Home Cart 0 Sign in  
X

[ CAS No. 112-29-8 ] {[proInfo.proName]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]}
HazMat Fee +

There will be a HazMat fee per item when shipping a dangerous goods. The HazMat fee will be charged to your UPS/DHL/FedEx collect account or added to the invoice unless the package is shipped via Ground service. Ship by air in Excepted Quantity (each bottle), which is up to 1g/1mL for class 6.1 packing group I or II, and up to 25g/25ml for all other HazMat items.

Type HazMat fee for 500 gram (Estimated)
Excepted Quantity USD 0.00
Limited Quantity USD 15-60
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), Domestic USD 80+
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), International USD 150+
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), Domestic USD 100+
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), International USD 200+
3d Animation Molecule Structure of 112-29-8
Chemical Structure| 112-29-8
Chemical Structure| 112-29-8
Structure of 112-29-8 * Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
Cart0 Add to My Favorites Add to My Favorites Bulk Inquiry Inquiry Add To Cart

Quality Control of [ 112-29-8 ]

Related Doc. of [ 112-29-8 ]

Alternatived Products of [ 112-29-8 ]

Product Details of [ 112-29-8 ]

CAS No. :112-29-8 MDL No. :MFCD00000221
Formula : C10H21Br Boiling Point : -
Linear Structure Formula :- InChI Key :MYMSJFSOOQERIO-UHFFFAOYSA-N
M.W : 221.18 Pubchem ID :8173
Synonyms :

Calculated chemistry of [ 112-29-8 ]

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms : 11
Num. arom. heavy atoms : 0
Fraction Csp3 : 1.0
Num. rotatable bonds : 8
Num. H-bond acceptors : 0.0
Num. H-bond donors : 0.0
Molar Refractivity : 58.05
TPSA : 0.0 Ų

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption : Low
BBB permeant : No
P-gp substrate : No
CYP1A2 inhibitor : Yes
CYP2C19 inhibitor : No
CYP2C9 inhibitor : No
CYP2D6 inhibitor : No
CYP3A4 inhibitor : No
Log Kp (skin permeation) : -3.41 cm/s

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP) : 3.53
Log Po/w (XLOGP3) : 5.97
Log Po/w (WLOGP) : 4.52
Log Po/w (MLOGP) : 4.34
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT) : 4.17
Consensus Log Po/w : 4.51

Druglikeness

Lipinski : 1.0
Ghose : None
Veber : 0.0
Egan : 0.0
Muegge : 2.0
Bioavailability Score : 0.55

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL) : -4.44
Solubility : 0.00795 mg/ml ; 0.0000359 mol/l
Class : Moderately soluble
Log S (Ali) : -5.75
Solubility : 0.000397 mg/ml ; 0.00000179 mol/l
Class : Moderately soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT) : -4.77
Solubility : 0.00376 mg/ml ; 0.000017 mol/l
Class : Moderately soluble

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS : 0.0 alert
Brenk : 1.0 alert
Leadlikeness : 3.0
Synthetic accessibility : 3.56

Safety of [ 112-29-8 ]

Signal Word:Danger Class:9
Precautionary Statements:P501-P273-P260-P270-P264-P280-P391-P314-P337+P313-P305+P351+P338-P301+P312+P330 UN#:3082
Hazard Statements:H302-H319-H372-H410 Packing Group:
GHS Pictogram:

Application In Synthesis of [ 112-29-8 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Upstream synthesis route of [ 112-29-8 ]
  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 112-29-8 ]

[ 112-29-8 ] Synthesis Path-Upstream   1~29

  • 1
  • [ 626-55-1 ]
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 59652-33-4 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2008, vol. 73, # 3, p. 830 - 839
  • 2
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 143-15-7 ]
  • [ 2687-96-9 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1983, vol. 72, # 11, p. 1354 - 1356
  • 3
  • [ 288-32-4 ]
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 33529-02-1 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
94% at 50℃; Microwave irradiation In a wide-necked Erlenmeyer flask areintroduced 6.8g (0.1 mol) imidazole, 45.5g (0.1 mol)1-bromohexadecan, 2.4g (7.5mmol)tertiobutyllammoniumbromid (TBAB). The mixtureis adsorbed on mixture of potassium carbonate andpotassium hydroxide ratio 1:1 and then irradiatedin an open vessel in a domestic microwave oven300 Watt power for 3 min by period of 20 secondstill it changed to pasty.After dilution in dichloromethane followedby washing with water, the organic phase isseparated and dried over sodium sulfate. Afterfiltration, the solvent is evaporated under vacuum.
88.3% With sodium hydroxide In dimethyl sulfoxide at 20 - 25℃; Inert atmosphere Equipped with a stirrer, a thermometer, a three-necked flask was added 0.440 g (11.0 mmol) NaOH, 0.714 g (10.5 mmol) of imidazole and 10 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), at 20 ° C ~ 25 ° C under nitrogen atmosphere after stirring until a clear solution, to which was added dropwise 2.21 g (10.0 mmol) of bromo decane, the reaction of about 4 ~ 6 h, the reaction was poured into 10 mL of water and extracted with chloroform 3 × 10 mL, washed with water The chloroform layer was 4 to 5 times, and then dried over anhydrous MgSO 4, filtered to obtain a filtrate, the chloroform was removed to give a pale yellow liquid N- decyl-imidazole 1.84 g, yield 88.3percent.
86%
Stage #1: With sodium hydride In tetrahydrofuran; mineral oil at 0℃; for 0.5 h; Inert atmosphere
Stage #2: at 20℃; Inert atmosphere
General procedure: This compound was synthesized using a variation of the procedure previously reported [32]. Sodium hydride (60percent dispersion in mineral oil, 1.56 g, 39.0 mmol) was suspended in dry THF (50 mL) under Ar at 0 °C. Imidazole (2.16 g, 31.7 mmol) was dissolved in dry THF (20 mL) and added drop-wise. After 30 min, 1-bromodecane (5.41 g, 24.5 mmol) was added. The resulting reaction mixture was then stirred at room temperature overnight. After careful addition of a few drops of water to quench the remaining sodium hydride, the organic solvent was removed in vacuo, and diethyl ether (50 mL) was added. This solution was then washed with water (3 × 50 mL), dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, concentrated, and then purified by flash chromatography (ethyl acetate/hexanes = 10/1 (v/v)) to give the product as a light yellow oil (yield: 4.38 g, 86percent). Spectroscopic and purity data matched those reported for this compound [32].
81.2%
Stage #1: With potassium hydroxide In dimethyl sulfoxide at 20℃; for 2 h;
Stage #2: for 4 h;
General procedure: A mixture of imidazole (30 mmol, 2.04 g), potassiumhydroxide (30 mmol, 1.68 g) and dimethyl sulfoxide(10 mL) was stirred for 2 h at room temperature. Afterthat, alkyl bromide (25.0 mmol of 1-bromohexane, 1-bromooctane,1-bromodecane, 1-bromododecane, 1-bromotetradecane,1-bromohexadecane, or 1-bromooctadecane)was dropped in slowly and the mixture was stirred for anadditional 4 h. Upon completion, water (30 mL) was addedto the resulting mixture followed by extraction with chloroform(5 x 30 mL). The combined organic layer wasdried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate and the filtratewas concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue wassubjected to flash chromatography with ethyl acetate aseluent to give N-alkyl imidazole. The respective yields ofN-hexyl imidazole, N-octyl imidazole, N-decyl imidazole,N-dodecyl imidazole, N-tetradecyl imidazole, N-hexadecylimidazole and N-octadecyl imidazole are 84.6, 82.3, 81.2,80.5, 80.4, 79.8 and 79.6 percent.
76%
Stage #1: With sodium hydroxide In dimethyl sulfoxide at 20℃; for 1.5 h;
Stage #2: at 20℃;
General procedure: Imidazole (3)/benzimidazole(5) (10 mmol) was dissolved in 10 ml of DMSO and solid NaOH(15 mmol) was then added it. The resulting pale yellow suspensionwas stirred in air at room temperature for 1.5 h, after which, thealkyl bromides or benzyl chlorides (15 mmol) were added andallowed to react until completion (TLC). Water (50 ml) was thenadded and the products were extracted with ethyl acetate. Combinedorganic layers were washed several times with water, thenwith brine, dried over Na2SO4 and subjected to chromatographicpurification over silica (100–200 mesh) using MeOH: EtOAc 5:95(v/v) as the mobile phase. Compounds 4a-f were isolated as yellowoils whereas, the compounds 7a-e were white solid. Spectroscopic data of the N-alkyl imidazoles are in accord with earlier literatureand thus are not shown here [30].

Reference: [1] Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2011, vol. 21, # 33, p. 12280 - 12287
[2] Oriental Journal of Chemistry, 2015, vol. 31, # 4, p. 2391 - 2394
[3] Patent: CN103951702, 2016, B, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0049; 0050
[4] Polymer, 2014, vol. 55, # 26, p. 6664 - 6671
[5] New Journal of Chemistry, 2007, vol. 31, # 6, p. 879 - 892
[6] Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 2016, vol. 19, # 4, p. 681 - 691
[7] European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2015, vol. 2015, # 3, p. 408 - 413
[8] Polyhedron, 2017, vol. 127, p. 68 - 83
[9] Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry, 1996, vol. 69, # 12, p. 1841 - 1848
[10] Organic Letters, 2009, vol. 11, # 8, p. 1757 - 1759
[11] Synthesis, 2009, # 19, p. 3219 - 3226
[12] Organic Letters, 2010, vol. 12, # 21, p. 4988 - 4991
[13] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2003, vol. 13, # 17, p. 2863 - 2865
[14] Polish Journal of Chemistry, 1995, vol. 69, # 3, p. 447 - 460
[15] Chemistry Letters, 2005, vol. 34, # 3, p. 442 - 443
[16] Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, 2006, vol. 51, # 4, p. 1274 - 1279
[17] Electrochimica Acta, 2010, vol. 55, # 20, p. 5652 - 5658
[18] Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2011, vol. 13, # 6, p. 2062 - 2068
[19] Dyes and Pigments, 2013, vol. 96, # 1, p. 16 - 24,9
[20] ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2013, vol. 4, # 4, p. 423 - 427
[21] Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society, 2013, vol. 60, # 7, p. 745 - 754
[22] Chemical Biology and Drug Design, 2014, vol. 83, # 3, p. 278 - 288
[23] RSC Advances, 2015, vol. 5, # 4, p. 2869 - 2881
[24] RSC Advances, 2015, vol. 5, # 71, p. 57968 - 57974
[25] Langmuir, 2015, vol. 31, # 12, p. 3587 - 3595
[26] RSC Advances, 2015, vol. 5, # 28, p. 21865 - 21876
[27] Molecules, 2018, vol. 23, # 9,
  • 4
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 5587-42-8 ]
  • [ 33529-02-1 ]
Reference: [1] RSC Advances, 2015, vol. 5, # 106, p. 87200 - 87205
  • 5
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 10496-18-1 ]
Reference: [1] Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii, 1951, vol. 21, p. 242,248;engl.Ausg.S.263,268
[2] Wear, 1957, vol. 1, p. 291,304
[3] Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii, 1950, vol. 20, p. 2085;engl.Ausg.S.2159
  • 6
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 1068-90-2 ]
  • [ 17702-88-4 ]
Reference: [1] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, 2006, vol. 14, # 14, p. 4775 - 4780
  • 7
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 35237-37-7 ]
Reference: [1] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2002, vol. 12, # 18, p. 2635 - 2637
[2] Liebigs Annalen der Chemie, 1990, # 12, p. 1175 - 1183
  • 8
  • [ 112-30-1 ]
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
90% With polystyrene supported bromo diphenylphsophonium bromide In chloroform at 60℃; for 18 h; General procedure: To asuspension of PSP Cl or PSP Br (6 equiv) in CHCl3 or DCE (20 mL) was added the appropriate substrate(s) e.g. alcohol/aldehyde/epoxide/oxime/carboxylicacid/amine (1 equiv). The mixture was heated at either 60°C (CHCl3 reactions) or 75°C (DCE reactions) for 18 h. The reaction mixture was filtered and the filter cake washed with CH2Cl2 (2 10 mL). The solvent was removed in vacuo to afford the corresponding products, which were either judged pure by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction product or were purified via normal phase silica gel flash column chromatography eluting with a Et2O/petroleum ether 40–60 solvent mixture. The recovered polymer could be reused without anyfurther manipulation.
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron, 2003, vol. 59, # 13, p. 2253 - 2258
[2] Synthesis, 1983, # 4, p. 306 - 308
[3] Organic Process Research and Development, 2002, vol. 6, # 2, p. 190 - 191
[4] Tetrahedron Letters, 2003, vol. 44, # 44, p. 8143 - 8147
[5] Tetrahedron Letters, 2014, vol. 55, # 4, p. 799 - 802
[6] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2011, vol. 17, # 40, p. 11290 - 11295
[7] Chemical Communications, 2010, vol. 46, # 17, p. 3025 - 3027
[8] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1928, vol. 50, p. 1477
[9] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1928, vol. 50, p. 1506
[10] Bulletin de la Societe Chimique de France, 1946, p. 366
[11] Chemische Berichte, 1942, vol. 75, p. 670,671[12] Chemische Berichte, 1944, vol. 77/79, p. 78
[13] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1942, vol. 64, p. 1802
[14] Journal fuer Praktische Chemie (Leipzig), 1932, vol. <2>135, p. 193,202
[15] Tetrahedron Letters, 1987, vol. 28, # 11, p. 1223 - 1224
[16] Molecular crystals and liquid crystals, 1982, vol. 88, # 1-4, p. 81 - 86
[17] Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, 1998, vol. 554, # 2, p. 135 - 137
[18] Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, 1998, vol. 557, # 2, p. 157 - 161
[19] Tetrahedron, 2007, vol. 63, # 32, p. 7696 - 7701
[20] Synthesis, 1987, # 5, p. 511 - 512
[21] Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 2008, vol. 43, # 9, p. 1224 - 1234
[22] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2011, vol. 76, # 16, p. 6749 - 6767
  • 9
  • [ 112-17-4 ]
  • [ 604-69-3 ]
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 572-09-8 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
57% at 20℃; Irradiation; Green chemistry General procedure: Bromine (1.5 mmol, 0.08 mL) was added slowly to a magnetic stirring barand perfluorohexanes (4.0 mL) in a test tube (14 mmφ x 105 mm) with a septum and then 1-O-acetylsugar 1a (1 mmol, 392 mg) in ethyl acetate (2.0 mL) wasadded slowly, forming three layers. The test tube was stirring upon irradiationwith 15 W black light (at 352 nm, TOSHIBA EFD15BLB-T) at 30 C. The light source wasplaced away from the test tube. After 23 hours, the bromine layer disappearedand the fluorous layer recovered transparency. The ethyl acetate layer wastaken up with a pipette. Then, additional ethyl acetate (2 mL x 4) was placedon the residual FC-72 layer, followed by decanting off. The combined ethylacetate layer was washed with water (15 mL), aqueous sat. NaHCO3 (20mL), brine (20 mL) and, dried over Na2SO4, andconcentrated. Purification by chromatography on silica gel with hexane/AcOEt = 2/1gave glycosyl bromide 2a (0.91 mmol,374 mg) in 91percent yield
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron Letters, 2013, vol. 54, # 52, p. 7124 - 7126
  • 10
  • [ 124-18-5 ]
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2015, vol. 407, p. 60 - 66
  • 11
  • [ 62871-09-4 ]
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2018, vol. 140, # 12, p. 4417 - 4429
[2] Tetrahedron Letters, 2010, vol. 51, # 2, p. 439 - 441
  • 12
  • [ 693-58-3 ]
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: US2007/281873, 2007, A1,
  • 13
  • [ 98750-95-9 ]
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, 1985, # 9, p. 571 - 572
  • 14
  • [ 4101-68-2 ]
  • [ 124-18-5 ]
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1981, vol. 46, # 19, p. 3909 - 3911
  • 15
  • [ 333-88-0 ]
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
Reference: [1] Synthesis, 1987, # 5, p. 511 - 512
  • 16
  • [ 41233-29-8 ]
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
Reference: [1] Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 1988, vol. 61, # 12, p. 4371 - 4378
[2] Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 1988, vol. 61, # 12, p. 4371 - 4378
  • 17
  • [ 112-30-1 ]
  • [ 1034-39-5 ]
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
Reference: [1] Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie, 1959, vol. 626, p. 26,33
  • 18
  • [ 558-13-4 ]
  • [ 112-30-1 ]
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 5451-52-5 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1997, vol. 62, # 20, p. 7061 - 7064
  • 19
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 1120-24-7 ]
  • [ 7173-51-5 ]
Reference: [1] European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2012, vol. 46, # 5, p. 336 - 345
  • 20
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 7173-51-5 ]
Reference: [1] Langmuir, 2013, vol. 29, # 21, p. 6242 - 6252
[2] International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2016, vol. 512, # 1, p. 273 - 281
  • 21
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 75-50-3 ]
  • [ 2082-84-0 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1943, vol. 65, p. 693
[2] Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 1966, vol. 55, # 4, p. 414 - 417
[3] Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1970, vol. 92, p. 7393 - 7400
[4] Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 2011, vol. 84, # 3, p. 312 - 319
[5] Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 2012, vol. 15, # 5, p. 587 - 592
  • 22
  • [ 7758-89-6 ]
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 106-37-6 ]
  • [ 106418-67-1 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: US5716542, 1998, A,
  • 23
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 106418-67-1 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2001, vol. 11, # 4, p. 1063 - 1071
  • 24
  • [ 872-31-1 ]
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 65016-55-9 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 2015, vol. 3, # 32, p. 8351 - 8357
[2] New Journal of Chemistry, 2015, vol. 39, # 12, p. 9700 - 9713
[3] Chemical Communications, 2011, vol. 47, # 33, p. 9471 - 9473
[4] Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2011, vol. 21, # 5, p. 1582 - 1592
[5] Macromolecules, 2011, vol. 44, # 16, p. 6370 - 6381
  • 25
  • [ 872-31-1 ]
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 3172-56-3 ]
  • [ 740804-46-0 ]
  • [ 65016-55-9 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
1.7 - 64.5 %Chromat.
Stage #1: With magnesium In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 48 h;
Stage #2: at 20℃;
EXAMPLE 16 (COMPARATIVE); 3-Bromothiophene (1 eq.) is combined in a flask with 1.1 mol of magnesium metal and 1.15 mol of 1-bromohexane in a 100percent THF solvent, and with 815 mg of a (1,3-bis (diphenylphosphino)propane)dichloro Nickel (II) catalyst in suspension. The Grignard reagent concentration in the solvent is 2.2 mol/L. The reactions were conducted at room temperature. Immediate gas chromatography of the reaction product showed 85.3percent 3-bromothiophene, 1.7percent 3-hexylthiophene and 0.5percent bis-thienyl side-product. GC after 48 hours showed 2.9percent 3-bromothiophene, 64.5percent 3-hexylthiophene, 9.8percent bis-thienyl side-product and 3.34percent 3-(1-methylpentyl)thiophene. This shows bad selectivity with a 100percent THF solvent.
86.7 %Chromat.
Stage #1: With magnesium In tetrahydrofuran; tert-butyl methyl ether at 20℃; for 15 h;
Stage #2: at 20℃;
EXAMPLE 17 (COMPARATIVE); 3-Bromothiophene (1 eq.) is combined in a flask with 1.2 mol of magnesium metal and 1.2 mol of 1-bromohexane in a 50:50 THF/MTBE solvent, and with 600 mg of a (1,3-bis (diphenylphosphino)propane)dichloro Nickel (II) catalyst in suspension. The Grignard reagent concentration in the solvent is 1.3 mol/L. The reactions were conducted at room temperature. Gas chromatography of the reaction product after 15 hours showed 0.2percent 3-bromothiophene, 86.7percent 3-hexylthiophene, 5.6percent bis-thienyl side-product and 1.59percent 3-(1-methylpentyl)thiophene. This shows high bis-thienyl and 3-(1-methylpentyl)thiophene side-product formation with a 50:50 THF/MTBE solvent. Overall, the comparative examples show that the main input factor for the selectivity is the catalyst, secondly the temperature and solvent is responsible for the final completion of the selectivity. Expressed in numbers: 60percent, 30percent, 10percent responsibility. In methyl-THF, a Grignard reagent concentration of up to 4 mol/L is possible.
Reference: [1] Patent: US2006/155134, 2006, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 5
[2] Patent: US2006/155134, 2006, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 5
  • 26
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 1120-24-7 ]
  • [ 2390-68-3 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1989, vol. 93, # 1, p. 323 - 333
[2] Patent: WO2005/97729, 2005, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 49-50; 51-52; 53-54
[3] Patent: WO2005/97729, 2005, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 49-50; 51-55
[4] Patent: WO2009/38919, 2009, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 6
[5] Patent: WO2009/38919, 2009, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 6
[6] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2013, vol. 355, # 2-3, p. 409 - 420
[7] Langmuir, 2013, vol. 29, # 21, p. 6242 - 6252
[8] International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2016, vol. 512, # 1, p. 273 - 281
  • 27
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 1120-24-7 ]
  • [ 112-30-1 ]
  • [ 7289-52-3 ]
  • [ 872-05-9 ]
  • [ 2390-68-3 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: WO2005/97729, 2005, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 49-50; 55-59
[2] Patent: WO2005/97729, 2005, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 49-50; 56-57
  • 28
  • [ 106-41-2 ]
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 147222-99-9 ]
Reference: [1] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2013, vol. 19, # 7, p. 2370 - 2383
  • 29
  • [ 112-29-8 ]
  • [ 16433-88-8 ]
  • [ 175922-78-8 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
92.7% With potassium hydroxide; potassium iodide In dimethyl sulfoxide at 0 - 20℃; for 4 h; EXAMPLE 1
2,7-Dibromo-9,9-didecyifluorene
A mixture of 2,7-dibromofluorene (64.8 g, 0.20 mol potassium iodide (3.0 g, 0.018 mol), finely powdered KOH (56.0 g, 1 mol), and DMSO (150 ML) was mechanically stirred under nitrogen in a three-necked round-bottom flask..
The flask was cooled in an ice water bath before adding four batches of the bromoalkyl (90 ML. 95.94 g, 0.434 mol)..
After each addition, the internal temperature rose sharply..
Once the last aliquot was completed, the reaction was stirred for 4 hours at room temperature before water (200 ML) was added..
The solid was filtered off and dried in a desiccator equipped with P2O5 under vacuum for 16 hours..
The crude product was recrystallized from ethanol to produce 2,7-dibromo-9,9-didecylfluorene as white crystals (m.p. 40-41° C.) in 92.7percent yield..
Mass Spec. m/z 602,604,606 (M+), 461,463,465 (M-C10H21), 382,384 (461-Br). Anal. Calcd for C33H48Br2: C, 65.56percent; H, 8.00percent; Br, 26.44percent. Found: C, 64.99percent; H, 8.21percent; Br, 27.25percent.
92% With tetrabutylammomium bromide; sodium hydroxide In water; dimethyl sulfoxide at 20℃; for 4 h; 2.2.1
2,7-dibromo-9,9-didecylfluorene (1)
1-bromodecane (4.42 g, 20.0 mmol) was added by syringe to a mixture of 2,7-dibromofluorene (2.59 g, 8 mmol), tetrabutyl ammonium bromide (0.02 g, 0.064 mmol) and 2.50 mL of 50percent aqueous sodium hydroxide in dimethyl sulfoxide (50.0 mL).
After stirring at room temperature for 4 h, the mixture was poured into water and extracted three times with dichloromethane.
The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the precipitate was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: petroleum ether) to afford 2,7-dibromo-9,9-didecylfluorene as a white powder (4.45 g, Yield 92percent).
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ): 7.51 (d, 2H, J = 8.70 Hz, Ar-H), 7.45 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 1.91 (m, 4H, CH2), 1.13 (m, 28H, CH2), 0.85 (t, 6H, J = 6.95 Hz, CH3), 0.58 (m, 4H, CH2). FT-IR (cm-1, KBr): ν = 2950, 2836 (s; CH), 1638, 1551 (w; Ar). Anal. Calcd. for C33H48Br2: C 65.56, H 8.00; Found: C 64.72, H 7.62.
90.7%
Stage #1: With potassium <i>tert</i>-butylate In tetrahydrofuranInert atmosphere
Stage #2: for 5.5 h; Cooling with liquid nitrogen
To a 2 L three-necked round bottom flask equipped with mechanical stir, nitrogen inlet and outlet, 81.00 g (0.250 mol) 25 2,7-dibromo-9H-fluorence and 500 mL 11 THF were charged. After the 2,7-dibromofluorence was dissolved, 58.9 g (0.525 mol) 26 potassium t-butoxide was added in three batch. The mixture was turned from colorless to dark red immediately, 116.1 g (0.525 mol) of 27 1-bromodecane in 150 mL THF was added drop wise within 3.5 hrs. After addition completed, the mixture was stirred under nitrogen for 2 hrs. Potassium salts was removed through filtration. The filtrate was concentrated under vacuum to give yellow viscous oil. The final product was purified by silica gel chromatography using hexanes as eluent. 137.1 g 28 product was obtained as waxy crystals, 90.7percent isolated yield, m.p. 37.8-39.0° C.
Reference: [1] Patent: US6730793, 2004, B1, . Location in patent: Page column 3
[2] Polymer, 2014, vol. 55, # 26, p. 6696 - 6707
[3] Patent: US2018/273524, 2018, A1, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0041
[4] Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals, 2013, vol. 578, # 1, p. 26 - 32
[5] Journal of Polymer Science, Part A: Polymer Chemistry, 2016, vol. 54, # 17, p. 2774 - 2784
Same Skeleton Products
Historical Records