Home Cart 0 Sign in  
X

[ CAS No. 63069-48-7 ] {[proInfo.proName]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]}
3d Animation Molecule Structure of 63069-48-7
Chemical Structure| 63069-48-7
Chemical Structure| 63069-48-7
Structure of 63069-48-7 * Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
Cart0 Add to My Favorites Add to My Favorites Bulk Inquiry Inquiry Add To Cart

Quality Control of [ 63069-48-7 ]

Related Doc. of [ 63069-48-7 ]

Alternatived Products of [ 63069-48-7 ]

Product Details of [ 63069-48-7 ]

CAS No. :63069-48-7 MDL No. :MFCD01863737
Formula : C6H5ClIN Boiling Point : -
Linear Structure Formula :- InChI Key :FLEJOBRWKBPUOX-UHFFFAOYSA-N
M.W : 253.47 Pubchem ID :2757615
Synonyms :

Calculated chemistry of [ 63069-48-7 ]

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms : 9
Num. arom. heavy atoms : 6
Fraction Csp3 : 0.0
Num. rotatable bonds : 0
Num. H-bond acceptors : 0.0
Num. H-bond donors : 1.0
Molar Refractivity : 48.57
TPSA : 26.02 Ų

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption : High
BBB permeant : Yes
P-gp substrate : No
CYP1A2 inhibitor : Yes
CYP2C19 inhibitor : No
CYP2C9 inhibitor : Yes
CYP2D6 inhibitor : No
CYP3A4 inhibitor : No
Log Kp (skin permeation) : -5.39 cm/s

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP) : 1.89
Log Po/w (XLOGP3) : 3.46
Log Po/w (WLOGP) : 2.53
Log Po/w (MLOGP) : 2.99
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT) : 2.75
Consensus Log Po/w : 2.73

Druglikeness

Lipinski : 0.0
Ghose : None
Veber : 0.0
Egan : 0.0
Muegge : 1.0
Bioavailability Score : 0.55

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL) : -4.08
Solubility : 0.0209 mg/ml ; 0.0000823 mol/l
Class : Moderately soluble
Log S (Ali) : -3.69
Solubility : 0.052 mg/ml ; 0.000205 mol/l
Class : Soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT) : -3.61
Solubility : 0.0624 mg/ml ; 0.000246 mol/l
Class : Soluble

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS : 0.0 alert
Brenk : 2.0 alert
Leadlikeness : 0.0
Synthetic accessibility : 1.83

Safety of [ 63069-48-7 ]

Signal Word:Warning Class:
Precautionary Statements:P261-P305+P351+P338 UN#:
Hazard Statements:H302-H315-H319-H335 Packing Group:
GHS Pictogram:

Application In Synthesis of [ 63069-48-7 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Upstream synthesis route of [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 63069-48-7 ]

[ 63069-48-7 ] Synthesis Path-Upstream   1~23

  • 1
  • [ 124-38-9 ]
  • [ 201230-82-2 ]
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 4743-17-3 ]
Reference: [1] ACS Catalysis, 2017, vol. 7, # 12, p. 8072 - 8076
  • 2
  • [ 201230-82-2 ]
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 4743-17-3 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2014, vol. 79, # 9, p. 4196 - 4200
  • 3
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 21617-20-9 ]
Reference: [1] Synthetic Communications, 2016, vol. 46, # 15, p. 1249 - 1256
  • 4
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 20028-68-6 ]
Reference: [1] Synlett, 2006, # 1, p. 65 - 68
  • 5
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 127-17-3 ]
  • [ 10517-21-2 ]
Reference: [1] ChemMedChem, 2018, vol. 13, # 12, p. 1181 - 1192
  • 6
  • [ 22121-86-4 ]
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 4792-67-0 ]
Reference: [1] European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2011, # 34, p. 6902 - 6908
  • 7
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 4792-67-0 ]
Reference: [1] ChemMedChem, 2018, vol. 13, # 12, p. 1181 - 1192
  • 8
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 98-80-6 ]
  • [ 73006-78-7 ]
Reference: [1] Organic Letters, 2014, vol. 16, # 6, p. 1768 - 1771
[2] Chemical Communications, 2017, vol. 53, # 33, p. 4585 - 4588
[3] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2018, vol. 83, # 10, p. 5698 - 5706
  • 9
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 140-89-6 ]
  • [ 51618-29-2 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
92.3% With copper(l) chloride In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 110℃; for 6 h; Inert atmosphere; Sealed tube General procedure: A 25 mL Wattecs reaction tube was charged with 2-haloaniline 1 (0.6 mmol), potassium O-ethyl dithiocarbonate 2 (1.8 mmol),CuCl (0.06 mmol), and DMF (2 mL). The reaction vessel was flushed with argon three times and sealed. Then the mixture was stirred electromagnetically in an oil bath at 110°C for 6 h.The reaction process was monitored by TLC on silica gel. After the reaction was completed, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, and then HCl (3 mL, 3 mol/L) was added and stirred for another 30 min. The reaction mixture solution was extracted by ethyl acetate (3 × 20 mL). Subsequently, the combined organic solutions were dried by anhydrous sodium sulfate and the target product was purified by chromatography on a silica gel column (eluent: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate) togive the corresponding pure product 3. Complete characterization characterizationof the products (all known) is found in the Supplemental Materials (Figures S1–S13).
77% With iron(III) trifluoride; 2,2'-bis-(diphenylphosphino)-1,1'-binaphthyl In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 110℃; for 18 h; Inert atmosphere; Sealed tube General procedure: A 25 mL reaction tube was charged with 2-haloaniline 1 (0.6 mmol), potassium o-ethyldithiocarbonate 2 (1.8 mmol), FeF3 (0.06 mmol), 2,2’-bis(diphenylphosphino)-1,1’-binaphthyl (0.03 mmol) and DMF (4 mL). The reaction vessel was flushed with argon for three times and sealed. Then the mixture was stirred electromagnetically in an oil bath at 110 for 3 - 21 hours. The reaction process was monitored by TLC on silica gel. After the reaction was completed, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, then 4 mL HCl (3mol/L) was added and stirred for 30 minutes. Then the reaction mixture solution was extracted by ethyl acetate (3*20 mL). Subsequently, the combined organic solution were dried by anhydrous sodium sulfate and the target product was purified by silica gel colum chromatography (eluent: petroleum ether / ethylacetate) to give the corresponding pure product 3.
Reference: [1] Phosphorus, Sulfur and Silicon and the Related Elements, 2016, vol. 191, # 5, p. 699 - 701
[2] Synthetic Communications, 2015, vol. 45, # 20, p. 2378 - 2385
  • 10
  • [ 75-15-0 ]
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 51618-29-2 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
82% With sodiumsulfide nonahydrate In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 110℃; for 12 h; Sealed tube; Inert atmosphere General procedure: A sealed tube (50 mL) was charged with 2-haloaniline 1a (2mmol), CS2 (10 mmol), Na2S (4mmol) and DMF (2 mL) at room temperature under an argon gas atmosphere and the tube was flushed with argon for three times and sealed. Then the mixture was stirred electromagnetically at 110 °C for 12 hours. The reaction process was monitored by TLC on silica gel. After the reaction was completed, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, 2 mL HCl (3 mol/L) was added and stirred for 30 minutes. Then the reaction mixture solution was extracted by dichloromethane (3*20 mL). Subsequently, the combined organic solution were dried by anhydrous magnesium sulfate and concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel colum chromatography (eluent: petroleum ether / ethyl acetate) give the corresponding pure product 2a.
Reference: [1] Synthetic Communications, 2017, vol. 47, # 20, p. 1916 - 1925
  • 11
  • [ 106-47-8 ]
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 88149-53-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
75% With hydrogenchloride; sodium iodine dichloride In methanol; water at 20℃; for 3 h; General procedure: To a solution of the aniline (1, 20.0 mmol) in a mixture of H2O (100 mL) and MeOH(300 mL), was added conc. hydrochloric acid was added until pH was 1–2 (pH strip).Then an aqueous solution of NaICl2 (50percent w/w 1.1–4;.8 molar equiv; for amount, seeTable) was added dropwise and the resulting mixture was stirred with a stirring bar atroom temperature for 3–4 h. Saturated aqueous NaHSO3 was added until negative starchtest was obtained and the product was worked up.When no precipitate was clearly visible in the product mixture, the mixture was madeslightly basic (pH strip) by dropwise addition of an aqueous solution of NaOH (1 M) andextracted with Et2O. The combined organic phases were dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentratedunder vacuum to give a solid.When a visible precipitate was obtained, the solid was isolated by gravity filtration(each case specified below) and the filtrate was then made slightly basic (pH strip) byaddition of an aqueous solution of NaOH (1 M) and extracted with Et2O. The combinedorganic extracts were dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated under vacuum to afford asolid.All the solids were analysed by TLC (silica gel; varying mixtures of hexanes/ethylacetate). When a solid consisted of several products, the compounds were separated andpurified by flash chromatography (silica gel; hexanes/ethyl acetate 9:1 when not otherwisestated).The products obtained were characterized by mps (and comparison with lit. mps), IR,MS, 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra as well as elemental analysis for all new compounds. Theanisidines gave no products that could be characterized. Anilines 1a–1j gave products assummarized below; most of them are known from the literature.
Reference: [1] Organic Preparations and Procedures International, 2016, vol. 48, # 5, p. 385 - 392
[2] Synlett, 2014, vol. 25, # 6, p. 831 - 834
  • 12
  • [ 106-47-8 ]
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
100% With iodine; sodium hydrogencarbonate; potassium iodide In water for 3.75 - 5.75 h; EXAMPLE 1
Preparation of 4-chloro-2-iodoaniline
An aqueous solution of potassium iodide (50 g, 0.301 mol), iodine (76 g, 0.299 mol), and water (100 mL) is added over 45 min. to a stirred suspension of 4-chloroaniline (35 g, 0.276 mol, 50 um average particle size), sodium hydrogen carbonate (37 g, 0.440 mol) and water (210 mL).
The mixture is stirred for 3-5 hours.
The solid is collected by filtration and washed with water, then dried to provide 4-chloro-2-iodoaniline (69.6 g, 100percent yield, 98.5percent purity).
1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.56 (d, 1H, J=2.4 Hz), 7.12 (dd, 1H, J=2.4 Hz, 8.6 Hz), 6.75 (d, 1H, J=8.6 Hz), 5.37 (br s, 2H).
91% With N-iodo-succinimide; [(Ph3P)Au]NTf2 In dichloromethane; toluene at 20℃; for 14 h; General procedure: To a stirred solution of the substrate (1 mmol) in CH2Cl2 or (CH2Cl)2 (0.1 M) were added Ph3PAuNTf2 (0.025 mmol, 19 mg; complex Ph3PAuNTf2 toluene, 2:1) followed by N-iodosuccinimide (1.1 mmol, 248 mg). The resulting solution was stirred at r.t. or under reflux until complete conversion of the starting material. After removal of the solvent under reduced pressure, the crude material was purified by flash column chromatography using different gradients of hexanes and EtOAc to obtain the pure desired products.
86% With dipotassium peroxodisulfate; choline chloride; iodine In acetonitrile at 65℃; for 2 h; General procedure: To a solution of aromatic compound (10 mmol) in acetonitrile (5 mL) in a 100 mL round-bottomed flask with a magnetic bar was added choline chloride(10 mmol), potassium peroxodisulfate (10 mmol) and iodine (15 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred for the appropriate time at 65 °C. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. The reaction mixture was poured into aqueous sodium thiosulfate solution (1 mol/L) in order to remove unreacted iodine and extracted with ethyl acetoacetate (10 mL, 3 times). Organic layer is dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate. Evaporation of the solvent under vacuum followed by column chromatography on silica gel gave the corresponding iodinated compounds (Scheme-I).
75% at 80℃; for 2.5 h; General procedure: A mixture of aromatic/heteroaromatic amine (1 mmol) and 1-butyl-3-methylpyridinium dichloroiodate (BMPDCI) (1.2 mmol) was heated to 80°C for 1-4 h. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), ethyl acetate was added, followed by addition of water. The organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer was extracted three times with ethyl acetate. The combined organic layer was dried using sodium sulfate and evaporated under vacuum to afford the crude product, which on further column chromatography using silica gel afforded the pure iodinated product as shown in Table 1.
70% With 1,4-dibenzyl-1,4-diazoniabicyclo[2.2.2]octane dichloroiodate In neat (no solvent) at 20℃; for 0.416667 h; General procedure: General procedure for the iodination of aryl amines under solvent-free conditions.DBDABCODCI (0.5 mmol) and aryl amine (1 mmol) were triturated together in a porcelainmortar at room temperature. After completing reaction which monitored by TLC, the ethylacetate added to mixture and filtered, the organic layer washed with 5percent aqueous sodiumthiosulfate, and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was removed in vacuum and the crude mixturewas purified by column chromatography using ethyl acetate and hexane mixture and analyzedby m.p. and 1H NMR spectroscopy.

Reference: [1] Patent: US2005/215812, 2005, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 4
[2] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1996, vol. 61, # 17, p. 5804 - 5812
[3] Organic Letters, 2013, vol. 15, # 11, p. 2616 - 2619
[4] ChemMedChem, 2018, vol. 13, # 12, p. 1181 - 1192
[5] Tetrahedron Letters, 2006, vol. 47, # 28, p. 4793 - 4796
[6] Indian Journal of Chemistry - Section B Organic and Medicinal Chemistry, 1999, vol. 38, # 8, p. 897 - 904
[7] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2017, vol. 359, # 15, p. 2640 - 2652
[8] Organic Letters, 2010, vol. 12, # 9, p. 2104 - 2107
[9] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2007, vol. 46, # 12, p. 2074 - 2077
[10] Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry, 2013, vol. 50, # 5, p. 1031 - 1038
[11] Synthetic Communications, 2006, vol. 36, # 13, p. 1915 - 1917
[12] Synlett, 2014, vol. 25, # 3, p. 399 - 402
[13] Journal of Chemical Research, 2006, # 9, p. 575 - 576
[14] Synthetic Communications, 2008, vol. 38, # 11, p. 1792 - 1798
[15] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2010, vol. 352, # 18, p. 3355 - 3363
[16] Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 2014, vol. 12, # 16, p. 2514 - 2518
[17] Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 1988, vol. 61, # 2, p. 600 - 602
[18] Asian Journal of Chemistry, 2018, vol. 30, # 7, p. 1659 - 1663
[19] Synthetic Communications, 2008, vol. 38, # 17, p. 2881 - 2888
[20] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2004, vol. 69, # 21, p. 6979 - 6985
[21] Synthetic Communications, 1992, vol. 22, # 22, p. 3215 - 3219
[22] Organic Letters, 2015, vol. 17, # 19, p. 4782 - 4785
[23] Synthetic Communications, 2010, vol. 40, # 23, p. 3506 - 3513
[24] Patent: WO2016/113757, 2016, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 12; 15
[25] Chemical Communications, 2017, vol. 53, # 24, p. 3481 - 3484
[26] Organic Preparations and Procedures International, 2007, vol. 39, # 1, p. 90 - 93
[27] Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Ethiopia, 2015, vol. 29, # 1, p. 157 - 162
[28] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1999, vol. 64, # 26, p. 9646 - 9652
[29] Helvetica Chimica Acta, 2010, vol. 93, # 2, p. 345 - 349
[30] Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 2016, vol. 14, # 6, p. 2127 - 2133
[31] RSC Advances, 2014, vol. 4, # 12, p. 6267 - 6274
[32] Tetrahedron, 1994, vol. 50, # 17, p. 5139 - 5146
[33] Organic Letters, 2008, vol. 10, # 13, p. 2657 - 2659
[34] Organic Letters, 2017, vol. 19, # 13, p. 3402 - 3405
[35] Indian Journal of Chemistry, Section A: Inorganic, Physical, Theoretical and Analytical, 1980, vol. 19, # 12, p. 1179 - 1182
[36] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1918, vol. 40, p. 932
[37] Synlett, 2003, # 14, p. 2231 - 2233
[38] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2006, vol. 16, # 21, p. 5646 - 5649
[39] Synlett, 2006, # 1, p. 65 - 68
[40] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2006, vol. 71, # 18, p. 7079 - 7082
[41] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2002, vol. 67, # 18, p. 6395 - 6405
[42] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2002, vol. 124, # 45, p. 13463 - 13473
[43] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2007, vol. 72, # 15, p. 5731 - 5736
[44] Tetrahedron Letters, 2007, vol. 48, # 35, p. 6124 - 6128
[45] Patent: US2005/70723, 2005, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 5
[46] Patent: US6635657, 2003, B1,
[47] Synthetic Communications, 2008, vol. 38, # 22, p. 3894 - 3902
[48] Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2009, vol. 5,
[49] Chemical Communications, 2012, vol. 48, # 83, p. 10346 - 10348
[50] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2013, vol. 23, # 5, p. 1351 - 1357
[51] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2015, vol. 80, # 21, p. 10806 - 10816
[52] Synthesis (Germany), 2016, vol. 48, # 6, p. 855 - 864
[53] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2018, vol. 360, # 16, p. 3150 - 3156
  • 13
  • [ 142-71-2 ]
  • [ 106-47-8 ]
  • [ 64-19-7 ]
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 88149-53-5 ]
  • [ 116035-66-6 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
35% at 120℃; for 12.5 h; A typical procedure was followed for one-pot synthesis of substituted 2-iodoaniline and 2-iodoacetanilide from substituted aniline. A mixture of 5 g of substituted aniline 1–6 shown inTable 1, granulated iodine (1 mol. equiv.) and copper(II) acetate(1 mol. equiv.) were stirred in 50 mL of glacial acetic for 30 min.The reaction mixture was refluxed for 12 h with constant stirring at 120 C. Then the reaction mixture was allowed to cool at room temperature. The precipitate of copper(I) iodide was removed byfiltration and the filtrate was poured into water and extracted with chloroform (3 50 mL). The combined chloroform extracts were washed with sodium hydrogen carbonate solution, sodium thiosulfate solution, distilled water and dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate.A crude semi-solid mass was obtained after removal of solvent. The crude product was purified by column chromatographyon silica gel using n-hexane/ethyl acetate as eluant (4:1) and compounds 7–24 were isolated.
Reference: [1] Journal of Molecular Structure, 2013, vol. 1054-1055, p. 367 - 374
  • 14
  • [ 106-47-8 ]
  • [ 98-86-2 ]
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 1421704-92-8 ]
Reference: [1] Organic Letters, 2013, vol. 15, # 4, p. 890 - 893
  • 15
  • [ 784183-51-3 ]
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
Reference: [1] Synlett, 2006, # 1, p. 65 - 68
  • 16
  • [ 106-47-8 ]
  • [ 586-96-9 ]
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 4340-77-6 ]
Reference: [1] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2018, vol. 360, # 16, p. 3150 - 3156
  • 17
  • [ 106-47-8 ]
  • [ 586-96-9 ]
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 4340-77-6 ]
Reference: [1] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2018, vol. 360, # 16, p. 3150 - 3156
  • 18
  • [ 106-47-8 ]
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 554-00-7 ]
Reference: [1] RSC Advances, 2015, vol. 5, # 107, p. 88311 - 88315
  • 19
  • [ 116035-66-6 ]
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
Reference: [1] Medicinal Chemistry Research, 2007, vol. 16, # 5, p. 205 - 212
  • 20
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 5922-60-1 ]
Reference: [1] Synlett, 2006, # 1, p. 65 - 68
  • 21
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 536-74-3 ]
  • [ 928782-97-2 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
80% With bis-triphenylphosphine-palladium(II) chloride; copper(l) iodide; triethylamine In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; Inert atmosphere; Schlenk technique General procedure: In a typical reaction, PdCl2(PPh3)2 (88 mg, 0.125 mmol), CuI (24 mg, 0.125 mmol) and THF (5 ml) were placed in an oven-dried, 2-neck RB flask. To this suspension, 2-iodoaniline (5.47 mg, 2.5 mmol) and triethylamine (702 μl, 5.0 mmol) were added. The reaction mixture was degassed by bubbling with argon for 15 min. Phenylacetylene (300 μl, 2.75 mmol) was then added, and the reaction mixture stirred at RT. After complete consumption of the 2-iodoanilines (~2 h, by TLC), the reaction mixture was filtered through celite, and the solvent rotary evaporated to obtain the crude product which was purified by silica gel (60-120 mesh) column chromatography using ethylacetate/ hexane (1:9, v/v) as eluent to give pure 2-phenylethynylaniline, 2a (400 mg, 83percent).
76% With sodium hydroxide In toluene at 130℃; for 72 h; General procedure: To a stirred solution of the corresponding 2-iodoaniline (6, 1 mmol) in toluene (3 mL) under argon atmosphere were added Pd/CuO-Fe3O4 (50 mg), NaOH (400 mg, 10 mmol), and the corresponding alkyne (2, 1.5 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at 130 °C until the end of reaction (see Table 6). The catalyst was removed by a magnet and the resulting mixture was quenched with water and extracted with EtOAc. The organic phases were dried over MgSO4, followed by evaporation under reduced pressure to remove the solvent. The product was purified by chromatography on silica gel (hexane/ethyl acetate) to give the corresponding compounds 7. Yields are included in Table 6. Then, to a stirred solution of 7 (1 mmol) in toluene (4 mL) was added ZnBr2 (225 mg, 1 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at 130 °C during 24 h. The mixture was quenched with water and extracted with EtOAc. The organic phases were dried over MgSO4, followed by evaporation under reduced pressure to give the pure products 8 in quantitative yields. Physical and spectroscopic data for compounds 7 and 8, as well as literature for known compounds, follow.
Reference: [1] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2013, vol. 52, # 45, p. 11835 - 11839[2] Angew. Chem., 2013, vol. 125, # 45, p. 12051 - 12055,5
[3] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2010, vol. 352, # 18, p. 3355 - 3363
[4] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, vol. 138, # 43, p. 14441 - 14448
[5] Tetrahedron Letters, 2014, vol. 55, # 40, p. 5495 - 5498
[6] Tetrahedron, 2012, vol. 68, # 5, p. 1393 - 1400
[7] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2007, vol. 72, # 15, p. 5731 - 5736
[8] Organic Letters, 2008, vol. 10, # 21, p. 4718 - 4721
[9] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2010, vol. 75, # 21, p. 7502 - 7504
[10] Tetrahedron Letters, 2013, vol. 54, # 19, p. 2357 - 2361
[11] Organic Letters, 2013, vol. 15, # 14, p. 3710 - 3713
[12] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2013, vol. 78, # 20, p. 10319 - 10328
[13] Organic Letters, 2013, vol. 15, # 23, p. 5940 - 5943
[14] Chemical Communications, 2014, vol. 50, # 23, p. 3024 - 3026
[15] RSC Advances, 2014, vol. 40, # 78, p. 41561 - 41564
[16] RSC Advances, 2014, vol. 4, # 78, p. 41561 - 41564
[17] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2015, vol. 21, # 8, p. 3193 - 3197
[18] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2016, vol. 81, # 10, p. 3994 - 4001
[19] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2017, vol. 359, # 8, p. 1373 - 1378
[20] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2017, vol. 359, # 11, p. 1844 - 1848
[21] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2018, vol. 360, # 21, p. 4054 - 4059
[22] Chemical Communications, 2017, vol. 53, # 64, p. 8980 - 8983
[23] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2017, vol. 82, # 16, p. 8455 - 8463
[24] Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 2017, vol. 15, # 33, p. 6997 - 7007
[25] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2018, vol. 360, # 18, p. 3460 - 3465
[26] Organic Letters, 2018,
[27] Journal of Chemical Research, 2018, vol. 42, # 11, p. 558 - 563
  • 22
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 148836-41-3 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: WO2008/76427, 2008, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 1199-200
  • 23
  • [ 63069-48-7 ]
  • [ 927961-18-0 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2018, vol. 61, # 6, p. 2246 - 2265
Same Skeleton Products
Historical Records

Related Functional Groups of
[ 63069-48-7 ]

Aryls

Chemical Structure| 84483-28-3

[ 84483-28-3 ]

2-Chloro-6-iodoaniline

Similarity: 0.90

Chemical Structure| 135050-44-1

[ 135050-44-1 ]

3-Chloro-4-iodoaniline

Similarity: 0.88

Chemical Structure| 83171-49-7

[ 83171-49-7 ]

3-Chloro-5-iodoaniline

Similarity: 0.85

Chemical Structure| 1150617-63-2

[ 1150617-63-2 ]

5-Chloro-2-iodo-3-methylaniline

Similarity: 0.85

Chemical Structure| 6828-35-9

[ 6828-35-9 ]

5-Chloro-2-iodoaniline

Similarity: 0.84

Chlorides

Chemical Structure| 84483-28-3

[ 84483-28-3 ]

2-Chloro-6-iodoaniline

Similarity: 0.90

Chemical Structure| 135050-44-1

[ 135050-44-1 ]

3-Chloro-4-iodoaniline

Similarity: 0.88

Chemical Structure| 83171-49-7

[ 83171-49-7 ]

3-Chloro-5-iodoaniline

Similarity: 0.85

Chemical Structure| 1150617-63-2

[ 1150617-63-2 ]

5-Chloro-2-iodo-3-methylaniline

Similarity: 0.85

Chemical Structure| 6828-35-9

[ 6828-35-9 ]

5-Chloro-2-iodoaniline

Similarity: 0.84

Amines

Chemical Structure| 84483-28-3

[ 84483-28-3 ]

2-Chloro-6-iodoaniline

Similarity: 0.90

Chemical Structure| 135050-44-1

[ 135050-44-1 ]

3-Chloro-4-iodoaniline

Similarity: 0.88

Chemical Structure| 83171-49-7

[ 83171-49-7 ]

3-Chloro-5-iodoaniline

Similarity: 0.85

Chemical Structure| 1150617-63-2

[ 1150617-63-2 ]

5-Chloro-2-iodo-3-methylaniline

Similarity: 0.85

Chemical Structure| 6828-35-9

[ 6828-35-9 ]

5-Chloro-2-iodoaniline

Similarity: 0.84