Home Cart 0 Sign in  

[ CAS No. 4651-91-6 ] {[proInfo.proName]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]}
Chemical Structure| 4651-91-6
Chemical Structure| 4651-91-6
Structure of 4651-91-6 * Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
Cart0 Add to My Favorites Add to My Favorites Bulk Inquiry Inquiry Add To Cart

Quality Control of [ 4651-91-6 ]

Related Doc. of [ 4651-91-6 ]

Alternatived Products of [ 4651-91-6 ]

Product Details of [ 4651-91-6 ]

CAS No. :4651-91-6 MDL No. :MFCD00128278
Formula : C9H10N2S Boiling Point : -
Linear Structure Formula :- InChI Key :ADHVMGAFAKSNOM-UHFFFAOYSA-N
M.W : 178.25 Pubchem ID :78382
Synonyms :

Calculated chemistry of [ 4651-91-6 ]

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms : 12
Num. arom. heavy atoms : 5
Fraction Csp3 : 0.44
Num. rotatable bonds : 0
Num. H-bond acceptors : 1.0
Num. H-bond donors : 1.0
Molar Refractivity : 50.87
TPSA : 78.05 Ų

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption : High
BBB permeant : No
P-gp substrate : No
CYP1A2 inhibitor : Yes
CYP2C19 inhibitor : Yes
CYP2C9 inhibitor : No
CYP2D6 inhibitor : No
CYP3A4 inhibitor : No
Log Kp (skin permeation) : -5.43 cm/s

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP) : 1.96
Log Po/w (XLOGP3) : 2.75
Log Po/w (WLOGP) : 2.09
Log Po/w (MLOGP) : 1.09
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT) : 3.21
Consensus Log Po/w : 2.22

Druglikeness

Lipinski : 0.0
Ghose : None
Veber : 0.0
Egan : 0.0
Muegge : 1.0
Bioavailability Score : 0.55

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL) : -2.99
Solubility : 0.184 mg/ml ; 0.00103 mol/l
Class : Soluble
Log S (Ali) : -4.04
Solubility : 0.0161 mg/ml ; 0.0000904 mol/l
Class : Moderately soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT) : -2.5
Solubility : 0.562 mg/ml ; 0.00316 mol/l
Class : Soluble

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS : 0.0 alert
Brenk : 0.0 alert
Leadlikeness : 1.0
Synthetic accessibility : 2.57

Safety of [ 4651-91-6 ]

Signal Word:Warning Class:N/A
Precautionary Statements:P261-P280-P305+P351+P338 UN#:N/A
Hazard Statements:H302+H312+H332-H315-H319-H335 Packing Group:N/A
GHS Pictogram:

Application In Synthesis of [ 4651-91-6 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Upstream synthesis route of [ 4651-91-6 ]
  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 4651-91-6 ]

[ 4651-91-6 ] Synthesis Path-Upstream   1~8

  • 1
  • [ 4651-91-6 ]
  • [ 4815-28-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
70% at 20℃; for 65 h; A solution of aminothiophene EO (prepared as described in Example C; 500mg, 2.8 mmol) in concentrated sulphuric acid (5ml) was stirred at room temperature for 65 hours. The reaction mixture was poured cautiously into ice-cold aqueous potassium carbonate, diluted with water and extracted with ethyl acetate. The combined organic extracts were washed with water and brine, dried over magnesium sulphate and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure to give the desired product (383mg, 70percent) as an off-white solid. 'H NMR 8H (400MHz, CDC13) : 6.15 (2H, br s), 4.40 (2H, b-r s), 2. 65 (2H, m), 2.50 (2H, m) and 1.80 (4H, m) ppm.
Reference: [1] Archiv der Pharmazie, 1981, vol. 314, # 2, p. 168 - 175
[2] Patent: WO2005/44008, 2005, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 105-106
[3] Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 2015, vol. 63, # 6, p. 450 - 456
  • 2
  • [ 108-94-1 ]
  • [ 109-77-3 ]
  • [ 4651-91-6 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
99% With octasulfur; bovine serum albumin In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 50℃; for 4 h; General procedure: A mixture of 1 (1 mmol), 2 (1 mmol), elemental sulfur (1 mmol)and BSA (20 mg) was added to 1 mL of DMF. The reaction was incubatedat 50 C and 200 rpm. After the required time, the BSA wasfiltered off to terminate the reaction. For the products with highyields, the solid crude products precipitated in water, and then followedby filtration and drying. For the products with low yields,the crude residues were purified by flash column chromatographyon silica gel using petroleum/ethyl acetate.The structures of the products were confirmed by IR, 1H NMRand 13C NMR. 1H (400 MHz) and 13C NMR (100 MHz) spectra wererecorded on a Bruker Avance 400 spectrometer in CDCl3 using TMS(tetramethylsilane) as internal reference. IR spectra were obtainedwith a Nicolet Nexus 470 FT-IR spectrophotometer. HPLC was carriedout using an Agilent 1100 series with an Agilent TC-C18 column(3a, 3c, 3e, 3g, 3i, 3k: methanol/water ratio = 60/40, 1.0 mL/minand 220 nm; 3b, 3d, 3f, 3h, 3g, 3l: methanol/water ratio = 60/40,1.0 mL/min and 229 nm).For all reactions, solvents for column chromatography were distilledbefore use.2.2.1. 2-Amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[b]thiophene-3-carbonitrile (3a)Yellow solid, mp 140–142 C (lit. [19] mp 144–146 C). IR (KBr):. 3447, 3329, 2198 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): : 4.62 (bs,2H), 2.53–2.46 (m, 4H), 1.85–1.73 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100 MHz,CDCl3): : 159.9, 132.4, 120.7, 115.5, 88.8, 24.5, 24.1, 23.4, 22.1.
94% With sulfur; diethylamine In ethanol at 70℃; for 17 h; To a stirred solution of cyclohexanone (10. 4ml, 0. 10 mol) in ethanol (300ml) were added sulphur (3.52g, O. llmol), malononitrile (6.60g, 0.10 mol) and diethylamine (10. 30ml, 0. 10mol). The reaction mixture was heated at 70°C for 17 hours. The mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature and the solvent removed under reduced pressure. The residue was partitioned between water and ethyl acetate and the aqueous extracted with further ethyl acetate. The combined organic extracts were washed with brine, dried over magnesium sulphate and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure to give the desired product (16. 7g, 94percent) as a brown solid. 1H NMR No.H (400MHz, CDCl3): 4.60 (2H, br s), 2.50 (4H, m) and 1.80 (4H, m) ppm.
94% With sulfur; potassium carbonate In ethanol for 3 h; Reflux Cyclohexanone (0.98 g, 10.0 mmol), malononitrile (0.66g, 10.0 mmol), elemental sulfur (0.35 g, 11.0 mmol) andK2CO3 (0.28 g, 2.0 mmol) in dry ethanol (15 mL) werestirred at reflux for 3 h. The solid catalyst was filtered off,and the solvent was removed by evaporation under reducedpressure, the crude product was washed with chilled waterand recrystallized from ethanol to give yellowish crystals in94percent yield, mp: 146 °C (Lit. [16] 147 °C).
92% With sulfur In ethanol at 50℃; for 1 h; General procedure: These compounds were prepared by methods borrowed from the literature [17, 18, 23-26]. We recall here the general procedure that we used: To a mixture of 0.03 mole of ketone, 0.03 mol of malononitrile and 0.03 mole of sulfur in ethanol were added drop wise with stirring a solution of diethyl amine or morpholine(2 mL) in ethanol (5 mL). When addition was completed; the mixture was stirred at a temperature of 50 °C until complete dissolution of sulfur. The heating and stirring were still left one hour. Aminothiophene1 was precipitated by adding 100 mL of cold water. The precipitate was recovered by filtration, washed with water, dried and then recrystallizedfrom suitable solvent.
88% With sulfur; diethylamine In neat (no solvent) for 0.333333 h; Milling General procedure: Cyclohexanone (0.0981 g, 1.0 mmol), malononitrile (0.0660 g,1.0 mmol), elemental sulfur (0.0384 g, 1.2 mmoL) was vigorouslyshaken by HSVM for a designated time.The product was purified by chromatography on silica gel and elutedusing CH2Cl2 as the eluent to afford the desired product 2‑amino-5,6-dihydro-4H-cyclopenta[b]-thiophene-3-carbonitrile as colourlesssolid.
88% at 60℃; for 2 h; Ionic liquid; Green chemistry General procedure: For the synthesis of 4,5-alkyl-2-aminothiophenes (2a–2j), the general procedures are the same as those of compound 2i. A mixture of N-benzyl-4-piperidone (1i, 380 mg, 2 mmol), malononitrile (132 mg, 2 mmol), sulfur (64 mg, 2 mmol), and basic ionic liquid (bmIm)OH (380 mg, 2.4 equiv.) was heated to 60°C for 2 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and washed with diethyl ether or ethyl acetate (340 mL),and the organic layers were concentrated under vacuum to obtain an oily crude product. The crude product was dissolved in ether/hexane (3:1, 50 mL) mixture, insoluble material was decanted, and the organic layer was concentrated to 1/4 of the volume and kept in a refrigerator. The precipitate that formed was filtered and dried.
88% With sulfur; choline chloride; urea; sodium hydroxide In water at 60℃; Green chemistry General procedure: A mixture of 0.070 g 4-propylcyclohexanone (0.5 mmol),0.030 g malononitrile (0.5 mmol), 0.019 g sulfur powder(0.6 mmol), and 0.1 cm3 NaOH (4 mol dm-3 aqueoussolution) in 1 cm3 choline chloride/urea was stirred at 60°C for 2–3 h. After completion of the reaction, indicated by TLC monitoring, 5 cm3 water was added. The solid product was separated by filtration and if necessary the precipitate recrystallized from EtOH to afford the corresponding pure product
88% With sulfur In neat (no solvent) at 60℃; for 2 h; General procedure: General procedure forpreparation of2‑aminothiophenes
84%
Stage #1: for 0.333333 h; Sonication; Green chemistry
Stage #2: With Na2S6 In water for 0.5 h; Sonication; Green chemistry
General procedure: A 50ml round-bottomed flask was charged with α-methylene carbonyl compound 10 (5 mmol),malononitrile 11 (5 mmol), and 25 ml H2O, which was stirred for 20 min under heating or ultrasoundirradiation. Subsequently, sodium polysulfide 12 (5 mmol) was added and stirred at 70Cunder conventional heating or ultrasound irradiation. The mixture became turbid at the end of thereaction, which was poured into cold water. The crude product was isolated by filtration and wasfurther purified by recrystallization with ethanol to afford pure 2-aminothiophenes. All the productswere isolated, and their isolated yields are given in Table 2. Identities of the products wereestablished by comparison of their physical and spectral data with those of reported compounds.
81% With zinc(II) oxide; sulfur In neat (no solvent) at 100℃; for 6 h; General procedure: 10 mmol of ketone or aldehyde, 10 mmol of malonodinitrile, and 10 mmol of sulfur powder were mixed. Then, 0.02 g (2.5 molpercent) of ZnO nano-particles was added and the mixture was heated to 100 °C with good stirring for the required time. After 6 h, the reaction was stopped and the corresponding product was worked up by 10 ml of ethanol and ZnO was separated by a simple filtration. Thereafter, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and poured into 150 ml of ice-water. The precipitate was filtered off, washed with cold water and dried. To further purification, the crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography with 10:1 hexane:ethyl acetate as eluent.
75%
Stage #1: With diethylamine In ethanol for 0.166667 h; Reflux
Stage #2: With sulfur In ethanol for 3 h; Reflux
EXAMPLE 10; The reaction scheme for the synthesis of azo dye 10 is shown below. In a Gewald reaction, diethylamine (8 ml) was added to a solution of equimolar quantities of cyclohexanone (9.80 g, 0.10 mol) and malononitrile (6.60 g, 0.10 mol) in ethanol, and the mixture was refluxed for 10 minutes. Then sulfur (3.53 g, 0.11 mol) was added, and the solution was refluxed for a further 3 hours. The pale yellow precipitate that formed was filtered and washed with cooled ethanol to give 10a as a pale yellow powder (13.4 g, 75percent yield), m.p. 147-148° C.
62.8%
Stage #1: With sulfur In ethanol at 20℃; for 0.166667 h;
Stage #2: at 60℃; for 12 h;
(1) elemental sulfur 1.6g, malononitrile 3.3g, cyclohexanone 5ml, placed in a round bottom flask,Add solvent ethanol 50ml, the reaction at room temperature for 10min, add morpholine 5ml, 60 ° C for 12h.After cooling, the reaction solution was poured into ice-water, a large amount of solid was precipitated, and the light brown filter cake was obtained by suction filtration. After drying, ethyl acetate: petroleum ether 1: 1Recrystallization gave 2-amino-3-nitrile-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzothiophene 5.4g, yield 62.8percent.
57% With morpholine; sulfur In ethanol for 2 h; Reflux General procedure: To a solution of ketone (8a-c, 10, 12e-f or 14) (25 mmol) and malononitrile (1.65 g, 25 mmol) in EtOH (50 mL), sulfur (0.88 g,27.5 mmol) and morpholine (4.35 mL, 50 mmol) were added, and the mixture was stirred at reflux for 2 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and the orange solid was collected by filtration and washed with cold EtOH.
51% With morpholine; cyanoacetic acid tert-butyl ester; sulfur In ethanol at 40℃; for 20 h; General procedure: A mixture of ketone (1.0 eq.), sulfur powder (1.0 eq.) and t-butyl cyanoacetate, ethyl cyanoacetate or malononitrile (1.0 eq.) in EtOH (2mL/mmol) was prepared before morpholine (1.0 eq.) was added dropwise, ensuring that the reaction did not heat up above 60°C during the addition. The mixture was then heated at 40°C and stirred for 4–20h.
44% With sulfur; triethylamine In ethanol for 16 h; Reflux EXAMPLE 42; Synthesis of N-phenyl-N'-4-[2-(5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobenzo[4,5]thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-ylamino)ethyl]phenylurea (Compound 42); 2-Amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[b]thiophen-3-yl cyanide (step a): To a mixture of cyclohexanone (1.18 g), malononitrile (0.66 g) and sulphur (0.40 g) in absolute ethanol (3 ml) was added triethylamine (2 mL). After refluxed for 16 h, the reaction mixture was concentrated and the residue was partitioned between water and ethyl acetate. The organic layer was concentrated and the crude compound was purified by silica gel column chromatography using a mixture of hexanes:ethyl acetate (4:1), to give 2-amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[b]thiophen-3-yl cyanide (0.94 g, 44percent).
44% With sulfur; triethylamine In ethanol for 16 h; Reflux 2-Amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[b]thiophen-3-yl cyanide (step a): To a mixture of cyclohexanone (1.18 g), malononitrile (0.66 g), and sulphur (0.40 g) in absolute ethanol (3 ml) was added triethylamine (2 mL). After refluxed for 16 h, the reaction mixture was concentrated and the residue was partitioned between water and ethyl acetate. The organic layer was concentrated and the crude compound was purified by silica gel column chromatography using a mixture of hexanes:ethyl acetate (4:1), to give the title compound (0.94 g, 44percent).
94 %Chromat. With sulfur; sodium hydroxide In <i>tert</i>-butyl alcohol at 20℃; for 0.5 h; Inert atmosphere NaOH (2.0 mmol, 80 mg) was added to a mixture of cyclohexanone (2.0 mmol, 196 mg), malononitrile (2.0 mmol, 132 mg), and sulfur (2.0 mmol, 64 mg) in t-BuOH (4.0 mL) under an argon atmosphere. The mixture was stirred at room temperature until the disappearance of the starting materials (TLC and GC). The mixture was dissolved in EtOAc (10 mL), washed with a saturated NH4Cl solution (20 mL), and dried (Na2SO4). The volatile portion was removed under reduced pressure and the solid residue recrystallized from ethyl acetate/hexanes to yield 5.

Reference: [1] Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, 2013, vol. 95, p. 29 - 35
[2] Synlett, 2010, # 9, p. 1351 - 1354
[3] Synthetic Communications, 2010, vol. 40, # 14, p. 2067 - 2074
[4] Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 2018, vol. 32, # 5,
[5] Patent: WO2005/44008, 2005, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 91
[6] Letters in Organic Chemistry, 2014, vol. 11, # 9, p. 700 - 705
[7] Tetrahedron Letters, 2007, vol. 48, # 18, p. 3171 - 3172
[8] Letters in Organic Chemistry, 2014, vol. 11, # 6, p. 403 - 408
[9] Heterocycles, 2014, vol. 88, # 1, p. 741 - 753
[10] Synthetic Communications, 2001, vol. 31, # 20, p. 3113 - 3117
[11] Synthetic Communications, 2012, vol. 42, # 16, p. 2367 - 2374
[12] Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 2017, vol. 31, # 11,
[13] Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, 2011, vol. 32, # 6, p. 2091 - 2092
[14] Synthetic Communications, 2013, vol. 43, # 13, p. 1859 - 1864
[15] Journal of Sulfur Chemistry, 2014, vol. 35, # 3, p. 261 - 269
[16] Archiv der Pharmazie, 2016, vol. 349, # 11, p. 827 - 847
[17] Journal of Chemical Research, 2014, vol. 38, # 7, p. 450 - 452
[18] Synthetic Communications, 2015, vol. 45, # 1, p. 119 - 126
[19] Monatshefte fur Chemie, 2017, vol. 148, # 4, p. 711 - 716
[20] Research on Chemical Intermediates, 2018, vol. 44, # 3, p. 2195 - 2213
[21] Tetrahedron, 2006, vol. 62, # 29, p. 7121 - 7131
[22] Journal of Sulfur Chemistry, 2013, vol. 34, # 5, p. 458 - 463
[23] Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2013, vol. 368-369, p. 16 - 23
[24] Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 2018, vol. 32, # 2,
[25] Patent: US2010/81823, 2010, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 7
[26] Patent: CN104945412, 2018, B, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0044; 0045
[27] European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2013, vol. 66, p. 32 - 45
[28] European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2017, vol. 138, p. 38 - 50
[29] Patent: US2009/275533, 2009, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 39
[30] Patent: US2010/120805, 2010, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 42-43
[31] Bioconjugate Chemistry, 2012, vol. 23, # 12, p. 2403 - 2416
[32] Medicinal Chemistry Research, 1996, vol. 6, # 3, p. 148 - 163
[33] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2007, vol. 17, # 5, p. 1296 - 1301
[34] Patent: WO2006/58600, 2006, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 8-9
[35] Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry, 2008, vol. 45, # 3, p. 853 - 857
[36] Patent: US2008/306053, 2008, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 57
[37] European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2010, vol. 45, # 9, p. 4026 - 4034
[38] Archiv der Pharmazie, 2010, vol. 343, # 10, p. 590 - 601
[39] Russian Chemical Bulletin, 2011, vol. 60, # 2, p. 352 - 360
[40] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2011, vol. 21, # 23, p. 7089 - 7093
[41] Egyptian Journal of Chemistry, 2010, vol. 53, # 4, p. 515 - 526
[42] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2013, vol. 56, # 9, p. 3620 - 3635
[43] European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2013, vol. 63, p. 924 - 934
[44] Journal of Sulfur Chemistry, 2013, vol. 34, # 3, p. 264 - 275
[45] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2015, vol. 25, # 6, p. 1306 - 1309
[46] European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2015, vol. 106, p. 1 - 14
[47] Chemical Biology and Drug Design, 2016, vol. 87, # 4, p. 499 - 507
[48] Tetrahedron Letters, 2016, vol. 57, # 22, p. 2455 - 2461
[49] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, 2016, vol. 24, # 18, p. 3972 - 3977
[50] Tetrahedron Letters, 2017, vol. 58, # 14, p. 1408 - 1412
[51] Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 2017, vol. 65, # 5, p. 469 - 477
[52] Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry, 2017, vol. 54, # 6, p. 3672 - 3681
[53] Chemical Biology and Drug Design, 2018, vol. 91, # 6, p. 1141 - 1155
[54] Bioorganic Chemistry, 2018, vol. 80, p. 693 - 705
[55] Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Ethiopia, 2018, vol. 32, # 2, p. 259 - 270
  • 3
  • [ 4354-73-8 ]
  • [ 4651-91-6 ]
Reference: [1] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2008, vol. 350, # 17, p. 2740 - 2746
[2] Synlett, 2010, # 9, p. 1351 - 1354
[3] Synthetic Communications, 2004, vol. 34, # 20, p. 3801 - 3806
[4] Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry, 2008, vol. 45, # 3, p. 853 - 857
[5] Turkish Journal of Chemistry, 2014, vol. 38, # 4, p. 650 - 660
  • 4
  • [ 1809-20-7 ]
  • [ 1254693-14-5 ]
  • [ 4651-91-6 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
76.4% at 20℃; General procedure: A mixture of 0.8 g azide 1 (3.9 mmol) and 4.1 mmol ofdimethyl, diethyl, or diisopropyl phosphite (6a–6c) in15 cm3 THF was stirred at r.t. for 6–10 h (TLC) andvolatile materials were removed under vacuum. Theresulting residue was chromatographed on silica gel withn-hexane/CHCl3 (8:2, v/v) to give 2-amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo-[b]thiophene-3-carbonitrile (9) as buff substancein 10.3 percent yield; m.p. 147 C (Ref. [26] 145 C). Elutionwith n-hexane/CHCl3 (1:1, v/v) afforded 8a–8c.
Reference: [1] Monatshefte fur Chemie, 2016, vol. 147, # 3, p. 619 - 626
  • 5
  • [ 1254693-14-5 ]
  • [ 868-85-9 ]
  • [ 4651-91-6 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
68.2% at 20℃; General procedure: A mixture of 0.8 g azide 1 (3.9 mmol) and 4.1 mmol ofdimethyl, diethyl, or diisopropyl phosphite (6a–6c) in15 cm3 THF was stirred at r.t. for 6–10 h (TLC) andvolatile materials were removed under vacuum. Theresulting residue was chromatographed on silica gel withn-hexane/CHCl3 (8:2, v/v) to give 2-amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo-[b]thiophene-3-carbonitrile (9) as buff substancein 10.3 percent yield; m.p. 147 C (Ref. [26] 145 C). Elutionwith n-hexane/CHCl3 (1:1, v/v) afforded 8a–8c.Dimethyl 3-cyano-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[b]thiophen-2-ylphosphoramidate (8a, C11H15N2O3PS)Colorless crystals; yield: 0.76 g (68.2 percent); m.p.: 174 C(EtOH); IR (KBr): v = 3322 (NH), 2198 (CN), 1234 (P=O,bonded), 1029 (P–O–C) cm-1; 1H NMR (500.7 MHz,CDCl3): d = 1.91, 2.45 (2 m, 4 9 2H, 4 H2C-hexyl), 3.79(d, 3JPH = 11.5 Hz, 2 9 3H, 2 Me.OP), 11.35 (br, 1H,HN) ppm; 13C NMR (125.4 MHz, CDCl3): d = 151.6 (d,2JPC = 31.5 Hz, C-NH), 134.4, 130.2 (C = C-hexyl),113.8 (CN), 74.3 (C–CN), 52.4 (d, 2JPC = 12.9 Hz, 2MeOP), 26.4, 26.1, 23.6, 22.3 (CH2-hexyl) ppm; 31P NMR(200.7 MHz, CDCl3): d = 17.6 ppm; MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z(percent) = 285 (53) [M?-1], 259 (34) [M?-27 (H ? CN)], 150(100) [M?-136 (H ? CN ? P(O)(OMe)2)].
Reference: [1] Monatshefte fur Chemie, 2016, vol. 147, # 3, p. 619 - 626
  • 6
  • [ 1254693-14-5 ]
  • [ 762-04-9 ]
  • [ 4651-91-6 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
70.6% at 20℃; General procedure: A mixture of 0.8 g azide 1 (3.9 mmol) and 4.1 mmol ofdimethyl, diethyl, or diisopropyl phosphite (6a–6c) in15 cm3 THF was stirred at r.t. for 6–10 h (TLC) andvolatile materials were removed under vacuum. Theresulting residue was chromatographed on silica gel withn-hexane/CHCl3 (8:2, v/v) to give 2-amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo-[b]thiophene-3-carbonitrile (9) as buff substancein 10.3 percent yield; m.p. 147 C (Ref. [26] 145 C). Elutionwith n-hexane/CHCl3 (1:1, v/v) afforded 8a–8c.
Reference: [1] Monatshefte fur Chemie, 2016, vol. 147, # 3, p. 619 - 626
  • 7
  • [ 2235-08-7 ]
  • [ 108-94-1 ]
  • [ 4651-91-6 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Chemistry, 2018, vol. 2018,
  • 8
  • [ 108-94-1 ]
  • [ 4651-91-6 ]
Reference: [1] Turkish Journal of Chemistry, 2014, vol. 38, # 4, p. 650 - 660
Same Skeleton Products
Historical Records