Purity | Size | Price | VIP Price | USA Stock *0-1 Day | Global Stock *5-7 Days | Quantity | |||||
{[ item.p_purity ]} | {[ item.pr_size ]} |
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1) ]} {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate) ]} |
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1) ]} | Inquiry {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate) ]} {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,1,item.mem_rate) ]} | {[ item.pr_usastock ]} | Inquiry - | {[ item.pr_chinastock ]} | Inquiry - |
* Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
CAS No. : | 3970-39-6 | MDL No. : | MFCD11035883 |
Formula : | C7H6ClNO3 | Boiling Point : | - |
Linear Structure Formula : | - | InChI Key : | XVBAPYDWAVGVGW-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
M.W : | 187.58 | Pubchem ID : | 12411827 |
Synonyms : |
|
Num. heavy atoms : | 12 |
Num. arom. heavy atoms : | 6 |
Fraction Csp3 : | 0.14 |
Num. rotatable bonds : | 2 |
Num. H-bond acceptors : | 3.0 |
Num. H-bond donors : | 0.0 |
Molar Refractivity : | 46.77 |
TPSA : | 55.05 Ų |
GI absorption : | High |
BBB permeant : | Yes |
P-gp substrate : | No |
CYP1A2 inhibitor : | No |
CYP2C19 inhibitor : | No |
CYP2C9 inhibitor : | No |
CYP2D6 inhibitor : | No |
CYP3A4 inhibitor : | No |
Log Kp (skin permeation) : | -6.39 cm/s |
Log Po/w (iLOGP) : | 1.55 |
Log Po/w (XLOGP3) : | 1.49 |
Log Po/w (WLOGP) : | 2.26 |
Log Po/w (MLOGP) : | 1.21 |
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT) : | 0.32 |
Consensus Log Po/w : | 1.37 |
Lipinski : | 0.0 |
Ghose : | None |
Veber : | 0.0 |
Egan : | 0.0 |
Muegge : | 1.0 |
Bioavailability Score : | 0.55 |
Log S (ESOL) : | -2.18 |
Solubility : | 1.24 mg/ml ; 0.00661 mol/l |
Class : | Soluble |
Log S (Ali) : | -2.25 |
Solubility : | 1.05 mg/ml ; 0.00558 mol/l |
Class : | Soluble |
Log S (SILICOS-IT) : | -2.52 |
Solubility : | 0.561 mg/ml ; 0.00299 mol/l |
Class : | Soluble |
PAINS : | 0.0 alert |
Brenk : | 2.0 alert |
Leadlikeness : | 1.0 |
Synthetic accessibility : | 2.03 |
Signal Word: | Warning | Class: | N/A |
Precautionary Statements: | P261-P305+P351+P338 | UN#: | N/A |
Hazard Statements: | H302-H315-H319-H335 | Packing Group: | N/A |
GHS Pictogram: |
* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
98% | With caesium carbonate In DMF (N,N-dimethyl-formamide) at 18 - 22℃; | The nitrophenol starting material C2 (1.3 g; 7.49 MMOL) was dissolved in DMF (10 mL) and to this solution was added ground cesium carbonate (2.92 g; 8.96 MMOL), followed by Mel (1. 4 mL; 22. 5 MMOL). The mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The DMF was evaporated in vacuo and the residue taken up in ether (150 ML), washed with water (150 mL), brine (4x 100 mL), and then dried over (MGSO4) THE organic phase was filtered and evaporated to afford the crude 2- CHLORO-3-NITROANISOLE C3 (98percent; 1.38 g) as an orange solid. Homogeneity by HPLC (TFA) 220 nm: 93percent. |
98% | With caesium carbonate In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 20℃; | Step B:; The nitrophenol starting material 1c1 (1.3 g; 7.49 mmol) was dissolved inDMF (10 ml) and to this solution was added ground cesium carbonate (2.92 g; 8.96mmol), followed by Mel (1.4 ml; 22.5 mmol). The mixture was stirred at roomtemperature overnight. The DMF was evaporated in vacuo and the residue taken upin ether (150 ml), washed with water (150 ml), brine (4 X 100 mL), and then driedover (MgSO4). The organic phase was filtered and evaporated to afford the crude 2-chloro-3-nitroanisole 1c2 (98percent; 1.38 g) as an orange solid. |
98% | With caesium carbonate In DMF (N,N-dimethyl-formamide) at 20℃; | The nitrophenol starting material 1c1 (1.3 g; 7.49 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (10 mL) and to this solution was added ground cesium carbonate (2.92 g; 8.96 mmol), followed by MeI (1.4 mL; 22.5 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The DMF was evaporated in vacuo and the residue taken up in ether (150 mL), washed with water (150 mL), brine (4.x.100 mL), and then dried over (MgSO4). The organic phase was filtered and evaporated to afford the crude 2-chloro-3-nitroanisole 1c2 (98percent; 1.38 g) as an orange solid. |
98% | With caesium carbonate In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 20℃; | The nitrophenol starting material 2c1 (1.3 g; 7.49 mmol) was dissolved inDMF (10 ml) and to this solution was added ground cesium carbonate (2.92 g; 8.96mmol), followed by Mel (1.4 ml; 22.5 mmol). The mixture was stirred at roomtemperature overnight. The DMF was evaporated in vacua and the residue taken upin ether (150 ml), washed with water (150 ml), brine (4 X 100 ml), and then driedover (MgSO4). The organic phase was filtered and evaporated to afford the crude 2-chloro-3-nitroanisole 2c2 (98percent; 1.38 g) as an orange solid.Homogeneity by HPLC (TFA) (at) 220nm: 93percent. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
16.5 g | Stage #1: With hydrogenchloride; sodium nitrite In water at 0℃; for 0.25 h; Stage #2: With hydrogenchloride; copper(l) chloride In water at 0 - 50℃; for 0.5 h; |
INTERMEDIATE: (5-Methoxy-3-methyl-quinoxalin-2-yl)-hydrazine (lie). 2-Methoxy-6-nitro- phenylamine (25.0 g) was dissolved in 37percent aq HC1, and the mixture ws cooled on an ice/water bath. A solution of NaN02 (11.8 g) in water (3 mL) was added, and the resulting mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 15 min. The reaction mixture was added to a solution of cuprous monochloride (14.7 g) in 37percent aq HC1 (10 mL) under stirring at 45-50 °C. The resulting mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 15 min, cooled at 5 °C for 15 min. The solid was filtered off and dried to give 2-chloro-l-methoxy-3- nitrobenzene (16.5 g). A mixture of 16 g of this material, racemic alanine (17 g), and K2CO3 (12 g) was heated in DMSO (180 mL) at 100 °C for 24h. The volatiles were removed using a freeze dryer. The residue was acidified with 2M aq HC1 (50 mL) and extracted into EtOAc. The organic extract was extracted with 2M aq Na2C03 and water. The combined aq extracts were acidified with 2M aq HC1 and extracted with EtOAc. The organic layer was washed with brine, dried over MgSO i, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to afford 2-(2-methoxy-6-nitro-phenylamino)-propionic acid. This material was dissolved in ethanol (600 mL) and 96percent> sulphuric acid (6 mL) was added. The mixture was heated at 80 °C overnight. The volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue was dissolved in EtOAc and washed with 2M aq Na2C03. The organic layer was dried over MgSO i, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to afford 2-(2-methoxy-6-nitro-phenylamino)-propionic acid ethyl ester (8.0 g). This material was dissolved in ethanol (300 mL) and 5percent palladium on carbon was added. The mixture was treated with 3 bars of hydrogen pressure on a Parr shaker for 3h. The catalyst was filtered off, and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by chromatography on silica (eluent: heptanes→ EtOAc) to afford 5-methoxy-3-methyl-3,4-dihydro- lH-quinoxalin-2-one (3.0 g). This material was dissolved in ethanol (300 mL) and treated with 30percent aq hydrogen peroxide at 80 °C overnight. Most of the volatiles were removed in vacuo. The residue was suspended in ethanol (10 mL) and cooled on an ice/water bath before the solid was filtered off, washed with ice-cold ethanol, and dried to afford 5-methoxy-3-methyl-lH-quinoxalin-2-one (2.2 g). This material was dissolved in phosphoryl chloride (24 mL) and heated at 130 °C for 2h. The volatiles were removed in vacuo. The residue was partitioned between chloroform and ice + 2M aq NaOH. The organic layer was dried over MgSO i, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to afford 2- chloro-5-methoxy-3-methyl-quinoxaline (2.5 g). This material was dissolved in ethanol (22 mL), hydrazine hydrate (2.9 mL) was added, and the mixture was refluxed for 2h. The volatiles were removed in vacuo, and water was added. The solid was filtered off, washed with water and heptanes and dried to afford lie (1.70 g) sufficiently pure for the next step. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
100% | With iron; acetic acid In ethanol for 3.5 h; Heating / reflux | 2-Chloro-3-nitroanisole C3 (1.38 g; 7.36 MMOL) was dissolved in a mixture of glacial acetic acid (19 ML)/ETHANOI (19 mL). To this solution was added iron powder (1.64 g; 29.4 MMOL). The mixture was stirred at reflux for 3.5 hr and worked up. The reaction mixture was diluted with water (70 mL), neutralized with solid NA2CO3 and the product extracted with CH2CI2 (3X 150 mL). The extracts were combined and washed with saturated. brine and then dried over (NA2SO4), filtered and concentrated in vacuo to afford the crude product, 2-chloro-3-methoxyaniline C4 (100percent; 1.2 g) as a yellow oil. This material was used as such in the following steps. MS 157.9 (MH) + ; Homogeneity by HPLC (TFA) 220 nm: 86percent. |
100% | With iron; acetic acid In ethanol for 3.5 h; Heating / reflux | Step C:; 2-Chloro-3-nitroanisole 1c2 (1.38 g; 7.36 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture ofglacial acetic acid (19 mL)/ethanol (19 mL). To this solution was added iron powder(1.64 g; 29.4 mmol). The mixture was stirred at reflux for 3.5 hr and worked up. Thereaction mixture was diluted with water (70 ml_), neutralized with solid Na2CO3 and theproduct extracted with CH2CI2 (3 X 150 ml). The extracts were combined and washedwith sat. brine and then dried over (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated in vacua toafford the crude product, 2-chloro-3-methoxyaniline 1c3 (100percent; 1.2 g) as a yellow oil.This material was used as such in the following steps. MS 157.9 (MH)+; Homogeneityby HPLC (TFA) (at) 220nm: 86percent. |
100% | With iron; acetic acid In ethanol for 3.5 h; Heating / reflux | 2-Chloro-3-nitroanisole 1c2 (1.38 g; 7.36 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture of glacial acetic acid (19 mL)/ethanol (19 mL). To this solution was added iron powder (1.64 g; 29.4 mmol). The mixture was stirred at reflux for 3.5 hr and worked up. The reaction mixture was diluted with water (70 mL), neutralized with solid Na2CO3 and the product extracted with CH2Cl2 (3*150 mL). The extracts were combined and washed with sat. brine and then dried over (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated in vacuo to afford the crude product, 2-chloro-3-methoxyaniline 1c3 (100percent; 1.2 g) as a yellow oil. This material was used as such in the following steps. MS 157.9 (MH)+; Homogeneity by HPLC (TFA)at;220 nm: 86percent. |
100% | With iron; acetic acid In ethanol for 3.5 h; Heating / reflux | 2-Chloro-3-nitroanisole 2c2 (1.38 g; 7.36 mmol) was dissolved in a mixtureof glacial acetic acid (19 ml_ )/ethanol (19 ml_). To this solution was added ironpowder (1.64 g; 29.4 mmol). The mixture was stirred at reflux for 3.5 hr and workedup. The reaction mixture was diluted with water (70 ml), neutralized with solidNa2CO3 and the product extracted with CH2CI2( 3X 150 ml). The extracts werecombined and washed with sat. brine and then dried over (Na2SO4), filtered andconcentrated in vacua to afford the crude product, 2-chloro-3-methoxyaniline 2c3(100percent; 1.2 g) as a yellow oil. This material was used as such in the following steps.MS 157.9 (MH)+; Homogeneity by HPLC (TFA) (at) 220nm: 86percent. |
[ 28987-59-9 ]
2-Chloro-4-methoxy-1-nitrobenzene
Similarity: 0.91
[ 17742-69-7 ]
1,3-Dichloro-2-methoxy-5-nitrobenzene
Similarity: 0.84
[ 1009-36-5 ]
1-Chloro-2-methoxy-4-nitrobenzene
Similarity: 0.83
[ 28987-59-9 ]
2-Chloro-4-methoxy-1-nitrobenzene
Similarity: 0.91
[ 17742-69-7 ]
1,3-Dichloro-2-methoxy-5-nitrobenzene
Similarity: 0.84
[ 1009-36-5 ]
1-Chloro-2-methoxy-4-nitrobenzene
Similarity: 0.83
[ 28987-59-9 ]
2-Chloro-4-methoxy-1-nitrobenzene
Similarity: 0.91
[ 17742-69-7 ]
1,3-Dichloro-2-methoxy-5-nitrobenzene
Similarity: 0.84
[ 1009-36-5 ]
1-Chloro-2-methoxy-4-nitrobenzene
Similarity: 0.83
[ 74672-01-8 ]
1,5-Dichloro-3-methoxy-2-nitrobenzene
Similarity: 0.82
[ 28987-59-9 ]
2-Chloro-4-methoxy-1-nitrobenzene
Similarity: 0.91
[ 17742-69-7 ]
1,3-Dichloro-2-methoxy-5-nitrobenzene
Similarity: 0.84
[ 1009-36-5 ]
1-Chloro-2-methoxy-4-nitrobenzene
Similarity: 0.83