichloroethanesolvent. The mixture thus obtained was stirred at50 °C under ambient pressure, and the reaction progress wasmonitored by gas chromatography (GC). Upon completingthe reaction, the catalyst was collected using an externalmagnet, rinsed using CH2Cl2,dried at 80 °C in an oven,and reused under the same reaction conditions. The productswere finally extracted with Et2Oand purified by columnchromatography using silica gel. |
56% | With tert.-butylhydroperoxide In acetonitrile at 80℃; for 4.5h; | 2.3 General Procedure forEpoxidation ofOlefinswithtert-BuOOHCatalyzed byRunp-nSTDP General procedure: The catalytic oxidation reactions of alkenes were carried outin a 25ml flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer and a refluxcondenser. In a typical run, the reaction vessel was chargedwith ruthenium catalyst (40mg, 0.84mol %), CH3CN(5ml), substrate (0.5mmol) and tert-BuOOH (1mmol).The reaction mixture was refluxed in an oil bath at 80°Cand its progress was monitored by GC. At the end of thereaction, the catalyst was removed by simple filtration andwashed with the adequate amount of acetonitrile (5ml) andH2O(5ml). Later on, the products were extracted with Et2Oand purified on a silica gel column (Et2O/n-hexane: 4:1).v |
53.1% | With [(N-(2-pyridylmethyl)iminodiethanol)2Co3(CH3COO)4]; 3-chloro-benzenecarboperoxoic acid In dichloromethane; acetonitrile at 20℃; for 0.166667h; | |
52% | With Ni(N-(2-pyridylmethyl)-N’-(2-hydroxyethyl)ethylenediamine)(N3)2; 3-chloro-benzenecarboperoxoic acid In dichloromethane; acetonitrile at 20℃; for 0.166667h; | |
50% | With MoO5*(Et)3PO*MeOH for 72h; | |
50% | With iron(II) trifluoromethanesulfonate; 2-Picolinic acid; dihydrogen peroxide; N-methyl-N,N-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)amine In acetonitrile at 20℃; for 0.5h; | |
48% | With dihydrogen peroxide In benzene at 70℃; for 20h; | |
45% | With tert.-butylhydroperoxide In dichloromethane at 35℃; for 24h; | |
45% | With tert.-butylhydroperoxide In 2,2,4-trimethypentane; dichloromethane at 34.9℃; for 24h; | |
45.1% | With aluminium trifluoromethanesulphonate; Mn(tris(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)amine)Cl2; [bis(acetoxy)iodo]benzene In dichloromethane; acetonitrile at -0.16℃; for 3.5h; | |
44.3% | With [NiII(2-(di(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)amino)-N-(2-(5-methylpyridin-2-yl)phenyl)acetamidate)](ClO4); 3-chloro-benzenecarboperoxoic acid In acetonitrile at 25℃; for 0.166667h; | |
42% | With dihydrogen peroxide; tetra(n-hexyl)-ammonium chloride In benzene at 70℃; for 20h; | |
38% | With N,N′-bis(salicylidene)ethylenediaminocobalt(II); oxygen In acetonitrile at 20℃; for 20h; | |
37% | With oxygen; copper (II) acetate; 2-Methylpropanal In acetonitrile at 60℃; for 20h; | |
35% | With tetrahexylammonium chloride; dihydrogen peroxide In benzene at 75℃; for 20h; | |
29% | With dihydrogen peroxide In benzene at 70℃; for 20h; | |
22.3% | With C30H33Cl2MnN2O5; 3-chloro-benzenecarboperoxoic acid In dichloromethane; acetonitrile at 22℃; for 0.116667h; | 2.3 Alkene epoxidations by MCPBA with Mn(III) catalysts 1a-1c General procedure: MCPBA (1×10-4 mol) was added to a mixture of the substrate (3.5×10-5 mol), Mn catalyst (1×10-3 mmol) and solvent (1.0mL, CH3CN/CH2Cl2=50:50), and the mixture was shaken at 22°C for 7min. Alkene oxidation and stilbene oxidation were analyzed by GC and HPLC, respectively. |
18% | With tert.-butylhydroperoxide; [Mo2(O)4[2,2'-(1,3-phenylene)bis(4,5-dihydrooxazole-4,2-diyl)]dimethanol}(acac)2] In 1,2-dichloro-ethane for 10h; Reflux; | 2.3. General procedure for oxidation of alkenes with TBHP catalyzed by Mo BOX complex General procedure: In a round-bottom flask (25 mL) equipped with a reflux condenser, a gas inlet and a magnetic stirrer, a solution of alkene (1 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (4 mL) was prepared. The molybdenum BOX complex (8 mg, 0.01 mmol, 0.02 mmol Mo) and TBHP (2 mmol) was added to this solution and the reaction mixture was stirred under reflux conditions. The reaction progress was monitored by GC. After completion of the reaction, the mixture was directly passed through a short column of silica-gel (1:1,n-hexane-ethyl acetate) to remove the catalyst. The elute was evaporated under reduced pressure and the remaining residue was purified by silica-gel plate chromatography (eluted withCCl4:Et2O = 9:1) to afford the corresponding epoxide. |
17% | With tetran-butylammonium salt of [γ-SiW10O34(H2O)2](4-); dihydrogen peroxide In lithium hydroxide monohydrate; ethyl acetate at 59.84℃; for 27h; | |
87 % Chromat. | With sodium wolframate; phosphoric acid; Aliquat; dihydrogen peroxide In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 70℃; for 1h; pH 1.6; | |
With lithium hydroxide monohydrate; fluorine In acetonitrile Yield given; | ||
With Peroxyacetic acid Ambient temperature; | ||
62.9 % Chromat. | With oxygen In 1,2-dichloro-benzene at 110℃; for 7.7h; Further byproducts given. Yields of byproduct given; | |
With benzoic acid sodium salt; dihydrogen peroxide In dichloromethane; lithium hydroxide monohydrate at 0℃; for 5h; | ||
79 % Chromat. | With dihydrogen peroxide; n-tetradecanoic acid at 25℃; for 24h; immobilised Candida antarctica lipase (comp. A and B); | |
With 4-tert-butylpyridine; sodium chlorine monoxide; (5,10,15,20-tetrakis(2,6-dichlorophenyl)porphyrinato)manganese(III) chloride; Sodium hydrogenocarbonate In dichloromethane; lithium hydroxide monohydrate at 10℃; for 20h; Yield given; | ||
99 % Chromat. | With dihydrogen peroxide In benzene at 70℃; for 20h; | |
92 % Chromat. | With dihydrogen peroxide; benzoic acid In dichloromethane; lithium hydroxide monohydrate at 0℃; for 0.25h; | |
With 3-chloro-benzenecarboperoxoic acid | ||
60 % Spectr. | With bis(diphenylphosphinic) anhydride; dihydrogen peroxide; potassium carbonate In tetrahydrofuran at -5℃; for 48h; | |
With Peroxyacetic acid In acetonitrile at 20℃; | ||
14 % Chromat. | With sodium (meta)periodate In dichloromethane; lithium hydroxide monohydrate at 1.5℃; for 15h; | |
37 % Chromat. | With oxygen; 3-methylbutyrylaldehyde In various solvent(s) at 25℃; for 14h; | |
With oxygen; 3-methylbutyrylaldehyde In acetonitrile at 25℃; for 14h; Yield given; | ||
67 % Chromat. | With sodium chlorine monoxide; Mn(III)-5,10,15,20-tetrakis(2,6-dichlorophenyl)porphyrin; 1-n-Hexylimidazole In dichloromethane; lithium hydroxide monohydrate at 0℃; for 6h; | |
With Peroxyacetic acid In acetonitrile at 20℃; other catalysts; | ||
37 % Chromat. | With oxygen; 3-methylbutyrylaldehyde In various solvent(s) at 25℃; for 14h; other reagents; | |
With Sal-Phe-Mn; oxygen at 100℃; for 12h; | ||
37.4 % Chromat. | With oxygen; 2-Methylpropanal In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 20℃; for 13h; | |
With phenylarsonic acid; dihydrogen peroxide In various solvent(s) at 60℃; | ||
22 % Chromat. | With sodium (meta)periodate In lithium hydroxide monohydrate; acetonitrile for 12h; | |
With glutamic acid salicylaldehyde Shiff base cobalt; oxygen at 100℃; for 10h; | ||
With dihydrogen peroxide | ||
81 % Chromat. | With oxygen; acetaldehyde In acetonitrile at 20℃; for 23h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
100% | With {(η6-C6H6)Ru(NCCH3)3}{BF4}2; water; hydrogen In benzene at 90℃; for 4h; | |
100% | With hydrogen In chloroform at 60℃; for 3h; | |
98% | With hydrogen In various solvent(s) at 20℃; for 3h; |
96% | With C30H37ClN4ORu; hydrogen; sodium t-butanolate In toluene at 105℃; for 20h; Glovebox; Sealed tube; | |
95% | With Wilkinson's catalyst; hydrogen In dichloromethane at 125℃; | |
94% | With CeO2#dotNi; hydrogen In isopropyl alcohol at 85℃; for 24h; | Typical procedures of catalytic reactions General procedure: Commercially available organic compounds were used withoutfurther purification. Typically, 3 or 5 wt% Ni/CeO2 (3 mol% of Ni withrespect to alcohol) was used in catalytic experiments. After thepre-reduction, we carried out catalytic tests without exposing thecatalyst to air as follows. The mixture of o-xylene (1.5 mL), alcohol(1 mmol), and n-dodecane (0.5 mmol) was injected to the prereducedcatalyst inside a reactor (cylindrical glass tube) througha septum inlet. Then, the reactor was purged by N2 and set in areaction vessel equipped with a condenser. The resulting mixturewas stirred at 80-144 C. Conversion and yields of products weredetermined by GC using n-dodecane as an internal standard. TheGC-FID (Shimadzu GC-14B) and GC-MS (Shimadzu GCMS-QP5000)analyses were carried out with a Rtx-65 capillary column (Shimadzu)using nitrogen or helium as the carrier gas. The productswere identified by GC-MS and by comparison with commerciallypure products |
92% | With C28H18Co(1-)*K(1+)*2C4H10O2; hydrogen In toluene at 60℃; for 24h; chemoselective reaction; | |
90% | With 10% Pd on charcoal; diethyl 2,6-dimethyl-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate In ethanol for 4h; Reflux; | |
90% | With Wilkinson's catalyst; calcium hydride; water In tetrahydrofuran at 55℃; for 20h; | |
86% | With LaNi5 hydride In tetrahydrofuran; methanol 1) 0 deg C, 6 h, 2) r.t., 15 h; | |
85% | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With triethyl borane; dichlorogallane In tetrahydrofuran; hexane; toluene at 0℃; for 4h; Stage #2: With methyllithium In tetrahydrofuran; hexane; various solvents at 0℃; for 1h; Stage #3: With hydrogenchloride In tetrahydrofuran; hexane; various solvents for 1h; | |
82.2% | With methanol; nickel boride; diborane for 0.5h; Ambient temperature; | |
82.2% | With methanol; nickel boride; diborane for 0.5h; Ambient temperature; Co2B instead of Ni2B; other substrates: aldehydes, ketones, nitriles, olefins bearing other functionalities; | |
74.1% | With methanol; nickel dichloride; diborane at -10℃; for 0.5h; | |
74.1% | With methanol; nickel dichloride; diborane at -10℃; for 0.5h; further transition metal salt: CoCl2; | |
With water; dichloroaluminum hydride 1) ether, RT; Yield given. Multistep reaction; | ||
With hydrogen In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 14h; | ||
97 % Chromat. | With triethylsilane In ethanol at 20℃; for 36h; | |
With hydrogen In toluene at 60℃; | ||
With water at 250℃; for 2h; | ||
With hydrogen; Methylated β-cyclodextrin In water at 20℃; for 7h; | ||
With Ph2P(CH2CH2O)16CH3; hydrogen; rhodium In water; butan-1-ol at 60℃; for 1h; Autoclave; | ||
With [2,2]bipyridinyl; hydrogen; 3-butyl-1-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium hexafluorophosphate at 20℃; for 2h; | 5 The reactions under atmospheric pressure are carried out at 20° C. 2 ml of colloidal rhodium(O) suspension is introduced into a 25 ml glass flask. The desired quantity of substrate that is to be hydrogenated is added to the reaction mixture (in general, 100 equivalents/metal). The flask is then connected to a 500 ml gas burette. The assembly is filled with hydrogen after having purged the system under vacuum. The unit is placed under vigorous stirring (1,500 min-1). The reaction is controlled by the volume of gas that is consumed and by gas phase chromatography. At the end of the reaction, the catalytic system is dispersed into 10 ml of CH3CN, centrifuged for 10 minutes (15,300 rpm-1; 20° C.). The sample is then analyzed by GPC. The results are grouped in Table 1 for different non-aromatic unsaturated substrates. | |
57 %Chromat. | With C49H57ClP4Rh(1+)*OPol(1-); hydrogen In toluene | |
With lumiflavin; N,N'-(2,6-pyridinediyl)bis(acetamide); hydrazine hydrate In chloroform at 30℃; Under air; | ||
With BF4(1-)*C17H22ClN2Ru(1+); isopropyl alcohol; potassium hydroxide In water at 90℃; for 0.333333h; Inert atmosphere; | ||
With hydrogen; rhodium In n-heptane; toluene at 60℃; for 1h; Autoclave; Ionic liquid; | ||
With hydrogen In pentan-1-ol; water at 60℃; for 1h; Autoclave; | ||
21 %Spectr. | With hydrogen In water at 20℃; for 24h; | |
99.9 %Chromat. | With hydrogen In water at 25℃; Autoclave; | |
With hydrogen In toluene at 25℃; for 23h; Schlenk technique; | 4 Hydrogenation with 1i-Rh and ZrP-Rh Immobilized RhImmobilized catalyst 1i-Rh (30 mg, containing 10 mg of Wilkin-son’s catalyst, corresponding to 0.010 mmol Rh) is suspended in5 mL of toluene in a Schlenk flask. The mixture appears opaque andorange/pink in color. The flask is then attached to the hydrogena-tion apparatus described earlier [5c] and 1 mmol of 1-dodecenedissolved in toluene (5 mL) is added to the suspension of 1i-Rh witha syringe through the stopcock. Subsequently the suspension wasstirred vigorously and the hydrogen consumption was monitored.After complete substrate conversion the catalyst was allowed to settle, the supernatant was removed via syringe and the materialwas washed three times with 5 mL of toluene. To start the secondand following cycles, fresh toluene was added and the described procedure was repeated.For the catalysis with ZrP-Rh (25 mg, containing 10 mg ofWilkinson’s catalyst, corresponding to 0.010 mmol Rh) the sameprocedure as outlined here for 1i-Rh was applied. | |
With hydrogen In water at 20℃; | ||
96 %Chromat. | With hydrogen In ethanol at 25℃; for 0.5h; | 2.3. Catalytic activity test General procedure: Typically, 1.0 mmol nitrobenzene, styrene or benzaldehyde, 10 mg catalyst and 2 mL EtOH were added into a glass tube (50 mL), respectively. Then, it was exchanged with H2 and the reaction was carried out in the presence of H2 at atmospheric pressure (H2 balloon) at the given temperature. After reaction, 154 mg biphenyl and 10 mL EtOH were added for quantitative analysis by GC-FID (Agilent 7890A). |
85 %Chromat. | With hydrazine hydrate In chloroform at 25℃; for 24h; | |
With hydrogen at 30℃; for 0.5h; Autoclave; Inert atmosphere; | ||
With hydrogen In pentan-1-ol; water at 60℃; for 1h; Autoclave; | ||
94 %Chromat. | With hydrogen In glycerol at 80℃; for 12h; | |
93 %Chromat. | With (18-crown-6)potassium(I) (η4-naphthalene)(η4-1,5-cyclooctadiene)cobaltate(1-); hydrogen In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 24h; Glovebox; Schlenk technique; | |
With hydrogen In methanol at 20℃; for 1.16667h; | ||
With [(1,3-di-tert-butyl-4-phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1λ4,3,2λ3-diazasilet-2-yl)(9,9-dimethylxanthene)(1,3-di-tert-butyl-4-phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1λ4,3,2λ3-diazasilet-2-yl)]nickel(0)(η2-1,3-cyclooctadiene); hydrogen In benzene-d6 at 20℃; for 24h; Sealed tube; Schlenk technique; | ||
With Wilkinson's catalyst surface-bound on immobilized Si(p-C6H4-p-C6H4PPh2)4 nanoparticles In toluene Schlenk technique; | 9. General hydrogenation procedure Immobilized catalyst 2iRh (240 mg, containing 10 mg of Wilkinson'scatalyst, corresponding to 0.010 mmol Rh) is suspended in5 ml of toluene in a Schlenk flask. The mixture appears opaque andorange/pink in color. The flask is then attached to the hydrogenationapparatus described earlier [12d] and 1 mmol of 1-dodecene,dissolved in toluene (5 ml), is added to the suspension of 2iRh witha syringe through the stopcock. Subsequently the suspension isstirred vigorously and the hydrogen consumption is monitored.After complete substrate conversion the catalyst is allowed tosettle, the supernatant is removed via syringe and the material iswashed three times with 5 ml of toluene. To start the second andfollowing cycles, fresh toluene is added and the described procedureis repeated. | |
With hydrogen In water at 30℃; for 1.5h; Autoclave; | ||
94 %Chromat. | With sodium tetrahydroborate; nickel(II) chloride hexahydrate; ethanol at 30℃; for 0.25h; Inert atmosphere; | |
> 99 %Chromat. | With cobalt In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 3h; | |
With hydrogen In methanol at 100℃; for 3h; | ||
With borane-ammonia complex In cyclohexane; water at 40℃; for 18h; Sealed tube; | ||
With C15H23Cl2FeN3; ethylmagnesium bromide In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 0.666667h; Inert atmosphere; | ||
93 %Chromat. | With borane-ammonia complex; [K(thf)1.5{(2,6-diisopropylphenyl bisaryl-(imino)acenaphthene)Co(η4-1,5-cyclooctadiene)}] In tetrahydrofuran at 25℃; for 16h; Inert atmosphere; Sealed tube; | |
With riboflavin 2’,3’,4’,5’-tetraoctadecanoate; hydrazine hydrate at 30℃; for 4.5h; | ||
With C5H14NO(1+)*C10H12NO4S(1-)*Pd; hydrogen In glycerol at 80℃; for 2h; Inert atmosphere; Schlenk technique; | 2.5. General procedure for Pd-catalyzed hydrogenation in glycerol General procedure: In a Fisher-Porter bottle (working from 1 to 3 bar total pressure) oran autoclave (working from 3 to 20 bar total pressure), the appropriate substrate (1 mmol for 1 mol % of catalyst or 10 mmol for 0.1 mol% of catalyst) was added to 1 mL of preformed nanoparticles (2.85 mg of Pd) in glycerol under argon. The reaction mixture was put under vacuum and then pressurized with H2 at the convenient pressure, heated up at 80 °C and stirred for the appropriate time; then cooled down to room temperature before extraction. Organic products were extracted from glycerol by a biphasic methodology, adding dichloromethane (5×3 mL); organic phases were collected and solvent removed under vacuum. Conversion and yields were determined by GC using decane as internal standard. The obtained products were characterized by GC-MS data and 1H and 13C NMR and compared to literature reports to confirm spectral identity (see Supplementary Material). | |
With hydrogen In water at 50℃; for 1h; Autoclave; | ||
With rhodium(III) chloride trihydrate; 3C38H79N3O16*C18H15O9PS3; hydrogen In methanol at 80℃; for 0.25h; Inert atmosphere; Schlenk technique; Autoclave; | ||
With iron(II) bis(trimethylsilyl)amide; hydrogen; diisobutylaluminium hydride at 20℃; | ||
With hydrogen at 60℃; | ||
99 %Spectr. | With fac-[Mn((1,2-bis(di-isopropylphosphino)ethane))(CO)3(CH2CH2CH3)]; hydrogen In diethyl ether at 25℃; for 18h; | |
With hydrogen In ethanol for 0.01h; Autoclave; Heating; | 2.2.3.1. Continuous flow hydrogenations using catalytic flat-sheetmembranes General procedure: Reactions were carried out in flow-through configurationwith the as-prepared catalytic flat sheet membranes. Solutionscontaining the substrate were pre-saturated with H2 using a hollowfibercontactor. The Gas/Liquid hollow-fiber contactor was designed toassure H2 saturation of solutions [39].The experimental set-up developed to perform the hydrogenationreactions in continuous mode is presented in Scheme 1.A home-made stainless-steel filtration cell, equipped with a magneticstir bar, was placed on a hot-plate at 65 °C. The flow rate ofethanol solution containing the substrate was controlled by a gearpump (Scheme 1, (1)). The solution was sent into to a home-madehollow fiber contactor module in counter-current to saturate the solutionwith H2 using a hydrogen generator (Schmidlin-FDBS). The homemadehollow fiber contactor module contained 15 fibers, an effectivelength of 0.3m and 4.0 10-3 m of diameter. The H2 saturated solution(Scheme 1, (2)) went into the filtration cell where it flowed through themembrane. 25 ml of permeate were taken for further analyses afterattaining steady-state (established when passing 4 times the total deadvolume: reactor volume+connection pipes volume, ca. 485 mL). | |
< 10 %Spectr. | With formic acid; sodium formate; 3C34H19O10P2(5-)*3BF4(1-)*3Pd(2+)*3C2H3N*Zr6O4(OH)4(12+) In methanol; water at 60℃; for 6h; Sealed tube; | |
With hydrogen; C48H58N4NiSi2 In benzene-d6 at 20℃; for 24h; | ||
96 %Chromat. | With hydrogen In methanol at 25 - 27℃; for 8h; Autoclave; | |
With hydrogen In octanol; water at 25℃; for 0.333333h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
99% | With air; palladium In ethanol; water at 50℃; for 13h; | |
92% | With oxygen; sodium acetate; palladium dichloride In [1,3]-dioxolan-2-one; water at 80℃; for 12h; Autoclave; | |
86% | With tetrafluoroboric acid; oxygen; palladium diacetate; p-benzoquinone In N,N-dimethyl acetamide; water; acetonitrile at 20℃; for 16h; regioselective reaction; |
86% | With tetrafluoroboric acid; water; palladium diacetate; p-benzoquinone at 20℃; for 16h; regioselective reaction; | 4.15 Example 4.15 [0122] General Procedure 2 (Table 2 and Scheme 1): Palladium acetate (11.5 mg, 0.05 mmol, 5 mol %) and benzoquinone (108 mg, 1.00 mmol) were charged in a resealable 20-mL vial under air. A mixture of DMA (2.2 mL), MeCN (2.2 mL) and water (0.63 mL) was added, followed by the addition of aqueous HBF4 (0.18 mL, 48% in water, 1.38 mmol). After the addition of the corresponding substrate (1.00 mmol), the homogenous reaction mixture was stirred for 16 h at room temperature. The crude reaction mixture was then diluted with brine (30 mL) and ether (30 mL), the phases were separated and the aqueous phase was further extracted (2×) with ether. The combined organic phases were then dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated in vacuo. In some cases, NMR-analysis of the crude mixture was performed to determine the regioselectivity of the process. The crude product was then further purified by column chromatography on silica gel using pentane/ether as eluent. [0138] Dodecan-2-one (Table 2, Entry 15) was obtained a as clear oil (158 mg, 0.86 mmol, 86%) following the General Procedure 2. GC-analysis of the crude sample showed 97.5% selectivity for ketone formation (2.5% for the aldehyde). 1H NMR: δ 2.39 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.11 (s, 3H), 1.54 (p, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.30-1.15 (m, 14H), 0.86 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR: δ 209.3, 43.8, 31.9, 29.8, 29.5, 29.4, 29.4, 29.3, 29.2, 23.8, 22.6, 14.1. Values were in accordance with a commercial sample. |
85% | With Pd((-)-sparteine)2Cl2; oxygen In N,N-dimethyl acetamide; water at 70℃; for 18h; | |
85% | With oxygen; sodium acetate; palladium dichloride In N,N-dimethyl acetamide at 80℃; for 3h; | |
85% | With C15H6BrF3N4O; iron(II) sulfate In dimethyl sulfoxide | 10 Preparation of dodecane-2-one: The olefin is 1-dodecene, the ligand is L5, the iron salt is iron sulfate, and the solvent is dimethyl sulfoxide. Dodecane-2-one is prepared according to the method of implementation seven with a yield of 85%. |
83% | With oxygen In N,N-dimethyl acetamide; water at 80℃; for 2h; | |
83% | With 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidine-N-oxyl; lithium perchlorate In water; acetonitrile at 20℃; Electrochemical reaction; | |
74% | With methanesulfonic acid; molybdovanadophosphate; oxygen In ethanol at 60℃; for 5.5h; | |
73% | With triethylsilyl hydroperoxide In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 20℃; for 16h; | |
67% | With palladium diacetate; perchloric acid; iron(II) phthalocyanine; oxygen; hydroquinone In water; N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 20℃; for 8h; | |
67% | With perchloric acid; oxygen In water; N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 20℃; for 8h; | |
64% | With oxygen In water; benzene other catalysts; | |
62% | With oxygen In water; benzene at 80℃; for 48h; other phase transfer catalysts; | |
62% | With oxygen In water; N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 60℃; for 3h; | |
58% | With ethanol; oxygen at 60℃; for 24h; | |
53% | With (phthalocyaninato)iron(II); zirconium phosphate; oxygen; hydroquinone In water; N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 20℃; for 3h; | |
47% | With potassium superoxide; sulfuric acid; copper(l) chloride; palladium dichloride In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 80℃; for 20h; | |
46% | With [Fe(meso-tetraphenylporphyrinato)]mesylate; 4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-[1,3,2]-dioxaboralane In toluene at 25℃; for 6h; Glovebox; | General procedure for the oxidation of olefins. General procedure: The reaction was performed in a 15 mL tube equipped with a Teflon-coated magnetic stirrerbar. In a glove box, Fe(TPP)OMs (0.01 mmol, 10 mol%) and the olefin (0.1 mmol) werestirred in toluene (1 mL) at 25 °C. After Fe(TPP)OMs was dissolved completely, HBpin (0.12mmol, 1.2 eq) in toluene (1 mL) were added and stirred at 25 °C for the indicated time underair. The reaction mixture was passed through a short silica gel pad and concentrated in vacuo.The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography with the given eluent. |
31% | With tert.-butylhydroperoxide; palladium dichloride In acetonitrile at 80℃; for 2h; | |
13% | With oxygen In water at 80℃; for 10h; | |
10% | With Pd(II)(15-crown-5-phen)Cl2; dinitrogen monoxide In N,N-dimethyl acetamide; water at 150℃; for 18h; | |
With air; macromolecular Pd complex based on iminodipropionitrile-functionalized polymer In ethanol; water at 50℃; for 13h; other solvents; CuCl2 or benzoquinone as cocatalyst; var. temp.; | ||
92 % Turnov. | With dihydrogen peroxide In <i>tert</i>-butyl alcohol at 80℃; for 6h; H2O2 (30percent) : olefin = 5, olefin : Pd(OAc)2 = 1500; | |
96 % Chromat. | With palladium(II) sulfate; H9PV6Mo6O40; heptakis(2,6-di-O-methyl)cyclomaltoheptaose; oxygen; copper(II) sulfate In water at 80℃; for 60h; | |
With copper chloride; oxygen; mono-6-O-(p-cyanobenzoyl)-β-cyclodextrin at 70℃; for 2h; | ||
91 % Chromat. | With water; oxygen; copper dichloride In N,N-dimethyl acetamide at 80℃; for 3h; | |
72 % Chromat. | With pyridine; oxygen; iso-butanol In toluene at 80℃; for 6h; | |
20 % Chromat. | With potassium chloride; oxygen In various solvent(s) at 130℃; for 18h; | |
With Pd(II)(15-crown-5-phen)Cl2; oxygen In N,N-dimethyl acetamide; water at 85℃; for 6h; | ||
With copper(II) ion; oxygen; palladium (II) ion In methanol; water at 80℃; for 1h; | ||
84 %Chromat. | With dinitrogen monoxide at 260℃; for 13h; Inert atmosphere; | 2.c EXAMPLE 2c: further 15g of the internal dodecene as used in Example lb was loaded with 36.20 bar (525 psig) of N2O and 4.14 (60 psig) of N2, heated to 260 °C while being stirred at 750 rpm and held at temperature for 13 hours. At the end of the run the liquid product was analyzed via GC and the results are provided in Table 1. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
63% | With bis(benzonitrile)palladium(II) dichloride; silver(I) nitrite; copper(II) choride dihydrate; nitromethane; Tridecane; oxygen; <i>tert</i>-butyl alcohol at 20℃; for 6h; Overall yield = 80 %; | |
63% | With bis(benzonitrile)palladium(II) dichloride; silver(I) nitrite; copper(II) choride dihydrate; oxygen In nitromethane; <i>tert</i>-butyl alcohol at 20℃; for 6h; Overall yield = 80 %; | 3.1 Example 3.1 General Procedures Example 3.1 General Procedures Example 3.1.1 Procedure (A) for Larger-Scale (0.5 Mmol) Oxidation of Aliphatic Alkenes (Isolation) [0140] PdCl2(PhCN)2 (0.06 mmol, 0.023 g), CuCl2*2H2O (0.06 mmol, 0.0102 g) and AgNO2 (0.03 mmol, 0.0046 g) were weighed into a 20 mL vial charged with a stir bar. The vial was sparged for 2 minutes with oxygen (1 atm, balloon). Premixed and oxygen saturated tert-BuOH (7.5 mL) and MeNO2 (0.5 mL) was added followed by the alkene (0.5 mmol) were added in that order via syringe. The solution was saturated with oxygen by an additional 45 seconds of sparging. The reaction was then allowed to stir at room temperature for 6 hours. Next, the reaction was quenched by addition to water (ca. 50 mL) and extracted three times with dichloromethane (ca. 25 mL). The combined organic layers were subsequently washed with a saturated solution of NaHCO3 and dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the desired aldehyde product was purified using flash chromatography (pentane/ether). Selectivity was determined from 1H NMR analysis of the unpurified mixture by ratio of the aldehydic 1H signal to the most clear signal from the methyl ketone (usually the methyl group). Long relaxation delays (d1=15) were applied due to the long T1 of the aldehydic proton signal. Example 3.1.2 Procedure (B) for Smaller-Scale (0.2 Mmol) Oxidation of 1-Dodecene (GC Analysis) [0141] PdCl2(PhCN)2 (0.024 mmol, 0.0092 g), CuCl2*2H2O (0.024 mmol, 0.0041 g) and AgNO2 (0.012 mmol, 0.0018 g) were weighed into a 2 dram screw-cap vial charged with a stir bar. The vial was sparged for 45 seconds with oxygen (1 atm, balloon) then subsequently tridecane (0.00246 mmol, 6 μL), tert-BuOH (3 mL), MeNO2 (0.2 mL) and 1-dodecene (0.2 mmol, 44.4 μL) were added in that order via syringe. The solution was saturated with oxygen by an additional 45 seconds of sparging. The reaction was then allowed to stir at room temperature for 6 hours. Next, an aliquot (ca. 0.2 mL) was injected into a 2 mL vial containing an estimated 1 mL of premixed EtOAc/pyridine solution (3:1) to quench the reaction. The resulting solution was subsequently subjected to GC analysis to determine yield and selectivity. Example 3.1.3 Procedure (C) for Small-Scale (0.2 Mmol) Oxidation of Alkenes (NMR Analysis) [0142] PdCl2(PhCN)2 (0.024 mmol, 0.0092 g), CuCl2.2H2O (0.024 mmol, 0.0041 g) and AgNO2 (0.012 mmol, 0.0018 g) were weighed into a 2 dram screw-cap vial charged with a stir bar. The vial was sparged for 45 seconds with oxygen (1 atm, balloon) then subsequently tert-BuOH (3 mL), MeNO2 (0.2 mL) and alkene (0.2 mmol) were added in that order via syringe. The solution was saturated with oxygen by an additional 45 seconds of sparging. The reaction was then allowed to stir at room temperature for 6 hours. Next, the reaction mixture was diluted with water (ca. 20 mL) and subsequently extracted three times with CDCl3, dried with Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure for 1H NMR analysis. Immediately prior to NMR analysis nitrobenzene was added as an internal standard. The resulting solution was subsequently subjected to 1H NMR analysis to determine yield and selectivity by ratio of the aldehydic 1H signal to the most clear signal from the methyl ketone (usually the methyl group). Long relaxation delays (d1=15) were applied due to the long t1 of the aldehydic proton signal. Example 3.1.4 Procedure (D) for Stoichiometric Oxidation of 1-Dodecene (GC Analysis) [0143] PdCl2(PhCN)2 (0.024 mmol, 0.0092 g), CuCl2.2H2O (0.024 mmol, 0.0041 g) and AgNO2 (0.012 mmol, 0.0018 g) were weighed into a 2 dram screw-cap vial charged with a stir bar. The vial was sparged for 45 seconds with oxygen (1 atm, balloon) then subsequently tridecane (0.00246 mmol, 6 μL), tert-BuOH (3 mL), MeNO2 (0.2 mL) and 1-dodecene (0.024 mmol, 5.3 μL) were added in that order via syringe. The solution was saturated with oxygen by an additional 45 seconds of sparging. The reaction was then allowed to stir at room temperature for 3 hours and 30 minutes. Next, an aliquot (ca. 0.2 mL) was injected into a 2 mL vial containing an estimated 1 mL of premixed EtOAc/pyridine solution (3:1) to quench the reaction. The resulting solution was subsequently subjected to GC analysis to determine yield and selectivity. Example 3.1.5 Procedures for Variation of Oxygen Atmosphere [0144] A series of experiments to determine the effect of oxygen atmosphere were conducted, the results being shown in the following Table 1: Based on these data, and without being necessarily bound by the correctness of any particular theory or statement, it appeared that oxygen was the terminal oxidant and sole stoichiometric reagent in this system. Although reaction sealed under air resulted in acceptable yield (60%, see Table 1), the rate and conversion improved significantly under an oxygen atmosphere. Further increase in oxygen pressure (3 atm) did not provide increased efficiency but did marginally increase the selectivity. [TABLE-US-00001] TABLE 1 Oxygen atmosphere variation Overall yield entry Conditions (aldehyde yield) selectivity 1 no O2 (argon) 12 (10) 80% 2 air (sealed) 60 (48) 79% 3 air (open) 38 (27) 71% 4 O2 (1 atm) 80 (63) 79% 5 O2 (3 atm) 68 (58) 84% [0145] Entry 1: Conducted as described in procedure B except using a balloon filled with argon (1 atm) in place of a balloon filled with oxygen. [0146] Entry 2: Conducted as described in procedure B except the reaction was never exposed to pure molecular oxygen. [0147] Entry 3: Conducted as described in procedure B except the reaction was never exposed to pure molecular oxygen and the vial was left uncapped. [0148] Entry 4: Conducted as described in procedure B with no deviation. [0149] Entry 5: Conducted in an open vial placed inside a Fischer porter bottle connected to an oxygen tank and adjusted to 3 atm O2. Example 3.2 Effect of Reaction Parameters (FIG. 3A) [0155] Various redox catalysts, ligands, redox catalysts, palladium sources and a wide variety of additives were investigated. Each of the type of palladium and copper complexes, and the types of oxygen-centered radical species were found to play an important role in the overall performance of the catalytic system, as did the choice of solvent. Removal of any of these components results in dramatically poorer conversion, selectivity, or both. [0156] In one variation of Procedure D, experiments were conducted with the omission of either copper or palladium. The GC was monitored over 3 hours and 30 minutes. When palladium was omitted: no conversion was observed. When copper was omitted: 33% yield (combined aldehyde and ketone) was observed with 53% ketone-selectivity. As a reference point, the analogous reaction with DMF/water and no AgNO2 has proceeded to complete conversion with complete ketone selectivity within this time. The results are shown in FIG. 3B. [0157] Removal of copper from the process provided only traces of products. Exposure of alkene to stoichiometric palladium and silver nitrite, however, also provided incomplete oxidation and poor selectivity, suggesting a more intimate role of the copper salt than a simple redox catalyst for palladium (FIG. 3B). Furthermore, stoichiometric copper dichloride and silver nitrite (no palladium) provided no conversion of the alkene. Thus, it appears that both palladium and copper are crucial metals for the efficient stoichiometric oxidation of alkenes. Ag(I) salts have been shown to be non-innocent additives (potential oxidants) in palladium-catalyzed reactions. However, if AgNO2 was replaced by NaNO2, a similar reaction outcome was observed with marginally lower selectivity (FIG. 3C). This strongly implied that nitrite was the critical component of the co-catalyst, not Ag(I). [0158] Detailed reaction profiles employing various quantities of AgNO2 (FIG. 3D) were generated to study the effect of time on the reaction. Increased loading of AgNO2 correlated with a faster reaction, implying a rate dependence on AgNO2 concentration. A similar overall yield of aldehyde was obtained using both 12 and 6 mol % AgNO2, with slightly improved aldehyde yield using 6 mol %. Interestingly, even 2 mol % AgNO2 provided useful yields of aldehyde after a longer reaction time. Omission of AgNO2 led to a process not exceeding 20% overall yield. [0159] In a related series of experiments, Procedure B was used to measure the progress of the reaction with time. Time points were collected with a Freeslate (formerly Symyx) software system at the given times and quenched with a 3:1 mixture of EtOAc and pyridine, followed by GC analysis using tridecane as an internal standard. Reaction temperature is further maintained at 20° C. throughout the course of the reaction. Variation of nitrite loading was accomplished with no further deviation from protocol B. After GC analysis, the data was processed and graphed using Microsoft Excel. See again FIG. 3D. [0160] In contrast to previous attempts by others to develop and aldehyde-selective Wacker-type oxidation, that have been plagued by low yields and loss of selectivity over the course of the reaction, in the present experiments, tests with 1-dodecene showed the selectivity stabilized after 5% conversion and became relatively independent of both yield and time. See FIG. 3E. [0161] Other nitrite sources, including organic and inorganic derivatives, were evaluated by Procedure B. Catalytic AgNO2 was found to provide the highest selectivity among nitrite sources (see Table 2). [TABLE-US-00002] TABLE 2 Nitrite sources (obtained by procedure B) Overall yield entry Conditions (aldehyde yield) selectivity 1 tert-BuONO 75 (41) 55% 2 n-BuONO 76 (34) 45% 3 NOBF4 73 (42) 59% 4 Pd(NO2)Cl(MeCN)2 80 (21) 29% 5 AgNO2 80 (63) 79% 6 NaNO2 82 (61) 75% [0162] From these studies, co-catalytic nitrite salts were found to provide unparalleled reactivity in the presence of palladium and copper. Intriguingly, when the reaction was conducted in an open vessel, both yield and selectivity were significantly worse than when sealed under air. (see Table 1). [0163] The introduction of a small amount of a polar co-solvent, nitromethane, both increased homogeneity of the reaction mixture and enabled room temperature reaction. Once optimized, the new conditions (PdCl2(PhCN)2 (12 mol %), CuCl2*2H2O (12 mol %), AgNO2 (6 mol %) in tert-BuOH/MeNO2 (15:1) under 1 atm oxygen) oxidized 1-dodecene to dodecanal in 63% yield (see also FIG. 2A/2B and FIG. 3A). Example 3.5 Characterizations of Products in Table 3 [0166] Dodecanal (Table 1, Entry 2) [0168] 61% yield obtained using procedure A. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.76 (t, J=1.9 Hz, 1H), 2.43 (td, J=7.4, 1.9 Hz, 2H), 1.64 (tt, J=7.5, 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.49-1.18 (m, 16H), 0.97-0.77 (t, J=6.8, 3H). Spectral data were in accordance with a commercial sample. |
21% | With bis(benzonitrile)palladium(II) dichloride; copper(II) choride dihydrate; bis(acetonitrile)chloronitropalladium(II); oxygen In nitromethane; <i>tert</i>-butyl alcohol at 20℃; for 6h; Overall yield = 80 %; | 3.2 Example 3.2 Effect of Reaction Parameters (FIG. 3A) Example 3.2 Effect of Reaction Parameters (FIG. 3A) [0155] Various redox catalysts, ligands, redox catalysts, palladium sources and a wide variety of additives were investigated. Each of the type of palladium and copper complexes, and the types of oxygen-centered radical species were found to play an important role in the overall performance of the catalytic system, as did the choice of solvent. Removal of any of these components results in dramatically poorer conversion, selectivity, or both. [0156] In one variation of Procedure D, experiments were conducted with the omission of either copper or palladium. The GC was monitored over 3 hours and 30 minutes. When palladium was omitted: no conversion was observed. When copper was omitted: 33% yield (combined aldehyde and ketone) was observed with 53% ketone-selectivity. As a reference point, the analogous reaction with DMF/water and no AgNO2 has proceeded to complete conversion with complete ketone selectivity within this time. The results are shown in FIG. 3B. [0157] Removal of copper from the process provided only traces of products. Exposure of alkene to stoichiometric palladium and silver nitrite, however, also provided incomplete oxidation and poor selectivity, suggesting a more intimate role of the copper salt than a simple redox catalyst for palladium (FIG. 3B). Furthermore, stoichiometric copper dichloride and silver nitrite (no palladium) provided no conversion of the alkene. Thus, it appears that both palladium and copper are crucial metals for the efficient stoichiometric oxidation of alkenes. Ag(I) salts have been shown to be non-innocent additives (potential oxidants) in palladium-catalyzed reactions. However, if AgNO2 was replaced by NaNO2, a similar reaction outcome was observed with marginally lower selectivity (FIG. 3C). This strongly implied that nitrite was the critical component of the co-catalyst, not Ag(I). [0158] Detailed reaction profiles employing various quantities of AgNO2 (FIG. 3D) were generated to study the effect of time on the reaction. Increased loading of AgNO2 correlated with a faster reaction, implying a rate dependence on AgNO2 concentration. A similar overall yield of aldehyde was obtained using both 12 and 6 mol % AgNO2, with slightly improved aldehyde yield using 6 mol %. Interestingly, even 2 mol % AgNO2 provided useful yields of aldehyde after a longer reaction time. Omission of AgNO2 led to a process not exceeding 20% overall yield. [0159] In a related series of experiments, Procedure B was used to measure the progress of the reaction with time. Time points were collected with a Freeslate (formerly Symyx) software system at the given times and quenched with a 3:1 mixture of EtOAc and pyridine, followed by GC analysis using tridecane as an internal standard. Reaction temperature is further maintained at 20° C. throughout the course of the reaction. Variation of nitrite loading was accomplished with no further deviation from protocol B. After GC analysis, the data was processed and graphed using Microsoft Excel. See again FIG. 3D. [0160] In contrast to previous attempts by others to develop and aldehyde-selective Wacker-type oxidation, that have been plagued by low yields and loss of selectivity over the course of the reaction, in the present experiments, tests with 1-dodecene showed the selectivity stabilized after 5% conversion and became relatively independent of both yield and time. See FIG. 3E. [0161] Other nitrite sources, including organic and inorganic derivatives, were evaluated by Procedure B. Catalytic AgNO2 was found to provide the highest selectivity among nitrite sources (see Table 2). [TABLE-US-00002] TABLE 2 Nitrite sources (obtained by procedure B) Overall yield entry Conditions (aldehyde yield) selectivity 1 tert-BuONO 75 (41) 55% 2 n-BuONO 76 (34) 45% 3 NOBF4 73 (42) 59% 4 Pd(NO2)Cl(MeCN)2 80 (21) 29% 5 AgNO2 80 (63) 79% 6 NaNO2 82 (61) 75% [0162] From these studies, co-catalytic nitrite salts were found to provide unparalleled reactivity in the presence of palladium and copper. Intriguingly, when the reaction was conducted in an open vessel, both yield and selectivity were significantly worse than when sealed under air. (see Table 1). [0163] The introduction of a small amount of a polar co-solvent, nitromethane, both increased homogeneity of the reaction mixture and enabled room temperature reaction. Once optimized, the new conditions (PdCl2(PhCN)2 (12 mol %), CuCl2*2H2O (12 mol %), AgNO2 (6 mol %) in tert-BuOH/MeNO2 (15:1) under 1 atm oxygen) oxidized 1-dodecene to dodecanal in 63% yield (see also FIG. 2A/2B and FIG. 3A). |
With dimethylsulfide borane complex; pyridinium chlorochromate 1.) CH2Cl2, 1 h, RT; 2.) CH2Cl2, reflux, 4 h; Yield given. Multistep reaction. Yields of byproduct given; | ||
With carbon monoxide; rhodium(III) chloride trihydrate; 3C38H79N3O16*C18H15O9PS3; hydrogen In toluene at 85℃; for 2h; Autoclave; | 19 A RhCl3 .3H2O/[CH3(EO)16N+H=C(N(CH3)2)2M(SO3-)3-R6], toluene and 1- dodecene added to Stainless steel high pressure reactor, its ratio is : [CH3(EO)16N+H=C(N(CH3)2)2M(SO3-)3-R6/RhCl3.3H2O =10:1(molar ratio) , 1- dodecene / RhCl3.3H2O = 1000 : 1 (molar ratio) , toluene/ 1- dodecene = 3:1-5:1 (volume ratio) and the air was replaced with nitrogen or argon for 4-6 times. Then adding pressure to 5.0 MPa by using syngas (H2 / CO = 1: 1), the reaction temperature was 85 ° C, reaction time was 2hrs and then cooled to room temperature. After evacuation, the toluene was removed under reduced pressure, and n-heptane was added to remove the aldehyde phase of the upper product. Through gas chromatography analysis, conversion of 1- dodecene was 93%, the selectivity of aldehyde was 94%, the molar ratio of n-aldehyde to isoaldehyde was 2.6: 1, and remaining ionic liquid phase continues the next catalytic cycle after the addition of new toluene and 1- dodecene. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With bis-(1,2-dimethylpropyl)borane; pyridinium chlorochromate 1.) Ether, 0 deg C, 2.) CH2Cl2, reflux; Yield given. Multistep reaction; | ||
70 %Spectr. | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With {tetrakis(2,6-dichlorophenyl)porphyrinato}iron(III) triflate; iodosylbenzene In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 20℃; for 1h; Inert atmosphere; Stage #2: In 1,4-dioxane; 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 80℃; for 3h; Inert atmosphere; | |
60 %Spectr. | With Pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid; iron(II) tetrafluoroborate hexahydrate; iodosylbenzene In chloroform at 59.84℃; for 48h; Molecular sieve; regioselective reaction; |
91.8 %Chromat. | With water; oxygen; ozone In acetone at 5℃; Flow reactor; | Experimental procedure General procedure: Preparation of olefin solutions: Taking styrene solution(1.5 mmol/L) for an example, 9.37 kg styrene and 4.86 kgdeionized water were used as trapping agent and reductantwas added into storage tank. Then, acetone solvent wasadded into storage tank slowly and constant volume to 60 L.The other terminal alkenes are listed in Table 1, and differentconcentration solutions were obtained by referencing thismethod.Typical ozonolysis operation: The O2valve was openedand adjusted flow to 5.0 m3/h when the ozone generatorwas kept switch off. Then, conveying pump and heatexchanger were started successively, and the substrateflow was adjusted to 6.0 L/h and 5 °C. After a period ofstabilization, the switch of ozone generator was shifted. The ozonization of substrate occurred at the same time.The samples were collected from product flow by a samplerat 10-min intervals (10 min, 20 min, 30 min) anddetected by GC. The measurements of the samples wereaveraged to obtain the corresponding yields of aldehydeand acid. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
98% | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With PyBH2I In dichloromethane at 20℃; Stage #2: With sodium hydroxide; dihydrogen peroxide In methanol; dichloromethane at 0 - 20℃; | |
96% | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With sodium tetrahydroborate; ethyl iodide In 1,2-dimethoxyethane at 25℃; for 20h; Stage #2: With dihydrogen peroxide; sodium hydroxide In water at 0 - 25℃; for 0.333333h; | Typical procedure for hydroboration of alkenes with borane from NaBH4 and ethyl iodide using the PV method (Condition C) General procedure: Ethyl iodide (380 mg, 2.4 mmol) and magnetic stirring bar were placed at the bottom of a test tube (15mm f × 130 mm), to which Galden HT-135 (2 mL) and Galden HT-200 (1 mL) were added slowly using a syringe in order. Subsequently, NaBH4 (84 mg, 2.2 mmol), a solution of 4-methylstyrene (1a) (240mg, 2.0 mmol) in DME (5.0 mL) were added slowly in order, forming four layers. A rubber septum was fitted to the test tube, and a needle equipped with a balloon, which acted as a reservoir of borane gas during the reaction, was then pricked into the septum. The air in the test tube was removed by a syringe until the balloon was completely flattened. The test tube was stirred slowly for 20 h at 25 °C, taking care not to mix the layers. The reaction mixture was then cooled to 0 °C with ice while stirring. An aqueous NaOH solution (1 M, 1.35 mL) was added slowly in ten portions. Verifying that organic layer was changed to basic condition using a pH test paper, H2O2 solution (30%, 0.5 mL) was added slowly in two portions. After 20 min stirring, the organic layer was taken up with a glass pipette to a separating funnel, and washed with water and brine three times. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4. After filtration, the solvent was evaporated. The residue was then purified by column chromatography on silica gel,eluting hexane/ethyl acetate (8:2) afforded 2-(p-tolyl)-1-ethanol (2a) (247 mg, 91%). |
95% | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With borane-THF In tetrahydrofuran; water at 0 - 20℃; for 7h; Inert atmosphere; Stage #2: With dihydrogen peroxide; sodium hydroxide In tetrahydrofuran; water at 0 - 20℃; for 6.5h; Inert atmosphere; |
95% | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With borane-THF Stage #2: With dihydrogen peroxide; sodium hydroxide | 5A Examples 5A-5B Dehomologations of Olefin Feedstocks In Example 5A, 1-dodecene was subjected to a two-step synthesis including (i) hydroboration-oxidation of 1-dodecene by established methods to yield 1-dodecanol, and (ii) oxidative dehydroxymethylation of 1-dodecanol according to the general experimental procedure described above for Inventive Example 1K. The two-step process yielded the C11 α-olefin in excellent yield (86%). |
With lithium aluminium tetrahydride; aluminium trichloride; oxygen 1.) THF, 0 deg C, 30 min; 2.) hexane, 0 deg C, room temperature, 7 h; Yield given. Multistep reaction; | ||
With pyridine; oxygen; dichloroaluminum hydride 1) ether, RT, 2) RT, 3 h; Yield given. Multistep reaction; | ||
4.1 mmol | With sodium hydroxide; sodium tetrahydroborate; dihydrogen peroxide; ethyl acetate; calcium chloride In tetrahydrofuran 1.) reflux, 12 h then rt., 48 h; 2.) reflux, 7 h; | |
Stage #1: 1-dodecene With borane-THF Stage #2: With dihydrogen peroxide; sodium hydroxide |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
86% | With [Me(n-Oct)3N]3{PO4[WO(O2)2]4}; dihydrogen peroxide; In water; 1,2-dichloro-ethane; at 95℃; for 5h;Reflux; Green chemistry;Catalytic behavior; | General procedure: alpha-Alkenes were oxidized in a thermostat glass reactor (volume180 ml), equipped with reflux condenser and magnetic stirrer (n =500 min-1). Temperature 60-95 C was maintained with water thermostat with an accuracy of ±0.1 C. For reaction mixture preparation weighted catalyst sample was put into reactor, then, substrate was added and mixed with catalyst. After that 30% aqueous hydrogen peroxide was introduced, and heating was started. Catalysts II and III well dissolved in the substrate. Catalyst I was preliminarily dissolved in a small amount of 1,2-dichloroethane (1-2 ml). Reaction mixture was sampled in definite time intervals. For the purpose stirring was stopped. After organic and aqueous phases complete separation into layers (no longer than 20-30 s) sample from organic phase was taken. Carboxylic acid yield was determined using chromatography analysis via absolute calibration. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
87% | With N-Bromosuccinimide; DME*5HF In dichloromethane at 20℃; for 3h; | |
86% | With N-Bromosuccinimide; 3-ethyl-1-methyl-imidazorium oligo hydrogen fluoride In dichloromethane at 20℃; for 3h; | |
86% | With N-Bromosuccinimide; 3-ethyl-1-methylimidazolium oligo hydrogen fluoride In dichloromethane at 20℃; for 3h; |
82% | With 1,3-dibromo-5,5-dimethylimidazolidine-2,4-dione; tetra-n-butylammonium dihydrogen trifluoride In dichloromethane 1) 0 deg C, 5 h, 2) rt, 13 h; | |
82% | With 1,3-dibromo-5,5-dimethylimidazolidine-2,4-dione; tetra-n-butylammonium dihydrogen trifluoride In dichloromethane a) 0 deg C, 5 h, b) RT, 13 h; | |
73% | With 1,3-dibromo-5,5-dimethylimidazolidine-2,4-dione; tetrabutylphosphonium dihydrogenetrifluoride In dichloromethane at 20 - 25℃; for 1h; | |
64% | With N,N,N,N,N,N-hexamethylphosphoric triamide; 1,3-dibromo-5,5-dimethylimidazolidine-2,4-dione; perfluoropropylene; diethylamine In water; toluene for 24h; Ambient temperature; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 67% 2: 33% | Stage #1: 1-Iodododecane In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 3h; Stage #2: With hexyl-methyl-ketone In tetrahydrofuran for 4.5h; | |
With samarium diiodide In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 3h; Yield given; Yields of byproduct given; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With Me(C5H3)(CH2)4SO2Cl(1+)*CF3SO3(1-); scandium tris(trifluoromethanesulfonate) at 80℃; for 24h; | ||
With commercial Beta-2 zeolite catalyst In decane at 120℃; Inert atmosphere; | 3.3.1 Alkylation Alkylation of 1-dodecene (Acros, 93-95%) was performed in a 60mL reactor that was loaded under N2 atmosphere with 100mg dried catalyst, 8.4mL benzene, 21.1mL n-decane (Acros, 99%), and 2.4mL 1-dodecene (molar ratio benzene:1-dodecene 20), pressurized with 30barN2, and heated to 120°C with stirring speed 1250rpm. | |
With aluminum (III) chloride; water; 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonimide at 35 - 80℃; |
With methanesulfonic acid at 60℃; for 5.5h; Inert atmosphere; | 1 Example 1 To produce dodecylbenzene with 100% methanesulfonic acid as catalyst, 164 g of benzene, 50 g of 1-dodecene and 283 g of n-octane together with 769 g of methanesulfonic acid (Lutropur 100 from BASF SE) were charged into a double-walled glass reactor of 2.5 l in volume. The glass reactor was provided with a stirrer, a condenser and a thermocouple. The experiment was performed under an argon inert gas atmosphere. After stirring the solution for 2 minutes at 1000 rpm the stirrer was stopped. A phase separation occurred within about 120 seconds. Once the phases had separated, a start sample of the organic phase was taken. The reaction mixture was subsequently heated to 60° C. over 30 minutes with stirring at 1000 rpm and then stirred for a further five hours at this temperature. After each hour the stirrer was briefly stopped and, after phase separation, a sample of the organic phase was taken. Once reaction had ended the stirrer was stopped and the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature. This caused the phases to separate. The upper hydrophobic phase was clear and colorless. The lower, methanesulfonic acid-containing phase exhibited slight brown discoloration. This phase was drained off. This affords 428 g of hydrophobic phase and 777 g of hydrophilic, methanesulfonic acid-containing phase. The samples of organic phase were analyzed by gas chromatography to monitor the progress of the reaction. The decline in the dodecene concentration and the formation of dodecylbenzene isomers were observed. The areas of the GC signals for the dodecene isomers, for the dodecylbenzene isomers and for n-octane were measured and the dodecene isomers/octane and dodecylbenzene isomers/octane ratios were calculated. To observe the decline in the dodecene concentration, concentrations were normalized to the value of the start sample. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
86% | With butylmethylimidazolium tetrachloroferrate In diethyl ether at 0 - 20℃; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
94% | With potassium <i>tert</i>-butylate In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 22h; | |
90% | With 2,4,5,6‐tetra‐9H‐carbazol‐9‐yl‐1,3‐benzenedicarbonitrile; [CoCl2(dmgH)2(pyridine)]; potassium carbonate; N-ethyl-N,N-diisopropylamine In acetonitrile at 20℃; for 16h; Inert atmosphere; Sealed tube; Irradiation; | |
Multi-step reaction with 3 steps 1: 80 percent / NaOMe / methanol / 1) room temp., 0.5 h; 2) reflux, 2 h 2: 1) N-Chlorosuccinimide; 2) 10percent NaOH / 1) CH3OH, CH2Cl2, 0 degC, 30 min; 2) 5 min 3: 55 percent / benzene / Heating |
16.8 %Spectr. | With sodium t-butanolate In water at 50℃; for 2h; Sealed tube; UV-irradiation; | General protocol for the reaction and the method to determine the reaction yield: General procedure: For the reaction with UV: 1 mmol alkyl bromide or alkyl iodide was added into a 10 mL Quartz tube, which was followed by the addition of 1 mmol NaOtBu. Then 1 mL distilled water was added to get a biphase mixture. After sealing the tube, it was posed into a pre-heated 50 0C water bath and irradiated by a 350 watts UV lamp for 2 hours.When the reaction was stopped, 1 mL CDCl3 was employed to extract the organic compounds. After the extraction, 10 mLbenzyl alcohol, as the internal standard was added into the NMR tube. By using the integration, the conversion ratio of the starting material and the production of the elimination product can be calibrated. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With aluminum (III) chloride;methyl tributylammonium chloride; at 46 - 160℃; for 27.8h; | Example 3 Alkylation of Aniline Using Dodecenes, Aluminum Chloride and Methyltributylammonium Chloride An apparatus similar to that described in Example 1 was charged with aniline, dodecenes under nitrogen positive pressure, followed by aluminum chloride and then slow stirring started. There was an exotherm up to 46 C. upon stirring and then methyltributylammonium chloride was added. The reaction mixture was heated to 160 C. and maintained at this temperature for 27.8 hr. The reaction mixture was then allowed to cool to room temperature and diluted with 300 mL n-heptane-200 mL methylene chloride. The reaction mixture separated into a large volume upper phase and a dark red-orange lower phase. The upper layer was washed with 2×500 mL water, 500 mL aq. ammonia (400 mL water/100 mL conc. aq. ammonia) and then dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The sodium sulfate was removed by suction filtration and the filtrate stripped on a rotary evaporator in vacuo (5 mm final vacuum, 95 C. water bath). The residue was a reddish-orange oil, wt. 136.96 g. This was shown to be monododecylaniline by GC. IR analysis indicated the position of alkylation was mainly para. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With hydrogen;tributylphosphine; cobalt(II) decanoate; In n-heptane; at 170℃; under 63756.4 Torr; for 48h;Conversion of starting material; | Co(II)-decanoate (1.2% Co in heptane) (2.5 ml, 0.36 mmol), heptane (7 ml), C10-C15 olefins/C10-C15 paraffins (20 ml, pre-mixed each 8.3% by volume as described above) and nBu3P (1.44 mmol) were placed in a 50 ml autoclave, degassed with argon and heated to 170 C. Syngas (H2:CO 2:1) was added to 85 bar and supplied at this pressure for 48 h.Using an Agilent Pona GC-column (50 m×0.20 mm×0.50 musn, 40 C. for 5 minutes, 10 C./minute to 300 C., 300 C. for 20 minutes) which separates mainly on differential boiling points, the reaction mixture containing the C11-C16 alcohols and C10-C15 paraffins, was injected and the GC trace indicated that tridecane, tetradecane and pentadecane overlap with the resulting alcohols indicating that it would not be possible to separate all the paraffins via fractional distillation from the alcohol products (see FIG. 5). |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 96% 2: 2% | With [(dimethylphenylsilyl)methyl]magnesium chloride; 1,3-bis(mesityl)imidazolium chloride; cobalt(II) chloride In tetrahydrofuran; 1,4-dioxane at 25℃; for 0.5h; Inert atmosphere; regioselective reaction; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
56% | With diisopropylamine;bis-triphenylphosphine-palladium(II) chloride; copper(l) iodide; In benzene; at 20℃; for 14h;Inert atmosphere; | Under nitrogen atmosphere, <strong>[63262-06-6]1,4-dibromo-2,5-diiodobenzene</strong> (3.0 g, 6.2 mmol) was dissolved in diisopropylamine (45 ml) and anhydrous benzene (45 ml), followed by stirring for 30 minutes. Copper iodide (235 mg, 0.12 mmol), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (430 mg, 0.61 mmol), and 1-dodecene (1.9 ml, 12.9 mmol) were added to the mixture, followed by stirring at room temperature for 14 hours. The reaction liquid was poured into water and extracted with chloroform, and the obtained organic layer was washed with 200 ml of water three times. The resulting organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and purified by a column chromatography (silica gel and methylene chloride:hexane = 1:3), followed by recrystallization in ethanol, thereby colorless powdery 1,4-dibromo-2,5-bis(octyne-1-yl)benzene was obtained (1.56 g, yield: 56%). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCL3) delta7.59 (s, 2H) 2.45 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 4H) 1.65-1.23 (m, 32H) 0.88 (t, J=6.4 Hz, 6H) |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
94.1% | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With fumed silica-supported nitrogenous platinum complex at 110℃; for 0.5h; Stage #2: Triethoxysilane at 110℃; for 2.5h; regioselective reaction; | 2.3. Hydrosilylation of olefins with triethoxysilane Reactions were carried out in a three-necked flask with a magnetic stirrer and a reflux condenser with an attached drying system on the upper condenser. Olefin and platinum catalyst were stirred at the reaction temperature for 30 min before triethoxysilane which was added at a constant speed. The reaction mixture was heated at the reaction temperature within the stipulated time and then catalyst was separated from the raw product by decantation. After the removal of the raw product, a new portion of substrates was added and the reaction was repeated under the same conditions. Gas chromatography was employed to follow the course of the reaction by the appearance of product. All hydrosilylation products were characterized by 1H NMR and 13C NMR. |
94.1% | With silica supported poly-3-(2-aminoethylamino)propylsiloxane platinum complex at 110℃; for 2h; | Hydrosilylation of olefins with triethoxysilane General procedure: Hydrosilylation was carried out in a three-necked flask with amagnetic stirrer and a reflux condenser with an attached dryingsystem on the upper condenser. The olefin and platinumcomplex were stirred at the setting temperature for 30 min atfirst. Then the triethoxysilane was added at a constant speed.The reaction mixture was maintained at the reaction temperaturewithin the stipulated time. After the reaction, the catalystwas separated from the raw product by centrifugation. A newportion of substrates was added and the reaction was repeatedunder the same conditions. Gas chromatography was employedtofollowthe course of the reactionby the appearance of product. |
91% | With diphosphino-functionalised MCM-41-anchored platinum complex at 120℃; for 1.66667h; |
84.9% | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With Wilkinson's catalyst for 0.0833333h; Stage #2: Triethoxysilane at 90℃; for 5h; | General methods General procedure: All catalysis reaction operations were performed in a 10 mL flat-bottomed tube without protection from air. The alkene (4.0 mmol) and the requisite amount of catalyst were placed in a dried tube and the reaction mixture was stirred for 5 min. Thereafter, the silane (4.4 mmol) was added and the resulting mixture was heated and stirred for the requisite time and then cooled to room temperature. The product phase was separated by decantation and the conversion of the alkene and the selectivity were determined by GC-MS analysis on an Agilent 26890N/59731 apparatus equipped with a DB-5 column (30 m × 2.5 mm × 0.25 μm). 1H NMR (400 MHz) and 13C NMR (100.6 MHz) spectra were recorded on a Bruker Advance spectrometer using TMS as an internal standard. Methanol-d4 and DMSO-d6 were used as solvents. |
81% | With 1:1 mixture of platinum nanoparticles and iron oxide nanoparticles-OAc (PtNPs+FeNPs-OAc (Pt:Fe: 1:1)) In neat (no solvent) at 100℃; for 24h; Schlenk technique; Sealed tube; | 16; 17; 18; 19; 21; 22; 23; 24; 25; 26; 27; 28; 29; 1; 2 Examples 16 to 18 The PtNPs prepared in Synthesis Example 1 and the FeNPs-OAc prepared in Synthesis Example 2 were charged in a Schlenk tube in an amount that would result in the ratio of the amount of substance of the platinum element to the iron element of 1:1, and 0.05 mol % and 0.05 mol % (0.1 mol % in total) with respect to 1-dodecene described later. The DMF was distilled off using a rotary evaporator (25 hPa, 70° C., 15 min), and a residual trace of DMF was further removed with a rotary pump (10-1 Pa, 10 min). A stirrer was placed into the Schlenk tube. (0098) Then, 1-dodecene (0.111 mL, 0.5 mmol) and triethoxysilane (amount listed in Table 5 below) were added, and without replacing with inert gas, a closed two-way cock was attached to the Schlenk tube and thus the Schlenk tube was sealed. Then, the reaction solution was heated in an oil bath (100° C., 24 h) to react. (0099) After the completion of the reaction, the reaction solution was placed in an ice bath and quenched by adding n-hexane (10 mL). Then, n-nonane (30 mg) was added as an internal standard, and the solution passed through a membrane filter (0.2 m) was subjected to GC to calculate the yield. The results are shown in Table 5 below.The short column was then packed with silica (3 cm), and the column chromatography was carried out with ethyl acetate to remove the nanoparticle catalyst and impurities. Then, vacuum suction (10-1 Pa) and azeotropic removal with pentane were performed three times to remove impurities (GC yield 95% or more, isolation yield: 81%, 138 mg) (in the case of Example 18). |
81% | With platinum; iron(III) oxide; N,N-dimethyl-formamide In neat (no solvent) at 100℃; for 24h; Schlenk technique; | |
74.7% | With N-heterocyclic carbene fuctionalized with methyl(trimethylsilane) and methoxypolyethylene glycol Pt(II) complex at 90℃; for 10h; | Catalysis hydrosilylation General procedure: All the catalytic reactions were performed in a 10 mLat-bottomed tube without protection from air. The alkene(4.0 mmol) and the requisite amount of catalyst were placed ina dried tube and the reaction mixture was stirred for 5 min.Thereafter, the silane (4.4 mmol) was added and the resulting mixture was heated and stirred for the requisite time andthen cooled to room temperature. The product phase was separated by decantation and the alkene conversion and selectivity of the reaction were determined by GC-MS analysis on anAgilent 26890N/59731 apparatus equipped with a DB-5 column(30 m × 2.5 mm × 0.25 mm). |
90 %Chromat. | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With MCM-41-supported mercapto Pt complex at 110℃; for 0.5h; Stage #2: Triethoxysilane at 110℃; for 1.5h; | |
With chloro(η4-1,5-cyclooctadiene)[(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-3-methylimidazole-2-ylidene]rhodium(I); 3-butyl-1-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium hexafluorophosphate at 70℃; for 2h; regioselective reaction; | Catalytic hydrosilylation of alkene with triethoxysilane Typical hydrosilylation reaction procedures were as follows: Agiven amount of catalyst and ionic liquid were added to a 10 mLround bottomed flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer and thealkene and silane were then added. This mixture was heated to theappropriate temperature and the hydrosilylation reaction wasallowed to proceed with constant stirring for 5 h. At the end of thereaction, the product phase was separated from the catalyst bydecantation and the conversion of alkene and the selectivity weredetermined by GC. The catalyst was recharged with fresh alkeneand silane for the next catalytic run. | |
With Wilkinson's catalyst; carbon dioxide; potassium <i>tert</i>-butylate; 3-butyl-1-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium hexafluorophosphate at 70℃; for 2h; Autoclave; Supercritical conditions; | ||
87 %Chromat. | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With MCM-41-S-RhCl3 at 120℃; for 0.5h; Stage #2: Triethoxysilane at 120℃; for 1.16667h; | |
89 %Chromat. | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With MCM-41-supported bidentate phosphine rhodium complex at 100℃; for 0.5h; Stage #2: Triethoxysilane at 100℃; for 1.5h; | |
100 %Chromat. | With hydridochlorotris(triphenylphosphine)ruthenium(II); tris(dibutylamino)(dioctylamino)phosphonium hexafluorophosphate at 95℃; for 2h; | |
91 %Chromat. | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With [PtCl2(MeO)(O)2Si(CH2)3NH(CH2)2NH2] supported on mesoporous material MCM-41 at 120℃; for 0.5h; Stage #2: Triethoxysilane at 120℃; for 1.6h; | |
With Wilkinson's catalyst; 1-(2-carboxyethyl)-3-methylimidazolium inner salt at 90℃; for 5h; | 1 Catalytic hydrosilylation of alkene with triethoxysilane General procedure: Typical hydrosilylation reaction procedures were as follows: A given amount of catalyst and ionic liquid was added to a 10 mL round bottomed flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer and then the alkene and silane were added. After heating the mixture at the appropriate temperature, the hydrosilylation reaction was preceded with constant stirring for 5 h. At the end of the reaction, the product phase was separated from the catalyst by decantation and the conversion of alkene and the selectivity were determined by GC. The catalyst was recharged with fresh alkene and silane for the next catalytic run | |
With trans-Pt(PPh3)2(CH≡CSiPh3)2 at 90℃; for 5h; Inert atmosphere; Schlenk technique; | ||
With rhodium(III) chloride trihydrate; α-Oxo-phenylmethan-diphenylphosphin at 70℃; for 10h; Inert atmosphere; | 2.2.1 Catalytic hydrosilylation of alkene with triethoxysilane General procedure: A 10mL three-necked flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer was charged with RhCl3·3H2O (8.0×10-3mmol) and acylphosphines prepared (4.0×10-2mmol) under argon atmosphere. Then alkene (4mmol) and silane (4.4mmol) were added via syringe. The hydrosilylation reaction proceeded with constant stirring under an appropriate temperature for 5h. At the end of the reaction, the conversion of alkene and the selectivity of product were determined by GC (Scheme 3) . | |
96 %Spectr. | With SiliaCat Pt(0) - mesoporous organosilica microspheres doped with Pt nanoparticles In neat (no solvent) at 75℃; for 2h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With dihydrogen peroxide In acetonitrile for 0.583333h; Ultrasonic irradiation; Reflux; | ||
With dihydrogen peroxide In acetonitrile at 60℃; for 0.666667h; Ultrasonic irradiation; | ||
With dihydrogen peroxide In acetontrile for 20h; Reflux; |
With dihydrogen peroxide In acetonitrile at 60℃; for 0.666667h; Ultrasonic irradiation; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
600-900 g of each of finely powdered titanium dioxide, talc, mica and EPO <DP n="16"/>sericite was introduced into a fluidized reactor, and then the coating mixture 4 was introduced into a feed cylinder. Then, the coating mixture 4 was vaporized by heating it to about 120-2000C depending on the mixing ratio between the components of the coating mixture 4. Said temperature is a temperature higher than the boiling temperature of the coating mixture 4. The coating mixture 4 was passed through the heating device of a nozzle unit using air as a carrier gas, and then vaporized and introduced into the fluidized reactor. Subsequent steps were carried out in the same manner as in Example 1. Second surface modification (wet coating) of powder subjected to first surface modification using coating mixture 3 15 g of the first-surface-modified powder prepared in Example 4 was introduced into a three-neck round bottom, to which about 45 ml of ethanol was then added. The solution was uniformly stirred. Then, 0.002 ml of organic metal catalyst H2PtCl6 was added thereto. Then, 0.1-0.4 mol of 1- dodecene or vinyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane as a second coating compound was added thereto, and then the second surface modification of the powder was performed by stirring the mixture for about 2-3 hours while maintaining the reaction temperature at 7O0C |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
600-900 g of each of finely powdered titanium dioxide, talc, mica and sericite was introduced into a fluidized reactor, and then the coating mixture 3 was introduced into a feed cylinder. Then, the coating mixture 3 was vaporized by heating it to about 120-2000C depending on the mixing ratio between the components of the coating mixture 3. Said temperature is a temperature higher than the boiling temperature of the coating mixture 3.The coating mixture 3 was passed through the heating device of a nozzle unit using air as a carrier gas, and then vaporized and introduced into the fluidized reactor. Subsequent steps were carried out in the same manner as inExample 1. 15 g of the first-surface-modified powder prepared in Example 3 was EPO <DP n="17"/>introduced into a three-neck round bottom, to which about 45 ml of ethanol was then added. The solution was uniformly stirred. Then, 0.002 ml of organic metal catalyst H2PtCl6 was added thereto. Then, 0.1-0.4 mol of 1- dodecene or vinyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane as a second coating compound was added thereto, and then the second surface modification of the powder was performed by stirring the mixture for about 2-3 hours while maintaining the reaction temperature at 700C | ||
Surface modification using triethoxy carpryryl silane (TCS) 350 g of each of titanium dioxide, talc and mica was introduced into a main reactor, and then triethoxy carpryryl silane (TCS) was introduced into a feed cylinder and vaporized by heating it to a temperature of about 86-9O0C, which is higher than the boiling point of TCS. The vaporized TCS was introduced into the main reactor using inert nitrogen gas as carrier gas. Herein, the vaporized TCS was introduced into the main reactor at a rate of about 100-150 m/sec through a nozzle. The residence time of the vaporized EPO <DP n="18"/>TCS in the main reactor was 2-3 hours, and it was allowed to react with the pigment particles in the main reactor to form an S-H group on the surface of the particles. 15 g of the powder, which has been surface-modified with TCS inComparative Example 1 , was introduced into a three-neck round bottom, to which about 45 ml of ethanol was then added. The solution was uniformly stirred. Then, 0.002 ml of organic metal catalyst H2PtCl6 was added thereto.Then, 0.1-0.4 mol of 1-dodecene or vinyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane as a second coating compound was added thereto, and then the second surface modification of the powder was performed by stirring the mixture for about 2- 3 hours while maintaining the reaction temperature at 7O0C |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
Stage #1: ethene With [(t-Bu)NP(Ph)2N(t-Bu)]Cr(μ2-Cl)2Li(THF)2 In toluene at 60℃; for 1h; Inert atmosphere; Stage #2: With hydrogenchloride In ethanol; toluene | ||
With chromium(III) acetylacetonate; C20H20NP In toluene at 40 - 45℃; Autoclave; Inert atmosphere; | 7 Example 7 Ethylene was polymerized in the same manner as in Example 1, except that a solution of the following ligand compound D was used in place of the ligand compound A solution. The results thereof are shown in Table 1. | |
With C24H27Cl2CrN2O In water; toluene at 50 - 55℃; for 1h; Inert atmosphere; Autoclave; |
With trichlorotris(tetrahydrofuran)chromium(III); 1,1'-(thiophen-2-ylmethylene)bis(3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazole) In n-heptane; toluene at 60℃; for 0.5h; Schlenk technique; Autoclave; | Oligomerization of ethylene A 120 mL stainless steel reactorwas dried at 120 C for 3 h undervacuum, and then cooled down to the desired reaction temperature.The precatalysts and co-catalysts (MAO) were combined in aSchlenk vessel in the ratios indicated in Table 1. The resultantmixture was stirred for 1 min and immediately transferred to thereactor. Then the reactor was immediately pressurized. After thespecified reaction time, the reactionwas stopped by shutting in theethylene feed, cooling the system at 0 C, depressurizing, andquenched by addition of 30 mL of 10% aq. HCl. A small sample of theupper-layer solution was filtered through a layer of Celite andanalysed by GC using nonane as the internal standard. The individualoligomerization products were identified by GC-MS. Theremainder of the upper-layer solution was filtered to isolate thesolid polymeric products. The solid products were suspended in10% aq. HCl and stirred for 24 h, dried under reduced pressure andweighed. | |
With (Ph<SUB>2</SUB>PN-(Me)(CH<SUB>2</SUB>)<SUB>2</SUB>-NPPh2)CrCl<SUB>3</SUB>(THF) In methyl cyclohexane at 80℃; for 0.5h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
86% | With N,N,N,N,-tetramethylethylenediamine; fac-[Ir(ppy)3]; 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene In dichloromethane at 20℃; for 24h; Inert atmosphere; | 1 General procedure: 0.1mmol of the reactor into a 1-dodecene (1-dodecene), then degassed and filled with argon. Then the acetonitrile in the 0.001mmol of 0.5mL [Ru (bpy) 3] Cl2 was dissolved in the solution and 0.2mmol TMEDA was added to the reactor. And the acetate (BrCF2COOEt) with ethyl bromo 0.15mmol fluoro modayi was prepared and the reaction mixture is added to the reactor. The reaction mixture was stirred in an atmosphere of argon, and the under ambient temperature the reaction mixture is being used the blue LED was investigated visible light 7W Autumn Then, after keeping the reaction continued stirring the reaction mixture, the progress of the reaction It was observed by TLC or gas chromatography. About when the 24 hours after the reaction is complete, the reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate, washed with ammonium chloride solution and brine (brine), and the organic layer was dried with MgSO4, getting the product was concentrated in vacuo, purified by a product column by purified using chromatography to give the alkane with CF2CO2Et is introduced. The yield of the alkane is introduced CF2CO2Et was obtain by gas chromatography and 19F NMR spectroscopy, the results are shown in Table 1 |
55 %Chromat. | With fac-tris[2-phenylpyridinato-C2,N]iridium(III); 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 20℃; Sealed tube; Inert atmosphere; Irradiation; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
97% | With fac-[Ir(ppy)3]; potassium carbonate; 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 20℃; for 24h; Inert atmosphere; Irradiation; | 10 General procedure: 0.1mmol of the reactor into a 1-dodecene (1-dodecene), then degassed and filled with argon. Then the acetonitrile in the 0.001mmol of 0.5mL [Ru(bpy)3]Cl2 was dissolved in the solution and 0.2mmol TMEDA was added to the reactor. And the acetate (BrCF2COOEt) with ethyl bromo 0.15mmol fluoro modayi was prepared and the reaction mixture is added to the reactor. The reaction mixture was stirred in an atmosphere of argon, and the under ambient temperature the reaction mixture is being used the blue LED was investigated visible light 7W Autumn Then, after keeping the reaction continued stirring the reaction mixture, the progress of the reaction It was observed by TLC or gas chromatography. About when the 24 hours after the reaction is complete, the reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate, washed with ammonium chloride solution and brine (brine), and the organic layer was dried with MgSO4, getting the product was concentrated in vacuo, purified by a product column by purified using chromatography to give the alkane with CF2CO2Et is introduced. The yield of the alkane is introduced CF2CO2Et was obtain by gas chromatography and 19F NMR spectroscopy, the results are shown in Table 1 |
89% | With fac-tris[2-phenylpyridinato-C2,N]iridium(III); potassium carbonate; 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene In dichloromethane at 20℃; for 2h; Sealed tube; Inert atmosphere; Irradiation; stereoselective reaction; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
76% | With C42H49Cl2N3O3RuS2 In tetrahydrofuran at 22℃; for 4h; Inert atmosphere; Glovebox; stereoselective reaction; | |
72% | With C37H41Cl2N2ORuS2 In tetrahydrofuran at 22℃; for 4h; Inert atmosphere; diastereoselective reaction; | (Z)-2-tridecene-l-ol (A9) [00644] (Z)-2-tridecene-l-ol (A9) [00645] Following the general procedure in Section 2, a solution of lb (4.9 mg, 6.3 μηιο, 5.0 mol %) in tetrahydrofuran (255 μ) was transferred by syringe to a vial charged with 1- dodecene (21.4 mg, 0.127 mmol, 1.00 equiv) and cz's-2-butene-l,4-diol (24.2 mg, 0.254 mmol, 2.00 equiv). The resulting solution was allowed to stir for four hours at 22 °C. Analysis of the unpurified mixture revealed 81% consumption of 1-dodecene. The resulting brown oil was purified by silica gel chromatography (10% Et20 in hexanes to 40% Et20 in hexanes) to afford A9 (18.1 mg, 0.091 mmol, 72% yield) as pale yellow oil in 96:04 ZIE ratio. The spectral data for this compound were identical to those reported in the literature. Insect pheromone precursor 9 has been previously elaborated to (+)-disparlure over three steps in 49%> overall yield. |
72% | With C37H40Cl2N2ORuS2 In tetrahydrofuran at 22℃; for 4h; Inert atmosphere; diastereoselective reaction; |
64% | With 3,6-dichlorobenzene-1,2-dithiol; Hoveyda-Grubbs catalyst second generation; diethylzinc In tetrahydrofuran; hexane at 22℃; for 4h; Inert atmosphere; Sealed tube; stereoselective reaction; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
81% | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With (<SUP>18</SUP>O)-dimethylsulfoxide; tetrabutylammonium tetrafluoroborate; tetra-(n-butyl)ammonium iodide In dichloromethane at -78 - 0℃; for 1h; Inert atmosphere; Electrochemical reaction; Stage #2: With sodium methylate In methanol; dichloromethane at 25℃; for 0.0833333h; Inert atmosphere; Electrochemical reaction; | Synthesis of 18O-labelled epoxide 6c In the anodic chamber were placed Bu4NI (91.8 mg, 0.248 mmol), DMSO (96% 18O, 0.2 mL), and 0.3 MBu4NBF4/CH2Cl2 (10 mL). In the cathodic chamber were placed TfOH (60 μL, 0.68 mmol) and 0.3 MBu4NBF4/CH2Cl2 (10 mL). The constant current electrolysis (8.0 mA) was carried out at -78 °C withmagnetic stirring until 2.1 F mol-1 of electricity was consumed. To the anodic chamber was added a solutionof 1-dodecene (2c) (32.5 mg, 0.193 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (0.5 mL), and to the cathodic chamber was added 0.5mL of CH2Cl2 at -78 °C. The solution was stirred for 30 min at -78 °C then stirring was continued for30 min at 0 °C. NaOMe (5.0 M in MeOH, 0.2 mL) was added to both the anodic and cathodic chambers, andthe resulting mixture was warmed to 25 °C and stirred for 5 min. The solution in the anodic chamber wasfiltered through a short column (2 x 4 cm) of silica gel to remove Bu4NBF4 by using Et2O as an eluent. Afterremoval of the solvent under reduced pressure the crude product was purified by flash chromatography9(hexane) to obtain 18O-labelled 1,2-epoxydodecane (6c) in 81% yield (29.0 mg, 0.155 mmol). TLC Rf 0.67(hexane/EtOAc 5:1); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.88 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 6 H), 1.221.56 (m, 18 H), 2.46 (dd,J = 2.8, 5.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.74 (dd, J = 4.0, 5.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.882.93 (m, 1 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ14.1, 22.7, 26.0, 29.3, 29.4, 29.54, 29.57, 31.9, 32.5, 47.1, 52.4; HRMS (APCI) calcd for C12H2518O (M+H+):187.1942, found: 187.1940. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With hydrogen; at 99.84℃; under 7500.75 Torr; for 192h;Catalytic behavior; | General procedure: The hydroformylation of ethylene was conducted in a continuous flow fixed-bed reactor with an inner diameter of 9 mm. The effluent was passed through a condenser filled with 60 mL of cold de-ionized water. Propanal was captured by dissolution into the water in the condenser. The aqueous solution containing propanal was analyzed off-line with an Agilent 7890A gas chromatography,using an FID and ethanol as an internal standard. The tail gas was analyzed on-line using an Agilent 7890A gas chromatography witha Porapak-QS column and a TCD. The hydroformylation of 1-dodecene was conducted in a trickle-bed reactor with an inner diameter of 9 mm. The products of hydroformylation were analyzed by an Agilent 7890A gas chromatography, using an FID and n-propanol as an internal standard. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
96.9% | With N,N`-dimethylethylenediamine In diethylene glycol dimethyl ether; acetonitrile at 75℃; for 8h; | 2 Example 2 To a suitable amount of an organic solvent (a mixture of diglyme and acetonitrile in a volume ratio of 1: 2) were added 100 mmol of the compound of the above formula (I), 175 mmol of the compound of the formula (II), 7.5 mmol of catalyst (a mixture of 5 mmol of Ru3 (CO) 12 and 2.5 mmol of benzophenone), 39 mmol of a promoter (a mixture of 26 mmol of 2-fluorophenylboronic acid pinacol ester and 13 mmol of 1,2-bis (triethoxysilyl) ethane) 150mmol base DMEDA, then warmed to 75 °C and stirred at this temperature for 8 hours; After the reaction was completed, the reaction system was naturally cooled to room temperature, and then adjust the system pH value of 6.5-7, and then used toIonized water was thoroughly shaken and washed, and then added chloroform extraction 2-3 times, the combined organic phase was dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, vacuum distillation,The residue was chromatographed on a 300-400 mesh silica gel column using a mixture of ethyl acetate and acetone in a volume ratio of 1: 2 as an eluent. The endpoint of the elution was monitored by TLC, the eluate was collected and the solvent was removed by evaporation to obtain the compound of the above formula (III) compound in 96.9% yield. |
65% | With [ruthenium(II)(η6-1-methyl-4-isopropyl-benzene)(chloride)(μ-chloride)]2; 1-Adamantanecarboxylic acid; potassium carbonate In toluene at 120℃; for 12h; Sealed tube; Inert atmosphere; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
96.4% | With N,N`-dimethylethylenediamine In diethylene glycol dimethyl ether; acetonitrile at 80℃; for 6h; | 3 Example 3 To a suitable amount of an organic solvent (a mixture of diglyme and acetonitrile in a volume ratio of 1: 2) were added 100 mmol of the compound of the above formula (I), 175 mmol of the compound of the formula (II), 9.9 mmol catalyst (a mixture of 6.6 mmol Ru3 (CO) 12 and 3.3 mmol porphyrin), 50 mmol of a promoter (a mixture of 37.5 mmol of 2-fluorophenylboronic acid pinacol ester and 12.5 mmol of 1,2-bis (triethoxysilyl) ethane) 200mmol base DMEDA, then warmed to 80 °C and stirred at this temperature for 6 hours; After the reaction was completed, the reaction system was naturally cooled to room temperature, and then adjust the system pH value of 6.5-7, and then used toIonized water was thoroughly shaken and washed, and then added chloroform extraction 2-3 times, the combined organic phase was dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, vacuum distillation,The residue was chromatographed on a 300-400 mesh silica gel column using a mixture of ethyl acetate and acetone in a volume ratio of 1: 2 as an eluent. The endpoint of the elution was monitored by TLC, the eluate was collected and the solvent was removed by evaporation to obtain the compound of the above formula (III) compound in 96.4% yield. |
60% | With [ruthenium(II)(η6-1-methyl-4-isopropyl-benzene)(chloride)(μ-chloride)]2; 1-Adamantanecarboxylic acid; potassium carbonate In toluene at 120℃; for 12h; Sealed tube; Inert atmosphere; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
72% | In 1,4-dioxane; at 160℃; for 1h;Microwave irradiation; Sealed tube; | General procedure: Phenyphosphinic acid (0.2 mmol), alkene (0.4 mmol) and dioxane (4 mL) were added into a 10 mL microwavevial containing a Teflon-coated stirrer bar and a septum. The vial was sealed and was heated under microwaveirradiation at 160 C for 1 hour. After cooling to room temperature the reaction mixture was purified by columnchromatography on silica gel using CH2Cl2-MeOH-CH3COOH: 9-0.5-0.5 as eluent to give the corresponding<strong>[1779-48-2]phenyl phosphinic acid</strong>s 6. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
94% | With nickel(II) chloride hexahydrate; potassium <i>tert</i>-butylate In tetrahydrofuran at -30℃; for 1h; Schlenk technique; Inert atmosphere; Sealed tube; | |
81% | With C28H43Cl2FeN2P; sodium triethylborohydride In tetrahydrofuran at -38 - 25℃; for 24h; Inert atmosphere; Glovebox; regioselective reaction; | |
81% | With C10H14CoO5; 4,5-bis(diphenylphosphino)-9,9-dimethylxanthene In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 3h; regioselective reaction; |
62% | With platinum; iron(III) oxide; N,N-dimethyl-formamide In neat (no solvent) at 100℃; for 24h; Schlenk technique; | |
With [Zr{(Dipp)2DAD}(CH2SiMe3)2] In benzene-d6 at 60℃; for 24h; Sealed tube; regioselective reaction; | ||
54 %Chromat. | With ruthenium nanoparticle (Ru NPs) In diethylene glycol dimethyl ether at 120℃; for 24h; Schlenk technique; Inert atmosphere; | 6-1 (Experimental Example 3-1: Examination of reaction solvent) General procedure: 1000 μL (1.0 μmol in terms of Ru) of the ruthenium nanoparticle catalyst dispersion obtained in Synthesis Example 1 was added to the Schlenk tube, and the dispersion medium was distilled off under vacuum. In order to strictly remove the DMF not coordinated with the ruthenium nanoparticles, the obtained residue was further dried under vacuum at 80 ° C. to obtain a ruthenium nanoparticle catalyst. The inside of this Schlenk tube was replaced with argon. Then, 1 mL of diglyme, 0.5 mmol (0.0842 g) of 1-dodecene and 3.0 mmol (0.595 g) of diphenylmethylsilane were added to the Schlenk tube. After passing argon through the Schlenk tube, the mixture was stirred for 24 hours while heating at 120 ° C. After cooling the reaction solution in an ice bath, about 10 mL of hexane and nonane as an internal reference substance were added to the reaction solution, and GC measurement was performed. Table 3 shows the conversion rate of the substrate and the yield of the product calculated from the GC measurement results. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
General procedure: Lim-10 (5-10 mol%), 2-ethylhexanoic acid (10 mol%) and KOH/EtOH (1.0 M soln.; 2.5 mol%) were loaded in to a glass liner containing a magnetic stirring bar and flushed with a continuous stream of argon. Solid Co2(CO)8 (5 mol%) was weighed promptly and added to the liner. Then, under argon protection, alkene (2.0 mmol) and solvent (5 mL) were added. The glass liner was then inserted into a stainless steel autoclave, capped and purged three times with CO and then pressurized at room temperature to 200 psi of CO and 400 psi of H2. The autoclave was heated at 110 C for 22 h and then cooled to room temperature before releasing the excess gases. The reaction mixture was then transferred to a flask using 5-10 mL of MeOH to which was added NaBH4 (1.2 equiv.) at 0 C and the consumption of the RCHO monitored by TLC. Upon completion of the reaction, the resulting mixture was acidified to PH~6 and extracted with ether (3x 50 mL). The combined organic layers were dried with anhydrous MgSO4 and the solvent was removed in vacuo to give an oil residue which was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel with hexane / EtOAc (v/v, 5:1 to 2:1) as the eluant to obtain inseparable mixture of alcohols in 53-99 % yields. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 75 %Chromat. 2: 24 %Chromat. | With copper(l) iodide In 2-methyltetrahydrofuran; toluene at 80℃; for 18h; Inert atmosphere; Schlenk technique; Sealed tube; | Copper-catalyzed cross-coupling non-activated alkyl chloride with phenylmagnesium bromide: general procedure General procedure: To an oven-dried Schlenk tube were added CuI (0.1 mmol, 10 mol%), then the tube was evacuated and backfilled with argon for three times. To this Schlenk tube were added alkyl chloride (1.0 mmol), toluene (2.0 mL) and phenylmagnesium bromide (0.8 mL of a 2.9 mol/L 2-MeTHF solution, 2.3 mmol). The tube was sealed and the mixture was allowed to stir at 80 °C for 18 h. After being cooled to room temperature, the reaction mixture was quenched with HCl aq. (1 N). The aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O three times. The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated. The residue was purified by column chromatography using petroleum ether (30 - 60oC) as eluent to afford the product. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 43 %Chromat. 2: 54 %Chromat. | With copper(l) iodide In 2-methyltetrahydrofuran; toluene at 80℃; for 18h; Inert atmosphere; Schlenk technique; Sealed tube; | Copper-catalyzed cross-coupling non-activated alkyl chloride with phenylmagnesium bromide: general procedure General procedure: To an oven-dried Schlenk tube were added CuI (0.1 mmol, 10 mol%), then the tube was evacuated and backfilled with argon for three times. To this Schlenk tube were added alkyl chloride (1.0 mmol), toluene (2.0 mL) and phenylmagnesium bromide (0.8 mL of a 2.9 mol/L 2-MeTHF solution, 2.3 mmol). The tube was sealed and the mixture was allowed to stir at 80 °C for 18 h. After being cooled to room temperature, the reaction mixture was quenched with HCl aq. (1 N). The aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O three times. The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated. The residue was purified by column chromatography using petroleum ether (30 - 60oC) as eluent to afford the product. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 39.3 %Chromat. 2: 35.6 %Chromat. 3: 19.2 %Chromat. | With Ce0.3Co0.7Fe2O4; dihydrogen peroxide In 1,4-dioxane at 90℃; for 9h; | 2.3. Oxidation of styrene The selective oxidation of styrene was carried out in a 25 mLSchlenk tube. In a typical procedure, 0.06 mmol (ca. 15.0 mg, basedon the given formula CexCo1xFe2O4) of catalyst, 2.0 mL(17.4 mmol) of styrene, 10 mL of solvent, and 2.7 mL of hydrogenperoxide (30%), styrene:H2O2 molar ratio of 2:3, were added successivelyinto the flask. The flask was then immersed in an oil bathat a desired temperature for a desired reaction time under stirringwith an optimum stirrer speed of 1200 rpm, at which the highestconversion rate could be obtained (Fig. S1; see the SupportingInformation). It is clear from Fig. S1 that the reaction is effectedby diffusion limitation. Under the above conditions, the atmospherein the tube included mainly air, vapor of substrate, water,and solvent, and oxygen from decomposition of H2O2. The pressurein the tube ranged from 1.1 to 1.2 atm. After the reaction, the tubewas cooled to room temperature. The gas-phase mixture was collectedand analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) equipped witha 5A molecular sieve column and a thermal conductivity detector(TCD). Liquid-phase aliquots were identified by GC-MS andquantified by GC equipped with an SE-54 capillary column and ahydrogen flame ionization detector (FID) using toluene as internalstandard. The detected products in the liquid phase included themain product benzaldehyde and byproducts phenylacetaldehyde,styrene oxide, benzoic acid, phenylacetic acid, and formaldehyde.Trace of CO was detected in the gas phase. The amount of residualH2O2 was determined by iodometric titration [63,64] and theH2O2 utilization efficiency was defined as follows: H2O2 utilizationefficiency = [(mol (benzaldehyde + phenylacetaldehyde +styrene oxide) + 2 mol (benzoic acid + phenylacetic acid))/mol(H2O2)consumed] 100%. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
97.7% | With active clay 22B; at 160℃; for 2h;Inert atmosphere; | The 100g UV - P, 10g active clay 22B type into the reaction container, nitrogen replacement after injecting the protective nitrogen, elevation of temperature material, the temperature is stabilized at 160 C in the system after the uniform dropwise 82.3g dodecene, dropping time 4h, after the completion of the dropping insulation reaction 2h. To the reaction solution in the content of the UV - P (HPLC) less than 0.5% as the end of the reaction. After the reaction, filtering to remove the catalyst. Reduced pressure distillation to remove the excessive dodecene, to obtain light yellow oily product UV - 571. UV - 571 content (HPLC) 99.2%, yield 95.7% (calculated on the basis of the UV - P). |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
85% | With palladium(II) trifluoroacetate; 1,5-bis-(diphenylphosphino)pentane; glycine ethyl ester hydrochloride; methoxybenzene In water at 120℃; for 21h; | 28 The 1 - is can (0.8 mmol), amine acetal 2a (81.2 mg, 0.2 mmol), Pd (TFA)2 (3.3 mg, 0 . 01 mmol), DPPPen (5.3 mg, 0 . 012 mmol), NH2 CH2 CO2 Me·HCl (0.04 mmol), H2 O (4 μL, 0 . 22 mmol) is added 1.0 ml anisole in, carbon monoxide (10 atm), 120 o C reaction 21 hours after stopping the reaction, of the drying solvent, ethyl acetate/petroleum ether column chromatography (1:10), get the pure product amide derivatives 3ra. The product is a white solid, 134 mg, yield 85%. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
99% | With platinum(0)-1,3-divinyl-1,1,3,3-tetramethyldisiloxane complex at 80℃; | 11 Comparative Example 11 ALPHAPLUS 1-dodecene, 67.2 grams, was added at room temperature to a 500-milliliter round bottom flask equipped with a condenser. Next, mixture of 24 grams of 2,4,6,8-tetramethylcyclotetrasiloxane and 0.024 gram of Karstedt's catalyst solution was added to the flask at room temperature followed by heating at 80°C and stirring for 6-8 hours. 2,4,6,8-Tetramethyl-tetra-dodecyl cyclotetrasiloxane was obtained as viscous liquid (91 grams, 99% yield). |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
91% | With 1-hydroxy-1,2-benzodioxol-3-(1H)-one; trimethylsilylazide; trifluoroacetic acid In dichloromethane; water at 0 - 22℃; for 2h; Inert atmosphere; | |
91% | With 1-hydroxy-1,2-benzodioxol-3-(1H)-one; trimethylsilylazide; water; trifluoroacetic acid In dichloromethane at 0 - 22℃; for 1.5h; Inert atmosphere; | 2.2 Example 2 Synthesis of 1-Azidododecane by Procedure 2 To a flame-dried sealable 2-dram vial equipped with a stir bar were added 1-dodecene (2: m , 1 .0 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and l-hydroxy-I k3-benzo[if][l,2]iodaoxol-3(l//)-one (19 mg, 0.07 mmol, 0.07 equiv). After this vial was evacuated and backfilled with N2 twice, anhydrous CH2CI2 (0.2 mL) and H2O (11 LiL, 0.6 mmol, 0.6 equiv) were added via syringes. After the vial was cooled to 0 °C, freshly distilled trimethylsilyiazide (237 mT, 1.8 mmol, 1.8 equiv) was added to the reaction followed by the addition of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (15 mT, 0.2 mmol, 0.2 equiv). The mixture was warmed up to 22 °C and kept stirring for 1.5 h until the olefin was fully consumed (monitored by TLC). The reaction was cooled to 0 °C, hexanes (2 mL) and saturated NaHCCfi solution (1.5 mL) were added to quench the reaction and to neutralize the residual hydrazoic acid. The organic phase was separated from the aqueous phase, and the aqueous phase was extracted with hexanes (3 mL x 3). The combined organic phase was washed with brine (2 mL) and dried over Na2S04. After concentration in vacuo, the residue was purified through column chromatography (100% hexanes) to afford 1 -azidododecane as colorless oil (192 mg, 91% yield). |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
50% | General procedure: In the glove box, add to the 8mL vial(R,R,R,R)-ANIPE-CuCl Compound 35 (3.4 mg, 4 mmol,2.0mol%),tBuONa (33.6 mg, 0.3 mmol, 1.5 equiv) and n-hexane (1.0 mL), and the reaction mixture was reacted at room temperature for 1 hour.B2dmpd2 (113 mg, 0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv) was added, and the reaction mixture was further reacted at room temperature for 30 minutes.Add non-activated terminal olefin compound 36 (0.2 mmol) and MeOH (16 uL, 0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv), the reaction mixture was reacted at room temperature for 24 hours.The mixture was filtered through Celite, diluted with ethyl acetate.The reaction solution was sparged and the silica gel was passed through a column to give a chiral alkyl boron compound 37a.The enantioselectivity of the chiral alkyl boride is determined by oxidation of H2O2/NaOH to give the chiral alcohol. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
92% | With palladium diacetate; acetic anhydride; P(p-C6H4F)3; In toluene; at 80℃; for 48h;Inert atmosphere; Sealed tube; | TFPP stands for monophosphine ligand.Under the protection of argon gas, palladium acetate (0.025 mmol, 0.0056 g), monophosphine ligand TFPP (0.15 mmol, 0.0474 g), 0.5 mL of toluene were sequentially added to the reactor, and 1-dodecene having the structural formula 3-b (0.5 mmol, 0.0842 g), formic acid (0.75 mmol, 0.0345 g), and acetic anhydride (0.1 mmol, 0.0102 g). Screw on the bottle cap to seal and adjust the temperature of the heating plate to 80 C. After 48 hours, heating was stopped, cooled to room temperature, and separated by column chromatography (the volume ratio of petroleum ether: ethyl acetate was 10: 1) to obtain 0.0989 g of a white solid tridecanoic acid (see structural formula 4-b described in the above reaction formula). ), Yield 92%, linear to branched chain ratio 25: 1 |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 37 %Chromat. 2: 12 %Chromat. 3: 11 %Chromat. | With iron(II) acetate In tetrahydrofuran at 0℃; for 1h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 76 %Chromat. 2: 11 %Chromat. | With iron(II) acetate In diethyl ether at 0℃; for 1h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 32 %Chromat. 2: 35 %Chromat. | With iron(II) acetate In diethyl ether at 0℃; for 1h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With dihydrogen peroxide In water; toluene at 85℃; for 15h; | 3 Example 3 A thermometer and a condenser were attached to a 500 ml four-neck flask, 1-dodecene 168 gr (1.0 mol), 99% concentration of acetic anhydride 45 gr (0.75 mol), and toluene 100 gr were added, and the temperature was raised to 85°C. When the temperature reached 85° C., 175 gr (1.8 mol) of hydrogen peroxide at a concentration of 35% was added dropwise at the same temperature over 10 hours. After further stirring and cooling at the same temperature for 5 hours, the organic material layer was concentrated by performing layer separation, removing the water layer, and removing toluene from the remaining organic material layer. As a result of analyzing the obtained organic material layer by gas chromatography, the composition of the epoxy compound 1,2-epoxydodecane 48% by weight, 1,2-dodecanediol 35% by weight, and hydroxydodecyl acetate 13% by weight It was confirmed that a reaction mixture was obtained, and the conversion rate to the reaction mixture was 94.2%. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 56 %Spectr. 2: 44 %Spectr. | With sodium tetrahydroborate; vitamin B12; sodium hydrogencarbonate In acetonitrile at 20℃; Inert atmosphere; Irradiation; Overall yield = 100 percentSpectr.; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
95.61% | With sulfuric acid In methanol at 5 - 35℃; for 2h; Large scale; | 1.1-1.7; 2.1-2.7; 3.1-3.7; 4.1-4.7; 5.1-5.7; 63.1-6.7; 7.1-7.7; 8.1-8.7; 9.1-9.7 Example 6 (1) Add 170 kilograms of tetrapropylene to the reaction kettle, add 12 kilograms of 50% methanol solution under stirring, so that the tetrapropylene and 50% methanol solution are fully mixed, and the temperature in the reaction kettle is lowered to below 10°C; (2) The temperature of the materials in the reactor is reduced to 510, and 26 kg of hydrocyanic acid and 75 kg of 98% sulfuric acid are added dropwise to the reactor. with An acidic mixed catalyst with a ratio of 1:1 fuming sulfuric acid, During the dropping process of the hydrocyanic acid and acidic mixed catalyst, keep the materials in the reactor in a stirring state, and control the reaction temperature to not exceed 30. After the dropwise addition of the hydrocyanic acid and acidic mixed catalyst is completed, keep the temperature of the materials in the kettle at 30 In the range of 35, keep the materials in heat for 2 hours; (3) After the heat preservation reaction is completed for 2 hours, 37.5 kg of methanol and 60 kg of water are added to the reactor again, fully stirred and mixed, and the reaction is continued for 2 hours; (4) Transfer the mixed and reacted materials in step (3) to the neutralization kettle. With the pH value of the materials in the kettle as the standard of 6-7, add alkaline regulator to the neutralization kettle to neutralize the materials. 24 hours; (5) The materials after the neutralization reaction are transferred to the settling tank for standing and stratification. The upper layer is N,N-dimethyl-n-decylamine semi-finished products, the lower layer is the sulphate-containing brine layer, the upper semi-finished products are transferred to the semi-finished product storage tank, and the lower layer contains semi-finished products. The sulphate brine layer is transferred to the thickening kettle; (6) The N,N-dimethyl-decylamine semi-finished product in the semi-finished product storage tank is transferred to the distillation tower for distillation and purification, and low boiling substances are removed to obtain 185.6 kg of N,N-dimethyl-decylamine finished product. The reaction yield is 95.61%; (7) The salty wastewater in the concentration kettle is distilled and concentrated to separate water and sulfate. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
75% | Stage #1: 1-dodecene With tetrabutylammonium borohydride; ethyl iodide In tetrahydrofuran at 25℃; for 20h; Stage #2: iodobenzene With bis-triphenylphosphine-palladium(II) chloride; sodium hydroxide In water at 80℃; for 16h; Inert atmosphere; | Typical procedure for Suzuki-Miyaura coupling of organoborane generated by the PV method General procedure: Ethyl iodide (172 mg, 1.1 mmol) and magnetic stirring bar were placed at the bottom of a test tube (15mm f × 130 mm), to which Galden HT-135 (1.5 mL) and Galden HT-200 (0.5 mL) were added slowly using a syringe in order. Subsequently, nBu4NBH4 (300 mg, 1.1 mmol), a solution of 4-methylstyrene(1a, 120 mg, 1.0 mmol) in THF (2.5 mL) were added slowly in order, forming three layers. A rubber septum was fitted to the test tube, and a needle equipped with a balloon, which acted as a reservoir of borane gas during the reaction, was then pricked into the septum. The air in the test tube was removed by a syringe until the balloon was completely flattened. The test tube was stirred slowly for 2 h at 25 °C, taking care not to mix the layers. After 2 h, iodobenzene (214 mg, 1.05 mmol), an aqueous NaOH solution (2.5 M, 1.0 mL), and PdCl2(PPh3)2 (28 mg, 4 mol%) were added under argon atmosphere. Asmall condenser (cold finger type) was fitted to the test tube and the reaction mixture was heated at80 °C for 16 h. The organic layer was taken up with a glass pipette to a separating funnel, and washed with water and brine three times. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4. After filtration, the solvent was evaporated. The residue was then purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluting hexane afforded 2-(p-tolyl)ethylbenzene (6a, 142 mg, 72%). |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
77% | With C42H53N3O4Ru In tetrahydrofuran at 25℃; for 30h; Inert atmosphere; Glovebox; Sealed tube; stereoselective reaction; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
63% | With C42H53N3O4Ru In tetrahydrofuran at 25℃; for 24h; Inert atmosphere; Glovebox; Sealed tube; stereoselective reaction; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
63% | With C42H53N3O4Ru In tetrahydrofuran at 25℃; for 48h; Inert atmosphere; Glovebox; Sealed tube; stereoselective reaction; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
85% | With dichloro bis(acetonitrile) palladium(II); N-chloro-succinimide; chlorotriisopropylsilane; water; C14H20N2O2; triethylamine In dichloromethane; acetonitrile at 25℃; Schlenk technique; Inert atmosphere; Sealed tube; regioselective reaction; | General procedure for the hydrochlorination of unactivated alkenes General procedure: Into an oven-dried Schlenk tube, Pd(CH3CN)2Cl2 (6.5 mg, 0.025 mmol, 5 mol%), L9 (9.2 mg, 0.0375 mmol, 7.5 mol%) and NCS (1.0-1.5 mmol, 2.0-3.0 equiv.) were weighed and dissolved in a mixture of anhydrous solvents CH3CN/DCM (5 ml, 2:8v/v) under argon. Then alkene substrate (0.5 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), H2O (6.5-10 μl),NEt3 (1 M in DCM, 0.025 mmol, 5 mol%) and iPr3SiH (1.5 mmol, 3.0 equiv.) were gradually added. The tube was sealed and the mixture was stirred at 25-35 °C. After the reaction was completed, solvent was removed under vacuum, and the residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel with a gradient eluent of petroleum ether/ethyl acetate to give the desired product. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
80% | With diethoxymethylsilane; palladium diacetate; C17H18N2O; p-benzoquinone In lithium hydroxide monohydrate; 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane at -10℃; for 48h; Sealed tube; enantioselective reaction; |
Tags: 112-41-4 synthesis path| 112-41-4 SDS| 112-41-4 COA| 112-41-4 purity| 112-41-4 application| 112-41-4 NMR| 112-41-4 COA| 112-41-4 structure
Precautionary Statements-General | |
Code | Phrase |
P101 | If medical advice is needed,have product container or label at hand. |
P102 | Keep out of reach of children. |
P103 | Read label before use |
Prevention | |
Code | Phrase |
P201 | Obtain special instructions before use. |
P202 | Do not handle until all safety precautions have been read and understood. |
P210 | Keep away from heat/sparks/open flames/hot surfaces. - No smoking. |
P211 | Do not spray on an open flame or other ignition source. |
P220 | Keep/Store away from clothing/combustible materials. |
P221 | Take any precaution to avoid mixing with combustibles |
P222 | Do not allow contact with air. |
P223 | Keep away from any possible contact with water, because of violent reaction and possible flash fire. |
P230 | Keep wetted |
P231 | Handle under inert gas. |
P232 | Protect from moisture. |
P233 | Keep container tightly closed. |
P234 | Keep only in original container. |
P235 | Keep cool |
P240 | Ground/bond container and receiving equipment. |
P241 | Use explosion-proof electrical/ventilating/lighting/equipment. |
P242 | Use only non-sparking tools. |
P243 | Take precautionary measures against static discharge. |
P244 | Keep reduction valves free from grease and oil. |
P250 | Do not subject to grinding/shock/friction. |
P251 | Pressurized container: Do not pierce or burn, even after use. |
P260 | Do not breathe dust/fume/gas/mist/vapours/spray. |
P261 | Avoid breathing dust/fume/gas/mist/vapours/spray. |
P262 | Do not get in eyes, on skin, or on clothing. |
P263 | Avoid contact during pregnancy/while nursing. |
P264 | Wash hands thoroughly after handling. |
P265 | Wash skin thouroughly after handling. |
P270 | Do not eat, drink or smoke when using this product. |
P271 | Use only outdoors or in a well-ventilated area. |
P272 | Contaminated work clothing should not be allowed out of the workplace. |
P273 | Avoid release to the environment. |
P280 | Wear protective gloves/protective clothing/eye protection/face protection. |
P281 | Use personal protective equipment as required. |
P282 | Wear cold insulating gloves/face shield/eye protection. |
P283 | Wear fire/flame resistant/retardant clothing. |
P284 | Wear respiratory protection. |
P285 | In case of inadequate ventilation wear respiratory protection. |
P231 + P232 | Handle under inert gas. Protect from moisture. |
P235 + P410 | Keep cool. Protect from sunlight. |
Response | |
Code | Phrase |
P301 | IF SWALLOWED: |
P304 | IF INHALED: |
P305 | IF IN EYES: |
P306 | IF ON CLOTHING: |
P307 | IF exposed: |
P308 | IF exposed or concerned: |
P309 | IF exposed or if you feel unwell: |
P310 | Immediately call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. |
P311 | Call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. |
P312 | Call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician if you feel unwell. |
P313 | Get medical advice/attention. |
P314 | Get medical advice/attention if you feel unwell. |
P315 | Get immediate medical advice/attention. |
P320 | |
P302 + P352 | IF ON SKIN: wash with plenty of soap and water. |
P321 | |
P322 | |
P330 | Rinse mouth. |
P331 | Do NOT induce vomiting. |
P332 | IF SKIN irritation occurs: |
P333 | If skin irritation or rash occurs: |
P334 | Immerse in cool water/wrap n wet bandages. |
P335 | Brush off loose particles from skin. |
P336 | Thaw frosted parts with lukewarm water. Do not rub affected area. |
P337 | If eye irritation persists: |
P338 | Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. |
P340 | Remove victim to fresh air and keep at rest in a position comfortable for breathing. |
P341 | If breathing is difficult, remove victim to fresh air and keep at rest in a position comfortable for breathing. |
P342 | If experiencing respiratory symptoms: |
P350 | Gently wash with plenty of soap and water. |
P351 | Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. |
P352 | Wash with plenty of soap and water. |
P353 | Rinse skin with water/shower. |
P360 | Rinse immediately contaminated clothing and skin with plenty of water before removing clothes. |
P361 | Remove/Take off immediately all contaminated clothing. |
P362 | Take off contaminated clothing and wash before reuse. |
P363 | Wash contaminated clothing before reuse. |
P370 | In case of fire: |
P371 | In case of major fire and large quantities: |
P372 | Explosion risk in case of fire. |
P373 | DO NOT fight fire when fire reaches explosives. |
P374 | Fight fire with normal precautions from a reasonable distance. |
P376 | Stop leak if safe to do so. Oxidising gases (section 2.4) 1 |
P377 | Leaking gas fire: Do not extinguish, unless leak can be stopped safely. |
P378 | |
P380 | Evacuate area. |
P381 | Eliminate all ignition sources if safe to do so. |
P390 | Absorb spillage to prevent material damage. |
P391 | Collect spillage. Hazardous to the aquatic environment |
P301 + P310 | IF SWALLOWED: Immediately call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. |
P301 + P312 | IF SWALLOWED: call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician IF you feel unwell. |
P301 + P330 + P331 | IF SWALLOWED: Rinse mouth. Do NOT induce vomiting. |
P302 + P334 | IF ON SKIN: Immerse in cool water/wrap in wet bandages. |
P302 + P350 | IF ON SKIN: Gently wash with plenty of soap and water. |
P303 + P361 + P353 | IF ON SKIN (or hair): Remove/Take off Immediately all contaminated clothing. Rinse SKIN with water/shower. |
P304 + P312 | IF INHALED: Call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician if you feel unwell. |
P304 + P340 | IF INHALED: Remove victim to fresh air and Keep at rest in a position comfortable for breathing. |
P304 + P341 | IF INHALED: If breathing is difficult, remove victim to fresh air and keep at rest in a position comfortable for breathing. |
P305 + P351 + P338 | IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. |
P306 + P360 | IF ON CLOTHING: Rinse Immediately contaminated CLOTHING and SKIN with plenty of water before removing clothes. |
P307 + P311 | IF exposed: call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. |
P308 + P313 | IF exposed or concerned: Get medical advice/attention. |
P309 + P311 | IF exposed or if you feel unwell: call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. |
P332 + P313 | IF SKIN irritation occurs: Get medical advice/attention. |
P333 + P313 | IF SKIN irritation or rash occurs: Get medical advice/attention. |
P335 + P334 | Brush off loose particles from skin. Immerse in cool water/wrap in wet bandages. |
P337 + P313 | IF eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention. |
P342 + P311 | IF experiencing respiratory symptoms: call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. |
P370 + P376 | In case of fire: Stop leak if safe to Do so. |
P370 + P378 | In case of fire: |
P370 + P380 | In case of fire: Evacuate area. |
P370 + P380 + P375 | In case of fire: Evacuate area. Fight fire remotely due to the risk of explosion. |
P371 + P380 + P375 | In case of major fire and large quantities: Evacuate area. Fight fire remotely due to the risk of explosion. |
Storage | |
Code | Phrase |
P401 | |
P402 | Store in a dry place. |
P403 | Store in a well-ventilated place. |
P404 | Store in a closed container. |
P405 | Store locked up. |
P406 | Store in corrosive resistant/ container with a resistant inner liner. |
P407 | Maintain air gap between stacks/pallets. |
P410 | Protect from sunlight. |
P411 | |
P412 | Do not expose to temperatures exceeding 50 oC/ 122 oF. |
P413 | |
P420 | Store away from other materials. |
P422 | |
P402 + P404 | Store in a dry place. Store in a closed container. |
P403 + P233 | Store in a well-ventilated place. Keep container tightly closed. |
P403 + P235 | Store in a well-ventilated place. Keep cool. |
P410 + P403 | Protect from sunlight. Store in a well-ventilated place. |
P410 + P412 | Protect from sunlight. Do not expose to temperatures exceeding 50 oC/122oF. |
P411 + P235 | Keep cool. |
Disposal | |
Code | Phrase |
P501 | Dispose of contents/container to ... |
P502 | Refer to manufacturer/supplier for information on recovery/recycling |
Physical hazards | |
Code | Phrase |
H200 | Unstable explosive |
H201 | Explosive; mass explosion hazard |
H202 | Explosive; severe projection hazard |
H203 | Explosive; fire, blast or projection hazard |
H204 | Fire or projection hazard |
H205 | May mass explode in fire |
H220 | Extremely flammable gas |
H221 | Flammable gas |
H222 | Extremely flammable aerosol |
H223 | Flammable aerosol |
H224 | Extremely flammable liquid and vapour |
H225 | Highly flammable liquid and vapour |
H226 | Flammable liquid and vapour |
H227 | Combustible liquid |
H228 | Flammable solid |
H229 | Pressurized container: may burst if heated |
H230 | May react explosively even in the absence of air |
H231 | May react explosively even in the absence of air at elevated pressure and/or temperature |
H240 | Heating may cause an explosion |
H241 | Heating may cause a fire or explosion |
H242 | Heating may cause a fire |
H250 | Catches fire spontaneously if exposed to air |
H251 | Self-heating; may catch fire |
H252 | Self-heating in large quantities; may catch fire |
H260 | In contact with water releases flammable gases which may ignite spontaneously |
H261 | In contact with water releases flammable gas |
H270 | May cause or intensify fire; oxidizer |
H271 | May cause fire or explosion; strong oxidizer |
H272 | May intensify fire; oxidizer |
H280 | Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated |
H281 | Contains refrigerated gas; may cause cryogenic burns or injury |
H290 | May be corrosive to metals |
Health hazards | |
Code | Phrase |
H300 | Fatal if swallowed |
H301 | Toxic if swallowed |
H302 | Harmful if swallowed |
H303 | May be harmful if swallowed |
H304 | May be fatal if swallowed and enters airways |
H305 | May be harmful if swallowed and enters airways |
H310 | Fatal in contact with skin |
H311 | Toxic in contact with skin |
H312 | Harmful in contact with skin |
H313 | May be harmful in contact with skin |
H314 | Causes severe skin burns and eye damage |
H315 | Causes skin irritation |
H316 | Causes mild skin irritation |
H317 | May cause an allergic skin reaction |
H318 | Causes serious eye damage |
H319 | Causes serious eye irritation |
H320 | Causes eye irritation |
H330 | Fatal if inhaled |
H331 | Toxic if inhaled |
H332 | Harmful if inhaled |
H333 | May be harmful if inhaled |
H334 | May cause allergy or asthma symptoms or breathing difficulties if inhaled |
H335 | May cause respiratory irritation |
H336 | May cause drowsiness or dizziness |
H340 | May cause genetic defects |
H341 | Suspected of causing genetic defects |
H350 | May cause cancer |
H351 | Suspected of causing cancer |
H360 | May damage fertility or the unborn child |
H361 | Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child |
H361d | Suspected of damaging the unborn child |
H362 | May cause harm to breast-fed children |
H370 | Causes damage to organs |
H371 | May cause damage to organs |
H372 | Causes damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure |
H373 | May cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure |
Environmental hazards | |
Code | Phrase |
H400 | Very toxic to aquatic life |
H401 | Toxic to aquatic life |
H402 | Harmful to aquatic life |
H410 | Very toxic to aquatic life with long-lasting effects |
H411 | Toxic to aquatic life with long-lasting effects |
H412 | Harmful to aquatic life with long-lasting effects |
H413 | May cause long-lasting harmful effects to aquatic life |
H420 | Harms public health and the environment by destroying ozone in the upper atmosphere |
Sorry,this product has been discontinued.
Home
* Country/Region
* Quantity Required :
* Cat. No.:
* CAS No :
* Product Name :
* Additional Information :