Structure of 2905-56-8
*Storage: {[sel_prStorage]}
*Shipping: {[sel_prShipping]}
The BI-3802 was designed by Boehringer Ingelheim and could be obtained free of charge through the Boehringer Ingelheim open innovation portal opnMe.com, associated with its negative control.
4.5
*For Research Use Only !
Change View
| Size | Price | VIP Price |
DE Stock US Stock |
Asia Stock Global Stock |
In Stock |
| {[ item.pr_size ]} |
Inquiry
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.pr_usd) ]} {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,1,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.discount_usd) ]} {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.pr_usd) ]} |
Inquiry {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.vip_usd) ]} | {[ item.p_spot_brand_remark ]} 1-2 weeks {[ item.pr_usastock ]} In Stock Inquiry - | {[ item.p_spot_brand_remark ]} 1-2 weeks {[ item.pr_chinastock ]} {[ item.pr_remark ]} In Stock Inquiry - | Login - + |
Please Login or Create an Account to: See VIP prices and availability
Asia Stock: Ship in 3-5 business days
EU Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 5-7 days
US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 5-7 days
{[ item.p_spot_brand_remark ]}
1-2weeks
Inquiry
Inquiry
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.vip_usd) ]}
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.pr_usd) ]}
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,1,item.mem_rate,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.pr_usd) ]}
{[ item.p_spot_brand_remark ]}
1-2weeks
Inquiry
Inquiry
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,1,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.vip_usd) ]}
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.pr_usd) ]}
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.pr_usd) ]}
In Stock
- +
Please Login or Create an Account to: See VIP prices and availability
Asia Stock: Ship in 3-5 business days
EU Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 5-7 days
US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 5-7 days
Search for reports by entering the product batch number.
Batch number can be found on the product's label following the word 'Batch'.
Search for reports by entering the product batch number.
Batch number can be found on the product's label following the word 'Batch'.
Search for reports by entering the product batch number.
Batch number can be found on the product's label following the word 'Batch'.
Search for reports by entering the product batch number.
Batch number can be found on the product's label following the word 'Batch'.
Search for reports by entering the product batch number.
Batch number can be found on the product's label following the word 'Batch'.
Molly M. Sherard ; Jamie S. Kaplan ; Jeffrey H. Simpson ; Kevin W. Kittredge ; Michael C. Leopold ;
Abstract: Fentanyl (FTN) and synthetic analogs of FTN continue to ravage populations across the globe, including in the United States where opioids are increasingly being used and abused and are causing a staggering and growing number of overdose deaths each year. This growing pandemic is worsened by the ease with which FTN can be derivatized into numerous derivatives. Understanding the chemical properties/behaviors of the FTN class of compounds is critical for developing effective chemical detection schemes using nanoparticles (NPs) to optimize important chemical interactions. Halogen bonding (XB) is an intermolecular interaction between a polarized halogen atom on a molecule and e−-rich sites on another molecule, the latter of which is present at two or more sites on most fentanyl-type structures. Density functional theory (DFT) is used to identify these XB acceptor sites on different FTN derivatives. The high toxicity of these compounds necessitated a “fragmentation” strategy where smaller, non-toxic molecules resembling parts of the opioids acted as mimics of XB acceptor sites present on intact FTN and its derivatives. DFT of the fragments’ interactions informed solution measurements of XB using 19F NMR titrations as well as electrochemical measurements of XB at self-assembled monolayer (SAM)-modified electrodes featuring XB donor ligands. Gold NPs, known as monolayer-protected clusters (MPCs), were also functionalized with strong XB donor ligands and assembled into films, and their interactions with FTN “fragments” were studied using voltammetry. Ultimately, spectroscopy and TEM analysis were combined to study whole-molecule FTN interactions with the functionalized MPCs in solution. The results suggested that the strongest XB interaction site on FTN, while common to most of the drug’s derivatives, is not strong enough to induce NP-aggregation detection but may be better exploited in sensing schemes involving films.
Show More >
Keywords: opioid ; fentanyl ; halogen bonding ; gold nanoparticle ; monolayer-protected cluster ; cyclic voltammetry
Show More >
| CAS No. : | 2905-56-8 |
| Formula : | C12H17N |
| M.W : | 175.27 |
| SMILES Code : | C(N1CCCCC1)C1=CC=CC=C1 |
| MDL No. : | MFCD00224901 |
| InChI Key : | NZVZVGPYTICZBZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
| Pubchem ID : | 76190 |
| GHS Pictogram: |
|
| Signal Word: | Warning |
| Hazard Statements: | H315-H319 |
| Precautionary Statements: | P305+P351+P338 |
| Num. heavy atoms | 13 |
| Num. arom. heavy atoms | 6 |
| Fraction Csp3 | 0.5 |
| Num. rotatable bonds | 2 |
| Num. H-bond acceptors | 1.0 |
| Num. H-bond donors | 0.0 |
| Molar Refractivity | 60.14 |
| TPSA ? Topological Polar Surface Area: Calculated from |
3.24 Ų |
| Log Po/w (iLOGP)? iLOGP: in-house physics-based method implemented from |
2.59 |
| Log Po/w (XLOGP3)? XLOGP3: Atomistic and knowledge-based method calculated by |
2.6 |
| Log Po/w (WLOGP)? WLOGP: Atomistic method implemented from |
2.14 |
| Log Po/w (MLOGP)? MLOGP: Topological method implemented from |
2.67 |
| Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT)? SILICOS-IT: Hybrid fragmental/topological method calculated by |
2.94 |
| Consensus Log Po/w? Consensus Log Po/w: Average of all five predictions |
2.59 |
| Log S (ESOL):? ESOL: Topological method implemented from |
-2.77 |
| Solubility | 0.295 mg/ml ; 0.00168 mol/l |
| Class? Solubility class: Log S scale |
Soluble |
| Log S (Ali)? Ali: Topological method implemented from |
-2.32 |
| Solubility | 0.844 mg/ml ; 0.00482 mol/l |
| Class? Solubility class: Log S scale |
Soluble |
| Log S (SILICOS-IT)? SILICOS-IT: Fragmental method calculated by |
-3.52 |
| Solubility | 0.0526 mg/ml ; 0.0003 mol/l |
| Class? Solubility class: Log S scale |
Soluble |
| GI absorption? Gatrointestinal absorption: according to the white of the BOILED-Egg |
Low |
| BBB permeant? BBB permeation: according to the yolk of the BOILED-Egg |
Yes |
| P-gp substrate? P-glycoprotein substrate: SVM model built on 1033 molecules (training set) |
No |
| CYP1A2 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9145 molecules (training set) |
No |
| CYP2C19 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9272 molecules (training set) |
No |
| CYP2C9 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibitor: SVM model built on 5940 molecules (training set) |
No |
| CYP2D6 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor: SVM model built on 3664 molecules (training set) |
Yes |
| CYP3A4 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor: SVM model built on 7518 molecules (training set) |
No |
| Log Kp (skin permeation)? Skin permeation: QSPR model implemented from |
-5.52 cm/s |
| Lipinski? Lipinski (Pfizer) filter: implemented from |
0.0 |
| Ghose? Ghose filter: implemented from |
None |
| Veber? Veber (GSK) filter: implemented from |
0.0 |
| Egan? Egan (Pharmacia) filter: implemented from |
0.0 |
| Muegge? Muegge (Bayer) filter: implemented from |
2.0 |
| Bioavailability Score? Abbott Bioavailability Score: Probability of F > 10% in rat |
0.55 |
| PAINS? Pan Assay Interference Structures: implemented from |
0.0 alert |
| Brenk? Structural Alert: implemented from |
0.0 alert: heavy_metal |
| Leadlikeness? Leadlikeness: implemented from |
No; 1 violation:MW<1.0 |
| Synthetic accessibility? Synthetic accessibility score: from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very difficult) |
1.0 |
* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

| Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
|---|---|---|
| 97% | With tetrabutylammomium bromide; sodium hydroxide; In water; at 100℃; for 1h; | General procedure: SiO2-CuI (0.1 g,5 mol% Cu) was added to a mixture of amine (0.5 mmol), benzyl chloride, allyl bromide, or n-butyl chloride (0.5 mmol for N-substitution and 1 mmol for N,N-disubstitution), NaOH (2 mmol), and TBAB (0.25 mmol) in a round-bottom flask(25 mL) in water (4mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at 15C (in the case of N-benzylation, allylation, or alkylation of primary amines,Table 2) or 70-100C (in the case of N,N-dibenzylation, allylation, or alkylation of primary amines, Table 3), and 100C(N-benzylation, allylation, and alkylation of secondary amines, Table 4) for an appropriate time. After completion of the reaction (monitored by thin-layer chromatography, TLC), the reaction mixture was triturated with EtOAc (20 mL) and the SiO2-CuI was filtered off. The product was obtained after removal of the solvent under reduced pressure followed by column chromatography or crystallization from EtOAc-petroleum ether. |
| 90% | With silica copper(I) oxide; tetrabutylammomium bromide; potassium carbonate; In water; at 100℃; for 0.5h;Green chemistry; | General procedure: A mixture of secondary amine (0.5 mmol), benzyl chloride (0.127 g, 1 mmol), K2CO3 (0.139 g, 1 mmol), TBAB (0.082 g,0.25 mmol), and SiO2-Cu2O (0.2 g, 5 mol% Cu) in water (5 mL) in a round-bottom flask (50 mL) was stirred at 100 C. On completionof the reaction (monitored by TLC), the flask was cooledto room temperature and the mixture filtered. The residue was washed with water followed by ethyl acetate (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic extracts were washed with water (3 × 100mL) and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the product was obtainedby crystallization from petroleum ether or ethyl acetate/ petroleumether, or by eluting the crude product through a columnof silica gel with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether. |
| 76% | With trimethylamine; In dichloromethane; at 20℃; for 6h;Inert atmosphere; | General procedure: Typical procedure: A solution of piperidine (0.84 g, 10.0 mmol), trimethylamine (1.01 g, 10.0 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (2 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere was cooled with an ice-water bath, then a solution of generation 1 bromide (3.83 g, 10.0 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (5mL) was slowly added. The mixture was stirred for 6 h at room temperature (TLC monitoring). After completion of the reaction, the crude product was puried by ash column chromatography on silica gel (petroleum ether: ethyl acetate 6:1,v/v) to afford 1-G1 as lightly yellow oil liquid. |
| Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
|---|---|---|
| 84% | General procedure: In a nitrogen-filled glovebox, to a 15 mL reaction tube equipped with a magnetic stirrer, were added Cp2ZrH2 (0.01mmol, 2.2 mg) as the catalyst, and the appropriate amide (0.2mmol); solvent was added when necessary. HBpin (3 equiv. peramide functional group) was then added, and the reaction tube was taken out from the glovebox and stirred at room temperature for 12-48 h. The resultant crude amines were either isolated using silica gel flash chromatography, or acidified by stirring with HCl in Et2O (2 mL, 1N) for 2 h, after which time precipitation was observed. Then, the reaction solution was transferred to a centrifuge tube and centrifuged three times. The supernatant was removed and the resulting solid was dried inan oven at 80 C for several hours to obtain the HCl salt of the amine. |
| Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
|---|---|---|
| 98% | With dihydrogen peroxide; benzonitrile;Mg-Al-O-t-Bu HT (Catalyst B); In methanol; water; at 65℃; for 0.75h;Product distribution / selectivity; | Oxidation of various tertiary amines using catalyst B was carried out following the procedure as in example 2 and the results are given in Table 2. |
[ 2905-56-8 ]
| Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
|---|---|---|
| 83% | With bis[dichloro(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)iridium(III)]; Bis(p-nitrophenyl) phosphate; In toluene; at 100℃; for 36h;Sealed tube; Molecular sieve; Green chemistry; | General procedure: Amine 11 (399.3 mg, 2.0 mmol, 1.0 eq.), diol 14 (379.7 mg, 2.4 mmol, 1.0eq.), were added to a sealed tube, 5.0 mL of toluene was added and stirred. Then [Ir] catalyst 15 (79.7 mg, 0.1 mmol, 0.05eq.) and phosphoric acid 16 (68.1 mg, 0.2 mmol, 0.1eq.), 4 molecular sieve (500.1 mg) was added, heated at 100 C for 36h. The reaction mass was allowed to cool to rt, then washed with 5% NaHCO3 solution, water, evaporated under vacuum. The crude mass was purified by silica gel column chromatography, eluted with 5% ethyl acetate in n-hexane to give clopidogrel (4) as a yellow oil. |
[ 110-89-4 ]

[ 113848-75-2 ]
[ 2905-56-8 ]| Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
|---|---|---|
| 97% | at 145℃; for 24h;Inert atmosphere; Sealed tube; | General procedure: Synthesis of tribenzylamine (4a): Under nitrogen atmosphere, to a 15-mL Pyrex glass screw-cap tube were added 1n (107 mg, 1 mmol), 2a (5 mL), and the Pt-Sn/γ-Al2O3 catalyst (98 mg, 0.25 mol % Pt). The resultant mixture was stirred in the sealed tube at 145 C for 8 h. After cooled to ambient temperature, the catalyst was removed by centrifugation and washed with Et2O (25 mL). The combined supernatant was concentrated under reduced pressure and then subjected to purification by silica gel column chromatography (eluent: petroleum ether (60-90 C)/EtOAc = 20:1, v/v), affording product 4a as a white solid (273 mg, 95%). |
| 91% | In o-xylene; at 150℃; for 30h;Inert atmosphere; Sealed tube; | General procedure: Dried pressure tube was charged with magnetic stir bar and50 mg of PdSiO2 catalysts (1 mol% with respect to amine). Then,1.0 mL o-xylene was added, followed by the addition of 0.5 mmolof amine and 1 mmol of benzyl alcohol. The pressure tube wasflushed with argon was closed with screw cap. Then it was placedin the preheated aluminum block and reaction was allowed to progressfor 30 h at 150 C. After completion of the reaction, pressuretube was removed from aluminum block and cooled down to roomtemperature. The catalyst was filtered out by ciliate and reactionproducts were analyzed by GC-MS and the corresponding amineswere purified by column chromatography. The yields of selectedamines were determined by GC analysis using n-hexadecane asstandard. For this purpose, after completion of the reaction, nhexadecane(100 mL) as standard was added to the reaction pressuretube and the reaction products were diluted with ethyl acetate followed by filtration using plug of silica and then subjected GCanalysis. |
| 79% | With trifuran-2-yl-phosphane; palladacycle; lithium hydroxide; In neat (no solvent); at 100℃; for 24h;Molecular sieve; Inert atmosphere; | General procedure: An oven dried Schlenk tube was charged with amine (3.0 mmol), alcohol (3.6 mmol), LiOH (1.5 mmol), palladacycle (6.0*10-3 mmol, 0.20 mol %), P(2-Fur)3 (12.0*10-3 mmol, 0.40 mol %) and activated 4 Å MS (100 mg) in argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred at 100 C for 24 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, diluted with ethyl acetate (10 mL), and washed with water followed by brine solution. The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate. After removal of the solvent, the crude was subjected to column chromatography on silica gel using ethyl acetate and n-hexane mixtures to afford the N-alkylated product. |
| 83%Chromat. | With CuO#NiO; at 145℃; for 18h;Inert atmosphere; | [0044] With reference to the conditions used in Examples 9-16, 60-150 mg of catalyst D obtained in Example 4 was weighted and added into a 40 mL glass reaction tube provided with a magnetic stirring apparatus containing 5 mmol amines having different structures and 5 mmol alcohols having different structures, respectively. After sealed, the tube was purged with N2 to replace the air in the system for three times. Next, the system was heated and stirred. The temperature was raised to 80-180 C. and then kept for 6-36 hours. The reaction was then stopped and the system was cooled down to the room temperature. The catalyst was obtained from the reaction mixture by filtration. Agilent 7890A (30 m×0.25 mm×0.33 μm capillary column, hydrogen flame ionization detector) gas chromatograph was used for quantitatively analyzing the reaction mixture. The other byproducts were qualitatively analyzed with Agilent 6890/5973 Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometer (equipped with NIST Mass Spectral Database chemical workstation, 30 m×0.25 mm×0.33 μm capillary column). Each of the analysis results was shown in Table 2. |


A487638 [102-05-6]
N-Benzyl-N-methyl-1-phenylmethanamine
Similarity: 0.90

A199210 [1205-72-7]
1-Benzylpiperidin-4-amine dihydrochloride
Similarity: 0.89

A278850 [40240-12-8]
1-Benzyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine
Similarity: 0.88

A199210 [1205-72-7]
1-Benzylpiperidin-4-amine dihydrochloride
Similarity: 0.89

A150486 [29608-05-7]
4-(Piperidin-1-ylmethyl)aniline
Similarity: 0.86

A200174 [368429-78-1]
1-Benzylpiperidin-3-amine hydrochloride
Similarity: 0.84