Home Cart 0 Sign in  
X

[ CAS No. 3731-52-0 ]

{[proInfo.proName]} (Synonyms:3-Picolylamine) ,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]}
HazMat Fee +

There will be a HazMat fee per item when shipping a dangerous goods. The HazMat fee will be charged to your UPS/DHL/FedEx collect account or added to the invoice unless the package is shipped via Ground service. Ship by air in Excepted Quantity (each bottle), which is up to 1g/1mL for class 6.1 packing group I or II, and up to 25g/25ml for all other HazMat items.

Type HazMat fee for 500 gram (Estimated)
Excepted Quantity USD 0.00
Limited Quantity USD 15-60
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), Domestic USD 80+
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), International USD 150+
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), Domestic USD 100+
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), International USD 200+
3d Animation Molecule Structure of 3731-52-0
Chemical Structure| 3731-52-0
Chemical Structure| 3731-52-0
Structure of 3731-52-0 * Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
Cart0 Add to My Favorites Bulk Inquiry Add To Cart

Quality Control of [ 3731-52-0 ]

Related Doc. of [ 3731-52-0 ]

Alternatived Products of [ 3731-52-0 ]

Product Details of [ 3731-52-0 ]

CAS No. :3731-52-0 MDL No. :MFCD00006412
Formula : C6H8N2 Boiling Point : -
Linear Structure Formula :- InChI Key :HDOUGSFASVGDCS-UHFFFAOYSA-N
M.W :108.14 Pubchem ID :31018
Synonyms :
3-Picolylamine

Safety of [ 3731-52-0 ]

Signal Word:Danger Class:8
Precautionary Statements:P501-P264-P280-P303+P361+P353-P301+P330+P331-P363-P304+P340+P310-P305+P351+P338+P310-P405 UN#:2735
Hazard Statements:H314 Packing Group:
GHS Pictogram:

Application In Synthesis of [ 3731-52-0 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Upstream synthesis route of [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 3731-52-0 ]

[ 3731-52-0 ] Synthesis Path-Upstream   1~28

  • 1
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 14613-37-7 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: US5086053, 1992, A,
  • 2
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 100-55-0 ]
Reference: [1] Synlett, 2012, vol. 23, # 5, p. 706 - 710
[2] DRP/DRBP Org.Chem.,
  • 3
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 69966-55-8 ]
  • [ 100-55-0 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
81% With bromine; isopentyl nitrite In dichloromethane [0091] The following example explores reaction conditions and product distributions.[0092] Under reaction conditions identical to those used with Br2 in Example 1, the reaction using I2 failed to produce the corresponding iodide. Using 10 equivalents of ICl however, as the source of halogen, results in the production of the chloride in good yield without the iodide. In a further experiment, using 10 equivalents of IBr, gives again the bromide with no detectable iodide. As per the postulated mechanism, the highly reactive nitryl, and nitrosyl halides are the active intermediates, neither of which is known for the iodide.[0093] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine to the bromide in THF was similar to that in CH2Cl2, but decreased in the series CH2Cl2 > CHCl3 > CCl4 with a <n="23"/>corresponding increase in the formation of the hydroxy product. Reaction in DMF or DMSO led to remaining AMP under the conditions used and also favored the formation of the 3-(hydroxymethyl)pyridine over the bromide.[0094] Using isoamyl nitrite as the nitroso source, and Br2, in water, resulted in an incomplete conversion with very little of the hydroxy product. In all solvents tried using NaNC>2 and acetic acid as the nitroso source, an increased amount of 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine was observed with incomplete reaction of the AMP. This latter observation is most likely due to the use of NaNO2 for the nitroso source, as in CH2CI2, increasing additions of acetic acid up to 5 equivalents with respect to AMP, favored the formation of the bromide over the hydroxy product. The stronger acid TFA, however, favored the formation of the hydroxy product over the bromide. Addition of an organic base, TEA, piperidine or DBU was well tolerated up to about 1 equivalent with respect to AMP, with higher amounts leading to less conversion of the amine to the bromide. Reaction to the bromide was concentration dependent with best conversions occurring at > 0.1 molar in AMP (variable only explored in GH2CI2).[0095] Conversion of 3-aminomethyl pyridine to 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine using 1.1 equiv. of nitrosyl agent and 5 equiv. of bromine was conducted in the solvent shown in Table 1 below. A sample of the reaction mixture was taken and quenched by high dilution into acetontrile for ESMS analysis of the products. 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine and 3-(isoamyloxymethyl)pyridine side products were also observed in addition to starting material and 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine product.Table 1. Product distributions based on variation in reaction conditions. <n="24"/>[0096] The gas evolved by the reaction was identified by collecting the gas in an IR cell and examining by IR Spectroscopy. The IR spectrum in Figure 2 shows the N2O gas produced by the reaction.[0097] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine (AMP) and 2-(2- aminoethyl)pyrdine (AEP) is efficient, as demonstrated by the HPLC traces before and after reaction as shown in Figure 3.[0098] Titration of the addition of both isoamyl nitrite and Bτ2 to AMP shows that the amine disappears from the reaction mixture on addition of one equivalent each of isoamyl nitrite and Br2. As shown in Figure 7, the formation of the product 3- (bromomethyl)pyridine is out of phase with the disappearance of reacting amine, and in some trials was almost completely absent until greater than one equivalent of isoamyl nitrite and Br2 was added. Best yields were obtained by a total addition of about five equivalents OfBr2.in this example
79% With bromine; isopentyl nitrite In tetrahydrofuran [0091] The following example explores reaction conditions and product distributions.[0092] Under reaction conditions identical to those used with Br2 in Example 1, the reaction using I2 failed to produce the corresponding iodide. Using 10 equivalents of ICl however, as the source of halogen, results in the production of the chloride in good yield without the iodide. In a further experiment, using 10 equivalents of IBr, gives again the bromide with no detectable iodide. As per the postulated mechanism, the highly reactive nitryl, and nitrosyl halides are the active intermediates, neither of which is known for the iodide.[0093] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine to the bromide in THF was similar to that in CH2Cl2, but decreased in the series CH2Cl2 > CHCl3 > CCl4 with a <n="23"/>corresponding increase in the formation of the hydroxy product. Reaction in DMF or DMSO led to remaining AMP under the conditions used and also favored the formation of the 3-(hydroxymethyl)pyridine over the bromide.[0094] Using isoamyl nitrite as the nitroso source, and Br2, in water, resulted in an incomplete conversion with very little of the hydroxy product. In all solvents tried using NaNC>2 and acetic acid as the nitroso source, an increased amount of 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine was observed with incomplete reaction of the AMP. This latter observation is most likely due to the use of NaNO2 for the nitroso source, as in CH2CI2, increasing additions of acetic acid up to 5 equivalents with respect to AMP, favored the formation of the bromide over the hydroxy product. The stronger acid TFA, however, favored the formation of the hydroxy product over the bromide. Addition of an organic base, TEA, piperidine or DBU was well tolerated up to about 1 equivalent with respect to AMP, with higher amounts leading to less conversion of the amine to the bromide. Reaction to the bromide was concentration dependent with best conversions occurring at > 0.1 molar in AMP (variable only explored in GH2CI2).[0095] Conversion of 3-aminomethyl pyridine to 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine using 1.1 equiv. of nitrosyl agent and 5 equiv. of bromine was conducted in the solvent shown in Table 1 below. A sample of the reaction mixture was taken and quenched by high dilution into acetontrile for ESMS analysis of the products. 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine and 3-(isoamyloxymethyl)pyridine side products were also observed in addition to starting material and 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine product.Table 1. Product distributions based on variation in reaction conditions. <n="24"/>[0096] The gas evolved by the reaction was identified by collecting the gas in an IR cell and examining by IR Spectroscopy. The IR spectrum in Figure 2 shows the N2O gas produced by the reaction.[0097] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine (AMP) and 2-(2- aminoethyl)pyrdine (AEP) is efficient, as demonstrated by the HPLC traces before and after reaction as shown in Figure 3.[0098] Titration of the addition of both isoamyl nitrite and Bτ2 to AMP shows that the amine disappears from the reaction mixture on addition of one equivalent each of isoamyl nitrite and Br2. As shown in Figure 7, the formation of the product 3- (bromomethyl)pyridine is out of phase with the disappearance of reacting amine, and in some trials was almost completely absent until greater than one equivalent of isoamyl nitrite and Br2 was added. Best yields were obtained by a total addition of about five equivalents OfBr2.in this example
67% With bromine; isopentyl nitrite In chloroform [0091] The following example explores reaction conditions and product distributions.[0092] Under reaction conditions identical to those used with Br2 in Example 1, the reaction using I2 failed to produce the corresponding iodide. Using 10 equivalents of ICl however, as the source of halogen, results in the production of the chloride in good yield without the iodide. In a further experiment, using 10 equivalents of IBr, gives again the bromide with no detectable iodide. As per the postulated mechanism, the highly reactive nitryl, and nitrosyl halides are the active intermediates, neither of which is known for the iodide.[0093] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine to the bromide in THF was similar to that in CH2Cl2, but decreased in the series CH2Cl2 > CHCl3 > CCl4 with a <n="23"/>corresponding increase in the formation of the hydroxy product. Reaction in DMF or DMSO led to remaining AMP under the conditions used and also favored the formation of the 3-(hydroxymethyl)pyridine over the bromide.[0094] Using isoamyl nitrite as the nitroso source, and Br2, in water, resulted in an incomplete conversion with very little of the hydroxy product. In all solvents tried using NaNC>2 and acetic acid as the nitroso source, an increased amount of 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine was observed with incomplete reaction of the AMP. This latter observation is most likely due to the use of NaNO2 for the nitroso source, as in CH2CI2, increasing additions of acetic acid up to 5 equivalents with respect to AMP, favored the formation of the bromide over the hydroxy product. The stronger acid TFA, however, favored the formation of the hydroxy product over the bromide. Addition of an organic base, TEA, piperidine or DBU was well tolerated up to about 1 equivalent with respect to AMP, with higher amounts leading to less conversion of the amine to the bromide. Reaction to the bromide was concentration dependent with best conversions occurring at > 0.1 molar in AMP (variable only explored in GH2CI2).[0095] Conversion of 3-aminomethyl pyridine to 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine using 1.1 equiv. of nitrosyl agent and 5 equiv. of bromine was conducted in the solvent shown in Table 1 below. A sample of the reaction mixture was taken and quenched by high dilution into acetontrile for ESMS analysis of the products. 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine and 3-(isoamyloxymethyl)pyridine side products were also observed in addition to starting material and 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine product.Table 1. Product distributions based on variation in reaction conditions. <n="24"/>[0096] The gas evolved by the reaction was identified by collecting the gas in an IR cell and examining by IR Spectroscopy. The IR spectrum in Figure 2 shows the N2O gas produced by the reaction.[0097] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine (AMP) and 2-(2- aminoethyl)pyrdine (AEP) is efficient, as demonstrated by the HPLC traces before and after reaction as shown in Figure 3.[0098] Titration of the addition of both isoamyl nitrite and Bτ2 to AMP shows that the amine disappears from the reaction mixture on addition of one equivalent each of isoamyl nitrite and Br2. As shown in Figure 7, the formation of the product 3- (bromomethyl)pyridine is out of phase with the disappearance of reacting amine, and in some trials was almost completely absent until greater than one equivalent of isoamyl nitrite and Br2 was added. Best yields were obtained by a total addition of about five equivalents OfBr2.in this example
61% With bromine; isopentyl nitrite In water [0091] The following example explores reaction conditions and product distributions.[0092] Under reaction conditions identical to those used with Br2 in Example 1, the reaction using I2 failed to produce the corresponding iodide. Using 10 equivalents of ICl however, as the source of halogen, results in the production of the chloride in good yield without the iodide. In a further experiment, using 10 equivalents of IBr, gives again the bromide with no detectable iodide. As per the postulated mechanism, the highly reactive nitryl, and nitrosyl halides are the active intermediates, neither of which is known for the iodide.[0093] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine to the bromide in THF was similar to that in CH2Cl2, but decreased in the series CH2Cl2 > CHCl3 > CCl4 with a <n="23"/>corresponding increase in the formation of the hydroxy product. Reaction in DMF or DMSO led to remaining AMP under the conditions used and also favored the formation of the 3-(hydroxymethyl)pyridine over the bromide.[0094] Using isoamyl nitrite as the nitroso source, and Br2, in water, resulted in an incomplete conversion with very little of the hydroxy product. In all solvents tried using NaNC>2 and acetic acid as the nitroso source, an increased amount of 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine was observed with incomplete reaction of the AMP. This latter observation is most likely due to the use of NaNO2 for the nitroso source, as in CH2CI2, increasing additions of acetic acid up to 5 equivalents with respect to AMP, favored the formation of the bromide over the hydroxy product. The stronger acid TFA, however, favored the formation of the hydroxy product over the bromide. Addition of an organic base, TEA, piperidine or DBU was well tolerated up to about 1 equivalent with respect to AMP, with higher amounts leading to less conversion of the amine to the bromide. Reaction to the bromide was concentration dependent with best conversions occurring at > 0.1 molar in AMP (variable only explored in GH2CI2).[0095] Conversion of 3-aminomethyl pyridine to 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine using 1.1 equiv. of nitrosyl agent and 5 equiv. of bromine was conducted in the solvent shown in Table 1 below. A sample of the reaction mixture was taken and quenched by high dilution into acetontrile for ESMS analysis of the products. 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine and 3-(isoamyloxymethyl)pyridine side products were also observed in addition to starting material and 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine product.Table 1. Product distributions based on variation in reaction conditions. <n="24"/>[0096] The gas evolved by the reaction was identified by collecting the gas in an IR cell and examining by IR Spectroscopy. The IR spectrum in Figure 2 shows the N2O gas produced by the reaction.[0097] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine (AMP) and 2-(2- aminoethyl)pyrdine (AEP) is efficient, as demonstrated by the HPLC traces before and after reaction as shown in Figure 3.[0098] Titration of the addition of both isoamyl nitrite and Bτ2 to AMP shows that the amine disappears from the reaction mixture on addition of one equivalent each of isoamyl nitrite and Br2. As shown in Figure 7, the formation of the product 3- (bromomethyl)pyridine is out of phase with the disappearance of reacting amine, and in some trials was almost completely absent until greater than one equivalent of isoamyl nitrite and Br2 was added. Best yields were obtained by a total addition of about five equivalents OfBr2.in this example
57% With bromine; isopentyl nitrite In dimethyl sulfoxide [0091] The following example explores reaction conditions and product distributions.[0092] Under reaction conditions identical to those used with Br2 in Example 1, the reaction using I2 failed to produce the corresponding iodide. Using 10 equivalents of ICl however, as the source of halogen, results in the production of the chloride in good yield without the iodide. In a further experiment, using 10 equivalents of IBr, gives again the bromide with no detectable iodide. As per the postulated mechanism, the highly reactive nitryl, and nitrosyl halides are the active intermediates, neither of which is known for the iodide.[0093] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine to the bromide in THF was similar to that in CH2Cl2, but decreased in the series CH2Cl2 > CHCl3 > CCl4 with a <n="23"/>corresponding increase in the formation of the hydroxy product. Reaction in DMF or DMSO led to remaining AMP under the conditions used and also favored the formation of the 3-(hydroxymethyl)pyridine over the bromide.[0094] Using isoamyl nitrite as the nitroso source, and Br2, in water, resulted in an incomplete conversion with very little of the hydroxy product. In all solvents tried using NaNC>2 and acetic acid as the nitroso source, an increased amount of 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine was observed with incomplete reaction of the AMP. This latter observation is most likely due to the use of NaNO2 for the nitroso source, as in CH2CI2, increasing additions of acetic acid up to 5 equivalents with respect to AMP, favored the formation of the bromide over the hydroxy product. The stronger acid TFA, however, favored the formation of the hydroxy product over the bromide. Addition of an organic base, TEA, piperidine or DBU was well tolerated up to about 1 equivalent with respect to AMP, with higher amounts leading to less conversion of the amine to the bromide. Reaction to the bromide was concentration dependent with best conversions occurring at > 0.1 molar in AMP (variable only explored in GH2CI2).[0095] Conversion of 3-aminomethyl pyridine to 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine using 1.1 equiv. of nitrosyl agent and 5 equiv. of bromine was conducted in the solvent shown in Table 1 below. A sample of the reaction mixture was taken and quenched by high dilution into acetontrile for ESMS analysis of the products. 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine and 3-(isoamyloxymethyl)pyridine side products were also observed in addition to starting material and 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine product.Table 1. Product distributions based on variation in reaction conditions. <n="24"/>[0096] The gas evolved by the reaction was identified by collecting the gas in an IR cell and examining by IR Spectroscopy. The IR spectrum in Figure 2 shows the N2O gas produced by the reaction.[0097] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine (AMP) and 2-(2- aminoethyl)pyrdine (AEP) is efficient, as demonstrated by the HPLC traces before and after reaction as shown in Figure 3.[0098] Titration of the addition of both isoamyl nitrite and Bτ2 to AMP shows that the amine disappears from the reaction mixture on addition of one equivalent each of isoamyl nitrite and Br2. As shown in Figure 7, the formation of the product 3- (bromomethyl)pyridine is out of phase with the disappearance of reacting amine, and in some trials was almost completely absent until greater than one equivalent of isoamyl nitrite and Br2 was added. Best yields were obtained by a total addition of about five equivalents OfBr2.in this example
54% With bromine; isopentyl nitrite In tetrachloromethane [0091] The following example explores reaction conditions and product distributions.[0092] Under reaction conditions identical to those used with Br2 in Example 1, the reaction using I2 failed to produce the corresponding iodide. Using 10 equivalents of ICl however, as the source of halogen, results in the production of the chloride in good yield without the iodide. In a further experiment, using 10 equivalents of IBr, gives again the bromide with no detectable iodide. As per the postulated mechanism, the highly reactive nitryl, and nitrosyl halides are the active intermediates, neither of which is known for the iodide.[0093] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine to the bromide in THF was similar to that in CH2Cl2, but decreased in the series CH2Cl2 > CHCl3 > CCl4 with a <n="23"/>corresponding increase in the formation of the hydroxy product. Reaction in DMF or DMSO led to remaining AMP under the conditions used and also favored the formation of the 3-(hydroxymethyl)pyridine over the bromide.[0094] Using isoamyl nitrite as the nitroso source, and Br2, in water, resulted in an incomplete conversion with very little of the hydroxy product. In all solvents tried using NaNC>2 and acetic acid as the nitroso source, an increased amount of 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine was observed with incomplete reaction of the AMP. This latter observation is most likely due to the use of NaNO2 for the nitroso source, as in CH2CI2, increasing additions of acetic acid up to 5 equivalents with respect to AMP, favored the formation of the bromide over the hydroxy product. The stronger acid TFA, however, favored the formation of the hydroxy product over the bromide. Addition of an organic base, TEA, piperidine or DBU was well tolerated up to about 1 equivalent with respect to AMP, with higher amounts leading to less conversion of the amine to the bromide. Reaction to the bromide was concentration dependent with best conversions occurring at > 0.1 molar in AMP (variable only explored in GH2CI2).[0095] Conversion of 3-aminomethyl pyridine to 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine using 1.1 equiv. of nitrosyl agent and 5 equiv. of bromine was conducted in the solvent shown in Table 1 below. A sample of the reaction mixture was taken and quenched by high dilution into acetontrile for ESMS analysis of the products. 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine and 3-(isoamyloxymethyl)pyridine side products were also observed in addition to starting material and 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine product.Table 1. Product distributions based on variation in reaction conditions. <n="24"/>[0096] The gas evolved by the reaction was identified by collecting the gas in an IR cell and examining by IR Spectroscopy. The IR spectrum in Figure 2 shows the N2O gas produced by the reaction.[0097] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine (AMP) and 2-(2- aminoethyl)pyrdine (AEP) is efficient, as demonstrated by the HPLC traces before and after reaction as shown in Figure 3.[0098] Titration of the addition of both isoamyl nitrite and Bτ2 to AMP shows that the amine disappears from the reaction mixture on addition of one equivalent each of isoamyl nitrite and Br2. As shown in Figure 7, the formation of the product 3- (bromomethyl)pyridine is out of phase with the disappearance of reacting amine, and in some trials was almost completely absent until greater than one equivalent of isoamyl nitrite and Br2 was added. Best yields were obtained by a total addition of about five equivalents OfBr2.in this example
47% With bromine; acetic acid; sodium nitrite In dimethyl sulfoxide [0091] The following example explores reaction conditions and product distributions.[0092] Under reaction conditions identical to those used with Br2 in Example 1, the reaction using I2 failed to produce the corresponding iodide. Using 10 equivalents of ICl however, as the source of halogen, results in the production of the chloride in good yield without the iodide. In a further experiment, using 10 equivalents of IBr, gives again the bromide with no detectable iodide. As per the postulated mechanism, the highly reactive nitryl, and nitrosyl halides are the active intermediates, neither of which is known for the iodide.[0093] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine to the bromide in THF was similar to that in CH2Cl2, but decreased in the series CH2Cl2 > CHCl3 > CCl4 with a <n="23"/>corresponding increase in the formation of the hydroxy product. Reaction in DMF or DMSO led to remaining AMP under the conditions used and also favored the formation of the 3-(hydroxymethyl)pyridine over the bromide.[0094] Using isoamyl nitrite as the nitroso source, and Br2, in water, resulted in an incomplete conversion with very little of the hydroxy product. In all solvents tried using NaNC>2 and acetic acid as the nitroso source, an increased amount of 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine was observed with incomplete reaction of the AMP. This latter observation is most likely due to the use of NaNO2 for the nitroso source, as in CH2CI2, increasing additions of acetic acid up to 5 equivalents with respect to AMP, favored the formation of the bromide over the hydroxy product. The stronger acid TFA, however, favored the formation of the hydroxy product over the bromide. Addition of an organic base, TEA, piperidine or DBU was well tolerated up to about 1 equivalent with respect to AMP, with higher amounts leading to less conversion of the amine to the bromide. Reaction to the bromide was concentration dependent with best conversions occurring at > 0.1 molar in AMP (variable only explored in GH2CI2).[0095] Conversion of 3-aminomethyl pyridine to 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine using 1.1 equiv. of nitrosyl agent and 5 equiv. of bromine was conducted in the solvent shown in Table 1 below. A sample of the reaction mixture was taken and quenched by high dilution into acetontrile for ESMS analysis of the products. 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine and 3-(isoamyloxymethyl)pyridine side products were also observed in addition to starting material and 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine product.Table 1. Product distributions based on variation in reaction conditions. <n="24"/>[0096] The gas evolved by the reaction was identified by collecting the gas in an IR cell and examining by IR Spectroscopy. The IR spectrum in Figure 2 shows the N2O gas produced by the reaction.[0097] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine (AMP) and 2-(2- aminoethyl)pyrdine (AEP) is efficient, as demonstrated by the HPLC traces before and after reaction as shown in Figure 3.[0098] Titration of the addition of both isoamyl nitrite and Bτ2 to AMP shows that the amine disappears from the reaction mixture on addition of one equivalent each of isoamyl nitrite and Br2. As shown in Figure 7, the formation of the product 3- (bromomethyl)pyridine is out of phase with the disappearance of reacting amine, and in some trials was almost completely absent until greater than one equivalent of isoamyl nitrite and Br2 was added. Best yields were obtained by a total addition of about five equivalents OfBr2.in this example
22% With bromine; isopentyl nitrite In N,N-dimethyl-formamide [0091] The following example explores reaction conditions and product distributions.[0092] Under reaction conditions identical to those used with Br2 in Example 1, the reaction using I2 failed to produce the corresponding iodide. Using 10 equivalents of ICl however, as the source of halogen, results in the production of the chloride in good yield without the iodide. In a further experiment, using 10 equivalents of IBr, gives again the bromide with no detectable iodide. As per the postulated mechanism, the highly reactive nitryl, and nitrosyl halides are the active intermediates, neither of which is known for the iodide.[0093] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine to the bromide in THF was similar to that in CH2Cl2, but decreased in the series CH2Cl2 > CHCl3 > CCl4 with a <n="23"/>corresponding increase in the formation of the hydroxy product. Reaction in DMF or DMSO led to remaining AMP under the conditions used and also favored the formation of the 3-(hydroxymethyl)pyridine over the bromide.[0094] Using isoamyl nitrite as the nitroso source, and Br2, in water, resulted in an incomplete conversion with very little of the hydroxy product. In all solvents tried using NaNC>2 and acetic acid as the nitroso source, an increased amount of 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine was observed with incomplete reaction of the AMP. This latter observation is most likely due to the use of NaNO2 for the nitroso source, as in CH2CI2, increasing additions of acetic acid up to 5 equivalents with respect to AMP, favored the formation of the bromide over the hydroxy product. The stronger acid TFA, however, favored the formation of the hydroxy product over the bromide. Addition of an organic base, TEA, piperidine or DBU was well tolerated up to about 1 equivalent with respect to AMP, with higher amounts leading to less conversion of the amine to the bromide. Reaction to the bromide was concentration dependent with best conversions occurring at > 0.1 molar in AMP (variable only explored in GH2CI2).[0095] Conversion of 3-aminomethyl pyridine to 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine using 1.1 equiv. of nitrosyl agent and 5 equiv. of bromine was conducted in the solvent shown in Table 1 below. A sample of the reaction mixture was taken and quenched by high dilution into acetontrile for ESMS analysis of the products. 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine and 3-(isoamyloxymethyl)pyridine side products were also observed in addition to starting material and 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine product.Table 1. Product distributions based on variation in reaction conditions. <n="24"/>[0096] The gas evolved by the reaction was identified by collecting the gas in an IR cell and examining by IR Spectroscopy. The IR spectrum in Figure 2 shows the N2O gas produced by the reaction.[0097] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine (AMP) and 2-(2- aminoethyl)pyrdine (AEP) is efficient, as demonstrated by the HPLC traces before and after reaction as shown in Figure 3.[0098] Titration of the addition of both isoamyl nitrite and Bτ2 to AMP shows that the amine disappears from the reaction mixture on addition of one equivalent each of isoamyl nitrite and Br2. As shown in Figure 7, the formation of the product 3- (bromomethyl)pyridine is out of phase with the disappearance of reacting amine, and in some trials was almost completely absent until greater than one equivalent of isoamyl nitrite and Br2 was added. Best yields were obtained by a total addition of about five equivalents OfBr2.in this example
30% With bromine; acetic acid; sodium nitrite In water [0091] The following example explores reaction conditions and product distributions.[0092] Under reaction conditions identical to those used with Br2 in Example 1, the reaction using I2 failed to produce the corresponding iodide. Using 10 equivalents of ICl however, as the source of halogen, results in the production of the chloride in good yield without the iodide. In a further experiment, using 10 equivalents of IBr, gives again the bromide with no detectable iodide. As per the postulated mechanism, the highly reactive nitryl, and nitrosyl halides are the active intermediates, neither of which is known for the iodide.[0093] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine to the bromide in THF was similar to that in CH2Cl2, but decreased in the series CH2Cl2 > CHCl3 > CCl4 with a <n="23"/>corresponding increase in the formation of the hydroxy product. Reaction in DMF or DMSO led to remaining AMP under the conditions used and also favored the formation of the 3-(hydroxymethyl)pyridine over the bromide.[0094] Using isoamyl nitrite as the nitroso source, and Br2, in water, resulted in an incomplete conversion with very little of the hydroxy product. In all solvents tried using NaNC>2 and acetic acid as the nitroso source, an increased amount of 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine was observed with incomplete reaction of the AMP. This latter observation is most likely due to the use of NaNO2 for the nitroso source, as in CH2CI2, increasing additions of acetic acid up to 5 equivalents with respect to AMP, favored the formation of the bromide over the hydroxy product. The stronger acid TFA, however, favored the formation of the hydroxy product over the bromide. Addition of an organic base, TEA, piperidine or DBU was well tolerated up to about 1 equivalent with respect to AMP, with higher amounts leading to less conversion of the amine to the bromide. Reaction to the bromide was concentration dependent with best conversions occurring at > 0.1 molar in AMP (variable only explored in GH2CI2).[0095] Conversion of 3-aminomethyl pyridine to 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine using 1.1 equiv. of nitrosyl agent and 5 equiv. of bromine was conducted in the solvent shown in Table 1 below. A sample of the reaction mixture was taken and quenched by high dilution into acetontrile for ESMS analysis of the products. 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine and 3-(isoamyloxymethyl)pyridine side products were also observed in addition to starting material and 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine product.Table 1. Product distributions based on variation in reaction conditions. <n="24"/>[0096] The gas evolved by the reaction was identified by collecting the gas in an IR cell and examining by IR Spectroscopy. The IR spectrum in Figure 2 shows the N2O gas produced by the reaction.[0097] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine (AMP) and 2-(2- aminoethyl)pyrdine (AEP) is efficient, as demonstrated by the HPLC traces before and after reaction as shown in Figure 3.[0098] Titration of the addition of both isoamyl nitrite and Bτ2 to AMP shows that the amine disappears from the reaction mixture on addition of one equivalent each of isoamyl nitrite and Br2. As shown in Figure 7, the formation of the product 3- (bromomethyl)pyridine is out of phase with the disappearance of reacting amine, and in some trials was almost completely absent until greater than one equivalent of isoamyl nitrite and Br2 was added. Best yields were obtained by a total addition of about five equivalents OfBr2.in this example

Reference: [1] Patent: WO2007/117404, 2007, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 21-23
[2] Patent: WO2007/117404, 2007, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 21-23
[3] Patent: WO2007/117404, 2007, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 21-23
[4] Patent: WO2007/117404, 2007, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 21-23
[5] Patent: WO2007/117404, 2007, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 21-23
[6] Patent: WO2007/117404, 2007, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 21-23
[7] Patent: WO2007/117404, 2007, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 21-23
[8] Patent: WO2007/117404, 2007, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 21-23
[9] Patent: WO2007/117404, 2007, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 21-23
  • 4
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 69966-55-8 ]
  • [ 100-55-0 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
44% With bromine; acetic acid; sodium nitrite In dichloromethane [0091] The following example explores reaction conditions and product distributions.[0092] Under reaction conditions identical to those used with Br2 in Example 1, the reaction using I2 failed to produce the corresponding iodide. Using 10 equivalents of ICl however, as the source of halogen, results in the production of the chloride in good yield without the iodide. In a further experiment, using 10 equivalents of IBr, gives again the bromide with no detectable iodide. As per the postulated mechanism, the highly reactive nitryl, and nitrosyl halides are the active intermediates, neither of which is known for the iodide.[0093] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine to the bromide in THF was similar to that in CH2Cl2, but decreased in the series CH2Cl2 > CHCl3 > CCl4 with a <n="23"/>corresponding increase in the formation of the hydroxy product. Reaction in DMF or DMSO led to remaining AMP under the conditions used and also favored the formation of the 3-(hydroxymethyl)pyridine over the bromide.[0094] Using isoamyl nitrite as the nitroso source, and Br2, in water, resulted in an incomplete conversion with very little of the hydroxy product. In all solvents tried using NaNC>2 and acetic acid as the nitroso source, an increased amount of 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine was observed with incomplete reaction of the AMP. This latter observation is most likely due to the use of NaNO2 for the nitroso source, as in CH2CI2, increasing additions of acetic acid up to 5 equivalents with respect to AMP, favored the formation of the bromide over the hydroxy product. The stronger acid TFA, however, favored the formation of the hydroxy product over the bromide. Addition of an organic base, TEA, piperidine or DBU was well tolerated up to about 1 equivalent with respect to AMP, with higher amounts leading to less conversion of the amine to the bromide. Reaction to the bromide was concentration dependent with best conversions occurring at > 0.1 molar in AMP (variable only explored in GH2CI2).[0095] Conversion of 3-aminomethyl pyridine to 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine using 1.1 equiv. of nitrosyl agent and 5 equiv. of bromine was conducted in the solvent shown in Table 1 below. A sample of the reaction mixture was taken and quenched by high dilution into acetontrile for ESMS analysis of the products. 3- (hydroxymethyl)pyridine and 3-(isoamyloxymethyl)pyridine side products were also observed in addition to starting material and 3-(bromomethyl)pyridine product.Table 1. Product distributions based on variation in reaction conditions. <n="24"/>[0096] The gas evolved by the reaction was identified by collecting the gas in an IR cell and examining by IR Spectroscopy. The IR spectrum in Figure 2 shows the N2O gas produced by the reaction.[0097] Conversion of 3-aminomethylpyridine (AMP) and 2-(2- aminoethyl)pyrdine (AEP) is efficient, as demonstrated by the HPLC traces before and after reaction as shown in Figure 3.[0098] Titration of the addition of both isoamyl nitrite and Bτ2 to AMP shows that the amine disappears from the reaction mixture on addition of one equivalent each of isoamyl nitrite and Br2. As shown in Figure 7, the formation of the product 3- (bromomethyl)pyridine is out of phase with the disappearance of reacting amine, and in some trials was almost completely absent until greater than one equivalent of isoamyl nitrite and Br2 was added. Best yields were obtained by a total addition of about five equivalents OfBr2.in this example
Reference: [1] Patent: WO2007/117404, 2007, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 21-23
  • 5
  • [ 98-92-0 ]
  • [ 100-55-0 ]
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
Reference: [1] Chemical Science, 2016, vol. 7, # 5, p. 3432 - 3442
  • 6
  • [ 100-55-0 ]
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
96% With (carbonyl)chloro(hydrido)tris(triphenylphosphine)ruthenium(II); ammonia; [5-(diphenylphosphanyl)-9,9-dimethyl-9H-xanthen-4-yl]diphenylphosphane In tert-Amyl alcohol at 140℃; for 20 h; Inert atmosphere; Cooling Example 6Direct Single-Stage Amination of Alcohols andHydroxy Acids by Means of Ammonia Over aHomogeneous Ruthenium Catalyst and Xantphos ata high V7J Vgas (according to the invention)Under an argon atmosphere, m g of starting material, mRU g of [carbonylchlorohydridotris(triphenylphosphane)ruthenium(II)] and mp g of 9,9-dimethyl-4,5-bis (diphenylphosphino)xanthene as catalyst and V07 ml of 2-methyl-2-butanol as solvent were introduced into a 50 mlsteel tube. The vessel was closed, pressurized three times with 20 bar of argon and depressurized each time. The vessel was then cooled by means of dry ice and m g of ammonia were condensed in. The reactor is heated to T° C. and maintained at this temperature for 20 hours. Afier cooling to room temperature, the reactor was depressurized and opened, the solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator and the residue was dissolved in methanol and then analysed by gas chromatography. Reaction parameters and conversions and selectivities to the desired reaction product are shown in Tab. 5. The results show that many different hydroxy-thnctionalized substrates can be aminated by the method described.
Reference: [1] Patent: US2013/331580, 2013, A1, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0063
[2] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2011, vol. 50, # 33, p. 7599 - 7603
  • 7
  • [ 100-54-9 ]
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
Reference: [1] Synlett, 2001, # 10, p. 1623 - 1625
[2] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2016, vol. 22, # 14, p. 4991 - 5002
[3] Catalysis Science and Technology, 2018, vol. 8, # 2, p. 499 - 507
[4] Small, 2018, vol. 14, # 37,
[5] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015, vol. 137, # 28, p. 8888 - 8891
[6] Helvetica Chimica Acta, 1937, vol. 20, p. 690
[7] Journal fuer Praktische Chemie (Leipzig), 1936, vol. &lt;2&gt; 146, p. 88,102
[8] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1956, vol. 78, p. 3693
[9] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1944, vol. 66, p. 876,877
[10] Chemicke Listy, 1951, vol. 45, p. 451[11] Chem.Abstr., 1953, p. 8068
[12] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1941, vol. 63, p. 490
[13] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1944, vol. 66, p. 1293
[14] Patent: US2615896, 1950, ,
[15] Helvetica Chimica Acta, 1937, vol. 20, p. 690
[16] Journal fuer Praktische Chemie (Leipzig), 1936, vol. &lt;2&gt; 146, p. 88,102
[17] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2008, vol. 14, # 31, p. 9491 - 9494
[18] Medicinal Chemistry Research, 2011, vol. 20, # 7, p. 1091 - 1101
[19] Catalysis Science and Technology, 2014, vol. 4, # 3, p. 629 - 632
[20] Chemical Communications, 2016, vol. 52, # 9, p. 1812 - 1815
[21] Catalysis Science and Technology, 2016, vol. 6, # 13, p. 4768 - 4772
[22] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, vol. 138, # 28, p. 8781 - 8788
[23] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, vol. 138, # 28, p. 8809 - 8814
[24] ChemSusChem, 2017, vol. 10, # 5, p. 842 - 846
[25] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2017, vol. 60, # 19, p. 7965 - 7983
[26] Synlett, 2017, vol. 28, # 20, p. 2855 - 2858
[27] Patent: CH244837, 1945, ,
  • 8
  • [ 33252-28-7 ]
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 97004-04-1 ]
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron Letters, 1999, vol. 40, # 32, p. 5885 - 5888
  • 9
  • [ 100-54-9 ]
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 1656-94-6 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1944, vol. 66, p. 1293
[2] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1944, vol. 66, p. 1293
[3] Chemicke Listy, 1951, vol. 45, p. 451[4] Chem.Abstr., 1953, p. 8068
  • 10
  • [ 33252-28-7 ]
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 23100-12-1 ]
  • [ 97004-04-1 ]
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron Letters, 1999, vol. 40, # 32, p. 5885 - 5888
[2] Tetrahedron Letters, 1999, vol. 40, # 32, p. 5885 - 5888
[3] Tetrahedron Letters, 1999, vol. 40, # 32, p. 5885 - 5888
[4] Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 2000, vol. 73, # 5, p. 1227 - 1231
  • 11
  • [ 100-54-9 ]
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: US6476267, 2002, B1,
[2] Patent: US6476267, 2002, B1,
  • 12
  • [ 51892-16-1 ]
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
Reference: [1] Journal fuer Praktische Chemie/Chemiker-Zeitung, 1994, vol. 336, # 8, p. 695 - 697
[2] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1931, vol. 53, p. 4367,4370
  • 13
  • [ 261958-73-0 ]
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: EP1961733, 2008, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 9; 10
  • 14
  • [ 98-92-0 ]
  • [ 100-55-0 ]
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
Reference: [1] Chemical Science, 2016, vol. 7, # 5, p. 3432 - 3442
  • 15
  • [ 34403-38-8 ]
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 612-14-6 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2018, vol. 140, # 24, p. 7453 - 7457
  • 16
  • [ 500-22-1 ]
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1931, vol. 53, p. 4367,4370
[2] Science, 2017, vol. 358, # 6361, p. 326 - 332
  • 17
  • [ 59-67-6 ]
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1944, vol. 66, p. 1293
[2] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1944, vol. 66, p. 1293
  • 18
  • [ 100-54-9 ]
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 98-92-0 ]
Reference: [1] Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 2018, vol. 32, # 9,
  • 19
  • [ 108-99-6 ]
  • [ 100-54-9 ]
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 124-38-9 ]
  • [ 98-92-0 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, 1988, p. 940 - 941
  • 20
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 124-38-9 ]
  • [ 20173-04-0 ]
  • [ 39642-65-4 ]
Reference: [1] Organometallics, 2015, vol. 34, # 4, p. 763 - 769
  • 21
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 20173-04-0 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1993, vol. 36, # 3, p. 320 - 330
[2] Tetrahedron Letters, 1985, vol. 26, # 48, p. 5863 - 5866
  • 22
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 20173-04-0 ]
  • [ 2055-21-2 ]
Reference: [1] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2018, vol. 57, # 21, p. 6166 - 6170[2] Angew. Chem., 2018, vol. 130, p. 6274 - 6278,5
  • 23
  • [ 33252-28-7 ]
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 23100-12-1 ]
  • [ 97004-04-1 ]
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron Letters, 1999, vol. 40, # 32, p. 5885 - 5888
[2] Tetrahedron Letters, 1999, vol. 40, # 32, p. 5885 - 5888
[3] Tetrahedron Letters, 1999, vol. 40, # 32, p. 5885 - 5888
[4] Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 2000, vol. 73, # 5, p. 1227 - 1231
  • 24
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 142643-29-6 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1994, vol. 37, # 23, p. 3889 - 3901
  • 25
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 75-44-5 ]
  • [ 97004-04-1 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
87% With sodium hydroxide; dihydrogen peroxide; trimethylamine In hydrogenchloride; chloroform; water EXAMPLE 7
Manufacturing of 3-(aminomethyl)-6-chloropyridine starting from 3-(aminomethyl)pyridine: STR18
To a suspension consisting of 3-pyridine methane amine in an amount of 21.6g (0.2 mol), 80 ml aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide in an amount of 8.8g and chloroform in a volume of 60 ml, was fed dropwise isopropoxycarbonyl chloride in an amount of 25.7 g (0.21 mol) at a temperature of from 5° to 10° C. while stirring and spending 30 minutes, and thereaction mixture was further stirred for 30 minutes.
After separating the mixture, the organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and wasthen dissolved in 20 ml water together with sodium tungstate in an amount of 0.58 g and 35percent hydrochloric acid in an amount of 1.0 g.
To this solution, 34.5percent hydrogen peroxide solution in an amount of 27.6 g was fed dropwise at 100° C. while spending 30 minutes.
After adjusting the pH of the solution to 5 and allowing the solution to proceed a reaction for 3.5 hours at 100° C., the solution was then cooled down to a room temperature and added with hypo to an extent that an iodo-starch reaction in the solution changes to the negative one.
The reaction mixturewas then repeatedly extracted with chloroform in a volume of 100 ml, and all of the chloroform solution collected together was subjected to an azeotropic dehydration.
To 250 ml chloroform solution obtained as described above, was added trimethylamine in an amount of 30.0 g (0.51 mol), and the resultant solution was added phosgene in an amount of 24.0 g(0.24 mol) at -5° C. while stirring and spending 1 hour.
The reaction mixture was then transferred into an autoclave, whereto hydrogen chloride gas in an amount of 67.0 g was subsequently introduced, and the solution was allowed to a reaction for 5 hours at 50° C. under a pressure of 5 kgf/cm2 while stirring.
After cooling the solution to aroom temperature, the solution was then extracted with 35percent hydrochloric acid in a volume of 160 ml.
The aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid obtained was then heated for 3.5 hours at a temperature of from 90°to 65° C.
After cooling the solution to a room temperature, the reaction mixture was then added with 28percent aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide to adjust the pH of the solution to 13.5.
The solution was then extracted with 150 ml chloroform, and the aqueous layer was further repeatedly extracted with chloroform.
All chloroform layers were collectedtogether to dry it with magnesium sulfate and the solvent therein was removed by distillation, thereby affording 3-(aminomethyl)-6-chloropyridine in an amount of 24.8 g in a crystalline form The yield was 87percent.
Reference: [1] Patent: US5744608, 1998, A,
  • 26
  • [ 33252-28-7 ]
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 97004-04-1 ]
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron Letters, 1999, vol. 40, # 32, p. 5885 - 5888
  • 27
  • [ 33252-28-7 ]
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 23100-12-1 ]
  • [ 97004-04-1 ]
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron Letters, 1999, vol. 40, # 32, p. 5885 - 5888
[2] Tetrahedron Letters, 1999, vol. 40, # 32, p. 5885 - 5888
[3] Tetrahedron Letters, 1999, vol. 40, # 32, p. 5885 - 5888
[4] Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 2000, vol. 73, # 5, p. 1227 - 1231
  • 28
  • [ 3731-52-0 ]
  • [ 894187-61-2 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: WO2013/155338, 2013, A2,
Same Skeleton Products
Historical Records

Related Functional Groups of
[ 3731-52-0 ]

Amines

Chemical Structure| 20173-04-0

[ 20173-04-0 ]

N-Methyl-1-(pyridin-3-yl)methanamine

Similarity: 0.89

Chemical Structure| 56622-54-9

[ 56622-54-9 ]

(6-Methylpyridin-3-yl)methanamine

Similarity: 0.87

Chemical Structure| 40154-75-4

[ 40154-75-4 ]

(R)-1-(Pyridin-3-yl)ethanamine

Similarity: 0.85

Chemical Structure| 56129-55-6

[ 56129-55-6 ]

1-(Pyridin-3-yl)ethanamine

Similarity: 0.85

Chemical Structure| 40154-84-5

[ 40154-84-5 ]

(S)-1-(Pyridin-3-yl)ethanamine dihydrochloride

Similarity: 0.83

Related Parent Nucleus of
[ 3731-52-0 ]

Pyridines

Chemical Structure| 20173-04-0

[ 20173-04-0 ]

N-Methyl-1-(pyridin-3-yl)methanamine

Similarity: 0.89

Chemical Structure| 56622-54-9

[ 56622-54-9 ]

(6-Methylpyridin-3-yl)methanamine

Similarity: 0.87

Chemical Structure| 40154-75-4

[ 40154-75-4 ]

(R)-1-(Pyridin-3-yl)ethanamine

Similarity: 0.85

Chemical Structure| 56129-55-6

[ 56129-55-6 ]

1-(Pyridin-3-yl)ethanamine

Similarity: 0.85

Chemical Structure| 40154-84-5

[ 40154-84-5 ]

(S)-1-(Pyridin-3-yl)ethanamine dihydrochloride

Similarity: 0.83