There will be a HazMat fee per item when shipping a dangerous goods. The HazMat fee will be charged to your UPS/DHL/FedEx collect account or added to the invoice unless the package is shipped via Ground service. Ship by air in Excepted Quantity (each bottle), which is up to 1g/1mL for class 6.1 packing group I or II, and up to 25g/25ml for all other HazMat items.
Type | HazMat fee for 500 gram (Estimated) |
Excepted Quantity | USD 0.00 |
Limited Quantity | USD 15-60 |
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), Domestic | USD 80+ |
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), International | USD 150+ |
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), Domestic | USD 100+ |
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), International | USD 200+ |
Structure of 1,2,4,5-Tetrafluorobenzene
CAS No.: 327-54-8
*Storage: {[sel_prStorage]}
*Shipping: {[sel_prShipping]}
The BI-3802 was designed by Boehringer Ingelheim and could be obtained free of charge through the Boehringer Ingelheim open innovation portal opnMe.com, associated with its negative control.
4.5
*For Research Use Only !
Change View
Size | Price | VIP Price | US Stock |
Global Stock |
In Stock | ||
{[ item.pr_size ]} |
Inquiry
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.pr_usd) ]} {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,1,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.discount_usd) ]} {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.pr_usd) ]} |
Inquiry {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.vip_usd) ]} | Inquiry {[ item.pr_usastock ]} In Stock Inquiry - | {[ item.pr_chinastock ]} {[ item.pr_remark ]} In Stock 1-2 weeks - Inquiry - | Login | - + | Inquiry |
Please Login or Create an Account to: See VIP prices and availability
US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 5-7 days
1-2weeks
Inquiry
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.vip_usd) ]}
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.pr_usd) ]}
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,1,item.mem_rate,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.pr_usd) ]}
Inquiry
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,1,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.vip_usd) ]}
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.pr_usd) ]}
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.pr_usd) ]}
In Stock
- +
Please Login or Create an Account to: See VIP prices and availability
US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 2 weeks
Search for reports by entering the product batch number.
Batch number can be found on the product's label following the word 'Batch'.
Search for reports by entering the product batch number.
Batch number can be found on the product's label following the word 'Batch'.
Search for reports by entering the product batch number.
Batch number can be found on the product's label following the word 'Batch'.
Search for reports by entering the product batch number.
Batch number can be found on the product's label following the word 'Batch'.
Search for reports by entering the product batch number.
Batch number can be found on the product's label following the word 'Batch'.
CAS No. : | 327-54-8 |
Formula : | C6H2F4 |
M.W : | 150.07 |
SMILES Code : | FC1=C(F)C=C(F)C(F)=C1 |
MDL No. : | MFCD00000307 |
InChI Key : | SDXUIOOHCIQXRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
Pubchem ID : | 9474 |
GHS Pictogram: |
![]() ![]() |
Signal Word: | Danger |
Hazard Statements: | H225-H315-H319-H335 |
Precautionary Statements: | P210-P261-P305+P351+P338 |
Class: | 3 |
UN#: | 1993 |
Packing Group: | Ⅱ |
Num. heavy atoms | 10 |
Num. arom. heavy atoms | 6 |
Fraction Csp3 | 0.0 |
Num. rotatable bonds | 0 |
Num. H-bond acceptors | 4.0 |
Num. H-bond donors | 0.0 |
Molar Refractivity | 26.27 |
TPSA ? Topological Polar Surface Area: Calculated from |
0.0 Ų |
Log Po/w (iLOGP)? iLOGP: in-house physics-based method implemented from |
1.84 |
Log Po/w (XLOGP3)? XLOGP3: Atomistic and knowledge-based method calculated by |
2.32 |
Log Po/w (WLOGP)? WLOGP: Atomistic method implemented from |
3.92 |
Log Po/w (MLOGP)? MLOGP: Topological method implemented from |
4.01 |
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT)? SILICOS-IT: Hybrid fragmental/topological method calculated by |
3.54 |
Consensus Log Po/w? Consensus Log Po/w: Average of all five predictions |
3.13 |
Log S (ESOL):? ESOL: Topological method implemented from |
-2.68 |
Solubility | 0.316 mg/ml ; 0.00211 mol/l |
Class? Solubility class: Log S scale |
Soluble |
Log S (Ali)? Ali: Topological method implemented from |
-1.96 |
Solubility | 1.65 mg/ml ; 0.011 mol/l |
Class? Solubility class: Log S scale |
Very soluble |
Log S (SILICOS-IT)? SILICOS-IT: Fragmental method calculated by |
-3.5 |
Solubility | 0.048 mg/ml ; 0.00032 mol/l |
Class? Solubility class: Log S scale |
Soluble |
GI absorption? Gatrointestinal absorption: according to the white of the BOILED-Egg |
Low |
BBB permeant? BBB permeation: according to the yolk of the BOILED-Egg |
Yes |
P-gp substrate? P-glycoprotein substrate: SVM model built on 1033 molecules (training set) |
No |
CYP1A2 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9145 molecules (training set) |
No |
CYP2C19 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9272 molecules (training set) |
No |
CYP2C9 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibitor: SVM model built on 5940 molecules (training set) |
No |
CYP2D6 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor: SVM model built on 3664 molecules (training set) |
No |
CYP3A4 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor: SVM model built on 7518 molecules (training set) |
No |
Log Kp (skin permeation)? Skin permeation: QSPR model implemented from |
-5.57 cm/s |
Lipinski? Lipinski (Pfizer) filter: implemented from |
0.0 |
Ghose? Ghose filter: implemented from |
None |
Veber? Veber (GSK) filter: implemented from |
0.0 |
Egan? Egan (Pharmacia) filter: implemented from |
0.0 |
Muegge? Muegge (Bayer) filter: implemented from |
2.0 |
Bioavailability Score? Abbott Bioavailability Score: Probability of F > 10% in rat |
0.55 |
PAINS? Pan Assay Interference Structures: implemented from |
0.0 alert |
Brenk? Structural Alert: implemented from |
1.0 alert: heavy_metal |
Leadlikeness? Leadlikeness: implemented from |
No; 1 violation:MW<1.0 |
Synthetic accessibility? Synthetic accessibility score: from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very difficult) |
1.23 |
* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
[Example 1]; In a conical flask, 20.6 g of 95% sulfuric acid was slowly added dropwise to 70 g (2.2 mol) of methanol with ice cooling. Then, into a 300-ml glass autoclave, the resulting sulfuric acid/methanol solution and a 5% Rh/C catalyst (available from NE Chemcat Corporation, hydrous product) in an amount of 0.25 g on a dry weight basis were charged. The system was purged with hydrogen to make a hydrogen pressure 0.1 MPa at room temperature. Heating of the autoclave and stirring of the contents in the EPO <DP n="20"/>autoclave were started, and the temperature was increased to 400C and was held constant for 1 hour. After the autoclave was cooled, 10 g (50 mmol) of tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile (available from Tokyo Kasei Kogyo Co., Ltd.) was fed to the autoclave, and the temperature was raised to 700C in a nitrogen atmosphere. At 700C, introduction of hydrogen was started. The reaction pressure was controlled so that the hydrogen absorption rate should become not more than 10 ml/min. After a lapse of 6 hours and 30 minutes, absorption of hydrogen ceased. The quantity of hydrogen absorbed was 119% of the theoretical quantity of hydrogen absorbed. The reaction solution was filtered to separate the catalyst, and methanol was distilled off at atmospheric pressure. Thereafter, 100 g of water was added to the residue, and the mixture was refluxed by heating at an internal temperature of 1000C for 60 minutes. Then, methanol formed by hydrolysis of acetal was distilled off at atmospheric pressure. When the top temperature of the distillation reached 99C, the distillation was finished, and the resulting solution was cooled to room temperature. Then, the solution was extracted 3 times each with 30 g of toluene . EPO <DP n="21"/>From the toluene extract, a small amount of a sample was withdrawn, and it was subjected to GC analysis. As a result of the analysis, a peak of the tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile as a raw material was below the detection limit, the amount of tetrafluoroterephthalaldehyde was 92.0 mol%, the amount of 2, 3, 5, 6-tetrafluorobenzene was 0.94 mol%, and the amount of 2, 3, 5, 6-tetrafluorobenzonitrile was 0.79 mol%. On the other hand, the aqueous phase was neutralized and then subjected to GC analysis. As a result of the analysis, presence of 3.39 mol% of 2, 3, 5, 6-tetrafluorobenzylamine was confirmed. The results are set forth in Table 1. [Example 2]The same operations as in Example 1 were carried out, except that as a catalyst a 5% Pd/C catalyst (available from NE Chemcat Corporation, hydrous product) was charged in an amount of 0.25 g on a dry weight basis. After a lapse of 3.3 hours, absorption of hydrogen ceased. The quantity of hydrogen absorbed was 117% of the theoretical quantity of hydrogen absorbed. Treatment of the reaction solution was carried out in the same manner as in Example 1.From the toluene extract, a small amount of a sample was withdrawn, and it was subjected to GC analysis. As a EPO <DP n="22"/>result of the analysis, a peak of the tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile as a raw material was below the detection limit, and the amount of tetrafluoroterephthalaldehyde was 68.9 mol%. On the other hand, the aqueous phase was neutralized and then subjected to GC analysis. As a result of the analysis, presence of14.8 mo1% of 2, 3, 5, 6-tetrafluorobenzylamine was confirmed.The results are set forth in Table 1. [Example 2]; The same operations as in Example 1 were carried out, except that as a catalyst a 5% Pd/C catalyst (available from NE Chemcat Corporation, hydrous product) was charged in an amount of 0.25 g on a dry weight basis. After a lapse of 3.3 hours, absorption of hydrogen ceased. The quantity of hydrogen absorbed was 117% of the theoretical quantity of hydrogen absorbed. Treatment of the reaction solution was carried out in the same manner as in Example 1.From the toluene extract, a small amount of a sample was withdrawn, and it was subjected to GC analysis. As a EPO <DP n="22"/>result of the analysis, a peak of the tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile as a raw material was below the detection limit, and the amount of tetrafluoroterephthalaldehyde was 68.9 mol%. On the other hand, the aqueous phase was neutralized and then subjected to GC analysis. As a result of the analysis, presence of14.8 mo1% of 2, 3, 5, 6-tetrafluorobenzylamine was confirmed.The results are set forth in Table 1.; [Example 3] The same operations as in Example 1 were carried out, except that the temperature of the pretreatment of the catalyst with hydrogen was changed from 400C to 500C.After a lapse of 5.5 hours, absorption of hydrogen ceased.The quantity of hydrogen absorbed was 106% of the theoretical quantity of hydrogen absorbed. Treatment of the reaction solution was carried out in the same manner as in Example 1.From the toluene extract, a small amount of a sample was withdrawn, and it was subjected to GC analysis. As a result of the analysis, a peak of the tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile as a raw material was ... | ||
[Example 7]; The same operations as in Example 1 were carried out, except that the catalyst used was changed from the 5% Rh/C catalyst (available from NE Chemcat Corporation, hydrous product) to a 2% Rh/C catalyst (available from NE Chemcat EPO <DP n="26"/>Corporation, hydrous product) . After a lapse of 7.3 hours, absorption of hydrogen ceased. The quantity of hydrogen absorbed was 114% of the theoretical quantity of hydrogen absorbed. Treatment of the reaction solution was carried out in the same manner as in Example 1.From the toluene extract, a small amount of a sample was withdrawn, and it was subjected to GC analysis. As a result of the analysis, a peak of the tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile as a raw material was below the detection limit, the amount of tetrafluoroterephthalaldehyde was 88.6 mol%, the amount of 2, 3, 5, 6-tetrafluorobenzene was 1.15 mol%, and the amount of 2, 3, 5, 6-tetrafluorobenzonitrile was 2.63 ralphaol%. On the other hand, the aqueous phase was neutralized and then subjected to GC analysis. As a result of the analysis, presence of 2.36 mol% of 2, 3, 5, 6-tetrafluorobenzylamine was confirmed. The results are set forth in Table 1. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
[Comparative Example 1]; The same operations as in Example 1 were carried out, except that the amount of the catalyst used was changed from 0.25 g to 0.05 g on a dry weight basis. After a lapse of 7.0 hours, absorption of hydrogen ceased. The quantity of hydrogen absorbed was 83% of the theoretical quantity of hydrogen absorbed. Treatment of the reaction solution was carried out in the same manner as in Example 1. EPO <DP n="28"/>From the toluene extract, a small amount of a sample was withdrawn, and it was subjected to GC analysis. As a result of the analysis, the tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile as a raw material remained in an amount of 21.0 mol%, and tetrafluoroterephthalaldehyde was obtained in an amount of only 5.0 mol%. The amount of 2, 3, 5, 6-tetrafluorobenzene was 0.65 mol%, the amount of 2,3,5,6- tetrafluorobenzonitrile was 0.53 mol%, and 1-cyano- 2, 3, 5, 6-tetrafluorobenzaldehyde wherein a nitrile group on only one side had reacted was obtained in an amount of 63.1 mol%. On the other hand, the aqueous phase was neutralized and then subjected to GC analysis. As a result of the analysis, presence of 2.88 mol% of 2,3,5,6- tetrafluorobenzylamine was confirmed. The results are set forth in Table 2.; [Comparative Example 3]; The same operations as in Example 1 were carried out, except that the amount of sulfuric acid used was changed from 20.6 g to 5.15 g (50 mmol). After a lapse of 4.2 hours, absorption of hydrogen ceased. The quantity of hydrogen absorbed was 47% of the theoretical quantity of hydrogen absorbed. Treatment of the reaction solution was carried out in the same manner as in Example 1.From the toluene extract, a small amount of a sample was withdrawn, and it was subjected to GC analysis. As a result of the analysis, a peak of the tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile as a raw material was below EPO <DP n="30"/>the detection limit, and tetrafluoroterephthalaldehyde was obtained in an amount of only 14.5 mol%. The amount of 2, 3, 5, 6-tetrafluorobenzene was 0.81 mol%, the amount of 2, 3, 5, 6-tetrafluorobenzonitrile was 0.67 mol%, and 1- cyano-2, 3, 5, 6-tetrafluorobenzaldehyde wherein a nitrile group on only one side had reacted was obtained in an amount of 54.0 mol%. On the other hand, the aqueous phase was neutralized and then subjected to GC analysis. As a result of the analysis, presence of 0.04 mol% of 2,3,5,6- tetrafluorobenzylamine was confirmed. The results are set forth in Table 2. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
[Comparative Example 4]; The same operations as in Example 1 were carried out, except that the reaction temperature was changed from 7O0C to 12O0C. After a lapse of 8.0 hours, absorption of hydrogen ceased. The quantity of hydrogen absorbed was 103% of the theoretical quantity of hydrogen absorbed. Treatment of the reaction solution was carried out in the same manner as in Example 1. From the toluene extract, a small amount of a sample was withdrawn, and it was subjected to GC analysis. As a result of the analysis, a peak of the tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile as a raw material was below the detection limit, and tetrafluoroterephthalaldehyde was EPO <DP n="31"/>obtained in an amount of only 2.6 mol%. The amount of 2, 3, 5, beta-tetrafluorobenzene was 1.08 mol%, the amount of 2, 3, 5, 6-tetrafluorobenzonitrile was 0.87 mol%, and 1- cyano-2, 3, 5, 6-tetrafluorobenzaldehyde wherein a nitrile group on only one side had reacted was obtained in an amount of 42.2 mol%. On the other hand, the aqueous phase was neutralized and then subjected to GC analysis. As a result of the analysis, the amount of 2,3,5,6- tetrafluorobenzylamine was below the detection limit. The results are set forth in Table 2. |