Home Cart Sign in  
Chemical Structure| 1993-03-9 Chemical Structure| 1993-03-9

Structure of 2-Fluorophenylboronic acid
CAS No.: 1993-03-9

Chemical Structure| 1993-03-9

*Storage: {[sel_prStorage]}

*Shipping: {[sel_prShipping]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}

4.5 *For Research Use Only !

{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]} Purity: {[proInfo.pro_purity]}

Change View

Size Price VIP Price

DE Stock

US Stock

Asia Stock

Global Stock

In Stock
{[ item.pr_size ]} Inquiry {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.vip_usd) ]}

  • {[ item.pr_size ]}

In Stock

- +

Please Login or Create an Account to: See VIP prices and availability

  • 1-2 Day Shipping
  • High Quality
  • Technical Support
Product Citations

Product Citations

Wolesensky, Robert M ; Morales-Colón, María T ; Sanford, Melanie S ;

Abstract: This article describes a detailed interrogation of the initiation step (reduction of PdII to Pd0) for Buchwald’s G3 palladium precatalysts and derivatives thereof. These studies demonstrate that under Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling conditions, the cyclometalated PdII complexes initiate to form a mixture of two organic products: carbazole (via intramolecular C(sp2)–N coupling) and biaryl (via intermolecular C(sp2)–C(sp2) coupling with the arylboronic acid substrate). The overall yield and rate of initiation, as well as the organic product ratio, vary dramatically as a function of the phosphine ligand, base, solvent, and boronic acid structure. Implications of these results for catalysis are discussed, and the findings are applied to a different class of cyclometalated precatalysts. Overall, this work shows that precatalyst activation is highly condition-dependent and that this step should be a key consideration in the optimization of Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions.

Keywords: palladium ; precatalyst ; cross-coupling ; ligands ; selectivity ; kinetics

Purchased from AmBeed:

Alternative Products

Product Details of [ 1993-03-9 ]

CAS No. :1993-03-9
Formula : C6H6BFO2
M.W : 139.92
SMILES Code : FC1=CC=CC=C1B(O)O
MDL No. :MFCD00674013
InChI Key :QCSLIRFWJPOENV-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Pubchem ID :2734354

Safety of [ 1993-03-9 ]

GHS Pictogram:
Signal Word:Warning
Hazard Statements:H302-H315-H319-H332-H335
Precautionary Statements:P261-P280-P305+P351+P338

Computational Chemistry of [ 1993-03-9 ] Show Less

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms 10
Num. arom. heavy atoms 6
Fraction Csp3 0.0
Num. rotatable bonds 1
Num. H-bond acceptors 3.0
Num. H-bond donors 2.0
Molar Refractivity 36.23
TPSA ?

Topological Polar Surface Area: Calculated from
Ertl P. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.

40.46 Ų

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP)?

iLOGP: in-house physics-based method implemented from
Daina A et al. 2014 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

0.0
Log Po/w (XLOGP3)?

XLOGP3: Atomistic and knowledge-based method calculated by
XLOGP program, version 3.2.2, courtesy of CCBG, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry

0.93
Log Po/w (WLOGP)?

WLOGP: Atomistic method implemented from
Wildman SA and Crippen GM. 1999 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-0.07
Log Po/w (MLOGP)?

MLOGP: Topological method implemented from
Moriguchi I. et al. 1992 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Moriguchi I. et al. 1994 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Lipinski PA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev.

0.7
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Hybrid fragmental/topological method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

-0.3
Consensus Log Po/w?

Consensus Log Po/w: Average of all five predictions

0.25

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL):?

ESOL: Topological method implemented from
Delaney JS. 2004 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-1.67
Solubility 2.98 mg/ml ; 0.0213 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Very soluble
Log S (Ali)?

Ali: Topological method implemented from
Ali J. et al. 2012 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-1.37
Solubility 6.03 mg/ml ; 0.0431 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Very soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Fragmental method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

-1.54
Solubility 4.04 mg/ml ; 0.0288 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption?

Gatrointestinal absorption: according to the white of the BOILED-Egg

High
BBB permeant?

BBB permeation: according to the yolk of the BOILED-Egg

No
P-gp substrate?

P-glycoprotein substrate: SVM model built on 1033 molecules (training set)
and tested on 415 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.72 / AUC=0.77
External: ACC=0.88 / AUC=0.94

No
CYP1A2 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9145 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.83 / AUC=0.90
External: ACC=0.84 / AUC=0.91

No
CYP2C19 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9272 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.86
External: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP2C9 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibitor: SVM model built on 5940 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2075 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.71 / AUC=0.81

No
CYP2D6 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor: SVM model built on 3664 molecules (training set)
and tested on 1068 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.79 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.81 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP3A4 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor: SVM model built on 7518 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2579 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.77 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.86

Yes
Log Kp (skin permeation)?

Skin permeation: QSPR model implemented from
Potts RO and Guy RH. 1992 Pharm. Res.

-6.49 cm/s

Druglikeness

Lipinski?

Lipinski (Pfizer) filter: implemented from
Lipinski CA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
MW ≤ 500
MLOGP ≤ 4.15
N or O ≤ 10
NH or OH ≤ 5

0.0
Ghose?

Ghose filter: implemented from
Ghose AK. et al. 1999 J. Comb. Chem.
160 ≤ MW ≤ 480
-0.4 ≤ WLOGP ≤ 5.6
40 ≤ MR ≤ 130
20 ≤ atoms ≤ 70

None
Veber?

Veber (GSK) filter: implemented from
Veber DF. et al. 2002 J. Med. Chem.
Rotatable bonds ≤ 10
TPSA ≤ 140

0.0
Egan?

Egan (Pharmacia) filter: implemented from
Egan WJ. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.
WLOGP ≤ 5.88
TPSA ≤ 131.6

0.0
Muegge?

Muegge (Bayer) filter: implemented from
Muegge I. et al. 2001 J. Med. Chem.
200 ≤ MW ≤ 600
-2 ≤ XLOGP ≤ 5
TPSA ≤ 150
Num. rings ≤ 7
Num. carbon > 4
Num. heteroatoms > 1
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 15
H-bond acc. ≤ 10
H-bond don. ≤ 5

1.0
Bioavailability Score?

Abbott Bioavailability Score: Probability of F > 10% in rat
implemented from
Martin YC. 2005 J. Med. Chem.

0.55

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS?

Pan Assay Interference Structures: implemented from
Baell JB. & Holloway GA. 2010 J. Med. Chem.

0.0 alert
Brenk?

Structural Alert: implemented from
Brenk R. et al. 2008 ChemMedChem

1.0 alert: heavy_metal
Leadlikeness?

Leadlikeness: implemented from
Teague SJ. 1999 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
250 ≤ MW ≤ 350
XLOGP ≤ 3.5
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 7

No; 1 violation:MW<1.0
Synthetic accessibility?

Synthetic accessibility score: from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very difficult)
based on 1024 fragmental contributions (FP2) modulated by size and complexity penaties,
trained on 12'782'590 molecules and tested on 40 external molecules (r2 = 0.94)

1.89

Application In Synthesis of [ 1993-03-9 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Upstream synthesis route of [ 1993-03-9 ]
  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 1993-03-9 ]

[ 1993-03-9 ] Synthesis Path-Upstream   1~2

  • 1
  • [ 76-09-5 ]
  • [ 1993-03-9 ]
  • [ 18107-18-1 ]
  • [ 517920-60-4 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
81%
Stage #1: at 60℃; for 4 h;
Stage #2: With tetrabutyl ammonium fluoride In tetrahydrofuran; 1,4-dioxane; water at 60℃; for 4 h;
To a 10 mL reaction tube equipped with a magnet was added 56 mg (0.4 mmol) of 2-fluorobenzeneboronic acid, 0.6 mL (1.2 mmol) of trimethylsilyl diazomethane (2 M n-hexane solution), 1 mL of toluene was added to the system, The rubber stopper was stoppered and reacted on an electromagnetic heating stirrer at 60 ° C for 4 hours.(0.4 mmol) of tetramethylammonium fluoride (1 M tetrahydrofuran solution) and 200 uL of water were added to an electromagnetic heating stirrer at 60 ° C On the reaction for 4 hours.After completion of the reaction, the organic solvent was removed by a rotary evaporator and purified by column chromatography2-fluorobenzyl boronic acid pinacol ester, its structure is as follows:The compound was a colorless liquid in a yield of 81percent and its NMR data was as follows:
References: [1] Patent: CN105884808, 2016, A, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0148; 0149; 0150; 0151; 0152; 0153.
  • 2
  • [ 14221-01-3 ]
  • [ 1993-03-9 ]
  • [ 886444-12-8 ]
References: [1] Patent: US2007/37974, 2007, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 23.
 

Historical Records

Technical Information

Categories

Related Functional Groups of
[ 1993-03-9 ]

Fluorinated Building Blocks

Chemical Structure| 1765-93-1

A107392 [1765-93-1]

4-Fluorophenylboronic acid

Similarity: 0.93

Chemical Structure| 162101-25-9

A308353 [162101-25-9]

2,6-Difluorophenylboronic acid

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 182482-25-3

A500473 [182482-25-3]

2,4,6-Trifluorophenylboronic acid

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 182482-25-3

A500473 [182482-25-3]

2,4,6-Trifluorophenylboronic acid

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 182482-25-3

A500473 [182482-25-3]

2,4,6-Trifluorophenylboronic acid

Similarity: 0.92

Organoborons

Chemical Structure| 1765-93-1

A107392 [1765-93-1]

4-Fluorophenylboronic acid

Similarity: 0.93

Chemical Structure| 162101-25-9

A308353 [162101-25-9]

2,6-Difluorophenylboronic acid

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 182482-25-3

A500473 [182482-25-3]

2,4,6-Trifluorophenylboronic acid

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 182482-25-3

A500473 [182482-25-3]

2,4,6-Trifluorophenylboronic acid

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 182482-25-3

A500473 [182482-25-3]

2,4,6-Trifluorophenylboronic acid

Similarity: 0.92

Aryls

Chemical Structure| 1765-93-1

A107392 [1765-93-1]

4-Fluorophenylboronic acid

Similarity: 0.93

Chemical Structure| 162101-25-9

A308353 [162101-25-9]

2,6-Difluorophenylboronic acid

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 182482-25-3

A500473 [182482-25-3]

2,4,6-Trifluorophenylboronic acid

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 182482-25-3

A500473 [182482-25-3]

2,4,6-Trifluorophenylboronic acid

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 182482-25-3

A500473 [182482-25-3]

2,4,6-Trifluorophenylboronic acid

Similarity: 0.92